Are you a believer in Lottery systems

Reply #38

masslottery — Thu, 04 May 2006 00:42:33 GMT

hell yea

Reply #37

bellyache — Wed, 03 May 2006 17:43:38 GMT

I think systems are helpful, to a point. I like to use wheels and I think I've done a little bit better then when I've just picked my own numbers or qp's. However, I think it's only helpful if you are able to narrow down the right numbers in the first place.

Reply #36

pacattack05 — Mon, 24 Apr 2006 19:41:20 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by pacattack05 on April 18, 2006 BOOK HIT'S A TOTAL OF 2,970 TIMES IN A PERIOD OF 16 MONTHS IN ONE STATE, DATES AND DETAILS ARE IN THE BOOK titled [Long version $3.95], there's also a Short version for a $1.95 FALSE AND MISLEADING ADVERTISEMENT IS AGAINST THE LAW, AND I DON'T WANT ANY PROBLEMS WITH MISREPRESENTATION WHICH IS A CRIME AND PUNISHABLE. EVERY STATEMENT ON THIS SITE IS TRUE.

It's the purpose of this site to inform you of the best system book o... [ More ]

Reply #35

Clipper — Mon, 24 Apr 2006 00:17:40 GMT

I most definitely believe in systems. I've also talked to many people who I call Doubting Thomas' that dont believe you can predict what is going too play and can not or will not get past the statement..... it's all random .

I've found the people who say and believe this are ones who have never taken the time to study the numbers. keep written record of what has played in the last week much less the last month.

Systems do work but besides using a system you have to have thorough know... [ More ]

Reply #34

pacattack05 — Sun, 23 Apr 2006 19:02:38 GMT

eonmacbz

No your not dumb. It's just a policy here at the LP , which states that there shall be no spamming. So I can't mention the link.

I don't think I want to mention it anyway, even if it was ok, because I never received a confirmation in my email, from paypal. The person who sold the system was probably the same guy who stole $1100.00 from me. I had 4 different charges made to my account, which are pending. Bank of America put a pending status on the charges because of so many large... [ More ]

Reply #33

eonmacbz — Sun, 23 Apr 2006 18:18:38 GMT

Hello there

Did I miss the title of the book and where to purchase it?

Call me stupid but did I?

Odin

Reply #32

pacattack05 — Wed, 19 Apr 2006 20:23:56 GMT

Reply #31

pacattack05 — Tue, 18 Apr 2006 23:39:55 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by BevsPicks on April 18, 2006 If you play on a regular basis (3 or more times each week) systems help tremendously. I believe that you are at a disadvantage if you don't. Numbers do run in patterns. Sticking with patterns will you come close a lot but you will also hit more frequently. I have developed my own system that works pretty good. But I'm not rich yet so I still spend $5 on quick picks for the PB and MM.

I would like to add to what you said Bev, conce... [ More ]

Reply #30

BevsPicks — Tue, 18 Apr 2006 22:50:29 GMT

If you play on a regular basis (3 or more times each week) systems help tremendously. I believe that you are at a disadvantage if you don't. Numbers do run in patterns. Sticking with patterns will you come close a lot but you will also hit more frequently. I have developed my own system that works pretty good. But I'm not rich yet so I still spend $5 on quick picks for the PB and MM.

Reply #29

pacattack05 — Tue, 18 Apr 2006 22:20:55 GMT

BOOK HIT'S A TOTAL OF 2,970 TIMES IN A PERIOD OF 16 MONTHS IN ONE STATE, DATES AND DETAILS ARE IN THE BOOK titled [Long version $3.95], there's also a Short version for a $1.95 FALSE AND MISLEADING ADVERTISEMENT IS AGAINST THE LAW, AND I DON'T WANT ANY PROBLEMS WITH MISREPRESENTATION WHICH IS A CRIME AND PUNISHABLE. EVERY STATEMENT ON THIS SITE IS TRUE.

It's the purpose of this site to inform you of the best system book on the market for the prediction of the Daily 3 digit lottery g... [ More ]

Reply #28

dnroth — Tue, 18 Apr 2006 22:13:22 GMT

Although I haven't found a dependable method as of yet (I develop my own), I just cannot believe that the process of picking numbers out of a hat totally eliminates detectable causal relationships (the whole idea that we can create a random process seems to be founded upon hubris). So, there has to be a yet undeveloped system that'll do the trick.

Reply #27

psykomo — Tue, 28 Mar 2006 23:21:51 GMT

A toast to you........................Littlemanjen!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Yes, we must sit down and share a bottle of The Monkey Bottle

It's a very light Pinot Noir from the Baden Region..........of Germany and I

must say it is a challenge to drink ....................but not that BAD if you

have just won the JACKPOT in the US of AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA.

PROMISEEEEEEEEE to meet you in the Baden Region when I win AHHHHH

JACKPOT........the bottle and trip will b... [ More ]

Reply #26

Littlemanjen — Tue, 14 Mar 2006 02:33:03 GMT

Psykomo.....you are absolutely the one person on this website that I would love to sit down with a bottle of wine and get to know, your posts make me laugh as I wonder what it would be like to be a fly on your computer and watch how you type, LOL. Hope you win a jackpot someday...

Reply #25

psykomo — Sun, 12 Mar 2006 21:18:27 GMT

Thanks RJOh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You nailed my X,<<<<>>>>////////'''''''''''''????????? with the lottery............

mainly,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,the jackpot games which, I mainly, play!

Having bought some of the best software in my DUM-dayssssssss, hoppin

to HIT with a $$$$$$$$$ and a Dream and contributed more to edication

than to my bank count.................I began to throw money moe money to

the JACKPOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Sorry, to say, no jack... [ More ]

Reply #24

Clairvoyance — Sun, 12 Mar 2006 19:22:05 GMT

I Believe in the SKIPPY System YES I DO !!! LOL

Reply #23

xavier102772 — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:16:27 GMT

Sorry, I found it.

Reply #22

xavier102772 — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 18:57:46 GMT

What's your system for pick3 Cashman

Reply #21

Todd — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:55:08 GMT

I voted YES, mainly for the following reason: if you play your numbers smarty, and you wager smartly, I think you improve your chances of not losing so bad, or better yet, coming out on top.

I tell you from experience that my winnings (my luck ) greatly increased when I started playing smarter.

Reply #20

Littlemanjen — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:01:48 GMT

not a believer, sorry

Reply #19

masslottery — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 13:54:13 GMT

hey cashman and all you lottery players need help hiting lottery any systems out their for boston lottery so far i like the 023 method but what is mirror number's pls explain

Reply #18

Cashman87 — Mon, 27 Feb 2006 06:53:08 GMT

Well, you pretty much got it.

I've seen ken silver's systems. Regardless of what the approach on jackpot games are....they still consist of TONS of luck to get hits. The matrix for those numbers are rediculously high....genius made, to keep the average man, from cracking the code .

Reply #17

BobP — Mon, 27 Feb 2006 06:48:28 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Dream on February 27, 2006 Quote: Originally posted by LANTERN on February 25, 2006 Like Tntea, Tenaj, BlackApple, CalifDude, Lucky, Libra Dave, BobP, Red (Casho)MikeK, LottosCorp, George S and so very many others I not only use and believe on systems, but also develop them.

Now I know why you were backing up systems when I said

THEY DO NOT WORK!!!!!!!!!

It is impossible to prove a system's output will or will not produce a winner in the next drawing... [ More ]

Reply #16

Cashman87 — Mon, 27 Feb 2006 06:45:40 GMT

Well, it's hard as hell to convince a non believer, but, I'll say this....

Not knowing how to approach the route of creating a working system is the biggest headache of them all.

Don't use anything that would seem ordinary....use what will seem out of the ordinary. I'm living proof systems works, simply because I make a living from gambling, which I've done for several years, ....though my lottery world has only started in dec. of 05, I have not been stopped yet.

Coi... [ More ]

Reply #15

Dream — Mon, 27 Feb 2006 05:47:01 GMT

Now I know why you were backing up systems when I said

THEY DO NOT WORK

Reply #14

Coin Toss — Mon, 27 Feb 2006 05:40:18 GMT

Could any of you telling us you have systems that work give us a hint at the system and how to obtain it? Not reveal how it works but just steer us towards which one to get, and how?

Thanks, thus far I can't even pick my nose, lol.

Reply #13

Cashman87 — Mon, 27 Feb 2006 04:01:53 GMT

Cahman, you fool, it's spelled definitely, not definately!

Learn english idiot!!!

lol

Reply #12

Cashman87 — Sun, 26 Feb 2006 18:58:09 GMT

I'd have to say yes.

As someone who gambles for a living, I definately believe, for certain, that ANYTHING to do with numbers (horse racing, sports betting, gambling, stock trading, etc.) can surely and certainly be take advantage of,......enough to give the player an edge where he/she can win consistently enough, where the profit out weighs the investment, enough to make a living from it.

I've created my own, and seen other's, systems for pick 3 and pick 4 that simply just keep h... [ More ]

Reply #11

bobby623 — Sun, 26 Feb 2006 16:07:05 GMT

I have purchased several programs, none of which has provided consistent results. I keep detailed records and have concluded that playing combinations suggested by several of programs is a total waste of money. However, there is positive side. Knowing that certain systems will almost always be completely wrong, I use the suggestions to develop sequences for wheel play. Trying to determine which numbers to put in a wheel has always been difficult for me, but using the 'loser' suggestions has been... [ More ]

Reply #10

Debzo — Sun, 26 Feb 2006 16:01:38 GMT

I only play pick 3, I have not won much, but the few times that I have won, was because of a system. I have never had any luck with quick picks,I'am not knocking them, they just don't work for me.

Reply #9

RJOh — Sun, 26 Feb 2006 07:24:56 GMT

No system will ever allow the player to play at house odds because the house only has to pick one combination which is always right and the player has to pick from millions of combinations and 98% of them won't even have one of the winning numbers.

A system can help a player pick his combinations using a strategy, but most systems are used by players who have no strategy and are dependent on someone else having included one in the system when it was created. That's the reason players are alw... [ More ]

Reply #8

sirbrad — Sun, 26 Feb 2006 07:16:17 GMT

Would defintiley be more satisfying winning via a system. But I will take a QP win as well anyday. I am not picky.

Reply #7

BobP — Sun, 26 Feb 2006 06:38:25 GMT

A good system has you playing at house odds. While it's supposed to be impossible, I've seen bad systems dodge the win so many times I'm now covinced it's possible to design a system/software that doesn't win.

The idea of a system that produces wins, playing at a profit over time, is not something science can reproduce in the lab, code into software and take to the bank. At best, like comets, systems and draws occassionally come into contact for a brief time and then fly apart again. As w... [ More ]

Reply #6

JAP69 — Sun, 26 Feb 2006 06:03:29 GMT

I am a believer in systems or methods.

In my opinion numbers run in patterns and sytems or methods help to define the patterns on what to play next. Some patterns will go on a run and to find the break in the pattern is helpful.

I just seen a pattern that was ready to break in S.C. and figured the probables where it was going next and with the luck of the draw it happen. It is in my blog where I pointed out the pattern break.

Reply #5

sirbrad — Sun, 26 Feb 2006 05:57:34 GMT

Systems make it more fun, win or lose. Whether I believe in them or not is yet to be determined. But QPs have netted me more cash so far, but I also played more QPs than system numbers. I am still in the testing process of my own systems. I believe the millions will be coming soon.

Reply #4

LANTERN — Sun, 26 Feb 2006 04:47:23 GMT

Like Tntea, Tenaj, BlackApple, CalifDude, Lucky, Libra Dave, BobP, Red (Casho)MikeK, LottosCorp, George S and so very many others I not only use and believe on systems, but also develop them.

Reply #3

tntea — Sun, 26 Feb 2006 02:40:50 GMT

Without some method behind what I am playing is a total lost for me. My daughter won 3 times this week with qps. I am just not that lucky..

I tried 10 qps in pick 3 today and didn't not even get close..

I just ran the double vtrac for the evening and got a hit..

So without a system.. I have to cross my fingers.. cross my eyes.. cross my toes.. and then lose..

Reply #2

Karnac — Sun, 26 Feb 2006 02:16:50 GMT

In my opinion there's really only one lottery system on the market today worth the money.

Gail Howards Advantage Plus is the only system I use on a daily basis, and it's paid it's way many times over. I strongly believe if you're not using it then you're at a real disadvantage. It is only a tool in the lottery toolbox, but it does provide a distinct advantage when it comes to number selection.

Reply #1

Zoozie — Sun, 26 Feb 2006 01:28:18 GMT

I have won more money using systems/methods than I ever could with quick picks. Of course, this is for pick 3 and 4. I do quick picks with the Powerball... but am currently beta testing a program for a developer and he can normally get the powerball plus 1 number. Nothing major yet.

Are you a believer in Lottery systems

fast eddie — Sun, 26 Feb 2006 01:16:19 GMT

Are you a believer in Lottery systems? What I mean by that is that they really work and give you a distinct advantage.