<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Ohio LOP-how much longer?</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/138206</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/138206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Ohio LOP-how much longer?</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #10</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/138206/668870</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/138206/668870</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>CASH Only</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Wednesday 8/23 had a payout of under 85k, by far the lowest payout yet for a LOP drawing. Will LOP be gone before PA Unlucky for Life</p>]]></description>
			<category>CASH Only</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #9</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/138206/653785</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/138206/653785</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 00:04:03 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>CASH Only</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The Wednesday 7/26 drawing paid out just over 95k, once again setting an all-time low for the game. No doubt one of Ohio&#x27;s proposals will replace LOP.</p>]]></description>
			<category>CASH Only</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #8</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/138206/648802</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/138206/648802</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 15:59:45 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Just6ntlc</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Cash Only, so 99K is the lowest LOP winnings so far? I hope Ohio doesn&#x27;t go for Win for Life game [no cash option] if they retire LOP. I think Ohio should go back to classic SLP game if LOP retires with cash option jackpot starting at $1 million.</p>]]></description>
			<category>Just6ntlc</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #7</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/138206/648616</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/138206/648616</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 10:37:25 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>RJOh</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I think Rolling Cash5 will probably survive as long as Buckeye5, the game it replaced.</p>]]></description>
			<category>RJOh</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #6</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/138206/648088</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/138206/648088</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 15:42:24 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>CASH Only</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I don&#x27;t have a problem with how LOP works; what I don&#x27;t like is that Ohio does not use a floating percentage for the cash-to-annuity ratio. Lump-sum winners get stiffed.<br /><br />Ohio was considering a lifetime prize game. Ohio gives scratch winners a choice of cash or annuity, so I can see Ohio offering a cash option in a lifetime game. Regardless, I don&#x27;t see LOP lasting much longer, as the jackpot was hit in a drawing that would otherwise have paid out the lowest for a Saturday drawing.... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/138206/648088">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>CASH Only</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #5</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/138206/646751</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/138206/646751</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2006 01:31:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JimmySand9</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Nebraska has 38 numbers, not 49.</p>]]></description>
			<category>JimmySand9</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/138206/646643</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/138206/646643</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 22:51:07 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>guesser</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Nebraska pick 5 (out of 49) is routinely 75K, so I take my chances and aim for a PB pick 5 (200K), I don&#x27;t think the odds are THAT MUCH different - when you get right down to it.  Just forget 50-55 and play 1-49.   And the way PB has been hitting lately, just forget about playing 1-9, and 50-55, and just play numbers between 10 and 49.  (and as soon as I say that.........</p>]]></description>
			<category>guesser</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/138206/646591</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/138206/646591</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 21:25:53 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JimmySand9</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Let&#x27;s not go rooting for Lot &#x27;O Play&#x27;s demise. If they get rid of it, they will probably replace it with a win-for-life type game, which will most likely be devoid of a cash option. That&#x27;s the trend right now.</p>]]></description>
			<category>JimmySand9</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/138206/645816</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/138206/645816</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:03:32 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Just6ntlc</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>RJOh, I think Rolling Cash5 will survive in 2006, but not Ohio LOP.</p>]]></description>
			<category>Just6ntlc</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/138206/645616</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/138206/645616</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>RJOh</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>You&#x27;re playing the wrong game, the Rolling Cash5 will payout a jackpot of $300K+ tonight if there&#x27;s a winner and the odds of winning it is 1:500K.  If there isn&#x27;t a winner tonight then the jackpot will roll to an even larger amount with the same odds of winning.   You&#x27;ve just got to play smarter and pick your games at the right time.  Good luck.<br /><br />RJOh</p>]]></description>
			<category>RJOh</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ohio LOP-how much longer?</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/138206</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/138206</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 14:19:33 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>CASH Only</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Another record low payout. 99k for Wednesday, July 12.</p>]]></description>
			<category>CASH Only</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

