Celestial coordinates, moon phases and lottery numbers

Reply #87

Rip Snorter — Fri, 28 Jul 2006 00:47:31 GMT

Hi mysticwomyn:

The space station's not something I've given much thought to.

Thanks for the congrats.

I'm thinking the world will be just as good a place if this thread's allowed to slide off into the abys. I've said about all I plan to concerning the subject matter on this.

Gracias

Jack

Reply #86

mysticwomyn — Thu, 27 Jul 2006 20:09:08 GMT

Rip Snorter

Congrats on your 5 of 6 win ( Multi-States ) yesterday.

Have you considered what the effect the space station has (if any) on ball results when it passes over the USA

Reply #85

pacattack05 — Fri, 21 Jul 2006 04:48:52 GMT

The explanation is that it's working.....

There's definitely something to it.....

Keep the testing going.......

Reply #84

Rip Snorter — Fri, 21 Jul 2006 04:24:13 GMT

Thanks Mike and Pac:

Pac, I said earlier it makes no difference why the numbers behave the way they do, insofar as what influences cause them to do so. What does matter is understanding the way they behave well enough to predict what they're going to do.

A few posts ago I posted a pageful of hits of numbers derived in two different ways. One, the simple method, was from July, 1995, Illinois Lotto draws. The other was from those, plus celestial coordinates of stars, and moon phase data.... [ More ]

Reply #83

LOTTOMIKE — Fri, 21 Jul 2006 04:04:17 GMT

doing a good job jack.really enjoyed reading through the pages.

Reply #82

pacattack05 — Fri, 21 Jul 2006 03:57:04 GMT

My third eye is currently looking through an old set of specs....LOL

Funny thing was....When the prescription ran out, I tripped over some egos and ran into a wall.

The best part was that there was no wall left, considering having run into it so many times...LOL

So......I am in the process of re-polishing my lens.....

Four out of five doctors recommended me to renew my subscription...I mean...... prescription.

Reply #81

Rip Snorter — Fri, 21 Jul 2006 03:45:29 GMT

Try using the third eye

Reply #80

pacattack05 — Fri, 21 Jul 2006 03:40:27 GMT

Nice lunar pic......

I believe it......These days everything is game.....LOL

Reply #79

Rip Snorter — Fri, 21 Jul 2006 03:27:16 GMT

Pac:

I posted this on another thread, but it got buried, so I'll post here, as well:

https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/137907.htm

I can tell you this without fear of being believed.

There's an ancient, pock-marked, automated installation on the trailing side of the visible moon surface near the equator that's responsible. It's solar powered, but the ancient batteries won't hold a charge anymore through the dark moon. So it fades off, dissipates to almost nothing toward the end of... [ More ]

Reply #78

pacattack05 — Fri, 21 Jul 2006 03:17:42 GMT

Thanx for the response Rip.

I in no way considered your method absurd, I was really trying to understand whether the influences from celestial bodies was derived from astronomical traits, or just a belief system. I'm leaning towards the latter only because I know that the astronomical influences, based on what I've learned, are extremely small, and not noticable. Purely on the physics end of it for the most part.

On the other hand, I don't know enough about the source of the influence that... [ More ]

Reply #77

Rip Snorter — Fri, 21 Jul 2006 03:09:51 GMT

As of 8:30 pm MDST the methods used yesterday, strictly the July, 1995, Illinois Lotto numbers, and the methods used today applying moon phase data and celestial coordinates appear to be doing equally well.

I get the sense the numbers are 'rolling through' this moon phase, passing from lottery to lottery. At least that's the best explanation I can think of for what's happening.

So, picking a particular night for a given lottery might be difficult. But I expect they'll all salute before a... [ More ]

Reply #76

Rip Snorter — Fri, 21 Jul 2006 02:40:54 GMT

Hmmm no whatchallit, editor options

Reply #75

Rip Snorter — Thu, 20 Jul 2006 23:31:48 GMT

Also this the draw for today, but posted yesterday using only the Illinois July 1995 numbers

Rip SnorterPennsylvaniaLucky for Life Lotto4 of 604-05-06-15-18-3406-07-08-15-18-34$100

Rip SnorterPennsylvaniaLucky for Life Lotto3 of 604-05-06-15-25-3406-07-08-15-18-34$5

Rip SnorterPennsylvaniaLucky for Life Lotto3 of 601-05-06-18-26-3406-07-08-15-18-34$5

Rip SnorterPennsylvaniaLucky for Life Lotto4 of 604-06-09-15-18-3406-07-08-15-18-34$100

Rip SnorterPennsylvaniaLucky for Life... [ More ]

Reply #74

Rip Snorter — Thu, 20 Jul 2006 23:25:40 GMT

This just in. It was posted using methods expanded from what was implied by the tests yesterday. The prediction numbers were the same fundamental set from July, 1995 Illinois Lotto, but tweaked to include celestial coordinates and moon phase data from surrounding months.

Rip SnorterPennsylvaniaLucky for Life Lotto4 of 604-05-06-15-18-3406-07-08-15-18-34$100

Rip SnorterPennsylvaniaLucky for Life Lotto3 of 604-05-06-15-25-3406-07-08-15-18-34$5

Rip SnorterPennsylvaniaLucky for Lif... [ More ]

Reply #73

Rip Snorter — Thu, 20 Jul 2006 20:00:53 GMT

I'm probably trying to move too fast with things, jumping to conclusions, I suppose.

This is just in from the 'yesterday method'.

Rip SnorterVirginiaMidday Cash 5 3 of 5 05-13-15-20-31 08-13-15-16-31$10

Rip SnorterVirginiaMidday Cash 5 3 of 5 05-13-15-16-20 08-13-15-16-31$10

Rip SnorterVirginiaMidday Cash 5 3 of 5 05-13-15-20-31 08-13-15-16-31$10

Rip SnorterVirginiaMidday Cash 5 3 of 5 05-13-15-16-20 08-13-15-16-31$10

I might have to drop he revised... [ More ]

Reply #72

Rip Snorter — Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:56:41 GMT

When I began this thread I was operating under a single set of basic premises. It's been the undercurrent for most of my thinking about random number behavior for more than a year.

Premise #1:

Every attempt to impose random behavior on numbers, mechanical, or RNG, merely serves to 'free' those numbers to behave in ways that are non-random. Once free they universally respond to an external influence of which we are not yet aware, (or are not yet certain).

Premise #2:

Regardle... [ More ]

Reply #71

Rip Snorter — Thu, 20 Jul 2006 17:22:00 GMT

pacattack05 and others reading this thread.

I'd be interested in seeing any theory put forth to explain the results of the prediction results of yesterday. Any plausible explanation other than moon phases and solar cycles will be most welcome.

If there's nothing you've learned maybe you can think something up yourself. (This applies to anyone. Not just pacattack05.)

If you come up with something good, we'll test it, too.

Jack

Reply #70

Rip Snorter — Thu, 20 Jul 2006 16:54:13 GMT

pacattack05

I've been thinking about your post a bit. After doing so I concluded it needs a hair more answer than I gave it, though I suspect you knew the answer already.

Yes. I have an underlying premise running through the entire celestial coordinates, moon-phase thinking I do. I'm aware you, and probably everyone else who's read it on a Discussion Forum thread a while back probably believe it's absurd.

Eventually it might prove itself false to me and another explanation might emer... [ More ]

Reply #69

Rip Snorter — Thu, 20 Jul 2006 15:29:54 GMT

General update:

I'm still reeling over the prediction results of yesterday.

Today, I'm trying to plug moon phases and celestial coordinates into the equation to narrow the field a bit as a next step.

I'm using those numbers to fill empty slots in the prediction page with wheels generated from the original Illinois Lotto July 1995 numbers, then wheeling the results and posting them where ever I have openings for Thursday draws, be they pick 5, or pick 6.

I'm going to quit posting pr... [ More ]

Reply #68

Rip Snorter — Thu, 20 Jul 2006 15:14:47 GMT

csfb:

Thanks for the post.

It's a shame those solar cycles last so long. It would be interesting to chase them backward in our lives to see if maybe we aren't 'sun children'.

Thinking back, July1995, July 1984, July 1973, July 1962, July 1951, don't all stand out in my memory as momentous times, though some do. If July, 2006, happens to be a time of change thanks to the numbers I'll have to think back more closely on those, I expect.

Gracias,

Jack... [ More ]

Reply #67

csfb — Thu, 20 Jul 2006 14:10:15 GMT

The title intrigued me so I had to browse through the topic, though I don't know much about these games.

Regarding moonphases, I remember growing up, we had a neighbour, about 15/16 years old, beautiful girl with shiny, long tresses. Everytime the moon was up, she would go prancing and singing down the street, totally naked. Her mom and dad, would be running after her to clothe her and take her home. That was always a struggle for them. She was wildest when the full moon was at its sple... [ More ]

Reply #66

Rip Snorter — Thu, 20 Jul 2006 10:12:18 GMT

Hi Pac:

Thanks for the post.

Basically, my question is.....What one thing would you say is the reason why you put so much credence to the system you use, based on the above satatements? In other words, Is it because of continous wins (albeit small wins), or something else.

In answer to your question. For the moment I don't have a system to put credence in. I'm merely testing, doing my best to develop enough knowledge to be able to apply it.

I don't know much about beachball.

Gr... [ More ]

Reply #65

pacattack05 — Thu, 20 Jul 2006 04:51:04 GMT

Hey Rip,

I know very little on this subject, however I do realize that the moon does have an affect on objects on earth. I also have been taught, just recently that the amount of influence is extremely small. As someone put it, the influence of the moon to small objects on earth is equivalent to as much influence as holding a beach ball 10 inches or so away from your body.

I also remember the same person stating that the reason the moon has strong influences on the tides is because of the

Reply #64

Rip Snorter — Thu, 20 Jul 2006 04:01:29 GMT

There are some odds and ends still out that might change things a little. Washington Keno, BC 6/49. Maybe others.

But I don't think more lotteries are going to be needed to give you a feel for how those Illinois Lotto numbers from July, 1995, fared today.

The test is going to have to go on several days longer because I posted some of the predictions for several draws.

But frankly, I think it's a waste. This day has told me what I need to know to go to the next step. The next step is... [ More ]

Reply #63

Rip Snorter — Thu, 20 Jul 2006 02:48:42 GMT

Those hits are still coming in hot and heavy. The list above is becoming more partial by the moment.

I'll put the entire thing up when all the draws are in, or tomorrow morning.

Jack

Reply #62

Rip Snorter — Thu, 20 Jul 2006 02:02:55 GMT

Hi Karnac:

Thanks for the post. Sounds as though you had the moon-phase part of things down, maybe as pat as it can get. I can see how it got your head swimming, though. Does it to me, even using Excel.

On this phase of testing I've had to drop the celestial coordinates portion of things until I see where things are going. The moon phase is running, but only because of the coincidence of 1995 July moon this quarter is only two days off the 2006 phase, which is handy. It allows me to l... [ More ]

Reply #61

Karnac — Thu, 20 Jul 2006 00:24:45 GMT

Jack, I've been following your posts with regards to celestial events and lottery draws with great interest. Now my interest has been rekindled and I've been trying to find my old notes to resurrect this idea which would be much simpler to handle with Excel, and far less time consuming....I put together a system back in 1985 based on numbers drawn within so many days of the full and new moons. I didn't get into the times and degrees and such but the results were outstanding. It got to a point wh... [ More ]

Reply #60

Rip Snorter — Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:25:35 GMT

Maybe you're just the right amount of analytical.

The results yesterday were certainly nothing to write home about, despite all those 3 of 5s and 3 of 6s. The did, at least, get paying hits on a high percentage of lotteries where I tried it.

There are a lot more pick 6 draws today, which will give it a lot better workout. The ones that I've posted today (as opposed to spillovers from posts yesterday) I've customized to the individual lotteries, still using the four basic numbers Illinois... [ More ]

Reply #59

Rick G — Wed, 19 Jul 2006 05:59:50 GMT

Jack,

So there was a method to your madness. 11 year solar cycle...good addition to the theory for testing. Some of you guys have great imaginations for testing different things.

I'm just too damned anal-ytical

Reply #58

Rip Snorter — Wed, 19 Jul 2006 04:50:11 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Rick G on July 19, 2006 Jack,

Another interesting experiment. Good luck with it. It'll be interesting to see the results. Then you have to tell us why you picked IL 1995 ?

Hi Rick:

I needed a high numbers game from 11 years ago to check out that Russian astrophysicists (story earlier in the thread) theories about random number behavior and the 11 year solar cycles. I figured if it showed up on the Russian and French lotteries it might be worth a test or three... [ More ]

Reply #57

Rick G — Wed, 19 Jul 2006 04:41:18 GMT

Jack,

Another interesting experiment. Good luck with it. It'll be interesting to see the results. Then you have to tell us why you picked IL 1995

Reply #56

Rip Snorter — Wed, 19 Jul 2006 02:10:21 GMT

Illinois July, 1995 results

Jul 29, 1995 10 15 20 22 41 46

Jul 26, 1995 16 19 20 21 42 49

Jul 22, 1995 13 23 24 27 49 54

Jul 19, 1995 02 05 23 27 31 39

Jul 15, 1995 03 15 28 33 34 49

Jul 12, 1995 05 15 37 42 45 47

Jul 8, 1995 01 05 11 28 31 44

Jul 5, 1995 02 13 20 32 33 43

Jul 1,

Reply #55

Rip Snorter — Tue, 18 Jul 2006 23:24:00 GMT

Early returns on the July, 1995 Illinois Lotto generic wheel posted across the lottery spectrum:

Rip SnorterPennsylvaniaCash 53 of 5 03-05-15-20-23 01-03-05-23-39$10

Rip SnorterPennsylvaniaMatch 63 of 6 05-13-15-20-45-49 05-08-13-15-19-28$5

Rip SnorterPennsylvaniaMatch 63 of 6 05-15-20-28-43-49 05-08-13-15-19-28$5

Rip SnorterPennsylvaniaMatch 63 of 6 15-19-20-28-43-49 05-08-13-15-19-28$5

Rip SnorterPennsylvaniaMatch 63 of 6 03-05-13-15-24-45 05-08-13-15-19-28

Reply #54

Rip Snorter — Tue, 18 Jul 2006 19:03:20 GMT

Hokay.

Anyone who's watching this stuff and is interested in the thoughts of the Russian astrophysicist about 11 year solar cycles.

As all of you probably know about me by now, I believe the numbers behave in a more-or-less generic pattern. One possibility is that a person can use the results of a single lottery to guestimate what will occur on other, similarly matrixed draws.

I've used the compiled, most frequently hit numbers from Illinois Lottery, July, 1995, created a rough wheel o... [ More ]

Reply #53

Rip Snorter — Tue, 18 Jul 2006 17:29:17 GMT

Just for grins I compiled a wheel of most frequently occuring numbers for WV Cash 25, July 1995, and posted it for Thursday (I'd already filled Tuesday for WV testing something I can't remember what).

Posted it for 7 consecutive draws beginning Thursday. $350 US Imaginary in wagers betting 1995 was a good year, what with being pre-Y2K and all.

Here's the 1995 numbers wheel trying to rear their heads in WV in hot, dry, brave new world:

12

15

16

19

20

21

4

15... [ More ]

Reply #52

Rip Snorter — Tue, 18 Jul 2006 16:12:55 GMT

Roughly half of the MM prediction for tonight (July 18) is a rudimentary test of the 11 year solar cycle piece of the Zilberman theory. All the red ball predictions are derived from that.

Jack

Reply #51

Rip Snorter — Tue, 18 Jul 2006 15:12:56 GMT

I originally posted this on the Mystical Forum. Howsomeever, the solar cycles portion seems to fit this thread well enough to justify posting it here, as well:

ESP and the Lottery

AlternativeScience.com

Most developed countries have had public lotteries for many years -- in the case of nations like France and Spain, for centuries. It was not, however, until 1989 that anyone realised that public numerical lotteries provide an unparalleled opportunity to test for the existence of p... [ More ]

Reply #50

Rip Snorter — Tue, 18 Jul 2006 03:18:32 GMT

Zip.

Kentucky Cashball:

Rip Snorter Kentucky Cashball 0 + 1 15-19-21-25, Cash Ball: 01 02-17-30-33, Cash Ball: 01 $2

Rip Snorter Kentucky Cashball 2 + 0 02-17-21-25, Cash Ball: 15 02-17-30-33, Cash Ball: 01 $1

Rip Snorter Kentucky Cashball 2 + 0 02-15-17-19, Cash Ball: 19 02-17-30-33, Cash Ball: 01 $1

15-19-21-25 +1 ** 15-19-21-25 +2 ** 15-19-21-25 +3 ** 15-19-21-25 +4 ** 15-19-21-25 +5 ** 15-19-21-25 +6 ** 15-19-21-25 +7 ** 15-19-21-25 +8 ** 15-19-21-25 +9 ** 15-19-21-25 +10... [ More ]

Reply #49

Rip Snorter — Tue, 18 Jul 2006 03:02:09 GMT

Semi-interesting on the red-ball prediction pursuit.

Kentucky isn't in yet, but here's what happened on Kansas:

Super Kansas Cash 14-17-19-24-27, Cash Ball: 02 Mon, Jul 17, 2006

The three contenders (I thought) the method should reveal for red balls were 14, 17 and 19.

2-6-12-14-16 +14 ** 2-6-12-14-18 +17 ** 2-6-12-14-19 +19 ** 2-6-12-16-18 +17 ** 2-6-12-16-19 +19 ** 2-6-12-18-19 +14 ** 2-6-14-16-18 +19 ** 2-6-14-16-19 +14 ** 2-6-14-18-19 +17 ** 2-6-16-18-19 +14... [ More ]

Reply #48

Rip Snorter — Mon, 17 Jul 2006 22:34:07 GMT

Kola and gasmeterguy:

Thanks for the posts and the visits.

I sometimes allow myself to believe the only reason the Universe, or the coincidence coordinators gave us lotteries was to provide an incentive for figuring out how the numbers work.

Gasmeterguy, I agree with you. Someone's going to figure it out. Heck, someone (multiples of someone) probably already have.

Kola, thanks for the kind remarks. Come back when you can stay longer.

I'm hoping I'll have something innerstin' to... [ More ]

Reply #47

GASMETERGUY — Mon, 17 Jul 2006 17:52:30 GMT

Koala

I could not agree more. I wish I could but just can't. Your point was well made.

Jack, keep on trucking. While you might feel all alone in this thread, rest assured that you are not. I, too, am keeping an eye on this. I wish you well. I hope you succeed.

One of these days someone somewhere will say What if it try...... and he/she will be the first amateur Noble Prize winner in Mathematics.

Reply #46

Kola — Mon, 17 Jul 2006 17:12:34 GMT

Hi Rip Snorter. I love this thread, and check-in always. The path your marching down is challenging indeed, but doable. Like you said, it really is all in the nuances. If you've peridocally gotten synchronicities between Lotto results, and your picks, then in my book you are on a winning path. .

Your own wonderful creative imagination, like everyone else's is, is the key in progressive movement toward a winning way. Nature or Consciousness, is infinitely more Creative than we allow ourselve... [ More ]

Reply #45

Rip Snorter — Mon, 17 Jul 2006 04:35:19 GMT

Rick:

It's looking less daunting, depending on how things go with KS and Kentucky tomorrow. Meanwhile I've come across a couple of shortcuts on the non-bonus ball games that might help some.

Imaginary wagers today, 9 lotteries, $440 Imaginary US. Wins, with NMRR and one other ( I think) still out: $400 Imaginary US. Two 4 of 5s for Indiana.

I'll try running up some more using that shortcut tomorrow and see how they play.

Jack

Reply #44

Rip Snorter — Sun, 16 Jul 2006 18:48:12 GMT

Thanks Rick. And CARBOB, thanks again.

There's always a chance an old English Lit major will read underlying meaning and stuff crammed in between the lines of something written, but I think I'm catching the right nuances to what you are both saying. Stuff the writer never intended to be there. The Finnegan's Wake of the lottery discussion forums.

It's a tough call in a lot of ways.

On the one hand, I absolutely don't wish to make life easier for any folks living off the wages of sin... [ More ]

Reply #43

Rick G — Sun, 16 Jul 2006 16:01:05 GMT

Good post by CARBOB.

Jack, keep in mind that your new angle of tackling the bogus ball games is a very daunting task. These games are designed for the player to lose. It doesn't take anything away from the concept. You've already demonstrated that it does work.

So keep on truckin

Reply #42

Rip Snorter — Sun, 16 Jul 2006 15:33:40 GMT

Thanks Carbob:

I'm obliged to you for the post.

Hope isn't one of the things I'm light on, mostly.

But I do try to recognize things that aren't working as early as I can. What I tried with those bonus ball games Thursday/Friday/(and spillover to Saturday) was one of those a person can't get rid of quickly enough.

This morning I'm trying to hone down whatever it was might have partly worked on KS.

I'm grateful for your remarks. Sometimes I feel middling private here on this thr... [ More ]

Reply #41

CARBOB — Sun, 16 Jul 2006 15:25:48 GMT

Jack,

You should never give up hope. Sometimes, that's all we have. Even complete failure can be seen as productive, when all is said and done. Keep experimenting, a lot of eyes are watching.

Bob

Reply #40

Rip Snorter — Sun, 16 Jul 2006 12:05:40 GMT

Every test I ran yesterday (the bulk of which were bonus ball method tests from the previous day) can be counted as negative learning experience. Those Thursday/Friday methods ain't worth talking about.

I don't even remember what I was trying to test on the Illinois and Texas games.

The sniff of hope left in bonus ball methodology came with Kentucky and Kansas. Those were two of the relatively few bonus ball games I had room to try anything with because I'd filled up all the prediction s... [ More ]

Reply #39

Rip Snorter — Sun, 16 Jul 2006 04:16:09 GMT

There's one chunk of testing lost radar contact and vanished off the screens. No point in dredging the lakes and sending divers to try to find the in-flight recorders on that one.

Powerball 20-35-36-47-50, Powerball: 05, Power Play: 4Sat, Jul 15, 2006Wed, Sat

Reply #38

Rip Snorter — Sun, 16 Jul 2006 00:21:49 GMT

I've been pondering that Georgia Fantasy 5 hit series yesterday and it finally dawned on me. Its not about Celestial Coordinates and Moon Phases, but it might eventually lead to that, or make it easier.

This might work for any Premium LP Member in finding lotteries in sinc with your own, then even discovering some running a day ahead of yours:

Take the last two draws from your lottery and wheel the numbers.Run the wheel up across the board, every pick 5 or pick 6 lottery on the day follow... [ More ]

Reply #37

Rip Snorter — Sat, 15 Jul 2006 20:53:31 GMT

If anyone else is reading this, ignore it if it bothers you. I'm just trying to keep my head on straight here

So I can remember this

Method C and C1

Give me these numbers for WB

1 2 5 6 17 36 41

1 2 5 6 17 20 29 32 34 36 40 41 48

34, 40, 41 most likely as red balls.

Reply #36

Rip Snorter — Sat, 15 Jul 2006 16:33:43 GMT

In trying to understand what can be learned from the bonus ball behavior tries yesterday, and if I hadn't already filled my prediction quota for PB, I'd be wheeling the following whites based on moon phase data, no stellar coordinates nor azimuths in the mix:

White balls: 1

2

10

14

20

29

32

34

40

48

Here are the red balls I'd give the best shot at by the same methods:

Red ball

1

10

14

20

40

The 1 looks best from one pers... [ More ]

Reply #35

lucky146 — Sat, 15 Jul 2006 15:12:00 GMT

Thanks for that update Jack.

Using this technique I played $5 on Ny take five but only won a free game. Still not great but I am seeing a slightly higher than usual win rate than before. (3 days of play 2/5 numbers on two days). Also I would have gotten 3/5 yesterday if I had wheeled in that number from my pool of numbers taken from the star coordinates.

Also bizzarely, the same few states seem to come up as my sync lotteries. I think you may be right though, this technique requires a lot

Reply #34

Rip Snorter — Sat, 15 Jul 2006 12:42:41 GMT

One thing's completely certain now. I knew it before, but it was reinforced yesterday.

Anytime you're using mixed game history to attempt to locate synchronizations between games, you have to pull out the bonus ball games. Those operate on an entirely different schedule I'm (as demonstrated by the yesterday results) still trying to work out.

Synchronizations frequently happen and last over several moon-phases, but they won't happen between a game with a bonus-ball and one that doesn't ha... [ More ]

Reply #33

Rip Snorter — Sat, 15 Jul 2006 12:25:34 GMT

Correction.

I had 1697 bucks Imaginary US wagered yesterday and the wins were 620. So the entire episode counts as a serious blow to the imaginary pocketbook and an indictment of both methods used yesterday.

I'd already posted another $800 in wagers for today on the bonus ball games, so I'm stuck with seeing another day of that method tested. Maybe a two-day lag time will show something about the way the draws synchronize with bonus balls. Hopefully something can be learned from what... [ More ]

Reply #32

Rip Snorter — Sat, 15 Jul 2006 11:43:45 GMT

Mixed bag yesterday.

800 dollars Imaginary US wagered

620 dollars Imaginary US won

The bonus ball test was a complete bust, but a learning experience. I haven't had time to digest it all, but I think I understand what happened and how to change it.

I said earlier the bonus balls were sneaky, the coyotes of the numbers games. Yesterday I discovered that, like coyotes in my experience sometimes prove to be, they're sneakier than I thought. They had a trick up their sleeves yester... [ More ]

Reply #31

Rip Snorter — Fri, 14 Jul 2006 16:02:41 GMT

It takes some fine tuning and tweaking, that's for sure. Sorry you didn't do well on NY take 5. Maybe you'll do better on NY lotto tonight.

Best to you,

Jack

Reply #30

lucky146 — Fri, 14 Jul 2006 14:57:12 GMT

Hi Jack

Yes - I am going to continue to play around with this technique for a while - perhaps in conjunction with other methods/games.

BTW using this technique, I played $3 in NY take five yesterday but only got one number, so I guess it was a bust for me. Im not terribly crazy about this game, but it is a convenient game to play around in and test different theories.

Oddly, yesterdays numbers were 23, 24, 25, 26, 29 - almost a straight LOL - and there were like six first place winner... [ More ]

Reply #29

Rip Snorter — Fri, 14 Jul 2006 12:03:50 GMT

Back to the drawing board.

Possumly that NY prediction yesterday might come in, but I did right going to bed when I did.

New Mexico and Maryland were a bust, which pretty well takes the steam out of that piece of the theory.

I'm gonna have to go out onto the front porch and look at the new day, sip a cup of coffee a while. Maybe something will come to me what I ought to be working on today.

For a while there I was thinking maybe I finally had those bonus ball games nailed.

J... [ More ]

Reply #28

Rip Snorter — Fri, 14 Jul 2006 04:52:43 GMT

I haven't looked at the Results page, but it's getting close to time for me to take it to the wagon yard .... almost 11 pm here, and I'm not seeing NM or Maryland on the Thursday YESTERDAY WINNER list.

Leads me to think I'm still probably 'way off on getting anywhere with Pick 5 bonus ball behavior, but maybe (WADC) I'm getting closer with Pick 6s, or the coincidence coordinators are playing a trick worthy of their reputation.

I've just re-posted the WADC numbers I used today so's to see... [ More ]

Reply #27

lucky146 — Fri, 14 Jul 2006 02:40:26 GMT

Wow...nice work - definitely not to shabby at all for a first go round -

I'm very interested to see how the others pan out as well.

Reply #26

Rip Snorter — Fri, 14 Jul 2006 02:22:33 GMT

I just posted wheels with numbers derived from trying to find something Maryland, New Mexico Roadrunner, and Washington DC had in common on azimuths, moon phases, anything. Those are the only bonus ball games I'm aware of (without checking more) with draws today.

For a first try, Washington DC Pick 6 didn't doooooooo too badly. NMRR and Maryland aren't going to be in for a while, I reckons, but I'm middling curious to see how they do.

Rip SnorterWashington, D.C.DC Daily 63 of... [ More ]

Reply #25

Rip Snorter — Thu, 13 Jul 2006 23:41:37 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by lucky146 on July 13, 2006 Thanks for the reply -

smoking some cells over here as well -

I hear you.

I finally got tired of thinking about it and decided to throw up an entire smoke-screen using those number and wheels I made from the bonsu (Heehee) ball games all over the prediction page.

Any time I get an excuse to test a wild hare I know's been chewing the lettuce in my garden but I never got around to having for supper, I try to do it. What I did... [ More ]

Reply #24

lucky146 — Thu, 13 Jul 2006 23:11:13 GMT

Thanks for the reply -

smoking some cells over here as well

Reply #23

Rip Snorter — Thu, 13 Jul 2006 17:00:35 GMT

Lucky 146:

You got me thinking more about those bonus ball games, so I decided to stop what I was doing and try out a couple of things with them.

I just posted wheels with numbers derived from trying to find something Maryland, New Mexico Roadrunner, and Washington DC had in common on azimuths, moon phases, anything. Those are the only bonus ball games I'm aware of (without checking more) with draws today.

I used the same base set of numbers for all of them and put together some headac... [ More ]

Reply #22

Rip Snorter — Thu, 13 Jul 2006 15:52:47 GMT

Hi lucky146:

Still working things out here, so you have a wide open field. Yesterdays method I was trying only gave back about $90 imaginary US, to around $1500 imaginary US in wagers.

The games with bonus balls, which include the big jackpot games, mostly, behave entirely differently than the others. In the end I think they'll actually be easier to predict by this method than the non-bonus ball games because of something wierd that happens in the number-behavior realm when you throw in... [ More ]

Reply #21

lucky146 — Thu, 13 Jul 2006 14:15:00 GMT

thanks for posting this Jack.

Seems really interesting. I am going to play around with this for a while - tried it last night and got 2/5 numbers in NY take 5- might have been just luck because I'm not really sure I'm doing it correctly yet. For one thing I could only find one other lottery that seemed to be "in sync" with mine.

Also, do you use this system for lotto/big jackpot games

Reply #20

Rip Snorter — Wed, 12 Jul 2006 23:40:30 GMT

4mybrds:

I'm sorry.... when I was replying to your post earlier I neglected the (important) time issue.

UT is the industry standard on the NO site. So you'll need to convert the time of the draws at the locations of the draws to UT.

direct conversion from UTC to U.S.A. timezones.

Local Time Subtract from UTC:

Atlantic Standard Four hours

Atlantic Daylight Three hours

Eastern Standard Five hours

Eastern Daylight Four hours

Central Standard Six hours

Central Daylight F... [ More ]

Reply #19

Rip Snorter — Wed, 12 Jul 2006 23:23:17 GMT

Something that might help anyone who's attempting to use this, but doesn't know anything about astronomy:

Each of those stars as they make their track across the sky will share the same latitude east to west, mostly. Which is to say, lottery draws happening in locations sharing a latitude will also share a middling piece of the coordinates by virtue of the path across the sky appearing to the beholder being roughly the same, if he's standing at the same latitude as anyone else on the planet.... [ More ]

Reply #18

Rip Snorter — Wed, 12 Jul 2006 23:02:57 GMT

Thanks Dave.

Fact is I have you to thank for getting me started on it originally. That chart you sent me a year or two ago opened all kinds of doors and eyes for me.

I can't thank you enough.

Gracias

Jack

Reply #17

libra — Wed, 12 Jul 2006 22:45:34 GMT

W.T.G. Rip Snorter

Glad to see your getting somewhere with the Astrology and the numbers.

Libra Dave

Reply #16

Rip Snorter — Wed, 12 Jul 2006 20:02:34 GMT

Thanks for the comment, Rick.

For me, making sense is one of the things it doesn't do, but it's moving in the direction of holding together by some oblique-upside-down logic.

It was a long time getting this far

J

Reply #15

Rick G — Wed, 12 Jul 2006 17:17:49 GMT

Very interesting. It makes sense too. Thanks, Jack

Reply #14

Rip Snorter — Wed, 12 Jul 2006 16:16:09 GMT

I neglected to mention the importance of moon-transit times.

This only works when the moon is overhead at the times of all draws used. If the moonrise/moonset causes the moon to be overhead daytime and down for the night draws, you can only use it for daytime draws and the numbers you use have to be from daytime draws.

Also if there's a physical barrier between the place of the draw, such as the Sandia Mountains in Albuquerque, you can only use draws that occured after the moon was actual... [ More ]

Reply #13

Rip Snorter — Wed, 12 Jul 2006 15:30:18 GMT

This day of this moon phase during the two previous months, I should have said.

I haven't figured out why yet, but the same day of the moon phase of the previous month of the previous year same moon phase seems to work, also.

That can be helpful with lotteries that don't have Sunday draws

Reply #12

Rip Snorter — Wed, 12 Jul 2006 15:23:15 GMT

Morning tntea:

Evidently you thought there might be some merit to be found in this.

Here's the process I'm trying out at the moment:

Step 1:

Find at least two lotteries that were 'in sinc' with your own during the last two previous moon phases on this day of the phase.

2006 Phases of the Moon

Universal Time

NEW MOON FIRST QUARTER FULL MOON LAST QUARTER

d h m d h m d h m d h m

Reply #11

4mybrdz — Wed, 12 Jul 2006 15:18:35 GMT

Rip Snorter

Would you use the information based on the location where the lottery numbers are drawn? Example Florida numbers are drawn in Tallahassee. Also, would time be based on where the numbers are drawn?

Thank you

Reply #10

tntea — Wed, 12 Jul 2006 14:45:01 GMT

The following information is provided for Ardmore, Giles County, Tennessee (longitude W86.8, latitude N35.0):

Wednesday 12 July 2006 Central Daylight Time SUN Begin civil twilight 5:14 a.m. Sunrise 5:43 a.m. Sun transit 12:53 p.m. Sunset 8:03 p.m. End civil twilight

Reply #9

Rip Snorter — Wed, 12 Jul 2006 14:16:55 GMT

Morning all:

RickG: Thanks.

MillionsWanted: Thanks. No. I wasn't aware there is one.

Bellyache: Thanks

Dynodyno: No

We'allwinners: Thanks

Best to all of you

J

Reply #8

Rick G — Wed, 12 Jul 2006 12:13:54 GMT

Jack,

Congrats on your hits, especially those two 5 of 6's in WV.

WTG

Reply #7

MillionsWanted — Wed, 12 Jul 2006 10:08:24 GMT

Congratulations are in order.

Do you use the Celestial lotto system which is sold on ebay

Reply #6

bellyache — Wed, 12 Jul 2006 05:17:50 GMT

Nice going Jack! You seem to have found something that gives you good results. I don't think any method is perfect, but I think there are ones out there that sure can help. Again good job.

Reply #5

dynodyno — Wed, 12 Jul 2006 05:13:01 GMT

Hi Ripsnorter, can you give us an example of your workouts

Reply #4

we;reallwinners — Wed, 12 Jul 2006 05:03:46 GMT

Correction.......your hard work is already paying off

Reply #3

we;reallwinners — Wed, 12 Jul 2006 04:35:53 GMT

WOW!

CONGRATULATIONS JACK........you're hard work will pay off soon!

Thanx for sharing...

Reply #2

Rip Snorter — Wed, 12 Jul 2006 04:30:04 GMT

Thanks Litebets:

I haven't got it worked out so's it's infallible, as you can see.

But it seems to be getting there.

When it's done you'll be able to recognize the event by the fact there are no Rip Snorter predictions showing up every day.

Best to you,

Jack

Reply #1

Litebets27 — Wed, 12 Jul 2006 04:10:15 GMT

Congratulations. I was just reviewing the prediction result page and noticed how well your pick5/6 were doing. I hope you have finally found that that winning formula that we all have been seeking.

litebets

Celestial coordinates, moon phases and lottery numbers

Rip Snorter — Wed, 12 Jul 2006 03:53:24 GMT

The prediction results at the bottom of this post are for today, Tuesday, July 11, 2006.

The numbers used in the wheels were all derived from draw histories correlated to moon phase occurances, and from triangulations on specific heavenly bodies by azimuths from the surface of the earth.

All the celestial data came from one site:

US Naval Observatory site:

http://aa.usno.navy.mil/AAmap.html

I don't have all the techniques work out as yet for the methods. That's the reason MI... [ More ]