Any new news on Lottosync ?

Reply #7

EXCALIBUR — Mon, 28 Aug 2006 18:54:51 GMT

By now it should at least be version # 5.

Reply #6

vick — Mon, 28 Aug 2006 02:38:54 GMT

yes Paul i'd also like to get some feedback.

C'mon Marco, let's get ver 1.8 or 1.9 whatever that current version is out

Reply #5

BobP — Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:14:37 GMT

Three winning numbers among 18 70% of the time would be a welcome improvement over three winning numbers among 20 50% of the time. We look forward to your success.

On the irony side, Lotto Sorcerer came through with two 3#+B wins among 24 discrete suggestions) with the data base pruned back to 56 past draws. This is the oz lotteries NSW 6/45 game I play with two bonus balls. I would have a 3# win almost 70% of the time if the lowest prize wasn't for 3+B making the lowest prize a 4# correc... [ More ]

Reply #4

lottoarchitect — Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:59:59 GMT

I'm sure you read my other port BobP. To make things clear, I said often 3+ numbers when picking 18 in a 6/40 lottery . That's not 100% but it is 70%+. 100% certainty is still impossible but nevertheless the results are very encouraging and I still have things to do to improve this engine more. When picking 10 numbers as this is the usual test the success is 25%-40% at the moment (depending on the lottery) for 3 numbers and can hit 4+ numbers at a reduced rate too. The best results obtained w... [ More ]

Reply #3

EXCALIBUR — Mon, 21 Aug 2006 06:37:25 GMT

Bob

But 3 numbers with how many combos to be played?

3 numbers pays little if anything at all.

Yes, I know that betters your chances of sooner or later getting more numbers right.

Besides, whatever method he uses for that, he might never put it into his software.

I will not waste my time emailing Marco.

As to Lotto Sorcerer, well is the same as with MaxHitPro, the trials probably do better than the registered versions, at least on the pick 3 games.

Jackpot games are so much

Reply #2

BobP — Mon, 21 Aug 2006 05:53:11 GMT

Have you emailed Marco? Just asking . . .

Lotto Architect says he has a way of getting three numbers correct almost every time, but it's a secret he isn't posting and it isn't in the current software.

Lotto Sorcerer stopped winning the day I upgraded the demo to paid. Pruned the data base to what was working, still not winning.

BobP

Reply #1

EXCALIBUR — Sun, 20 Aug 2006 17:02:14 GMT

Paul

Web site or not it seems to me that Marco, is not very interested in selling the 1.7 version.

Probably that 1.7 version is the same one that we already have and will never work any better than it does now.

A newer 1.8 version if we ever get one, might perhaps work just a tiny little bit better,but don't hold your breath on that, that is in both: Getting it and in its being better.

Better try some other program, like Expert Lotto or Lotto Architect.

Good luck to you.

Any new news on Lottosync ?

paul762 — Sun, 20 Aug 2006 16:34:28 GMT

Also why is V1.7 still for sale ? does it work now