Viable, or not?

Reply #21

GASMETERGUY — Tue, 25 Jul 2006 01:32:07 GMT

LP has over 43,000 members. That means we have over 43,000 computers ready to roll. Talk about having a super, super computer! What we need now is a coordinator and a computer program.

Any volunteers for the job of Co-ordinator ? Any volunteers for the job of Computer Programmer

Reply #20

Rip Snorter — Fri, 21 Jul 2006 19:27:10 GMT

Great thread. Thanks

Reply #19

calabs — Mon, 17 Jul 2006 22:01:18 GMT

Thanks Rick! Based on the numbers provided by Coin Toss, it looks like you go eve/eve or mid/mid. IN this system, is it best to change the number every day (delete the 12th draw and include most recent), or wait until the number hits

Reply #18

Rick G — Mon, 17 Jul 2006 21:28:34 GMT

Calabs...others and I have noticed a strong correllation beteen GA and IL numbers drawn. Don't ask me why. But if you pick one of the two states drawings, do the above workout and play the first 4 numbers in the other states drawing for a couple days and vice verse you will see what I mean.

Reply #17

calabs — Mon, 17 Jul 2006 21:19:16 GMT

Hey Rick - Have you even done any testing where you chose a state for your workout, then see if the number has a tendency to travel? Since it is only one number, it would be interesting to see if this happens.....just curious! thanks

Reply #16

cps10 — Mon, 17 Jul 2006 20:39:38 GMT

Thank you Rick

Reply #15

Rick G — Mon, 17 Jul 2006 20:34:29 GMT

LOL guys!

PS...This approach is an adaptation of Bob P.'s Power Trails as found on lotto-logix.com. Very good site for newbies just getting into the game and I wanted to make sure Bob gets his due.

Thanks, Bob!

Also Happy Birthday Cps

Reply #14

cps10 — Mon, 17 Jul 2006 20:14:15 GMT

Or Leave It To Beaver or some comedy from that era :) My Three Sons...

Reply #13

pacattack05 — Mon, 17 Jul 2006 20:08:20 GMT

Rick, your avatar always reminds me of the Dick Van Dyke show...LOL

Reply #12

pacattack05 — Mon, 17 Jul 2006 20:06:20 GMT

Thanx for the heads up Rick. I see my mistake, I was looking at this column below, not the one above, which is the actual drawings.

Hit frequency:

0 - 2

1 - 8

2 - 3

3 - 4

4 - 3

5 - 2

6 - 4

7 - 2

8 - 3

9 - 5

Reply #11

Rick G — Mon, 17 Jul 2006 20:04:16 GMT

Also to Coin Toss, thanks for resurrecting this post. I played around with this a lot to study where in the sequence the winning numbers were coming from. Time well spent.

Pick 4 is a different animal. When you do the sequence the same way for the last pick 4 draws, you see the winning numbers coming from different areas of the sequence. 2 hottest 2 coldest did pretty well.

Reply #10

Rick G — Mon, 17 Jul 2006 19:57:39 GMT

Pac,

Just saw this thread. No the sequence is correct. The 8 is least recent the 2 is second least recent and the 4 is most recent.

Reply #9

pacattack05 — Mon, 17 Jul 2006 19:46:45 GMT

Cool......

Reply #8

cps10 — Mon, 17 Jul 2006 19:43:22 GMT

Well, there is some software that could help, but I think we would need a super super computer. but in the meantime, I could test a few states and see what happens.

Reply #7

pacattack05 — Mon, 17 Jul 2006 19:38:02 GMT

It was all positions then, boy, too many systems to remember...LOL

It would be interesting, I agree.

Just think....All we need is a super computer to look at individual state's history and see what permutations have the most profitable line-up, and use it to make moola....

If we only knew what numbers to put in there.....There has to be a way of finding that, but then again, that goes back to cracking the code of chaos, and if we could do that, we wouldn't be playing the lottery. We wou... [ More ]

Reply #6

cps10 — Mon, 17 Jul 2006 19:31:32 GMT

I was doing it with all positions highest frequency and then wheeling those numbers in straight form. Although it would be interesting to see if that 3rd-4th-and-5th position hits a lot.

Reply #5

pacattack05 — Mon, 17 Jul 2006 19:27:48 GMT

I think we did this with positions, instead of all position's highest frequency. I'm not sure. But pretty sure.....

Reply #4

pacattack05 — Mon, 17 Jul 2006 19:25:46 GMT

You know.....I think you're right....LOL

Talk about going full circle.....

Reply #3

cps10 — Mon, 17 Jul 2006 19:11:10 GMT

Pac

Didn't we do this with your Vertical String System? I can't remember.

Reply #2

pacattack05 — Mon, 17 Jul 2006 18:58:45 GMT

I wonder if anyone can do a back test using all ten numbers straight.

1-9-6-3-8-4-2-7-5-0

How much would it cost to wheel all ten straight from left to right?

I know wheeling 7 numbers from left to right would cost $35.00, what would another 3 numbers cost?

And I would then like to back test to see whether there's any profit. HMMMMM

Reply #1

pacattack05 — Mon, 17 Jul 2006 18:54:09 GMT

According to the tie breaker rule, shoudn't it be: 1-9-6-3-8-4-2-7-5-0?

The 8 being the oldest, followed by the 4 which the second oldest, and the 2 being the third oldest for the frquency number of 3.

It doesen't change the prediction of 638, but I just thought I'd mention it.

Viable, or not?

Coin Toss — Mon, 17 Jul 2006 17:06:54 GMT

(Putting this in Lottery Discussions for more exposure)

In this thread:

https://www.lotterypost.com/threads.asp?tp=136306 sq=Coin+Toss tab=us rp=Search#i626497

Rick G from Chicago taught a way of picking Pick 3's:

Coin Toss,

Here's one that gets some straight/box hits with one pick.

Use the last 12 draws and note the amt. of times a digit has appeared. You are interested in the top five digits. When you have a tie, put the digit that has come in LEAST recently first.

Exampl... [ More ]