<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>End Game-Picking Your Numbers</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/145220</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/145220" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: End Game-Picking Your Numbers</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/145220/716476</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/145220/716476</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:34:08 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JKING</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br /><br />I am currently of the opinion that the best area to work in right now is how to deal with the remaining reduced/filtered combinations. There are numerous great filters/reduction methods/observations. But all of them keep running into the same wall...a huge amount of left over combinations to choose from. On the flip side. you can use to many filters/reduction methods and filter/reduce yourself right out of the winning combinations. This happens because the error factor of multiple reduc... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/145220/716476">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>JKING</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/145220/715568</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/145220/715568</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 20:51:54 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>jokerh1977</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I alluded to this in your other post, but let&#x27;s say I had 25,000 combos left. I start slimming this down with combos that  won&#x27;t happen . I use WinHunter and power532 for this. As an example, my lotto is 5/52. All five numbers never appear below  25 , so I would find all five digit combos from 1-25 (which is 53,000 or so). I then purge my combos of any of the 53,000 combos. Likewise, I can take all combos from 26-52 and do the same thing.<br /><br />This is on a smaller scale than what I typically do,... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/145220/715568">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>jokerh1977</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>End Game-Picking Your Numbers</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/145220</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/145220</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 15:48:42 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JKING</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br /><br />So, you&#x27;ve done alot of work...applied your formulas and filters to find the best numbers to pick and your left with a huge amount of combinations to select from.<br /><br />Initially, I pulled sorts to find out which numbers occurred most in those combinations. Now, I look for the highest amount of ocurring pairs in those projected combinations.<br /><br />How do you select your numbers, aside from randomly, from your system?<br /><br />Again, are comments are welcome.</p>]]></description>
			<category>JKING</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

