pick 5 poll

Reply #7

LOTTOMIKE — Mon, 20 Feb 2006 11:34:55 GMT

i'll probably check out those pick 6 state lotto games.it would be nice if you could play all states pick 5 though......

Reply #6

time*treat — Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:56:12 GMT

Those high population states (CA, FL, NY, TX) have enough demand for their p6 lotto games to be bet online , so that may be the best place to start. The hurdle is if a company thinks it can make $$$ on the p5 lotto offer. It's all gravy till some customer actually wins one of these monsters.

Checking the forums, p3 is way ahead of p4 in popularity, and p4 is much busier than the p5 forum.

I'd say p3 is where a company will put most of their effort, all the rest is eye candy for us and e... [ More ]

Reply #5

calabs — Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:59:15 GMT

That's what petitions are for! Perhaps Todd has some influence with Betslips.com? If the online company has a share in the profit, it sure would be an incentive as well

Reply #4

LOTTOMIKE — Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:27:47 GMT

there might not be enough demand to warrant it though.....

Reply #3

LOTTOMIKE — Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:26:35 GMT

i'm with both of you.we need a pick 5 online

Reply #2

calabs — Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:21:26 GMT

Without question. particularly if the offer a reduced ticket cost (like some states less than $1.00 bet). Provides more wheeling power. Also provides the opportunity to play lower odds games (compared to NJ which uses 40 balls). Count me in! Where do I sign the petition

Reply #1

time*treat — Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:13:56 GMT

Absolutely. I wouldn't need every state, either. Some of the larger states (FL, OH, PA) have some serious money on the line. And online = no publicity, too. If such a deal ever shows up, count me in.

pick 5 poll

LOTTOMIKE — Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:34:25 GMT

would you play pick 5 online if each individual state was offered