The Perfect Pick 3 Wrapdown and the Phase Method for Hits

Reply #36

Kola — Mon, 31 Jul 2006 16:52:41 GMT

214? Maybe. Who knows

Reply #35

geminii — Mon, 31 Jul 2006 16:32:42 GMT

So *KOLA what wil be the winning number for NY's eve draw ? 214

Reply #34

Kola — Mon, 31 Jul 2006 16:24:10 GMT

Hi retxx.

What I mean is that I cannot use 3 numbers from a Pick 4 game. It has to come from a real pick 3 game. Again, if I were to use 3 numbers from a Pick 4, instead of from an exclusively Pick 3 game, the results would be inconsistent. Fundamentally, the games are the same, but the application of the methods will be a little different. I would not want to mix the two.

Sorry to get a little esoteric on you, but what I understand is that an extra number performs a different kind of

Reply #33

retxx — Mon, 31 Jul 2006 15:06:28 GMT

kola those are the authentic first 3 numbers unless you want the entire pick 4 they came from. If so here it is.

1646 last

6768 next last

0341 winning #

Hope this is what you mean.

Reply #32

retxx — Mon, 31 Jul 2006 15:06:24 GMT

kola those are the authentic first 3 numbers unless you want the entire pick 4 they came from. If so here it is.

1646 last

6768 next last

0341 winning #

Hope this is what you mean.

Reply #31

Kola — Mon, 31 Jul 2006 07:22:03 GMT

Hi retxx.

Give me authentic Pick 3 numbers. Believe me, from my research of this method, the results will be too inconsistent if we use Pick 4 numbers. The mechanics of the Pick 3 and Pick 4 are the same in principle, but the application is different.

Reply #30

retxx — Mon, 31 Jul 2006 02:27:43 GMT

great really appreciate your help. here are the #'s

last one was 164 next to last was 676 and the winning # was 034

To answer your inquiry before remember in Mass. we payoff on the first 3 so you can still call that a pick 3 game. We also payoff on the last 3.

Looking forward to reading your example as I really am trying to apply it here.

Reply #29

Kola — Sun, 30 Jul 2006 19:00:38 GMT

Hi retxx.

I don't mind helping you out, but can not do it using those draws, because they are in reality 2/3 of the pick 4 draws

Massachusets currently has no Pick 3.

I haven't explored using the Pick 3 method on the Pick 4. Also, I did say that I have a Pick 4 version thats in development, but that is going s-l-o-w-l-y, because I'm focused on the Pick 3 right now. Once that is done using some of what I posted, the Pick 4 won't be too difficult. Even though the Pick 4 method will fun... [ More ]

Reply #28

lottolaughs — Sun, 30 Jul 2006 15:47:52 GMT

Gotcha! Thanks for clearing that up!!

PS: I figured you'd heard that one before. It was just too irresitable

Reply #27

Kola — Sun, 30 Jul 2006 15:32:32 GMT

Thanks cps10.

Reply #26

retxx — Sun, 30 Jul 2006 15:31:31 GMT

HI what i need is an example of your 3 steps to use using my last 2 draws here in Mass. if you do not mind helping me out. It may also help others watching this post so here is the last draw(164) and second last draw was (676). Thanks for your help.

Reply #25

Kola — Sun, 30 Jul 2006 15:30:21 GMT

Ha, I got called that all through my growing up!

Lottery math is when you don't carry over in your addition.

Example:

In regular math - 297 + 294 = 591

In lottery math - 297 + 294 = 481. There was no carry over.

-

With the methods I posted, the only place you would use lottery math is when you add up the two last draws to produce the number for the wrapdown or Spawn wrap as I call it. Sorry for the cheesy names, but it helps to codify and organize my workouts.

Reply #24

cps10 — Sun, 30 Jul 2006 14:17:34 GMT

Ohhhhh...my head is spinning!! Math math math!

Great ideas Kola.

Reply #23

lottolaughs — Sun, 30 Jul 2006 13:39:55 GMT

Hi,Coke-A-Kola!!

Just one question. When you talk about adding the 2 drawings together using lottery math , I just need to know what that means. I must've missed something somewhere.

Thanks in advance

Reply #22

PIOWER — Sun, 30 Jul 2006 06:13:23 GMT

hey kola what is mirror numbers and equal of a number. pm me. thanks.

Reply #21

Kola — Sun, 30 Jul 2006 00:18:37 GMT

Hi Frisky, thanks for your compliments.

I hope that you are referring to a backtest. Take your time, and carefully re-read my posts to get a good grasp on it. Please don't begin to play what I posted until you have tested and tweaked it to see how it works

I don't really understand your question. Please ask again and be as detailed as you can. What draws are you using, and which method out of the couple I posted are you referring

Reply #20

frisky — Sat, 29 Jul 2006 21:12:05 GMT

HI KOLA

THANK YOU FOR THE WONDERFUL SYSTEM THE SYSTEM SEEMS TO VERY INTERESTING ON THE WRAP DOWN METHOD TO HELP ONE FIND THE CLUSTER. I AM TRYING TO GIVE IT A TRY FOR ILLINOIS WHAT NUMBER ARE YOU ADDIND TO WHAT BECAUSE WHEN I ADDED THE

74+ 185+296+407+518+629+740+851+962=4662 THIS IS THE FIGURE I COME UP WITH. AFTER DIVDING 750/12=625 +861/15=574+972/18+54

WHAT STEP IS NEXT? HOW DID YOU THE 173.9

Reply #19

Kola — Sat, 29 Jul 2006 20:50:27 GMT

Thanks BA.

Reply #18

Blackapple — Sat, 29 Jul 2006 20:34:42 GMT

I see that you may leave things out

by mistake, I do that,signs of a quick mind,blazing

insights.

Reply #17

Kola — Sat, 29 Jul 2006 20:25:43 GMT

Thanks Blackapple. The Sum and Root Sum portion of this method is the key. I thank you for posting on one of my earlier threads to pay attention to the sums and roots. It has paid off.

Reply #16

Blackapple — Sat, 29 Jul 2006 20:14:39 GMT

Have'nt read/examined this post yet, but I love your

tenacity.And we know its

the ingredient for a breakthrough.

Reply #15

Kola — Sat, 29 Jul 2006 19:34:21 GMT

Hmm... Quite disconcerting. Thanks Ricky.

Reply #14

paurths — Sat, 29 Jul 2006 17:30:49 GMT

Not M. K. ,

he just waits until it gets written, then his side kick (or side show?) picks it up, then copy it and sells it

cheers

Ricky

Reply #13

Kola — Sat, 29 Jul 2006 16:57:36 GMT

Your welcome.

Reply #12

Kola — Sat, 29 Jul 2006 16:54:38 GMT

Hey Tntea.

Program? Well, I don't know. I think its not ready yet. I was reluctant to post it, because it is still in the research stage, but I felt that the brilliant minds on this forum could take it and shake it up. Its very imporatnt that you tweak what I posted. There is more refinement to be made for super-consistency before automation. I just have to do some more tests to deal with those testy nuances.

Reply #11

rhow — Sat, 29 Jul 2006 16:53:30 GMT

DA, THANKS FOR THIS INFO

Reply #10

Kola — Sat, 29 Jul 2006 16:45:24 GMT

HA , HA!!! Believe me, be Very grateful I was never your math teacher. Shucks, If I knew just a wee more, it would help to elucidate the labyrinth of conceptual data streamin' through me' noggin'!

Thanks for the shout out,and I look forward to you PM.

Reply #9

tntea — Sat, 29 Jul 2006 16:43:36 GMT

Can someone write a program for this

Reply #8

lottolaughs — Sat, 29 Jul 2006 16:22:44 GMT

Kola, I'm glad you were never my math teacher in school because just when I think I've got my homework finished, here comes some more!! No, seriously, great stuff you've got going on here!Going to PM you with a little something you might find useful. Sounds like you don't need any help but you never know! Keep up your fantastic work

Reply #7

Kola — Sat, 29 Jul 2006 16:13:56 GMT

Hmm...Good question. The possible scenario you listed above is great I think for holding numbers for a few days. My goal always been to hit from draw to draw.

There is a Pick 4 version of methods listed above that would be more direct. I haven't explored it fully, so I'll post it much, much later. My reasoning is that the same principles will apply to the Pick 4 if I can really master the Pick 3. And by extension - to a large degree - the Pick 5/6 as well. They are fundamentally all the same... [ More ]

Reply #6

retxx — Sat, 29 Jul 2006 15:35:07 GMT

Thanks,wonder how it would work on a state with a pick 4 to use on the front and back 3. Has anyone tried using it that way. Can anyone report back as a new idea win or lose situation

Reply #5

Kola — Sat, 29 Jul 2006 13:39:53 GMT

Concerning the sum and root sum technique aboves, then can be further applied to the Spawn wrap on the left and not the Spawn37 wrap on the left.

SPAWN ---------------SPAWN37

083 = 11 becomes 37*11 = 407

194 = 14 37*14 = 518

205 = 7 37*7 = 259

316 = 10 37*10 = 370

427 = 13 37*13 = 481

538 = 16 37*16 = 592

649 = 19 37*19 = 703

750 = 12 =3 37*12 = 444

861

Reply #4

Kola — Sat, 29 Jul 2006 06:57:39 GMT

My Pleasure - paint1.

Reply #3

paint1 — Sat, 29 Jul 2006 05:37:19 GMT

Thanks Kola - certainly interesting.

Reply #2

Kola — Sat, 29 Jul 2006 04:39:33 GMT

Yes it is. Very interesting. You will be surprised. When you backtest for Georgia, remember to even tweak the workouts much differently than how I laid out. Explore.

Reply #1

emilyg — Sat, 29 Jul 2006 04:34:45 GMT

kola - interesting. willtry in ga.

The Perfect Pick 3 Wrapdown and the Phase Method for Hits

Kola — Sat, 29 Jul 2006 04:15:40 GMT

I recently asked myself the question, what would the pefect Pick 3 wrapdown look like? The rational was that it would give me clues into how the pick 3 works, and ultimately generate more hits. So in my head the The Perfect Pick 3 Wrapdown would look like this:

111

222

333

444

555

666

777

888

999

000

-------

THE PHASE METHOD

One profound thing I noticed in the perfect wrap is the phase value between numbers that will generate hits in a week. If you loo... [ More ]