<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>California Scheming with 3-Pair Sets</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/143144</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/143144" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: California Scheming with 3-Pair Sets</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/143144/694751</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/143144/694751</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 11:55:25 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>jordi marey</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the reply.<br /><br />Please will you explain why you think the 7-7-9 or 7-9-9 maybe HOT?<br /><br />I place a few guesses from time to time on the Prediction screen   but rarely do I purchase any type of lottery.<br /><br />Thanks ZEN, will check out your Predictions Stats  for whatever states you have predicted in.</p>]]></description>
			<category>jordi marey</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/143144/694702</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/143144/694702</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 06:05:28 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>ZEN</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Jordi,<br /><br />Looks like 799 or 779 maybe HOT??? Im not an all states player so I hope you hit with it??<br /><br />ZEN</p>]]></description>
			<category>ZEN</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>California Scheming with 3-Pair Sets</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/143144</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/143144</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 22:42:42 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>jordi marey</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thought I was on to a little rule of expected win for one of the PAIRs in any three successive pairs (same position of course) that have not occurred in the last 800 days , BUT looking at CA nitely 3-Pair sets, I m wrong.  Some of these sets  collective skip periods exceed 1100 days.  Oh well, still worth watching   just not too closely.<br /><br />THREE-Set Pair Combinations<br /><br />Positions 1,2..Skips                 Positions 2,3 Skips<br /><br />21 ..148-day skip                  11 ..216-day skip<br /><br />22 ..1... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/143144">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>jordi marey</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

