code breaking and the LOtto...

Reply #105

Rip Snorter — Sat, 17 Jun 2006 14:30:45 GMT

Spy:

I've been thinking about this post of yours for some while, considering the implications. Since you made it on this thread, (which I almost wish you hadn't ---- I think it could have made a good thread standing on its own hind-legs), I think it's probably best to reply again on this thread if I'm going to reply at all.

You inspired me to post the thread/poll Lottery Beliefs by LP members, with the post you made above.

To some extent, I think the discussions on that thread and the... [ More ]

Reply #104

Rip Snorter — Sat, 17 Jun 2006 13:49:08 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by pumpi76 on June 16, 2006

I found a way that you could collect 32 numbers and contain the 6 winning numbers 42% of the time in Ga's win for life. However is only hypothetical extrapolation. Is done assuming the Win for life game will behave the same way in the future. Also is a very, very small sample since is only 31 draws and you will need like 90 draws to make an accurate extrapolation....I was looking at ga win for life game since it began and i began to record t... [ More ]

Reply #103

Rip Snorter — Sat, 17 Jun 2006 12:47:49 GMT

I have a system going where I consistently pick 4 of the 5 whiteballs almost every drawing, and about 25% of the time I get 5 out of 5, but it's across 5 games, not in the same game. I'm good at getting 4 of 5 with my system, but that 5th number, is usually from left field on me.

Guesser:

All you need to do is increase the number of balls you're playing in each game. Right now is sounds as though you're only playing 4/5ths of the balls and getting 4 of 5....... if you move up and use all... [ More ]

Reply #102

guesser — Sat, 17 Jun 2006 06:23:00 GMT

Apples and oranges.

A code is the result of something where someone already knows the end result, whereas the lottery, nobody knows the end result until it is played/happens.

Jealous because I/we can't ? No, apparently you can't figure it out either, and I'm not jealous of you.

I have a system going where I consistently pick 4 of the 5 whiteballs almost every drawing, and about 25% of the time I get 5 out of 5, but it's across 5 games, not in the same game. I'm good at getting 4... [ More ]

Reply #101

Winner1313 — Sat, 17 Jun 2006 03:01:45 GMT

Try the alternate system, less complicated more fun, and more accurate.

Reply #100

pumpi76 — Fri, 16 Jun 2006 10:12:41 GMT

I found a way that you could collect 32 numbers and contain the 6 winning numbers 42% of the time in Ga's win for life. However is only hypothetical extrapolation. Is done assuming the Win for life game will behave the same way in the future. Also is a very, very small sample since is only 31 draws and you will need like 90 draws to make an accurate extrapolation....I was looking at ga win for life game since it began and i began to record the winning numbers since the game inception. I am not g... [ More ]

Reply #99

RJOh — Fri, 16 Jun 2006 00:08:24 GMT

If ....all six winning numbers are in your pool of 15-18 numbers then you have 55-65 chances to match 1of6 winning combinations of 5 in the winning combination if your abbreviated wheel contains all the possible combinations of 5's.

That could be wrong, I was looking at the information below and guesstimating. There's a LP member that post in the Math Forum that has a website with all kinds of probability tables that might be helpful.

possible combination of 6 in 15 numbers is 5005

MA... [ More ]

Reply #98

pumpi76 — Thu, 15 Jun 2006 23:38:16 GMT

RJOh yeah is a dream to want to contain the 6 winning combinations in a 16-18 sized wheel 33% of the time.....But for 200 dollars you get 1 ticket matching 5of 6 if 6 are in 16 [don't ask me where though, that's a secret]. And i would like you to calculate the amount of money you will spend in 1 year compared to how much you will win. And again remember i said: at least 33% it could be 40% or 50% and if is 50% you got it made...

Calculate 200 x 10 days= 2,000 dollars. Out of the 10 days, 3 da... [ More ]

Reply #97

Winner1313 — Thu, 15 Jun 2006 22:42:32 GMT

Calling Alonzo Calling Alonzo Come Please!!

I am not one of those Rude fellow here, please P. M. your winning system to me thanks.

Reply #96

RJOh — Thu, 15 Jun 2006 22:23:42 GMT

If you're playing a match6 game and all six winning numbers are in your pool of 15-18 numbers then you have 55-65 chances to match 1of6 winning combinations of 5 in the winning combination if your abbreviated wheel contains all the possible combinations of 5's. That being said, the question is not how much you will make in 1 year but how much you will spend in 1 year chasing that dream. If you're matching 5of6 33% of the time you wheel 16-18 numbers then you're dreaming. WAKE UP... [ More ]

Reply #95

pumpi76 — Thu, 15 Jun 2006 21:41:22 GMT

I am talking about an abbreviated wheel that will guarantee 1 ticket having 5 of 6, in those 16-18 numbers....I want you to make the calculations/computation. If you were to play everyday a wheel for 16-18 numbers and contain the 6 winning number in those 16-18, 33% of the time and you match 5 of 6, 33% of the time in let's say mega millions or California lotto how much will you have made in 1 year?That's what i am talking about...

Been able to contain the 6 winning numbers in 16-18, at leas... [ More ]

Reply #94

RJOh — Thu, 15 Jun 2006 19:51:30 GMT

If you're talking about matching 6 in 15-18 numbers then you talking about playing 5005-18,564 possible combinations, on the other hand if you're talking about matching 5+1 in 15-18 numbers than you are talking about playing 45,045-154,224 possible combinations. If you are talking about a lottery which contain 49 or more numbers in its full pool, then it's unlikely you're going to find a pool of 15-18 numbers which contain all the winning numbers 33% of the time. LP members in the Jackpot Gam... [ More ]

Reply #93

pumpi76 — Thu, 15 Jun 2006 19:16:40 GMT

just another reason to prove that perhaps there are people out there that have crack the lottery. First of all, you don't need the winning combinations, if a person can contain the 6 winning numbers in a group of 16-18, 33% - 50% of the time, he or she would have cracked the lottery. Just to think that the second prize on any pick6 lottery would make you profit, or pay for your initial investment if you got the 6 winning numbers in 16-18, 33%-50% of the time...So what makes you think that no one... [ More ]

Reply #92

pumpi76 — Mon, 12 Jun 2006 14:10:41 GMT

Soon (if they haven't experimented with it yet) they will have a supercomputers cracking the lotto. If a supercomputer can beat the world most eminent chess players, soon they will use it to crack the lotto..Talking about computing power ...I don't know why but i believe that's the only way they will be able to crack the lotto or come close to it with less than 200 tickets. I mean a supercomputer can make simulations, run through all the combinations in 1/16 of 1 second, at least a Rng and who... [ More ]

Reply #91

pumpi76 — Mon, 12 Jun 2006 07:28:24 GMT

I've heard of people winning the lotteries and then claiming they got a system. I rather believe them even if is not true than to believe someone who purport they have a system and haven't won the lottery. But again guys another reason why these people may not have won the lottery is not because they can't hit the lotto but maybe because of economics. Maybe they are not economically built to make let's say $ 300 bet every time they bet? Some might have had kids before they were planning to strik... [ More ]

Reply #90

pacattack05 — Sun, 11 Jun 2006 17:49:59 GMT

I've never been a fan of country, but I gave his music a test run.

A 1 being the worst and a 10 being the best, I gave him an 8 for originality.

However, I gave him a 6 for his singing, not because he has a bad voice, but I noticed he was off key at times, but only by a hair. Mostly people who have a trained ear can pick them up.

I gave him an 8 for musicianship. Good key changes, and a professionally sound recording. ( No pun intended )

Overall, he's doing far better than Iam,... [ More ]

Reply #89

GASMETERGUY — Sun, 11 Jun 2006 16:39:33 GMT

Big Loooser, aka Alonzo Wright, can be found at

www.soundclick.com/bands/pageartist.cfm?bandID=131288

His e-mail address is listed at the bottom of the page.

Good luck to anyone who can reach him.

Reply #88

LOTTOMIKE — Sat, 10 Jun 2006 17:56:17 GMT

perhaps he did it hit it big.i would not doubt it.......

Reply #87

MillionsWanted — Sat, 10 Jun 2006 12:10:46 GMT

Whatever happened to bigloooser? His website is still not up even though it's been a while since he registered the domain.

Perhaps he makes enough money on his music.

Reply #86

LOTTOMIKE — Sat, 10 Jun 2006 09:12:57 GMT

i remember bigloooser promising he would be back and give a few select people the secret and the thing is he never returned.he did state on his last post that he would give a few people this secret by private message.did he ever private message anyone here with this?

my memory is not 100 percent but i think thats where it left off.....

Reply #85

pumpi76 — Sat, 10 Jun 2006 08:09:07 GMT

I've come to learn something over the past few months. Wheeling resembles a process in mathematics, called linear interpolation in a Cartesian Plane in which you try and construct a function/graph connecting [plotting] it to Coordinates points in the plane (assuming the function goes up and down). The coordinates represent the directions that the numbers/wheel must take..now the key is you don't have to connect the coordinates to all the points. In this case the wheel doesn't have to foll... [ More ]

Reply #84

Rip Snorter — Sat, 10 Jun 2006 03:28:06 GMT

Derek7:

Guess I figured you wrong on one count. But I think you might have the right stuff anyway.

Good luck

Jack

Reply #83

Rip Snorter — Sat, 10 Jun 2006 03:26:07 GMT

But when and if I ever figure out a profitable system (the key word here is profitable ), I will share with all my friends here at LP. The question will not be Does the system work? but Who are his friends? . LOL

gas-meter guy:

When and if you ever figure out a profitable system you'll find your cup runneth over with friends on LP, no matter how they treat you now (if you let it be known).

Good luck to you in working down your system into something that does the job.

I've been... [ More ]

Reply #82

derek7 — Fri, 09 Jun 2006 18:34:59 GMT

he he, it was about me, was not it...?

well, the bigggest prediction hit for me was Pick 3 straight + box.

Besides that (and possibly other Pick 3) I am hitting 2 of 5, 3 of 5 in Pick 5 games (on the prediction board).

I started predicting few weeks ago, this is why the ratio is still so good. I posted just few numbers, half of them hit for $2, one (or was it two) hit PICK 3 STR.

This is why the ratio is good. Or maybe I predicted something else here and I am not aware...?!?

My... [ More ]

Reply #81

GASMETERGUY — Fri, 09 Jun 2006 18:07:29 GMT

Perhaps later, when another person dares to declare they have a winning system, I will post my thoughts

Keep your eye on this guy. He's probably too savvy to announce anything to anyone, but he's steadily creeping up the hit/ratio list and maintaining it. If anyone on Lottery Post is onto a system I'd put my money on him.

derek7

Maybe the day will come when he's crazy enough, or elated enough, to lose his (evidently sound) judgement. Or maybe he'll run his head into a doorframe and... [ More ]

Reply #80

Rip Snorter — Tue, 06 Jun 2006 03:25:12 GMT

Thanks Bryan.

J

Reply #79

Bryan — Tue, 06 Jun 2006 03:01:13 GMT

Jack,

I truly enjoy your sense of humor. I had tears running on this one.

Bryan

Reply #78

Rip Snorter — Mon, 05 Jun 2006 23:07:02 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by GASMETERGUY on June 5, 2006 Alonzo, AKA Biglooser, has a web site. Do a search of this site for Biglooser and you will find it.

Go there. He is in the music business, making CD's for people. I feel he is making a living doing the music thing for Wanabee's.

I visited his site once. I listened to a couple of tunes. There was nothing to become excited about nor were the tunes gawd-awful. They were decent. There was nothing I would care to take to Music Ro... [ More ]

Reply #77

pumpi76 — Mon, 05 Jun 2006 22:17:08 GMT

I don't mind the lotto influencing the mega ball, high or down..they may be down sometimes. You can influence how much money you rake in by meddling with the bonus ball, but more than that is should not be allowed..

...............Remember...........if a robot can't make you, your mom can't make it................from movie Red Planet ...............

Reply #76

GASMETERGUY — Mon, 05 Jun 2006 17:02:44 GMT

Alonzo, AKA Biglooser, has a web site. Do a search of this site for Biglooser and you will find it.

Go there. He is in the music business, making CD's for people. I feel he is making a living doing the music thing for Wanabee's.

I visited his site once. I listened to a couple of tunes. There was nothing to become excited about nor were the tunes gawd-awful. They were decent. There was nothing I would care to take to Music Row and push. I have my own When The Moon Comes Over The... [ More ]

Reply #75

Winner1313 — Mon, 05 Jun 2006 15:50:48 GMT

Calling Big Looser !!! Come in please

Reply #74

Winner1313 — Mon, 05 Jun 2006 15:48:57 GMT

Calling Alonzo!!! Come in please!!

Calling Alonzo Come in !!

Alonzo, I humbly ask you to send me via Private Message, the system you were talking about years ago.

I know some good programers, who will be able to do the job. People like Slippo, and Pauts etc.

People who selflessly give of their time to others, receiving nothing in return.

Calling Alonzo, come in please !!

Alonzo I know you are out there, if you wish I will keep your system private and secret.

Alonzo I know

Reply #73

BobP — Mon, 05 Jun 2006 06:11:11 GMT

Lotwin by Futuresoft and LottoHat will build wheels around filter settings such as a sum range, though they work in blocks not percise settings, if you need that an old dos program called AMfilter could do it all.

Two problems come up. You can still end up with hundreds of thousands of tickets in the more attractive central filter ranges.

The other is if you use 10 filters you have to have all 10 correct to trap the jackpot. What are the odds of all 10 being correct? Not good.

BobP... [ More ]

Reply #72

Rip Snorter — Mon, 05 Jun 2006 04:15:04 GMT

Likely you're right, whatever the heck it is you said.

Best to you mr. winner.

Jack

Reply #71

Rip Snorter — Mon, 05 Jun 2006 04:13:06 GMT

Pumpi:

Maybe you're right.

I hope you find whatever you're looking for.

Jack

Reply #70

Winner1313 — Mon, 05 Jun 2006 03:45:18 GMT

psykomo

It Is It Possible For You to Give Me A hint, As to What Alonzo Was Talking About?

What Kinda Do you remember, of his system that he was talking about

Reply #69

Winner1313 — Mon, 05 Jun 2006 03:39:52 GMT

Rip Snorter

Say he is a fruit-cake. After reading the posts above I agree.

However I am not a Fruit cake, I am a Nut Cake. I love nuts.

"So who the hell are you to say anything at all about it if you weren't here? "

There goes the Snorter riping away !!!.

That is a very illogical statement, Why Should Not I Say Something? Since You Brought up The Name Alonzo?

Who The Hell Is Rip Snorter To Pass Judgement On Others?

I guess it must be the New Moon, and old Rip changes into... [ More ]

Reply #68

pumpi76 — Mon, 05 Jun 2006 03:33:30 GMT

Rip Snorter No i don't know much about tires but i like to observe 18wheels trucks carry new cars on their backs/load...I also like to watch big cargo ship carry brand new cars....

If you tell a supercomputer to create an abbreviated open wheel and make it weave/stich [actually is not wheeling] the numbers using a guideline/parameters that's based on patterns [different patterns] and filter it for 1 ratio only and just wait in line, i believe soon, you will come close to hitting the jack... [ More ]

Reply #67

Rip Snorter — Mon, 05 Jun 2006 02:54:36 GMT

I wasn't being sarcastic PAC. You gave me an honest, well-thought-out answer. It helped me to understand something I needed to understand.

I said I was grateful, and I meant it.

Jack

Reply #66

pacattack05 — Mon, 05 Jun 2006 00:41:44 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Rip Snorter on June 4, 2006 That's a good enough answer, amigo. Thanks for the trouble you went to giving it.

I'm grateful to you.

Jack

You don't have to get mad about it. I already said that I was not the person that felt he was qualified in the first place....Meaning me.....

Reply #65

Rip Snorter — Sun, 04 Jun 2006 23:58:58 GMT

That's a good enough answer, amigo. Thanks for the trouble you went to giving it.

I'm grateful to you.

Jack

Reply #64

pacattack05 — Sun, 04 Jun 2006 23:33:03 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Rip Snorter on June 4, 2006 Pac:

Actually, I still haven't expressed myself well enough to allow you to give me an answer to my question.

I'm not looking for affirmation of what is possible and what isn't. I'm not looking for anyone to explain what I might or mightn't have observed. I'm not in any way asserting that the moon, in particular, has anything to do with random number behavior. Phases is what I said. Moon phases. And I didn't actually even say tha... [ More ]

Reply #63

Rip Snorter — Sun, 04 Jun 2006 23:16:09 GMT

Pac:

Actually, I still haven't expressed myself well enough to allow you to give me an answer to my question.

I'm not looking for affirmation of what is possible and what isn't. I'm not looking for anyone to explain what I might or mightn't have observed. I'm not in any way asserting that the moon, in particular, has anything to do with random number behavior. Phases is what I said. Moon phases. And I didn't actually even say that.

What I'm asking you for is an explanation of how y... [ More ]

Reply #62

pacattack05 — Sun, 04 Jun 2006 23:10:06 GMT

I don't think I did justice to your question.

I guess the pivotal change which would make me subscribe to the belief that stars, planets and moons have strong influences, would rely on a profitable prediction rate I guess. If you consistently show me wins based on your predictions, I would have no choice but to take your word that the method you implemented was of an astrological, or astronomical one. I'm not sure what method precicely that you use, so I can't expound on the specifics.... [ More ]

Reply #61

pacattack05 — Sun, 04 Jun 2006 22:50:45 GMT

Thanx Rip.....WOW.....

You leave the weight of the universal questions on my shoulder?...LOL A mere commoner among the elite? Good one. Thanx, but I'm not smart or educated. I just have a really bad habit that involves a constant ....and an ilk of overkill which I call Acute Awareness Syndrome . Nothing special, but it's a very strange experience. That's another topic.

To answer your question,

There is a great possibility that anything is possible. That's just the way I think. Just wh... [ More ]

Reply #60

Rip Snorter — Sun, 04 Jun 2006 21:12:11 GMT

Thanks for the reply Pac.

I probably didn't phrase my question well.

Suppose, for the sake of the discussion, the numbers actually don't behave randomly.Suppose there's a connection between some external phenomenon, both with RNG and balls, a connection that is firm enough and repeated enough over time to suggest there's nothing anyone can do to force them to behave otherwise when humans attempt to impose randomness on them, except for a relatively short period of time. Suppose one of thos... [ More ]

Reply #59

psykomo — Sun, 04 Jun 2006 21:03:40 GMT

Winner1313 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

THANK$$$$$$$$ for the..............................Memorie$$$$$$$$$$$$$

"Yes".................Alonzo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.......had a system............

(and it got, complicated & hard 2-explain, as I......................RECALL)

He gave all a good run with Mega-Mill,,,,,,,,but he lived in the state of

Washington, I...........think..................QUESTION to..............anyone??

"Did.............California... [ More ]

Reply #58

pacattack05 — Sun, 04 Jun 2006 20:47:43 GMT

Rip......

I don't have any evidence because I've never been given an opportunity to test It, considering the lotteries rotate their tubes. There was a time, I believe, when New York revealed their rotation schedule, but at that time I was in the beginning stages of studying the numbers, and didn't really make that an objective consideration.

I firmly believe that old saying is true. It's just a matter of time . More often than not, a tube full of balls ranging from 0 to 9 have to abide to... [ More ]

Reply #57

pacattack05 — Sun, 04 Jun 2006 20:18:02 GMT

Sorry, but the Type of PDF file he sent doesen't allow copy and paste. Not to mention that It's illegal to do so.

I'm having a couple of people working on a program that will update the numbers daily. I'll let everyone know the outcome.

Reply #56

pacattack05 — Sun, 04 Jun 2006 20:14:52 GMT

Hey Rip,

I don't think I understand your question.

Reply #55

Rip Snorter — Sun, 04 Jun 2006 19:59:05 GMT

Probably the guy can't think of any numbers, so he needs some help with it.

17, 19, 22, 43, 47 -36

Next Powerball draw.

Remember where you heard it. Tell him I'll give him 10 percent of the winnings..... no, 5 percent.

Glad to be of assistance.

Reply #54

pumpi76 — Sun, 04 Jun 2006 19:47:48 GMT

Right now i am talking to a guy who said he invented a system that doesn't promises to win the jackpot but can come close. I am still having problems understanding him though...He says that all you have to do is to pick your number and he will arrange it for you. The way he arranges the numbers is a secret...

What i am interested in is hot and cold numbers and how the behave in the lottery even if is only in Rng simulations...

If i was millionaire i would try and bribe governments....... [ More ]

Reply #53

Rip Snorter — Sun, 04 Jun 2006 19:41:29 GMT

As long as they pre-test and rotate the tubes, successful forecasting or breaking anything resembling a code will prove futile.

Heck, Pac,

I'm sorry to see you say that. You saying it one more time that way might just be enough to kick it over the edge and make it fact, instead of merely opinion with a heavy vote-count.

However, you're a smart puppy and don't always echo the party line. I hope you'll think about this a moment and give me a straight answer.

What sort of evidence wo... [ More ]

Reply #52

pumpi76 — Sun, 04 Jun 2006 18:36:06 GMT

O.K then.....I guess alonzo was incredible....I wasn't here so i can't say...

Pacathack05 men, you nailed it, you took the words out of my mouth... if they only left those damn machines/pre-tests alone, people would win more often ....Someone ought to sue the state for that..you are going to tell me that they are going to do pre-test for until the numbers fall in the random guidelines...that's cheating..Only because the state collects 50% (or whatever digit) do they have to do that i say...... [ More ]

Reply #51

pacattack05 — Sun, 04 Jun 2006 18:06:09 GMT

As long as they pre-test and rotate the tubes, successful forecasting or breaking anything resembling a code will prove futile.

I've said this over and over here at the LP. I'm nowhere close to being a math wiz, but I can guarantee you that if they left those damn machines alone, I'd win much more often. Period.

The reason that most of the time, an overdue number doesn't come out when it should, is because of the above statements. I could do wonders if the overdue numbers (In the p-3) came... [ More ]

Reply #50

Rip Snorter — Sun, 04 Jun 2006 13:31:04 GMT

The Lunar-phase/numbers history test:

Those Washington Keno predictions yesterday hit 5 out of a pool of 14 number picks on a 20 number draw. Not enough to rattle any belief systems, but enough to re-affirm to me it's worth some more work to get a clearer answer. It's a 20/80 game. You math folks can probably compute some odds on that if you feel moved.

The Quebec Banco picks, compiled by the same method, but with sunrise/sunset/moonrise/moonset times mixed in, got no hits, as a person... [ More ]

Reply #49

Rip Snorter — Sun, 04 Jun 2006 11:16:12 GMT

If you'd like to change that 'you fruitcakes' to 'we fruitcakes' (you are here on Lottery Post) I probably wouldn't take exception to it.

I don't think there are any others on LP, but you and I both qualify.

You're a member. Search the database and get some answers on your own. Nothing to keep you from using your head for something besides a muscle.

I hope you're right about Alonzo being a multi-millionaire. I believe he had a system and that it worked. By demonstrating it to the ex... [ More ]

Reply #48

Rip Snorter — Sun, 04 Jun 2006 10:42:29 GMT

Let me tell you people something.

Alonzo had a winning system, it was not a fluke.

How many Fruit Cakes here have a system, that can be proven the way Alonzo Proved His??????????????????????

Winner 1313:

Alonzo probably did have a system that worked. I don't agree it's certain, but I think the evidence weighs in his favor.

When he began posting about it, my impression was (and continues to be) that he intended to share it. He came onto the systems forum looking for some h... [ More ]

Reply #47

Winner1313 — Sun, 04 Jun 2006 08:07:42 GMT

If I was Around then.

I would have wheeled and played his 17 numbers.

Why did you people Harrassed this Guy

Reply #46

Winner1313 — Sun, 04 Jun 2006 08:03:34 GMT

Let me tell you people something.

Alonzo had a winning system, it was not a fluke.

How many Fruit Cakes here have a system, that can be proven the way Alonzo Proved His??????????????????????

Why he did not share this?? If He Did, He Would Have Made All You Fruit Cakes in to Millionaires, and maybe shut the lottery down.

Who was Alonzo?? What was his profile?? is it still in the data base at lottery post

Reply #45

Winner1313 — Sun, 04 Jun 2006 07:43:18 GMT

Rip Snorter

Says:

"The case of a guy named Alonzo comes to mind. He announced he'd beaten the lottery code, as he dubbed it. He was vilified for days by the users of the systems forum, many of whom are still here.

So he answered their challenge. Several hours before the MM draw he posted 17 numbers which would include all the balls that would hit that night on MM. And a red ball. Four of the whites and the red hit"

Well Alonzo Had A system, And He Proved It. Beyond A shadow... [ More ]

Reply #44

pumpi76 — Sun, 04 Jun 2006 04:38:06 GMT

...I don't know in your area, but here its hungry every 4 minutes.....

....there is nothing funny about losing in any Red Planet....

Reply #43

pumpi76 — Sun, 04 Jun 2006 04:15:33 GMT

.....it changes color, like the chameleon..... you can't see it....plus there is no trap to catch it......

I don't know in your state, but in mines, it plays every 4 minutes....and it skins them...

Reply #42

Rip Snorter — Sat, 03 Jun 2006 23:09:37 GMT

Keno is el diablo cazador de hombres... ............it kills people and you can't see it..... ......from movie Predator ....

Pumpi:

Keno's just for people who are hard to kill, maybe. I'm willing to wait until after the draw tonight to see whether it gets a bit of hair and blood, but I'm confident I'll survive whatever happens.

Wheels:

I've never bought a wheel, but I've had occasion to buy a few used tires when times were hard. There are lots of tires out there... [ More ]

Reply #41

pumpi76 — Sat, 03 Jun 2006 21:56:34 GMT

Just to prove that cracking an encryption is more difficult than the lotto:

http://products.secureserver.net/products/ssl_encryptionstrength_linux.htm

read the last paragraph where it say that a 128 bit encryption has 2^128 power possible combinations. I speculate the following. They got supercomputers that can make a trillion calculations per second, some do quadrillion. Before code breakers had to do it by hand. Imagine with a supercomputer it will take 1 second to go through all possi... [ More ]

Reply #40

Rip Snorter — Sat, 03 Jun 2006 18:22:50 GMT

Anyway, trying to determine a seed for the random number generation would be more possible then looking for hidden messages. Like I said, patterns exist, they aren't messages, but in cracking a code one looks for repeating patterns to test keys against.

I don't just parrot stuff someone told me, I've given it thought or I don't offer an opinion. BobP

Bob:

I think you've read more into some of my posts in the past than I should have put there.

I don't discount the possibility... [ More ]

Reply #39

CASH3FTW — Fri, 02 Jun 2006 17:53:01 GMT

I think it is very possible to crack the lottery.

I saw a tv show about Roulette how 3 men designed a system to where it knew the exact number each time the ball fell into the hole. Now if someone can invent and master that I can think someone can get up a system to pick the numbers 100%.

Reply #38

Thoth — Fri, 02 Jun 2006 16:48:02 GMT

You might be better off breaking 48 of the 49 or so lottery numbers into 16 groups of 3 numbers. You could play those off against each other in 120 combinations. Get any two sets of 3 correct there is a 100% guarantee of a jackpot win. A set of 3 plus 2of3 would guarantee a 5# win, etc

Yea....Ive messed with several strategies and ideas for the bigger lotto games. Unfortunately, they all require spending too much money in order to have a real a chance of winning at least when basing

Reply #37

psykomo — Fri, 02 Jun 2006 05:35:46 GMT

THE Fabric................................

www.fabricelectronica.net ..................................FOR free,,,,,,,,,,,we

spend money on lotto !!!...................................!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LISSEnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn....................................For FREEE???????

or go to e-bay and ...........pay!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! .........%)/*%85$$

for..................................Miranda$$$$$$$$$$

or .........................win the lottery....................

Reply #36

psykomo — Fri, 02 Jun 2006 05:01:08 GMT

(but,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,QUICK-PICS.............TAKE a lot lesssssssssssssssss

TIME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!GOOoooooooFORitttttttttt$$$$

LOL

PSYKOMO

Reply #35

psykomo — Fri, 02 Jun 2006 04:56:24 GMT

CAN TTTTTTTTTTTT BELIEveeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeon !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

4/22,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,hit ($4........outta..............5..................LOL}$$$$$$$$$

PSYKOMO

Reply #34

BobP — Fri, 02 Jun 2006 03:16:43 GMT

You might be better off breaking 48 of the 49 or so lottery numbers into 16 groups of 3 numbers. You could play those off against each other in 120 combinations. Get any two sets of 3 correct there is a 100% guarantee of a jackpot win. A set of 3 plus 2of3 would guarantee a 5# win, etc.

1 2 3 4 5 6

1 2 3 7 8 9

1 2 3 10 11 12

1 2 3 13 14 15

1 2 3 16 17 18

1 2 3 19 20 21

1 2 3 22 23 24

1 2 3 25 26 27

1 2 3 28 29 30

1 2 3 31 32 33

1 2 3 34 35 3... [ More ]

Reply #33

Rip Snorter — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 14:12:00 GMT

Thoth: I admire your approach.

Those pick 3 and pick 4 draws are a piece of the puzzle I haven't studied, but they seem to me to be a lot more complex than the double digit draws. The repetitions and patterns within the overall lottery-pool are more compelling in some ways than they are for the larger draws.

Maybe the million-to-infinite digit sequence to the right of the decimal in Pi is the answer to the puzzle, as you suggest. I certainly believe you're correct in your premise that ex... [ More ]

Reply #32

Thoth — Thu, 01 Jun 2006 07:05:32 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by BobP on May 28, 2006 The problem is lottery numbers don't stand for anything, they are not a measure of anything, so there is no meaning behind their order to be worked out like there is with a code.

They are pictures that happen to look like numbers. Because of this we can use some math to deal with their distribution. It helps to remember a 1 has no more or less value then a 49.

There are patterns and those patterns can be slid up and down the scale. So even... [ More ]

Reply #31

BobP — Tue, 30 May 2006 04:08:31 GMT

A code begins with a message, a formula, something that is converted into the code to be deciphered by someone who holds the key at the other end.

To crack a code, to obtain the key, there has to be an original message or it can't be cracked because there is nothing to be found in the cracking of it.

The lottery is random or semi-random number generation. It isn't like the lottery is sending us hidden messages. Not that they aren't to be found, the million monkeys banging away at typew... [ More ]

Reply #30

bellyache — Mon, 29 May 2006 18:00:36 GMT

I think it is easier said then done. Like Jack said, take a try a predicting in the jackpot forum. A lot of people have been trying to find a method or system to beat the odds for years.

Reply #29

PadawanLotto — Mon, 29 May 2006 15:23:01 GMT

There are 55 single successive pairs possible in the Mega and out of 97 drawings since the last game change, single successive pairs have been drawn 35 times and multiple successive pairs have been drawn twice.

Reply #28

Rip Snorter — Mon, 29 May 2006 11:47:00 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by PadawanLotto on May 29, 2006 Some time ago I read an article about a south American lottery that used animals instead of numbers in their lottery to cater to people that were of lower education. Numbers, symbols, letters, or pictures, are no more than points of reference to something that has no point of reference.

Take time for instance, we know that time exists and passes but as to what reference? Time to us is no more than a point of reference created by man ba... [ More ]

Reply #27

Rip Snorter — Mon, 29 May 2006 11:41:51 GMT

Post a few predictions on the board here.

After demonstrating you've done it you can explain it to all the folks who will suddenly love and admire you.

Jack

Reply #26

PadawanLotto — Mon, 29 May 2006 07:26:33 GMT

Some time ago I read an article about a south American lottery that used animals instead of numbers in their lottery to cater to people that were of lower education. Numbers, symbols, letters, or pictures, are no more than points of reference to something that has no point of reference.

Take time for instance, we know that time exists and passes but as to what reference? Time to us is no more than a point of reference created by man based on the rotation of the earth as to night and day and

Reply #25

pumpi76 — Mon, 29 May 2006 06:07:46 GMT

Somebody mentioned that if you did cracked the lotto you may help your family and not tell nobody else. This is what i believe!

Guys, yes cracking the lotto will make everyone jealous of you, but I believe the following. If i had the strategy to crack the lotto, i don't know if i would be happy, here is why..I might be veering off the subject a bit but i wanted to add.

I believe that pick5, pick6, pick7, and pick10, all have a flaw. YOu may not see it that way, but is just my opinion. I f... [ More ]

Reply #24

bellyache — Mon, 29 May 2006 05:36:10 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Rip Snorter on May 29, 2006Quote: Originally posted by bellyache on May 29, 2006Quote: Originally posted by BobP on May 28, 2006The problem is lottery numbers don't stand for anything, they are not a measure of anything, so there is no meaning behind their order to be worked out like there is with a code.

They are pictures that happen to look like numbers. Because of this we can use some math to deal with their distribution. It helps to remember a 1 has no more o... [ More ]

Reply #23

Rip Snorter — Mon, 29 May 2006 04:34:44 GMT

bellyache:

Bob might be right. You might be right. Clair might be right.

The problem is that Bob's believing it is based upon his own experience, or on something someone else told him. Same as yours, same as Clair's, same as mine.

The we don't know the depth and breadth of Bob's experience.

We don't know the depth and breadth of the experience of whomever told him and he believed it.

All we know is that Bob believes what he believes and that he's willing to pronounce it a... [ More ]

Reply #22

pumpi76 — Mon, 29 May 2006 04:32:35 GMT

when i say you guys i mean all LP members(just a way of talking)

What i was trying to say was that code breaking is a formidable job, more so than cracking the lottery...Maybe not the lotto machine, since they, i believe, they do pre-testing, something, i believe, defeats the purpose of predicting lotto numbers...They might not be able to crack the lotto using let's say 5 combinations, but with a wheel. A extraordinary wheel...YOu will not be able to crack the lottery consistently, let's sa... [ More ]

Reply #21

Tenaj — Mon, 29 May 2006 04:15:12 GMT

Have that been your experience BobP? You speak that like it is fact.

I disagree with this wholeheartedly.

The problem is lottery numbers don't stand for anything, they are not a measure of anything, so there is no meaning behind their order to be worked out like there is with a code.

Everything in this universe have meaning and a code. Ever heard of Fibonacci? It exists in everything - not just nature. I know sometimes we give meaning to things that should not be but everything th... [ More ]

Reply #20

bellyache — Mon, 29 May 2006 04:08:02 GMT

That's what I wanted to say, but you said it much better.

Reply #19

Rip Snorter — Mon, 29 May 2006 04:03:53 GMT

Even so you haven't done too badly at the game.

BobP: Statistics Summary

Summary

Statistic Current Month Last Month Current Year Last Year Lifetime

Picks000247,727525,376

Hits0001,3032,845

Hit Ratio0.00%0.00%0.00%0.53%0.54%

Winnings$0$0$0$119,685$259,505

Prize Ratio0.00%0.00%0.00%48.31%49.39

Reply #18

BobP — Mon, 29 May 2006 03:59:02 GMT

The problem is lottery numbers don't stand for anything, they are not a measure of anything, so there is no meaning behind their order to be worked out like there is with a code.

They are pictures that happen to look like numbers. Because of this we can use some math to deal with their distribution. It helps to remember a 1 has no more or less value then a 49.

There are patterns and those patterns can be slid up and down the scale. So even when you identify a pattern, it can begin and en... [ More ]

Reply #17

Rip Snorter — Mon, 29 May 2006 03:54:44 GMT

Luckily, Clair, you believing as you do has no bearing on whether it's truth or fiction. No more than my believing as I do has any bearing on truth or fiction.

I'll make no claims as to whether I'm good at what I do.

What I do provides testimony enough.

Jack

Reply #16

Clairvoyance — Mon, 29 May 2006 03:44:24 GMT

Well Jack,

I still stand firm on what I have said. I am very, very, very good and what I do, so I have Great Knowledge! If I were SMART, I would be rich by now, there is a difference between smart and Knowledge!

I have great knowledge at what I am gifted to do, I do not have knowledge of cracking number codes! Not to smart is it? LOL

I will say again I do believe it has already been done! We will never know about it though!

Blessings

Reply #15

bellyache — Mon, 29 May 2006 03:13:57 GMT

That's fine, but when you address people as "you guys" in a certain thread it comes off as you are talking to a group of people in this thread. If you had said the board in general maybe I would have come up with the right conclusion. Can't fault me for that.

And thank you Jack of the explaination.

Reply #14

spy153 — Mon, 29 May 2006 03:10:11 GMT

there, see, he did it again. thanks again rip snorter.

Reply #13

Rip Snorter — Mon, 29 May 2006 03:08:38 GMT

bellyache:

I don't believe spy153 was referring to your post. For that matter, I don't believe he was particularly responding to anything on this thread.

More likely he was observing a phenomenon that's pervasive here. It's something I've puzzled over since my earliest days at LP. The rancor and venom LP members reserve for people who believe they've figured out the lotteries, the numbers, and for those who believe they can do so, if they haven't already.

The case of a guy named Alon... [ More ]

Reply #12

spy153 — Mon, 29 May 2006 03:08:35 GMT

go back and read rip snorter's post again, hun.... that is what I was getting at. It is the whole tone of the posts that make me wonder.

Reply #11

bellyache — Mon, 29 May 2006 02:51:06 GMT

I don't believe I or anyone else said it was bad if someone figure out how to beat the lottery. I said I don't think codes and the lotto are the same. How does that make me or anyone else jealous

Reply #10

Rip Snorter — Mon, 29 May 2006 02:42:49 GMT

You and I only differ in this instance, insofar as whether it's limited to RNGs.

I agree there's no reason I can think of for a person who'd gone to all the trouble to puzzle it out to tell anyone else how to do it.

Where we'd disagree is in the assumption the person would have to be particularly smart. Persevering, persistent, confident, strong willed, yes. Smart? No.

Probably the people who built Stonehenge could have figured the lotteries out in about a week. My thought is that... [ More ]

Reply #9

spy153 — Mon, 29 May 2006 02:41:22 GMT

well it sure isn't me. (I wish) But I think you are wrong on that winning thing. In fact, I believe a winner is just around the corner on (yes) both jackpots of mm and pb.

Reply #8

Winner1313 — Mon, 29 May 2006 02:32:34 GMT

I think many people has the code.

When the lotto reaches very high, some one wins.

Reply #7

spy153 — Mon, 29 May 2006 02:24:43 GMT

lol, thanks rip snorter, I think you put it in a much more fashionable manner than I. Been blunt and tactless all my life like that. I try to be careful what I say on my posts, honestly I do.

Reply #6

Clairvoyance — Mon, 29 May 2006 02:22:47 GMT

Personally, I think that the computerized draws have already been cracked by people, very smart people, and guess what they are not going to tell you or me how and that they have done so!

What would you do if you cracked the code? And knew what the computerized draw would be each day? Would you go around telling everyone? NO! You may give family numbers to help them but you would not tell the world of course.

Again computerized drawings I feel can and already have been hacked and cra... [ More ]