The New Way To Look At Pi System

Reply #15

mysticwomyn — Sun, 31 Dec 2006 17:22:05 GMT

TX 229...another one I missed

708 203

520 570

from the 5 to the 7 (2)

from the 7 to the 2 (9)

from the 2 to the 0 (2)

Maybe someone found this one on their own.

Reply #14

mysticwomyn — Sun, 31 Dec 2006 01:30:15 GMT

no hit in SC

Box hit in IL 324

NJ had 184...it's one I overlooked

768 263

620 670

in the first set 7 to 6 is 1; 6 to 2 is 8; 2 to 6 above is 4

second set 2 to 6 is 8; 6 to 7 is 1; 7 to 3 is 4

sorry I missed that one.

Still waiting on TX

Reply #13

emilyg — Sun, 31 Dec 2006 00:48:38 GMT

close - 492 damn sam

Reply #12

Kola — Sat, 30 Dec 2006 22:16:16 GMT

Neat Method Lottolaughs!

Had a thought...It may be worthwhile to put all sides of a number through your formula.

If we use your 728:

Instead of using just 72 and 28, we could use 27, 78, 82, and 87.

Thanks Lottolaughs

Reply #11

mysticwomyn — Sat, 30 Dec 2006 22:05:11 GMT

Hi lottolaughs

Came up with this. First the previous winning number has to end in a "0"

Did some backtesting..here's what I found.

Wash. DC on 12/23 had 530 midday...

This is the set up

3 3

5 0 5 0

Now take 728 and 273 to fill in the spaces to make a box like this

7 3 8 2 3 3

5 2 0 5 7 0

Now find a common combo without lifting your pencil on... [ More ]

Reply #10

lottolaughs — Sat, 30 Dec 2006 21:18:39 GMT

Got a box hit for Miss Kitty! Me thinks there's something here,just have to look a little closer. Thanks for stopping in,emily

Reply #9

lottolaughs — Sat, 30 Dec 2006 21:16:57 GMT

You're welcome,Keith! Thought we were due for a new kind of pi , I'm getting tired of apple

Reply #8

lottolaughs — Sat, 30 Dec 2006 21:12:02 GMT

Mystic,great to see you here! Miss you! Can't wait to see what you come up with,whatever it is I know it will be good. Gonna check out your other post too. You've always got such great info

Reply #7

budward — Sat, 30 Dec 2006 21:04:06 GMT

No prob LL.

I should deliver Jimmy John's Subs.

(Subs so fast you'll freak) LOL

Reply #6

lottolaughs — Sat, 30 Dec 2006 21:02:01 GMT

You're too fast for me,bud,haha! I'm still checking out your spreadsheet and just took a look here and see you had it all figured up. Thanks a bunch!

Well this is good to know. Time for a little adjusting. Are we in the ballpark at least

Reply #5

cps10 — Sat, 30 Dec 2006 21:00:12 GMT

I like this thread...thank you LL

Reply #4

budward — Sat, 30 Dec 2006 20:59:43 GMT

No hits in IL Mid.

Here is the GA rundown em

980 =559275 =320583 =443135 =151632

3143891 # off512220

038458236289

1071821 # off305358

176251374427

245289129465

314Box358198534

383427236257

4521821 # off305327

521251374082

Reply #3

emilyg — Sat, 30 Dec 2006 20:30:25 GMT

ga. starting with last evening

632

135

583

275

980

Oldest to newesr\t

980

275

583

135

632

Reply #2

mysticwomyn — Sat, 30 Dec 2006 20:21:46 GMT

Hi lottolaughs!

I like the way 728 and 273 =314.

I'm gonna try a couple workouts using these "secondary" PI's.

Get back to you later.

Reply #1

budward — Sat, 30 Dec 2006 19:55:59 GMT

Lets give Mid IL a shot at it.

Sat, Dec 30, 20060-4-0

Fri, Dec 29, 20069-8-2

Thu, Dec 28, 20068-7-0

Wed, Dec 27, 20061-8-9

Tue, Dec 26, 20060-5-4

The New Way To Look At Pi System

lottolaughs — Sat, 30 Dec 2006 19:36:28 GMT

Howdy everyone!

I've heard and read lots of ways to use pi when dealing with the pick 3.

Multiply by it,divide by it,etc.

But usually in these methods we use the ENTIRE number when doing this,correct? That's what I am understanding anyway.

I'm taking this a step further and thinking of dividing our pick 3 number into front pairs and back pairs before we multiply them.

Here is what I have been doing to my number.

For example---

728

72 x 3.14 = 226.08

28 x 3.14... [ More ]