New PA Game

Reply #3

CASH Only — Thu, 16 Nov 2006 20:48:35 GMT

For all we know, M M jackpot winners may be produced less often than in UNlucky for Life. I do see some people hating M M, but Pennsylvania is doing the right thing by not shoving annuity payments down the throats of M M winners.

Reply #2

sirbrad — Sun, 12 Nov 2006 05:47:00 GMT

To like anything with just a cash option is far too of a closed-minded approach for me. I think LFL should stay, but go down to a $1.00 a play. Get rid of the instant win thing if you want, I could care less. There will probably be even less winners with mix and match.

Reply #1

CASH Only — Fri, 10 Nov 2006 14:38:25 GMT

Anything that is all-cash or with a cash option is better than UNlucky for Life. The ultimate replacement for UfL would have been Hot Lotto with new matrixes.

New PA Game

JimmySand9 — Fri, 10 Nov 2006 05:40:40 GMT

We all know by now that PA is coming out with a new game, Mix Match, to replace Lucky For Life. My question is : Was this the best way for this to transpire? Is this as good as it could get? Should LFL stay? Should LFL been heaved for a game other than M M? Perhaps getting rid of LFL with no new game at all? What's your take