Betslips plays for 10/28

Reply #39

cps10 — Sun, 29 Oct 2006 15:51:01 GMT

Rick

Don't be discouraged. I think your approach is very sound. I wonder if we did pare down the list to include only those that have 3,8 or 9 in them as well, that would probably lengthen any progression that you could place on it so that in the long run you would make money regardless of any cold streaks.

Reply #38

Rick G — Sun, 29 Oct 2006 14:46:59 GMT

Thanks greeneyes. Only 2 hits out of 7...SC and TX. Not as good as I had hoped.

Reply #37

greeneyes — Sun, 29 Oct 2006 03:38:16 GMT

Nice call on Texas tonight a boxed hit the was 311 you had 113 keep up the good work and thank again for doing Texas..

Reply #36

Rick G — Sat, 28 Oct 2006 23:54:23 GMT

Bummer....one down six to go. I'm hoping for 3-4 wins or I'll be disappointed. But not discouraged because it will happen in the long run, mathematically. I just don't want to discourage anyone else and heaven forbid, I don't want anyone losing money on my claims.

Reply #35

emilyg — Sat, 28 Oct 2006 23:19:18 GMT

ga. 996

Reply #34

Rick G — Sat, 28 Oct 2006 20:29:07 GMT

Pcnut, a very logical approach and it makes total sense. Thanks for sharing that little tidbit of knowledge and study. Cps can apply progression betting to that concept and we have a winner.

The fact that it is profitable in box betting says volumes. That's tough to do from my experience. But admittedly, I've never actually played online betting (simulation only). I think there's money to be made there if it's not taken away from us.

Good work.

Reply #33

pcnut — Sat, 28 Oct 2006 20:17:01 GMT

Thank you cps10.

pcnut

Reply #32

pcnut — Sat, 28 Oct 2006 20:10:36 GMT

Thank you Rick G,

It's the only approach I find so far profitable in boxing. I have been researching this concept for 17 months now and following the results. Of the 10 digits in most states, this 3,8,9 is on top, performance wise. I you look at a computerized draw like CA, it makes no difference, and in some time frame, it out performs ball draws!

pcnut

Reply #31

Rick G — Sat, 28 Oct 2006 19:16:04 GMT

The more I look at pcnut's approach, the more I like it. Hope everyone caught that post. Seems to work anywhere.

Reply #30

Rick G — Sat, 28 Oct 2006 18:58:51 GMT

Yes, I like the team approach also and appreciate everyone's input. I knew that the great minds here at LP could make this work for them, one way or another.

Reply #29

lottaloot — Sat, 28 Oct 2006 18:28:30 GMT

I like the thread name as well as the team approach here.

Reply #28

Rick G — Sat, 28 Oct 2006 18:28:13 GMT

Yes, a new list every day and a different amount of combinations ranging from about 70 to 100. It depends on how many doubles you've had recently...more doubles, less combinations on the list.

Reply #27

Rick G — Sat, 28 Oct 2006 18:22:38 GMT

Interesting approach pcnut. I like it. I purposely have not reduced the list with any filters in order to preserve the 50% win guarantee. Players like you should do exactly as you're doing...reduce the list in your favorite ways.

Reply #26

cps10 — Sat, 28 Oct 2006 18:19:49 GMT

Thanks for that clarification, so the same numbers will not be used daily? A new list every day

Reply #25

Rick G — Sat, 28 Oct 2006 18:12:26 GMT

cps, I just want to make sure you understand that this is a dynamic list that will change daily. It sounds like you're applying the same list to past draws.

Reply #24

cps10 — Sat, 28 Oct 2006 18:11:33 GMT

pcnut

That is an interesting situation as well.

Reply #23

cps10 — Sat, 28 Oct 2006 18:06:33 GMT

Yeah, I like that and you could play multiple states to wait until there was some action. That would get you more action/earnings.

However, waiting for 2 misses would only have net you $23.50 on a $1,231.50 bankroll last month in SC

Reply #22

cps10 — Sat, 28 Oct 2006 18:04:37 GMT

If you used a $6,206.50 bankroll in SC, then over the past month, you would have won $1108.

If you used an approach whereby you waited for one loss, then you would have won $67 on a $2,799.00 bankroll.

Reply #21

pcnut — Sat, 28 Oct 2006 18:03:13 GMT

Hi Ricky G,

I like the selections you posted for these states.

Below is something of intrest for those wishing to reduce further.

Here is a concept I devised, 3,8,9 Concept

Notice the lapse in combos with no 3,8,9's digits (very little skips, 1 to 2 draws), this is a plus and why I only pick combos with only 3,8,9's in them. 85 sinlge digit combos rather than 120 and 48 doubles rather than 90. This cuts the odds down much to our favor in number reduction. I find this to hold true i... [ More ]

Reply #20

Rick G — Sat, 28 Oct 2006 17:48:09 GMT

That would be an excellent approach...wait for two misses and start playing with a progression.

Reply #19

cps10 — Sat, 28 Oct 2006 17:38:44 GMT

I agree. I am convinced. Of course, I just have the touch of a button to see the past skips and all. I can see that it works. I mean, it could work flat betting if you get lucky enough. However, a quarter bet requires $63.50 per draw, so you are looking at needing a double pretty regularly too, unless you play a progression.

I am going to take a look at the next week in SC and see what happens. Perhaps there is enough profit in the long run to allow a few 5-draw busts.

Also, if one is real... [ More ]

Reply #18

emilyg — Sat, 28 Oct 2006 17:37:39 GMT

of course.

Reply #17

Rick G — Sat, 28 Oct 2006 17:31:03 GMT

Did it just for you, Em...

Reply #16

emilyg — Sat, 28 Oct 2006 17:29:00 GMT

thanks

Reply #15

Rick G — Sat, 28 Oct 2006 17:27:56 GMT

cps, that's very interesting applying the progression concept to it. I know there's a way to make some bucks with this. I wouldn't recommend to anyone to do that until they are fully convinced of the 50% hit rate. We have 7 draws listed so we should get 3-4 hits today.

A little background...this worked very well in backtesting IL. Then I gave it the acid test...RNG draws. It still made a profit, but I think it will work better in ball-drawn states. Backtesting was done using Stefan's pi... [ More ]

Reply #14

cps10 — Sat, 28 Oct 2006 17:27:28 GMT

emily:

Your progression is as follows:

Draw #1234

SNG Box$30.50 $76.25 $167.75 $366.00

SNG #s61616161

SBx Unit251124

SNG STR$15.25 $15.25 $15.25 $30.50

SNG #s61616161

SStr Unit1112

DBL Box$6.50 $19.50 $39.00 $78.00

DBL #s26262626

DBx Unit13612

DBL STR$6.50 $6.50 $6.50 $6.50

DBL #s26262626

DStr Unit1111

TPL Bet$0.25 $0.25 $0.75 $1.00

TPL #s1111

TPL Unit1134

If Loss($59.00)($176.75)($406.00)($888.00)

If SNG Win$16.00 $10.75 $6.50

Reply #13

cps10 — Sat, 28 Oct 2006 17:17:45 GMT

Largest BOX skip for these numbers is 6 all time in SC EVE

Largest STR skip for these numbers is 68 all time.

Avg skip BOX = 1.14

Avg skip STR = 10.18

Reply #12

emilyg — Sat, 28 Oct 2006 17:14:31 GMT

thanks rick - ga. appreciates it

Reply #11

cps10 — Sat, 28 Oct 2006 17:13:52 GMT

The above is for a $1 bet by the way.

Reply #10

cps10 — Sat, 28 Oct 2006 17:13:30 GMT

BOX Only:

DrawSGL #sBet/UnitUnitsSGL BetDBL #sBet/UnitUnitsDBL BetIf LossSGL WinDBL Win

170$70.00 1$70.00 22$22.00 1$22.00 ($92.00)$58.00 $208.00

270$70.00 2$140.00 22$22.00 1$22.00 ($254.00)$46.00 $46.00

370$70.00 4$280.00 22$22.00 2$44.00 ($578.00)$22.00 $22.00

470$70.00 9$630.00 22$22.00 5$110.00 ($1,318.00)$32.00 $182.00

570$70.00 20$1,400.00 22$22.00 10$220.00 ($2,938.00)$62.00 $62.00

670$70.00 43$3,010.00 22$22.00 22$484.00 ($6,432.00)$18.00 $168.00

Reply #9

cps10 — Sat, 28 Oct 2006 17:09:40 GMT

Here is a 4-draw SC progression (multiply by 4 for a $1 bet):

Draw #1234

SNG Box$35.00 $105.00 $245.00 $577.50

SNG #s70707070

SBx Unit261433

SNG STR$17.50 $17.50 $17.50 $35.00

SNG #s70707070

SStr Unit1112

DBL Box$5.50 $16.50 $38.50 $93.50

DBL #s22222222

DBx Unit13717

DBL STR$5.50 $5.50 $5.50 $11.00

DBL #s22222222

DStr Unit1112

TPL Bet$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

TPL #s0000

TPL Unit1136

If Loss($63.50)($208.00)($514.50)($1,231.50)

If SNG

Reply #8

Rick G — Sat, 28 Oct 2006 16:52:17 GMT

cps,

Yes, this would work well with a progression. When testing this it rarely went four draws without a hit.

Reply #7

cps10 — Sat, 28 Oct 2006 16:48:18 GMT

Play for SC:

Draw #1

SNG Box$35.00

SNG #s70

SBx Unit2

SNG STR$17.50

SNG #s70

SStr Unit1

DBL Box$5.50

DBL #s22

DBx Unit1

DBL STR$5.50

DBL #s22

DStr Unit1

TPL Bet$0.00

TPL #s0

TPL Unit1

If Loss($63.50)

If SNG Win$11.50

If SNG STR Win$236.50

If DBL Win$11.50

If DBL STR Win$236.50

If TPL Win$161.50

Reply #6

cps10 — Sat, 28 Oct 2006 16:41:26 GMT

Rick,

Do you think a progression would be a good idea for this, or will the hits substantiate flat betting

Reply #5

Rick G — Sat, 28 Oct 2006 16:41:18 GMT

You're welcome cps and Miss Bee. Good luck to you guys today.

Here's the list for GA EVE:

88 combos

000 001 002 003 004 005 006 007 008 009 017 018 019 027 028 029 036 037 038 039 047 048 049 057 058 059 067 068 069 077 078 079 088 089 099 136 138 157 158 168 178 179 236 238 257 258 268 278 279 336 338 346 348 356 357 358 366 367 368 369 378 379 388 389 457 458 468 478 479 557 558 567 568 577 578 579 588 589 668 678 679 688 689 778 779 788 789 799

IMPORTANT NOTE on Betslips bet... [ More ]

Reply #4

Rick G — Sat, 28 Oct 2006 16:33:19 GMT

Thanks, lotterybraker.

Reply #3

Miss Bee — Sat, 28 Oct 2006 16:32:48 GMT

Thanks Rick I had already picked out a few of these before I saw your list, Thanks again, Looking forward to see how it does.

Reply #2

cps10 — Sat, 28 Oct 2006 16:30:33 GMT

Thanks Rick

Reply #1

lotterybraker — Sat, 28 Oct 2006 16:23:22 GMT

This is a very nice set of Numbers Rickg..these sets should do very nice indeed...

Betslips plays for 10/28

Rick G — Sat, 28 Oct 2006 16:16:04 GMT

50% of the time the drawn number will be in the list.

IL EVE.

85 combos

001 002 004 007 009 011 012 013 014 015 016 017 018 019 022 023 024 025 026 027 028 029 034 037 039 044 045 046 047 048 049 057 059 067 069 077 078 079 089 099 112 113 114 119 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 144 145 146 147 148 149 159 169 179 189 199 239 279 339 349 359 369 379 389 399 479 579 679 779 789 799

SC EVE

92 combos

001 007 011 012 013 014 015 016 017 018 019 027 036