Promising system..just bought

Reply #185

cps10 — Fri, 09 Jun 2006 01:02:19 GMT

Yeah, I would be a little concerned with the Pick-5 or Pick-6 games...

Reply #184

MillionsWanted — Thu, 08 Jun 2006 21:31:56 GMT

Nope, it's a piock-6 game 6/48. Perhaps the system is useless for pick-5 and pick-6?

I did a short 4 weeks of backtesting, picking the 12 most active numbers in the positional chart for for Viking Lotto and ended up with usually 2 numbers correct among the 12 picked, once only 1 correct number.

I need to go back to picking 18 or 20 numbers from the positional chart and use a reduced wheel which I can afford. Using the filter method as suggested by this system is useless when you pick many... [ More ]

Reply #183

cps10 — Thu, 08 Jun 2006 20:03:46 GMT

MW

That isn't a Pick 3 or Pick 4, right

Reply #182

MillionsWanted — Thu, 08 Jun 2006 15:17:27 GMT

Terrible results on Viking Lotto yesterday using the Code Cracked system.

Back to the drawing board again.

Reply #181

cps10 — Mon, 05 Jun 2006 21:08:45 GMT

That's cool....where is Ricky when we need him? LOL

Reply #180

pacattack05 — Mon, 05 Jun 2006 21:06:43 GMT

We haven't gotten that far yet. They'll have to see what kind of work will be involved first.

Reply #179

cps10 — Mon, 05 Jun 2006 20:02:38 GMT

Is it going to cost a rear-end-load to develop

Reply #178

pacattack05 — Mon, 05 Jun 2006 19:55:34 GMT

It should come complete with a broad choice of parameters, meaning you can input any amount of numbers from the high priority ones, all the way down to the lower ones. So I can have as many numbers intergrated as possible.

When I did my test, I ended up with only 8 sets of numbers to play, so I added the numbers that didn't have as many of the high frequency rates to the chart, so I can have more coverage, and that's what I'll expect from the program to do also. It has to be flexible.

I'll... [ More ]

Reply #177

cps10 — Mon, 05 Jun 2006 19:25:33 GMT

Pac

If you could have them do 81 256 for the P-4. I would be interested to see if that program can be done. Keep me posted.

Reply #176

pacattack05 — Mon, 05 Jun 2006 19:22:11 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by cps10 on June 5, 2006 Pac

That's exactly right. They change very rarely. I would say once a week they change maybe. But there are times when they will change one day, and then change back the next.

How is your testing going? I think this has some merit to be honest with you.

The pick-4 however, is a little suspect. I only have Pick-4 going 3x3x3x3 or 81 numbers. I wonder if it would be wise to bump that up to 4x4x4x4 or 256 numbers? I know it's a considerable... [ More ]

Reply #175

cps10 — Mon, 05 Jun 2006 18:31:11 GMT

Pac

That's exactly right. They change very rarely. I would say once a week they change maybe. But there are times when they will change one day, and then change back the next.

How is your testing going? I think this has some merit to be honest with you.

The pick-4 however, is a little suspect. I only have Pick-4 going 3x3x3x3 or 81 numbers. I wonder if it would be wise to bump that up to 4x4x4x4 or 256 numbers? I know it's a considerable jump, but it might include the winner regularly.... [ More ]

Reply #174

pacattack05 — Mon, 05 Jun 2006 18:25:18 GMT

Cool, I hope it works. I'm just focusing on the p-3 for now.

Good luck....

Reply #173

pacattack05 — Mon, 05 Jun 2006 18:24:06 GMT

When you update during the tests, do you notice a considerable difference in the changing of numbers to be played for the next day, or Is it like I imagined, where the numbers really don't change that much? I'm thinking that it's more like a week or so before the numbers change.

Reply #172

cps10 — Mon, 05 Jun 2006 18:11:30 GMT

Grasshopper,

Yes, it is the same system Pac has. It actually is working very well. I have found that even in flat betting instances, cold runs are usually overrun with a hot hot hot streak

Reply #171

MillionsWanted — Mon, 05 Jun 2006 11:13:02 GMT

I reduced the amount of numbers to 12 and got 32 combinations. No filters is being used.

I am using 100 weeks of statistics for these numbers. The Viking Lotto draw will be on wednesday.

Here's the numbers:

1

13

21

32

38

47

2

23

35

48

46

44

This is the combinations

Reply #170

GrassHopper35 — Mon, 05 Jun 2006 08:43:29 GMT

Cps10, is this the same system Pac has

Reply #169

cps10 — Sun, 04 Jun 2006 21:10:21 GMT

MW

I do 6 mos for Pick 3. Seems to work well.

I am going to run up a Pick-4 generator as well and see what I can find. That would be 81 combos though.

Reply #168

cps10 — Sun, 04 Jun 2006 21:09:08 GMT

You got it. I did a random test from a back month...actually what I did was start at Nov. 1, 2005. I did the workout and got the plays. Then on the Nov. 2, 2005, I re-did the workout and played, etc. Did Nov. 1, 2005-Dec. 5, 2005 and in one state, I would have won $705 flat. Would have won $993 progressively.

In another state, same testing procedure, I would have won $555 flat and $951 progressively.

That is playing $1 each number and playing box only. If I recall correctly, there were 2 s... [ More ]

Reply #167

MillionsWanted — Sun, 04 Jun 2006 21:06:24 GMT

I'm not going to give up. I'll try to use 12 or 14 numbers instead.

I need to do some backtesting to see if 12 or 14 numbers is enough to capture the drawn numbers.

A problem which I can see coming is that the numbers will not change much between each draw.

One might just as well play the same group of numbers for five weeks before using the charts again to find new numbers.

Another thing is how many weeks should I keep statistics for? Few enough to see some numbers change every week a... [ More ]

Reply #166

pacattack05 — Sun, 04 Jun 2006 20:53:01 GMT

Great news....

Have you been updating everyday during those tests

Reply #165

cps10 — Sun, 04 Jun 2006 20:13:11 GMT

I've tested Pick3 and it is doing pretty well to my surprise. I am going to continue my testing though.

Reply #164

MYDOGDYLAN — Sun, 04 Jun 2006 18:35:39 GMT

You could be right about about to many lines to play in the 6/49 lotto even with filtering.

I tried on the Euro millions on Friday and had to filter down to 10 numbers and then wheeled the 10 numbers into 5 lines @2 euros a go.

Got 1 number and the 2 lucky stars and it paid out 9.89 euros,so just about got my money back

15 numbers qualify for this Fridays game so i'll be filtering these down to mayboe 5/6/7 lines.

Reply #163

MillionsWanted — Sun, 04 Jun 2006 15:33:33 GMT

I've come to the conclusion that it would be too expensive to play all the number combinations out of the 18 numbers I have come down to(as suggested in the Lottery Techniques/Picking Numbers chapter), even if only 3 numbers(1,2 and 6) will be used as first numbers in the combinations. I will probably end up with 150-300 combinations to play.

It's actually worse. I've done some checking. You will need to play over 750 combinations. Even when using the frequency chart in the Lottery Technique... [ More ]

Reply #162

MillionsWanted — Sun, 04 Jun 2006 14:57:01 GMT

I've done some trials with the system for Pick 6, among other things trying to figure out how to pick the number combinations.

I've come to the conclusion that it would be too expensive to play all the number combinations out of the 18 numbers I have come down to(as suggested in the Lottery Techniques/Picking Numbers chapter), even if only 3 numbers(1,2 and 6) will be used as first numbers in the combinations. I will probably end up with 150-300 combinations to play.

If I knew the number... [ More ]

Reply #161

pacattack05 — Sat, 03 Jun 2006 04:27:41 GMT

No sweat, atleast you tried.

I think that I can do it with paper and pencil. It really shouldn't be that hard. Just make a list of the freqencies, and simply adjust them daily. I just get lazy sometimes...LOL

Reply #160

sfilippo — Fri, 02 Jun 2006 18:15:28 GMT

Hey Pac,

I don't think that programmer is interested in working on your system.

Best let paurths give it a go, I think.

Sorry about that.

Reply #159

emilyg — Fri, 02 Jun 2006 17:03:38 GMT

never too late - get on it.

Reply #158

lacie — Fri, 02 Jun 2006 16:53:08 GMT

cps-mw

I finally heard from the guy. he told me that pay pal hadn't notifed him yet.

I sent him a copy of the pay pal receipt that I had been sent, I'll see what happens.

Reply #157

cps10 — Fri, 02 Jun 2006 12:48:39 GMT

Pac

I can't do that like paurths, but we can ask him when he gets back.

Reply #156

pacattack05 — Fri, 02 Jun 2006 06:17:03 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by LOTTOMIKE on June 2, 2006 this system we were talking about.have you made anything using this system pac?

No, but I'm waiting for some person to come along and email me. The person has yet to do so.....

Oh well.....I'm waiting.....

Too much for pencil and papyra.......

Reply #155

pacattack05 — Fri, 02 Jun 2006 06:14:32 GMT

FROG HAIR...........

HORSE FEATHERS............

Platypus wings...........

CHICKEN LIPS....

Reply #154

LOTTOMIKE — Fri, 02 Jun 2006 06:09:44 GMT

this system we were talking about.have you made anything using this system pac

Reply #153

pacattack05 — Fri, 02 Jun 2006 06:04:28 GMT

Way too much Info.......LOOL....

Reply #152

LOTTOMIKE — Fri, 02 Jun 2006 05:53:17 GMT

well i guess they won't like me because i'm not circumsized,lol

Reply #151

pacattack05 — Fri, 02 Jun 2006 05:42:57 GMT

That's why Jewish women like circumsized men.......

They're 20 percent off.......LOL

Reply #150

pacattack05 — Fri, 02 Jun 2006 05:39:32 GMT

Only if you're born agian. If you're not, then i have a good deal for you. I got a special this week, 2 for one. If you refer me to a friend, I'll give you a 20 percent off discount......LOL

I'll baptise you while you pray I bring you back up.........LOL

Reply #149

LOTTOMIKE — Fri, 02 Jun 2006 05:25:43 GMT

good idea!!!!

can i go first? lol

Reply #148

pacattack05 — Fri, 02 Jun 2006 05:23:38 GMT

Good one....LOL Mike...........

How about dipping the betslip in Holy Water, and let it drip dry. Then fill in the blanks......LOL

Reply #147

LOTTOMIKE — Fri, 02 Jun 2006 05:15:37 GMT

maybe we could give the bestlip a steroid boost and get a few numbers.

look what its done for barry bonds,lol

Reply #146

pacattack05 — Fri, 02 Jun 2006 05:10:38 GMT

Centrum...A to Z.....The best. I take one everyday.

If we could only give vitamin boosts to the betslip.

Reply #145

LOTTOMIKE — Fri, 02 Jun 2006 05:02:35 GMT

west virginia,florida and oklahoma are all one a day vitamins,oops i meant one a day ball drawn states....

Reply #144

pacattack05 — Fri, 02 Jun 2006 04:50:15 GMT

Are you able to make a program like Puarths, where you just punch the new set in and it updates automatically, because I have no clue on Excel.....LOL

Thanx......

Reply #143

cps10 — Fri, 02 Jun 2006 02:39:59 GMT

xavier - I sure will. I am probably going to put it up on the website sometime tomorrow. Remind me if you don't see it up there.

Reply #142

xavier102772 — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 20:32:24 GMT

hey cps, can you send me that spreadsheet too. Thanks.

Reply #141

cps10 — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 20:06:28 GMT

Pac, MW

I have a spreadsheet now whereby you enter those numbers 3 for each position and it generates the plays for you. That could save you a good bit of time for sure. Let me know if you need it.

Reply #140

cps10 — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 18:55:42 GMT

xavier

Thanks! That is interesting...maybe we are onto something here...

Reply #139

cps10 — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 18:55:23 GMT

If you ordered it too late last night or too early today, it could take a while to get there since I think the guy has a full time job. How dare he? LOL

Reply #138

MillionsWanted — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 18:29:59 GMT

I received the link to download code cracked 30 minutes later. You get a link in the email. Click on that link and chose where to save the file.

Reply #137

xavier102772 — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 18:18:54 GMT

cps: those are for straight combinations

box would be more like this:

68.26% probability that one of 27 combinations will hit within 9 draws - 1STD

95.44% probability that one of 27 combinations will hit within 24 draws - 2STD

99.74% probability that one of 27 combinations will hit within 46 draws - 3STD

Reply #136

cps10 — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 18:00:14 GMT

Lacie

You get it electronically. It's a link.

xavier - thank you for the stats. Are those in straight form or in boxed format

Reply #135

lacie — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 17:51:08 GMT

mw, did you have any trouble getting code cracked. I bought it last night around 5:00pm and have not seen it yet.

I assume he sent it electronically but am really not sure.

please advise me on how you received yours?

thank you,

PaulB

Reply #134

xavier102772 — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 16:45:50 GMT

cps: FYI for 27 combinations, played the same, the skips can get very high. So if your numbers are not changing very much, then getting one hit in 45 draws is not much of a surprise. Also, from pacs numbers, getting 8 hits in 120 days is no surprise either. Both fall well within the probabilities.

Here are some probabilities for you to ponder.

27 combinations

25% probability that one of 27 combinations will hit within 11 draws

50% probability that one of 27 combinations will hit

Reply #133

cps10 — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 13:45:17 GMT

Not a bad idea MW...I will have to do that. If you ever can figure out an electronic version, please let me know.

Reply #132

MillionsWanted — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 13:42:37 GMT

Just bought the Code Cracked as well.

I'll recommend those who have bought it to take "print screens" (Alt+Print Screen) of all the pages and save it to hard disk via an image manipulation program (download GIMP for windows if you don't have any). Some pages are so long you will have to take two or more "print screens".

This Code Cracked program picks up webpages from lottery-code.com. If for any reason the server which stores the Code Cracked-pages is down you will not be able to use it.... [ More ]

Reply #131

cps10 — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 13:05:57 GMT

Thanks Hopper!

I am going to check WV OK

Reply #130

GrassHopper35 — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 09:56:13 GMT

How about West Virginia

Reply #129

cps10 — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 02:45:43 GMT

Alright...

ANYBODY have any non-computerized single draw states?? Please

Reply #128

pacattack05 — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 02:37:26 GMT

COOL....

I'll be working for the next 3 days, long hours, will keep tabs when I get home at night.....

Reply #127

cps10 — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 01:22:37 GMT

Pac - that seems easy enough...I will pick one of those

Reply #126

truecritic — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 00:47:01 GMT

In that case, I'll just sit back awaiting the results

Reply #125

pacattack05 — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 00:42:59 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by cps10 on May 31, 2006 Pac

Well, I was playing the same numbers for all intents and purposes, because they changed maybe twice in the entire 45 draws that I experimented with.

Let me ask you this...would you recommend mid-mid and eve-eve instead of mid-eve-mid? I had my test mixed. Maybe not such a good idea. Since FLA is just one draw per day, that could be the indicator.

For all intents and purposes, stick to a state which has only one drawing. It will make

Reply #124

cps10 — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 00:37:06 GMT

Pac

Well, I was playing the same numbers for all intents and purposes, because they changed maybe twice in the entire 45 draws that I experimented with.

Let me ask you this...would you recommend mid-mid and eve-eve instead of mid-eve-mid? I had my test mixed. Maybe not such a good idea. Since FLA is just one draw per day, that could be the indicator.

Reply #123

pacattack05 — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 00:36:51 GMT

Who's on third? and what's on second?....LOL

Reply #122

pacattack05 — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 00:35:27 GMT

I did. I did Florida for the past 120 days, without an update. And still came out ahead on paper atleast.

We need to see how we will do with updates. That's the question...

Reply #121

truecritic — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 00:32:15 GMT

Pac + cps10

Maybe it would be easier while you both check this out, to use a single State, so an actual comparison could be made. Like it might help it you supply the data for Florida with your straight hits - then you both start on the same page. Just an idea.

Reply #120

pacattack05 — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 00:23:19 GMT

For God's sake, they don't even have a lottery......LOOL

Reply #119

pacattack05 — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 00:22:29 GMT

I guess SC needs not to be an example....LOL

Reply #118

pacattack05 — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 00:20:27 GMT

But I forgot to add that you were playing the same 27 sets for 120 days? In your simulation? Yes? If it is a yes, that's not what the procedure is......LOL You did say that earlier....No big deal, I just want to confirm...

Reply #117

pacattack05 — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 00:17:24 GMT

WOW....

Well I see you have your hands full.

It didn't sound like what you explained before i corrected, but that's water under the bridge....

What's your plan

Reply #116

cps10 — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 00:13:48 GMT

Hey Pac,

That's how I was doing it...and I didn't take it the wrong way...you should know that by now. I was babysitting my Dad for a couple of hours after work while my Mom was away. Anyway, I am back home to the computer, much to the dismay of my wife and kids! LOL

Anyway, what I was doing was taking that 120 day set, and after one draw, I was deleting the oldest number and adding the newest number to keep a full 120 day set with which to get the selections. I was using SC as my test,... [ More ]

Reply #115

pacattack05 — Wed, 31 May 2006 23:34:42 GMT

What happened cps 10?

I was just joking.......

Reply #114

pacattack05 — Wed, 31 May 2006 21:41:13 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by cps10 on May 31, 2006 Okay...you take 120 days, right? Then you derive your plays from those frequenices? So, let's say you took the last 120 days and got those frequencies. It tells you what to play tonight. Tonight is outside of the last 120 days, right? Then play those numbers for another 120 days...that is how I thought you were playing it.

HA!

I knew there was something wrong....LOL

No that's not the way to do it. No wonder you weren't getting hardly any... [ More ]

Reply #113

cps10 — Wed, 31 May 2006 21:17:24 GMT

Okay...you take 120 days, right? Then you derive your plays from those frequenices? So, let's say you took the last 120 days and got those frequencies. It tells you what to play tonight. Tonight is outside of the last 120 days, right? Then play those numbers for another 120 days...that is how I thought you were playing it.

Reply #112

pacattack05 — Wed, 31 May 2006 21:12:45 GMT

I'm definitely not understanding what you're doing.

Why are the 45 days outside the 120? What difference does it make what days it is?

Thanx...

Reply #111

cps10 — Wed, 31 May 2006 21:01:52 GMT

The 45 days are outside of the 120-day interval...

But what I will do is take a 4 month interval and derive some numbers. Then I will play it for another 4 months with just those numbers and see what I come up with.

Reply #110

pacattack05 — Wed, 31 May 2006 20:52:52 GMT

Why can't you just start from 6 months ago and work your way forward to the present. I think you're making it more complicated than it needs to be. Why pick arbitrary dates of 6 month intervals, and choose 45 days within those 6 month intervals?

Also, I would like to ask, are you sure you're using the criteria he provides exactly to the T? I got 8 hits in 120 days without even an update. Something doesen't sound right.

Reply #109

cps10 — Wed, 31 May 2006 20:41:45 GMT

Pac

No, what I did was take, let's say for instance, July 1-Dec. 31, 2005 (6 months).

I generated my plays based on those frequencies.

Then I used those plays for the Jan. 1, 2006 drawing. These dates are arbitrary, just to show an example.

Win or lose, then I took the numbers from July 2, 2005-Jan. 1, 2006 (6 months).

I then generated my plays based on THOSE frequencies.

Then I used those plays for the Jan. 2, 2006 drawing.

Win or lose, then I took the number from July 3, 2... [ More ]

Reply #108

pacattack05 — Wed, 31 May 2006 20:36:39 GMT

I just bought a system that is very promising. I back tested it for four months and yielded a profit, even if you don't play online, but obviously much better if played online.

Cost: $3,240.00 120 days @ $27.00 a day.

Won: $7,200.00 Eight straight wins @ $900.00 X eight = $7,200.00

Netted: $3,960.99 Divided by 4 months = $990.00 a month profit.

What were you saying about evening out

Reply #107

xavier102772 — Wed, 31 May 2006 20:01:54 GMT

I think it all depends on the streaks pac. From what I know of the system, it is based on digit frequencies from the past drawings correct. And if it is, I would assume it will perform as does the normal distribution of probability for a given amount of combinations. If you combine probability theory and past draw digit frequencies in a method, it should produce a result that is on par witht he odds of pick3 or pick4. Meaning you should break even. Now, it is very probable to see streaks of... [ More ]

Reply #106

pacattack05 — Wed, 31 May 2006 19:27:13 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by cps10 on May 31, 2006 I used a floating group of numbers from 6 months before. The actual results I tested were only for 45-draws. Meaning, I took 6 months worth of history, formulated my selections, then played a draw. Got a result. Then took a new 6 months worth of history, formulated my selections, then played another draw. Got a result. Then took a new 6 months worth of history...etc etc. I did that exercise 45 times to get my 1 straight and four or five box hits.... [ More ]

Reply #105

cps10 — Wed, 31 May 2006 19:18:22 GMT

I used a floating group of numbers from 6 months before. The actual results I tested were only for 45-draws. Meaning, I took 6 months worth of history, formulated my selections, then played a draw. Got a result. Then took a new 6 months worth of history, formulated my selections, then played another draw. Got a result. Then took a new 6 months worth of history...etc etc. I did that exercise 45 times to get my 1 straight and four or five box hits.

Reply #104

pacattack05 — Wed, 31 May 2006 19:10:43 GMT

I thought you said you did a 6 month test.

Reply #103

cps10 — Wed, 31 May 2006 19:10:38 GMT

Pac

I do think that it has some merit though. I will continue to research it since I have definitely invested time and money into it already

Reply #102

cps10 — Wed, 31 May 2006 19:08:44 GMT

Yes, I updated the numbers after each win. Like I said, they rarely changed, so it's almost as if you are playing with the same 27 numbers for quite some time. Only 1 straight out of that 45-draw test I did.

Reply #101

pacattack05 — Wed, 31 May 2006 19:04:19 GMT

I play them for straight only.

Did your test involve updates

Reply #100

cps10 — Wed, 31 May 2006 18:47:07 GMT

Yeah, that would be helpful. I just did a test run of 6 months worth of back numbers to form the selections, and the numbers rarely changed. A progression would need to be used here for sure. I saw one 20-draw losing streak which could be bad especially when playing boxed. But most of the hits in the month that I had were within 4 draws and there were a couple of 1-draw winners.

Reply #99

pacattack05 — Wed, 31 May 2006 18:38:02 GMT

Cool...Thanx....

As far as I know, the only thing he mentions that involves how many days to look back is his use of the word historical data, which might mean all of the numbers, from the inception of the game itself, but I doubt it.

I should send him an email and ask.

Reply #98

cps10 — Wed, 31 May 2006 18:25:02 GMT

No problem. I will be able to backtest a little bit and then see what it might entail. Now, paurths' lotsoft might be able to fix this problem quickly.

Reply #97

pacattack05 — Wed, 31 May 2006 18:23:28 GMT

I think I should learn it because I'm sure there are days that you don't want to be bothered. Someone already tried to teach me how, but I couldn't grasp it. If you're gonna teach me, I hope that you use as many laymen terms as possible. You'll also have to start from scratch. Thanx.....LOL

Yes, they should stay relatively the same amount everyday.

Reply #96

cps10 — Wed, 31 May 2006 18:15:34 GMT

Pac

I would imagine that most plays each day would be the same. If the stats you are looking for are for 6 months out, then one drawing most likely would not change the workout, in my opinion. Now I would be glad to show you how to use it, or I could provide numbers to you regularly.

Reply #95

pacattack05 — Wed, 31 May 2006 18:09:23 GMT

I don't have the faintest clue on how to use Excel.

When I first bought my computer almost two years ago, I didn't even know that I could delete all my bulkmail with just one stroke. I deleted them, sometimes into the hundreds, by one page at a time...LOL

Reply #94

cps10 — Wed, 31 May 2006 14:41:36 GMT

Millions/Pac

I was going to suggest that as well. I need a lottery database that will allow me to put numbers into an Excel format. That is how I was thinking of automating it for Pac.

Now...I was going to buy P34Lotto just for the database update-ability, which would also give me positional statistics, which is what we need to effectively run this system correctly.

Reply #93

MillionsWanted — Wed, 31 May 2006 14:38:32 GMT

If you want to use excel to count how many times a special number appears in draws, use this formula :

=COUNTIF(J1:J5; =3 )

This one checks if the column J1 to J5 has the number 3 in it and how many times 3's appears.

If you have columns of whatever length with numbers you can use this formula to count how many times a specific ball has been drawn.

Reply #92

pacattack05 — Wed, 31 May 2006 14:18:38 GMT

Yes, everydraw. It might be a 90 day guarantee. I forget.

Right now I'm using the one for the pick 3, and have not implemented the last step which reduces it even further.

The way it worked for the p-3 was that it initially gave me only 8 sets of numbers to play daily, so I wanted more numbers to cover more area, and just applied the next highest numbers that came out to the list, giving me 27 sets.

It's gonna be really interesting to apply it to the Fantasy 5 here in Florida, but crunc... [ More ]

Reply #91

cps10 — Wed, 31 May 2006 13:32:13 GMT

Pac,

I see where you are talking about the dots...you are right...there are tons of them down there. you know that you could shorten the backtesting process by using Inspector...just a thought. Although it doesn't have it for positional on there. Although, I do know of a way to somewhat automate it.

Reply #90

cps10 — Wed, 31 May 2006 13:29:55 GMT

It used to be a 60-day...he has changed it recently. I have followed this ad for a while.

Hey Pac - are you supposed to work these numbers for every draw? Or until you get a hit? I am under the impression that you are to use these numbers pretty regularly.

Also, are you using the first, second or third technique?

I apologize to those who don't understand what we are talking about...

Reply #89

MillionsWanted — Wed, 31 May 2006 13:23:14 GMT

I'll hold on my money a little longer.

A thing I noticed: Pac says it has a 60 day money-back guarantee. The seller on ebay says it has a 90 days guarantee. I'm not sure if it is the same system yet.

Reply #88

pacattack05 — Wed, 31 May 2006 12:54:58 GMT

Nowhere does it say 120 days or any other amount. I came up with that number by counting the idividual dots shown in the example graph. And then I just picked a median number.

I just looked at it again, and I think he wants to look back even further. I don't know, but what I can say is this. I'm thinking atleast a six month to a year would be about right.

Each dot represents a drawing date's number, and there were about 160 of them. So out of laziness, and lack of time, I shortened it to... [ More ]

Reply #87

cps10 — Wed, 31 May 2006 12:28:53 GMT

It seems a little vague to me, Millions. I am still not reading where Pac says 120 days...but I haven't looked all the way through it yet today.

Reply #86

MillionsWanted — Wed, 31 May 2006 12:11:37 GMT

If it really is the Code Cracked system I will probably buy it. 8 bucks isn't that much. I've payed as much as 40 dollar for systems earlier.