<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>gails smart picks! wouldve won $$</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/128716</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/128716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: gails smart picks! wouldve won $$</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/128716/542044</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/128716/542044</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:39:23 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>calabs</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>While I really love Gail&#x27;s books and software for studying the numbers, I must say that her smart picks have not been very accurate, for me anyway, in NJ.  I should note that I have only had her software for about a month now, so I really haven&#x27;t given it much time yet.  Here data tables are invaluable!<br /><br />That&#x27;s awesome that you got 5 numbers correct with only an 11 number wheel.  Congrats</p>]]></description>
			<category>calabs</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/128716/541973</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/128716/541973</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 06:20:49 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>BobP</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>This wheel would have given you 6-4# winning tickets if you didn&#x27;t have a 5# win (60% chance) with 5 winning numbers. If you had all six winning numbers it would give you 3-5# prizes. Takes about 30 lines to guarantee 5if5. BobP<br /><br />1 2 4 5 6 8<br /><br />2 3 5 7 8 9<br /><br />1 2 3 4 5 7<br /><br />1 2 3 6 7 8<br /><br />1 2 3 5 8 9<br /><br />1 2 4 6 7 9<br /><br />1 2 5 6 7 8<br /><br />3 4 5 6 7 8<br /><br />1 3 4 5 6 9<br /><br />1 3 4 7 8 9<br /><br />1 5 6 7 8 9<br /><br />2 4 5 7 8 9<br /><br />2 3 4 6 8 9<br /><br />2 3 5 6 7 9<br /><br />end 14 lines.</p>]]></description>
			<category>BobP</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>gails smart picks! wouldve won $$</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/128716</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/128716</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 04:14:36 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>luckyhorse</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>looking back at my canada 6/49 draw 02/11/06 gails smart picks chart w would have produced five winning numbers in a small group of 9 if i had only had played this wont happen again</p>]]></description>
			<category>luckyhorse</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

