Possible Lottosync V1.8 Xmas Release?

Reply #54

MillionsWanted — Wed, 03 Jan 2007 14:58:06 GMT

Here's the theory:

To play one line in Viking Lotto you pay $ 0.64. Play ten lines = $ 6.40.

Play for 4 draws and it will cost a total of $ 25.60.

The prize for a fifth division win (3 numbers correct) is typically $ 7.20.

If you win 10 fifth divisions once every 4th draw you will get $ 72.00.

The result will be a good profit over the weeks played.

Reply #53

RJOh — Wed, 03 Jan 2007 04:36:18 GMT

If Lottosync is that good then a lottery player in Ohio could play for free until he won big. The Rolling Cash5(5/39) pays $1 for a match2 and $10 for a match3 and the new Lotto Classic (6/49) will pay $2 for a macth3 when it starts later this month.

Reply #52

MillionsWanted — Wed, 03 Jan 2007 00:08:56 GMT

That sounds like a good feature. Might be used to pick key numbers to be used in wheels.

Reply #51

paul762 — Tue, 02 Jan 2007 23:17:58 GMT

Marco, will V1.8 keep either feature of probability ranking of numbers like in V1.7 or show strongest numbers first like in V1.6 ?

thanks

Reply #50

MillionsWanted — Mon, 01 Jan 2007 21:52:29 GMT

If Lottosync really can predict 3 numbers correct with only one combination in 1 out of 3 or 1 out of 4 draws I would definetly be in line for buying his program.

I've done some tests on the Lotto Sorcerer v. 5.5 and the best which could be achieved in 25 weeks of draws was 3 numbers correct in two draws when trying to predict with only one combination to play.

Reply #49

Raziel — Mon, 01 Jan 2007 15:46:39 GMT

I purchased Lottosync when it first came out. I did have some good intial success with it (1.6 not 1.7). I have had some significant wins with it ( I was using a 10 number wheel of 35 tickets). So it has paid for itself and then some. However, I stopped using it because it went for a extremely long stretch of the odd 3 number win here and there... it was starting to cost me big. I then tried experimenting with other programs like Lottoarchitech (used this for quite a while...not bad) etc.

Reply #48

paul762 — Mon, 01 Jan 2007 13:22:12 GMT

I also purchased a new PC as soon as V1.8 was announced, I was close to selling it as its been gathering dust until a couple of weeks ago when I started using it for the Irish lotto, Whats funny is the PC will probably need upgrading before the V1.8 upgrade comes out

Reply #47

reddog — Mon, 01 Jan 2007 02:16:22 GMT

That is correct. But what hurts me is that I am still owed an upgrade and have gotten a new computor since two years ago. So I don't know if he will honor me on that. Mybe Marco has me e-mail addy on record. If not, all I can say is I won't shell out another one hundred bucks for 1.8.

Reply #46

paul762 — Mon, 01 Jan 2007 00:45:19 GMT

I think buyers are complaining because a better prediction engine was available some time ago(results/tickets posted by Marco) but has not been given to buyers who were promised the next 2 upgrades with the first upgrade (V1.7) having bugs that never got fixed.

Reply #45

RJOh — Sun, 31 Dec 2006 22:51:38 GMT

If no one has found any software that works better than Lottosync then why are its users complaining? It could be that such software doesn't exist or that it works too good to share with the general public.

I've read about gamblers who have come up with ways to beat casino games but no body ever hear about them until a casino catch them winning too much and ban them from entering again.

Reply #44

paul762 — Sun, 31 Dec 2006 21:27:10 GMT

No I havent as yet, done 4 numbers on irish lotto using V1.6 (sample 150) = (5-11-28-40)

(pays 6000/1) and got 2 of those and other 2 were 1 and 2 numbers away (5-10-11-26-31-41).

Very much looking forward to V1.8 if its better than V1.6

Marco - why you still got V1.7 for sale on site

Reply #43

EXCALIBUR — Sun, 31 Dec 2006 20:01:24 GMT

For a very short time years ago I took a quick look at the Texas' jackpot games and also tested only 2 jackpot games softwares for a very short time, with the help of those 2 programs I got 2 numbers right on from 1 to 3 lines (1 to 3 combinations) this was done 3 or 4 consecutive times (Draws), sometimes got 2 numbers right on 1 combination and also 1 number right on another one and one got 2 numbers right on one together with another 2 numbers right on another one, but as I could not get 3 num... [ More ]

Reply #42

RJOh — Sun, 31 Dec 2006 18:52:44 GMT

Has anyone found any software that works better than Lottosync

Reply #41

vick — Sun, 31 Dec 2006 18:27:20 GMT

i wonder if we get our grubby hands on 1.8 in January. Sure like to stick it to the government lottos and take their money $$$ Tax Free

Reply #40

paul762 — Fri, 29 Dec 2006 18:34:53 GMT

Marco getting 3 numbers from 3 correct on Irish Lotto pays around 600/1 here, any Ideas I could use before V1.8 is released, either with or without V1.6 ?

Thanks

Reply #39

Guru — Fri, 29 Dec 2006 16:54:55 GMT

Excalibur,

Lower prizes can make you a lot of money too... in the Belgian lottery matching 3 numbers pays only 2.5 Euro.

But, if you can match 3 numbers on a regular basis with playing only a single 6 number combination... Then play that single combination a 1000 times for the same draw and you win 2500 Euro.

In Belgium 1 ticket costs 0.5 Euro

0.5 X 1000 = 500 Euro

Suppose you can match 3 numbers with playing a single combination aproximately once in 4 draws.

Expense = 50... [ More ]

Reply #38

EXCALIBUR — Fri, 29 Dec 2006 09:42:51 GMT

Marco.

Lower prizes here on the USA pay next to nothing on most games, at least here on Texas.

So perhaps jackpot games most be played mostly or only for the top 2 prizes.

I don't see the past LottoSync as being a complete solution.

Perhaps it is more effective if used for your country's lottery game, as perhaps it was designed for it.

There are partially effective prediction solutions for many lottery games and sometimes when 2 or more of such solutions are combined, better pre... [ More ]

Reply #37

Raziel — Thu, 28 Dec 2006 21:53:56 GMT

Good to here from you Marco. Looking forward to gettign 1.8 soon like you mentioned. Can't wait to test it on Ontario Keno. I assume Vick can't wait either.

All the best

Raziel

Reply #36

Guru — Thu, 28 Dec 2006 20:50:39 GMT

Paul,

I cannot do what you ask...

If you knew how many hours I've spent developing the mathematical model for lottosync, you would surely understand why I don't want to make this an open source thing.

While you are sleeping... I am thinking... trying... retrying... creating... endlessly.

This may seem selfish or greedy, but you probably worked hard for some things you own too. Would you really be prepared to give away your car... or the house you live in ?

I have invested all m... [ More ]

Reply #35

paul762 — Thu, 28 Dec 2006 16:10:06 GMT

Marco I know you read these postings, so here goes..... a while back you mentioned that you had thought of a way to predict randomness somewhat and you couldnt believe how everyone else could have missed it and then lottosync was born etc. etc.

So instead, why not just tell everyone who missed it, what you found out/discovered, and maybe people on here might be able to improve upon your idea and make it even more accurate? This to me seems to be fairer than what is happening at present with... [ More ]

Reply #34

vick — Wed, 27 Dec 2006 06:19:18 GMT

same here Raziel. I'll be using it mostly for Ontario keno.

BTW did you see tonights results, Dec 26 2006, look at this sequence:

11--13-14-15-16-17-18

55-56-57

Reply #33

Raziel — Tue, 26 Dec 2006 15:01:13 GMT

I hope he is true to his word and 1.8 will support Keno as well. I look forward to testing it on Ontario Daily Keno.

Raziel

Reply #32

paurths — Tue, 26 Dec 2006 02:16:36 GMT

Monaco...

Reply #31

vick — Mon, 25 Dec 2006 21:05:36 GMT

also true and well put popeye.

we'll just have to wait it seems

Reply #30

popeye — Mon, 25 Dec 2006 20:21:52 GMT

I don't think Marco pays much attention to holidays or specific dates. I think he wants to come up with something that works.

We would be more disappointed if he issued V1.8 and it didn't perform any better than the others than not getting something for Christmas. Besides, I'm sure he has a family that wants his attention this time of year.

Hopefully, the wait will be worth it.

Reply #29

paul762 — Mon, 25 Dec 2006 18:53:36 GMT

Hopefully Vick........hopefully

Reply #28

vick — Mon, 25 Dec 2006 18:25:15 GMT

you were right Paul, another Christmas disappointment.

Maybe before New Years - ya right don't hold your breath

Hopefully in Jan 2007 soon

Reply #27

paul762 — Mon, 25 Dec 2006 18:21:20 GMT

Guess not then...... is that the 3rd christmas now?

I should have known better really

Reply #26

vick — Sat, 23 Dec 2006 20:13:54 GMT

sounds hopeful

Reply #25

paul762 — Fri, 22 Dec 2006 22:54:58 GMT

Did he also happen to mention anything about why the site still says V1.7 is available when it doesnt even work

Reply #24

luckyhorse — Fri, 22 Dec 2006 04:28:53 GMT

i e-mailed marco a couple of weeks back and he e-mailed me and told me very soon the finishing touches are being made

Reply #23

paul762 — Thu, 21 Dec 2006 17:04:27 GMT

Only 4 days before we find out if santa GURU will be delivering this year.

Reply #22

EXCALIBUR — Mon, 18 Dec 2006 07:24:27 GMT

I think that Marco is smart enough to come out with a good lottery program, but I wish that he would not be so fixated with that particular approach, at least it should be complemented with other prediction logic(s), as by itself does not seem to be good enough so far, not that it is a bad prediction logic, it has merits, but seems to need some help.

One most think about prediction logics and hopefully based on statistics or on whatever will make them work.

Reply #21

vick — Sun, 17 Dec 2006 19:20:58 GMT

luv that song paurths

Reply #20

hcrude14 — Sun, 17 Dec 2006 14:05:30 GMT

LS V1.6 numbers 1-4-8-10-17-18-29-34-35-48

Last nites WC649 drawn no's were 10-19-30-40-41-45 B43 caught the 10,will try again wensday.

Reply #19

paurths — Sun, 17 Dec 2006 12:53:14 GMT

Baby we can talk all night

But that ain't getting us nowhere

I told you everything I possibly can

There's nothing left inside of here

And maybe you can cry all night

But that'll never change the way I feel

The snow is really piling up outside

I wish you wouldn't make me leave here

I poured it on and I poured it out

I tried to show you just how much I care

I'm tired of words and I'm too hoarse to shout

But you've been cold to me so long

I'm crying icicl... [ More ]

Reply #18

vick — Sat, 16 Dec 2006 22:02:21 GMT

1 out of 3 is a very good result . There's still hope

Reply #17

EXCALIBUR — Sat, 16 Dec 2006 20:55:43 GMT

It has been a long time, so I wonder just how soon soon really is(?).

I hope that now it can be used for all or most jackpot games, Will it also have filters

Reply #16

paul762 — Sat, 16 Dec 2006 20:20:30 GMT

My BEST LS numbers = 11-28-31

Results for Irish main draw - 9-16-21-24-28-40 bonus 44

1 out of 3 for me tonight - So no 600/1 tonight

Strangely im happy, even though I lost

Reply #15

hcrude14 — Sat, 16 Dec 2006 16:06:19 GMT

I used V1.6 again 200 samples for tonites WC 649 draw, 1-4-8-10-17-18-29-34-35-48.

I plan to wheel them and see what happens,If I can get into town I'll play those wheeled sets.We had a real pile of snow here in this neck of the woods,so getting in to buy those numbers may be a problem.

Reply #14

paul762 — Sat, 16 Dec 2006 11:31:57 GMT

Here are some numbers from V1.6 500 sample for tonights Irish lotto main draw, I run 2 sets to find best numbers.

set 1 = 5-11-13-14-25-28-31-35-38-39

set 2 = 4-7-10-11-21-22-28-31-33-36

I will be playing these 3 numbers 11-28-31 in tonights main draw, to hopefully win 600 for my 1 stake.

Reply #13

Raziel — Fri, 15 Dec 2006 21:08:52 GMT

Thanks Vick on the reply let's hope 2 years is worth the wait.

Reply #12

psykomo — Fri, 15 Dec 2006 19:10:45 GMT

WHY.......Don't We see LOTTERY software in thee............

GIFT SHOP or advertised

on LP............???????

LOL$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

PSYKOMO

Reply #11

vick — Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:43:15 GMT

Raziel Marco responded recently in another thread by Paul

https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/146224.htm

by Guru Dec 7 2006:

Hello Paul, Jadelottery and others...

How long has it been, 2 years ?

Well, now I'm back... at least... almost.

Everyone who owns the 2 year old lottosync are soon going to find out that lottosync is not dead at all.

Although you had to wait for more than 2 years, Lottosync 1.8 is close to being final.

I'm not going to expand on how it performs,... [ More ]

Reply #10

paul762 — Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:01:11 GMT

I meant the Bold numbers you posted were all 1 number away.

Reply #9

Raziel — Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:34:17 GMT

How did he announce this? Did he email everyone who purchased it becayse i never received it.

Reply #8

paurths — Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:43:19 GMT

Hi Paul762,

should i consider that to be a good thing?

Assuming we have 10 numbers, created by lottosync or any other program, doesn't really matter,

then we compare to the numbers of the actual draw and we see that each number is only off by 1.

What does this really mean?

That instead of using 10 numbers, we might wanna use these 10 number, added to them 10 extra numbers that are 1 value lower than the original, and adding to them 10 more that are 1 value higher than the original.... [ More ]

Reply #7

paul762 — Thu, 14 Dec 2006 19:47:24 GMT

Hey paurths, you are only one number out on each of those though

Reply #6

vick — Thu, 14 Dec 2006 18:44:12 GMT

3 out of 10 numbers is excellent hcrude14

Reply #5

hcrude14 — Thu, 14 Dec 2006 13:07:30 GMT

Paurths,after reading your post the other day I to ran V1.6 using 150 samples for the WC 649 and heres what it produced 3 4 5 9 29 34 37 38 48 49.

Last nites Dec.13 Draw results for WC 649 5 16 21 32 34 44 B49,Lo and behold it got 2 numbers and the Bonus.Not a bad RNG. I'm going to try it again for this saturdays draw.

Reply #4

vick — Thu, 14 Dec 2006 05:08:05 GMT

paurths looks like your going to need the new more powerfull 1.8 . Us too

Reply #3

paurths — Thu, 14 Dec 2006 00:26:30 GMT

Result wednesday December 13: 9 - 11- 16 - 22 - 30 - 39 / 5

oops, ... nada...

Reply #2

paurths — Wed, 13 Dec 2006 00:21:56 GMT

I dug it back up, let it run 2 times this evening (sample of only 150),

and these are the numbers it came up with for tomorrows draw in Belgium,

let's see what happens:

4 - 5 - 8 - 10 - 14 - 19 - 21 - 29 - 34 - 38

2 - 3 - 4 - 10 - 12 - 13 - 29 - 35 - 36 - 38

Reply #1

vick — Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:05:02 GMT

Personally I think it may be a Christmas release. Why else would he announce it's imminent release so close to Christmas - he couldn't be so cruel to us again, could he?

C'mon, bring it on home Santa Guru

Possible Lottosync V1.8 Xmas Release?

paul762 — Mon, 11 Dec 2006 19:13:35 GMT

After Guru's latest announcement, What are the chances of an Xmas release?

BTW- Guru that's the chances of a 2006 xmas release