<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Most Matches Only</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/128090</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/128090" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Most Matches Only</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/128090/550336</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/128090/550336</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 02:19:02 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JimmySand9</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>It might work as an add-on game to the main Pick-5 game, but it would crash and burn very quickly on it&#x27;s own. Think of tenure of Double-Up Cash in Kentucky, that&#x27;s how long it would last.</p>]]></description>
			<category>JimmySand9</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/128090/549131</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/128090/549131</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2006 13:45:48 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JKING</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I think it would be interesting to see the payouts if the top payouts only required 3 out of 5 for the paramutuel split. If you got 4 or 5 out 5 it wouldn&#x27;t matter. Yeah, no huge pay offs, but maybe a decent pay off for reasonable odds.</p>]]></description>
			<category>JKING</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/128090/536906</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/128090/536906</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 20:03:17 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>RJOh</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In the Ohio Rolling Cash5, such a rule would mean most of the time your chances of winning anything would be (5/5) 1:575,757 or at best (4/5) 1:3387 or an average overall odd of 1:3367. That would change the amount of tickets that win something now from 11.39% to 0.02%.  Such a lottery would guarantee that 99.98% of the players would win nothing.  Ohio RC5 has a minimum jackpot of $100,000.00 daily, and Ohio would have to sell 200,000 tickets daily to be able to keep 50% of ticket sales for itse... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/128090/536906">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>RJOh</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Most Matches Only</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/128090</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/128090</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 19:59:37 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>rdc137</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Do any states operate a Pick 5 (or any other game) like this? If not, would you buy with this concept?<br /><br />Choose 5 numbers from a poll of whatever the standard is. Person who matches 5 of 5 gets the ENTIRE prize pool for that day&#x27;s drawing. 4 of 5, 3 of 5, 2 of 5, and 1 of 5 get nothing. If no one gets 5 of 5, the jackpot goes to those getting 4 of 5, and if no 4 of 5 matches, it goes to those getting 3 of 5, etc.</p>]]></description>
			<category>rdc137</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

