<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Weird results/payouts Ca SuperLotto 12-20</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/147279</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/147279" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Weird results/payouts Ca SuperLotto 12-20</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/147279/735823</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/147279/735823</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 12:46:03 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Prob988</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Well, for one thing, the numbers contained yesterday&#x27;s date: 12-21-06.<br /><br />There may have been many thousands of tickets that play a date, and the two other numbers represent a subset of the other numbers played.</p>]]></description>
			<category>Prob988</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/147279/735525</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/147279/735525</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 00:07:51 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>CA LotteryGuy</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Briand069....you are right that the numbers/payout for California Super Lotto Plus were weird for last night&#x27;s drawing.  For comparisons sake, the 5+0 for the drawing before this one (two winners) each got over $42,000.  Two drawings before (four winners) got over $19,000.<br /><br />The only thing I can think of is with four of the five of numbers below 31 that people played birthday and anniversary dates and that for some reason 36 was in their list of numbers.<br /><br />What would be interesting to find o... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/147279/735525">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>CA LotteryGuy</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/147279/735504</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/147279/735504</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 23:25:56 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Just6ntlc</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Briand069, it seems to me that a lot of people predicted 6-12-21-26-36, but missed the Mega Number 10. I predicted the Mega Number was 6 because White Ball 6 came out, but I missed.</p>]]></description>
			<category>Just6ntlc</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Weird results/payouts Ca SuperLotto 12-20</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/147279</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/147279</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 23:08:23 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Briand069</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>6-12-21-26-36 M-10<br /><br />Kinda is bad for those people who got 5+0 last night, 24 winners paying out 3,444. Not that 3,444 dollars wouldn&#x27;t be nice, but thats alot of winners for 5 numbers. Why does anyone think those numbers were so popular?<br /><br />Brian</p>]]></description>
			<category>Briand069</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

