<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Unlucky for some--Go balls</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/139575</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/139575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Unlucky for some--Go balls</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Unlucky for some--Go balls</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/139575</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/139575</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2006 20:20:28 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Blackapple</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Players of the state lottery in Arizona who adopted 9 as their lucky number have been anything but lucky. The lottery&#x27;s new  Pick 3  game used a computer program to draw three single digits at random. But due to some slipshod programming, the lottery ran for more than 30 draws before red-faced officials noticed that 9 was never among the three numbers.  We realised they hadn&#x27;t programmed it in,  says Serena Stapp, a lottery spokeswoman.<br /><br />As a result, 27 per cent of customers had no chance of w... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/139575">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Blackapple</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

