"Successful Lottery Reasults" -

Reply #47

Coin Toss — Sat, 04 Mar 2006 06:01:52 GMT

He claimed to have hit somewhere 11 days in a row. I think he said Oregon or Japan. (I had never heard of a lottery in Japan).

Reply #46

mylollipop — Sat, 04 Mar 2006 05:59:21 GMT

Did not see the show. My question is, how much or has the formula produced any wins? IF so, how consistent? Anybody know a college math professor

Reply #45

truecritic — Sat, 04 Mar 2006 02:11:38 GMT

Good point. Possible.

In fact, looking at his charts, most likely.

I've got to stop being so "straight" - LOL

Reply #44

Raven62 — Sat, 04 Mar 2006 02:09:29 GMT

Maybe the results are boxed?

ie: 984=489 boxed

Reply #43

truecritic — Sat, 04 Mar 2006 00:43:11 GMT

cashman 87

>Without that, the formula is useless.

Well...you are right but that is understating it.

It is clear from the numbers in his charts that those 3 digit numbers are used. Regardless of how he chose those numbers he is using a broken equation. Go back to either the charts posted or to the website and run a few numbers from the charts. You will see that those are indeed what is inserted into the equation.

How he chose the numbers in his charts is irrelevant.

No matter... [ More ]

Reply #42

Cashman87 — Fri, 03 Mar 2006 10:43:01 GMT

All you need to know is what numbers is used in tha formula, and how they are used.

Without that, the formula is useless.

And, you still need mixing .

That 748 hit he got in the example was the formula at it's best .

The formula is not always at it's best.

Numbers are sometimes, 3-4 digits way off.

:)

But, I will NEVER compare anything to theology/numerology.

Nothing... no system, no formula, can beat that method of prediction.... [ More ]

Reply #41

truecritic — Fri, 03 Mar 2006 03:30:24 GMT

I am not sure how that equation comes into play. Taking the numbers from his chart, as I posted previously, this is how the equation gets the answers he shows.

INTEGER(075/p +666) =690

Now consider these situations:

Using the lowest 3 digit number INTEGER(000/p +666) =666

Using the highest 3 digit number INTEGER(999/p +666) =984

Do you see what happens? If that equation is to be used to predict numbers, it has to be able to predict as low as 000 and as high as 999. Yet it does

Reply #40

LANTERN — Thu, 02 Mar 2006 08:52:54 GMT

Time ago, I also tried Formulas (Kind of) that is I found them while looking at past draws, but they worked on the past draws only for a few draws, I do find such things every once in a long while, but as they never work for long I very quickly forget about them, my Regular methods seem to be some-what more stable, for what-ever that is worth.

Reply #39

emilyg — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:30:43 GMT

back to what this is about - please

Reply #38

Cashman87 — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 07:11:01 GMT

:)

Haha, sure is!

Laughing all the way to the bank after getting a pick 4 straight hit is good medicine too!

lol, ....haven't experienced it yet, but,.....it'll be cool

Reply #37

LAVERNE MALONEY — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 07:08:25 GMT

That's a laugh. Laughing is good medicine.

Reply #36

Cashman87 — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 07:05:18 GMT

Ah!

I deeply apologize!

Sorry! Danget! That's the 3rd time I've done that this week.....

Guess I'm a criminal of skimming too. LOL

Cashman! You big lunkhead! lol

Reply #35

LAVERNE MALONEY — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 07:00:29 GMT

Cashman87, I am not a bro .

You skimmed over my name.

La is the feminine form.

Reply #34

Cashman87 — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 06:50:42 GMT

I understand, completely.

But, being closed to things like that will only limit your potential. Be skeptic, yes, ....but why make jokes about it? I dunno....just kind of bothered me, lol, I apologize for making a big noise outta nothin.

If someone saids they can see the future, I will beleive them, untill their performance prooves me wrong.

Why? Because numerology/Vibration resonance prooves that random is an illusion.

And time is a state of mind. (more or

Reply #33

Tenaj — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 06:44:19 GMT

Cashman, any method that works is powerful, whether it up or down, mystics, theology, dreams, my baby sneezed at 9:19 so I will play 919. I normally don't laugh at anybody's method, but I am skeptic if someone say they can see the future.

Hitting the number is the bottom line.

Reply #32

Cashman87 — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 06:41:48 GMT

But, the statements you made, means, you obviously did not read my posts enough to know what happened with me not being back here untill 2007.

And you would know about the method I posted.....it is worth as much as your mixing technique/ability.

So yes, you skimmed through my posts.

It's no big deal bro. No need to go back and forth, ...cool

Reply #31

LAVERNE MALONEY — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 06:39:05 GMT

I didn't skim through anything Cashman87, that is how I could pull up a copy of what you stated. It stayed in my mind...

Reply #30

Cashman87 — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 06:27:57 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by LAVERNE MALONEY on February 28, 2006 Quote: Originally posted by Cashman87 on February 28, 2006 That's great you guys cracked his code , ....

But, is it necessary to make a mockery of it like that? Maybe he really felt like he was using numbers as a way to see the actual future , which is possible.....what do you think will be on the blue print for the world's first time machine? A vast sequence of numbers, number formulas, and number equations.

I... [ More ]

Reply #29

Tenaj — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 06:21:45 GMT

Sorry you feel that way Cashman87. None of it was directed at you. I thought it was interesting that the numbers that guy presented were the lead numbers for the last 3 weeks, it's totals and mirrors. Go figure. V-tracs 311 fall in line with it as well.

I commend you for your spirituality.

Keep the hits coming, god speed.

Reply #28

LAVERNE MALONEY — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 06:10:45 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Cashman87 on February 28, 2006 That's great you guys cracked his code , ....

But, is it necessary to make a mockery of it like that? Maybe he really felt like he was using numbers as a way to see the actual future , which is possible.....what do you think will be on the blue print for the world's first time machine? A vast sequence of numbers, number formulas, and number equations.

I think this guy may be on to something....as theology works.... [ More ]

Reply #27

Cashman87 — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 06:02:54 GMT

And you guys don't even really know what numbers he used to put through the x/pi+666 formula

You are just assuming .

Reply #26

Cashman87 — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 05:50:36 GMT

That's great you guys cracked his code , ....

But, is it necessary to make a mockery of it like that? Maybe he really felt like he was using numbers as a way to see the actual future , which is possible.....what do you think will be on the blue print for the world's first time machine? A vast sequence of numbers, number formulas, and number equations.

I think this guy may be on to something....as theology works.

I bet you guys won't believe me when I tell you this...... [ More ]

Reply #25

Tinker — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 05:28:33 GMT

pi = 3.14159265

Reply #24

LAVERNE MALONEY — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 05:10:33 GMT

What's with the March 4, 2005 date in that link. Because that set of #'s did very well last year in March.

Thu, Mar 31, 2005FloridaCash 37-0-5

Thu, Mar 31, 2005KentuckyPick 37-3-2

Thu, Mar 31, 2005MissouriPick 37-2-6

Thu, Mar 31, 2005PennsylvaniaDaily Number7-0-5

Thu, Mar 31, 2005Washington, D.C.Midday Lucky Numbers3-0-7

Wed, Mar 30, 2005CaliforniaMidday 33-2-7

Wed, Mar 30, 2005New JerseyMidday Pick 35-2-8

Tue, Mar 29, 2005British ColumbiaDaily 35-0-2

Tue, Mar 29, 2005... [ More ]

Reply #23

sirbrad — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 05:03:40 GMT

I cracked the code also. post = bs.

Reply #22

Tenaj — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 04:45:02 GMT

370 Ct STRAIGHT YEAH BABY!!!!!!!!!$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ It's coming back even again.

Reply #21

retxx — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 04:18:28 GMT

ok everyone the lets use Mass. pick 4 front 3 as an example to try out his theory. Who wants to try it with tonights pick 3 here which was 282 or maybe you can try it with all 4 which was 2822. So what will we play on tues the 28th in Mass. Give it a shot.

Reply #20

LAVERNE MALONEY — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 04:17:34 GMT

HAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA HA

Go on Tenaj, you are coming down the pike hitting aces. Bring the truth right down front. Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, come on now.

Reply #19

Tenaj — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 04:04:10 GMT

I don't know what his theology is. I've always associated theology with religion.

I've visited his website before in the past, just surfing and meandered onto it tongue in cheek. And numbers don't have theology, it's numerology and only god knows that code. Fibonacci's theory was just a drop in the bucket and gave us something to think about.

Reply #18

Cashman87 — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 03:57:26 GMT

cracking in no time.

Very sad you guys.

Very.

Reply #17

WakeUpDifferen — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 03:55:12 GMT

Hey Guys,

I am not a big believer in codes for the lottery, but his equation to me would seem like a simple equation that he made up that uses cultural symbols to seem more credible. X = the unknown variable that equates to some number (whole, Fraction, etc.) divided by Pi (mathematical symbol for the corresponding numerical relationship that is inherent in all circles, It helps you find circumference, area, etc.) + 666 (which coincidentally is the number of the beast in Biblical expre... [ More ]

Reply #16

truecritic — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 03:54:34 GMT

You all realize that if you look at his first chart (as posted here) starting with the numbers 075 and 690 that is the equation at work?

INTEGER (075/p +666) = 690

Reply #15

Pinetree — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 03:48:11 GMT

Good job, Tenaj. I'll bet you can crack his theology equally well.

Or maybe I should just say his theology is equally cracked.

Reply #14

teacake58 — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 03:41:46 GMT

lol good one

Reply #13

Tenaj — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 03:38:39 GMT

Ok let me see if I can crack his pick 3 code.

Lead Number Feb 17, 2006

703,037,073,370,730

Mirror to 703

258,285,528,582,825,852

Lead Number 276 Feb 10, 2006

Total to lead Number 276

999

276

723

237,273,327,372,723,732

This week's lead number

052

Mirror to 052

507,057,075,570,705,750

I didn't use the imput as x/pi+666

I just used basic lottery math and got the same

numbers he did and I assure you I didn't

look into the future.... [ More ]

Reply #12

Cashman87 — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 03:35:55 GMT

One would need to know what the x is and the pi .

It does not look that hard to crack.

If one of use does crack it...DO NOT POST IT PUBLICLY.

Pms work wonders.

I'll be working on it on my spare time.

Reply #11

retxx — Tue, 28 Feb 2006 03:14:41 GMT

Good. lets keep this thread going until someone can crack his code. Maybe we can get him to join lottery post if anyone knows him. People here are smart enough to figure it out i am sure of it because we all like puzzles so see what we can do as a group. Thanks

Reply #10

Coin Toss — Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:47:00 GMT

Yeah, that was it emilyg. (sone people react a little weird of you say Art Bell, coast to coast, or George Noory). I just heard the lottery part.

Lantern

This board works a litle different that what I'm used to, when I tried to c & p and post it I just got a blank. Thanks.

silky, like I said, I just went to the link and didn't understand it. Still don't.

Reply #9

emilyg — Mon, 27 Feb 2006 17:48:49 GMT

he was on coast-to-coast last night

Reply #8

LANTERN — Mon, 27 Feb 2006 17:28:03 GMT

This is just to show that white letters are no problem at all to copy and paste.

0 7 5 690

0 5 7 684

7 0 5 890

7 5 0 905

5 0 7 827

5 7 0 847

5 2 8 834

5 8 2 851

2 5 8 748

2 8 5 757

8 5 2 937

8 2 5 929

3 7 2 784

3 2 7 770

7 3 2 899

7 2 3 896

2 3 7 741

2 7 3 753

3 7 0 784

3 0 7 764

7 3 0 898

7 3 0 890

0 3 7 678

0 7 3 689

1501 Friday, March 4, 2005

The input as x/pi+666 will reveal the winning numbers 847, 748, 784,

and 784 again. These... [ More ]

Reply #7

truecritic — Mon, 27 Feb 2006 17:05:59 GMT

Everyone can form their own opinions if they like the guy or not. Click here:

Aaron C. Donahue

Reply #6

truecritic — Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:56:50 GMT

That's the Michigan lottery he used in the example.

But I never heard of him.

Reply #5

silky — Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:51:08 GMT

Oopie. I meant coin toss, He saw this first ...Now I'll go back hiding

Reply #4

silky — Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:44:28 GMT

I was copying that for Retxx I don't know what the x/pi is If I did I would put it on here, I was hoping someone knows what this means, I'll hush now ! lol

Reply #3

Atomic Dog — Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:37:36 GMT

OK?????

So ... what are you usuing as an input for X ???

Fill us in!

Thanks!

Good Luck,

John

Reply #2

silky — Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:24:51 GMT

http://ummo.cc/S_L_R.html

Successful Lottery Results

075690

057684

705890

750905

507827

570847

528834

582851

258748

285757

852937

825929

372784

327770

732899

723896

237741

273753

370784

307764

730898

730890

037678

073689

1501 Friday, March 4, 2005

The input as x/pi+666 will reveal the winning numbers 847, 748, 784,

and 784 again. These numbers conform to the initial 874 a... [ More ]

Reply #1

retxx — Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:32:56 GMT

does he have a website? Maybe someone can figure out the formula x/pi+666 on the post and let us know.

"Successful Lottery Reasults" -

Coin Toss — Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:12:06 GMT

Sorry I couldn't copy and paste the info, it's white lettering. This guy was on radio last night, some pretty wild claims about the lotto, but for anyone who can understand this (I don't):

Aaron C. Donahue

http://ummo.cc/S_L_R.html