All Pick 6..All States Test

Reply #63

budward — Tue, 16 Jan 2007 05:35:02 GMT

Thanks rubi and pick3fan. Between my new job and the P-5 tests, I'm out of time for anything else.

Reply #62

pick3fan — Tue, 16 Jan 2007 04:21:56 GMT

me too,me too ...still waiting for your numbers for Mega tom. budward....

Reply #61

Rubi 311 — Sat, 13 Jan 2007 13:53:42 GMT

Thanks Budward! We'll be here waiting....

Reply #60

budward — Sat, 13 Jan 2007 13:25:49 GMT

I will be dropping this thread for a while. It will be back eventually.

Reply #59

budward — Sat, 13 Jan 2007 01:34:21 GMT

Sorry, out of time again tonight. Gonna spend some time with the wifey tonight

Reply #58

budward — Fri, 12 Jan 2007 02:03:57 GMT

Thank you lottolaughs. I hope I can eventually get it right

Reply #57

lottolaughs — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:41:02 GMT

Great idea,budward! Can't hurt to test them all ways. And congrats on your 5/6! Now we're talking

Reply #56

budward — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:02:56 GMT

Tonights Numbers...01/10/07

4791016192125333537414649

2471016192125333537414249

I will try my method of picking numbers for 1 month and then re-evaluate my method, make some changes, and try again.

Reply #55

budward — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 02:42:12 GMT

Thank you and so do I, just6ntlc!

I will restart this thread tomorrow.

Reply #54

Just6ntlc — Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:32:11 GMT

budward, I hope your picks become successful.

Reply #53

KY Floyd — Tue, 09 Jan 2007 19:09:33 GMT

As I've said in this thread and elsewhere, I don't believe that lottery results are perfectly random, but I also don't believe the results are far enough from random that we can use whatever bias there is to predict future results. The 104 drawings per year that most jackpot games offer just don't give us enough data. Thereforee my stategy is simply to have a combination that nobody else plays. I may not be able to increase my chances of winning, but I may be able to reduce my chances of sharin... [ More ]

Reply #52

budward — Tue, 09 Jan 2007 04:36:50 GMT

I will update as soon as possible.

16 hr workday today and tomorrow.

Reply #51

CCHS13 — Mon, 08 Jan 2007 11:28:14 GMT

KY, Maddog and Todd have been around for a while, they have seen people come and go

I think they are merely suggesting that constructive criticism is fine if the point is to

help along an idea that someone has or is tesing but the way you come at people

needs to be toned down. It comes down to being optimist or pessimist (sp?). Why play the

lottery if you are not optimist. Where are your ideas on picking numbers? Seems as if you

are the spokesperson for quickpicks. Good L... [ More ]

Reply #50

budward — Mon, 08 Jan 2007 11:18:05 GMT

These numbers are for Monday 01/08/07 also.

Reply #49

KY Floyd — Mon, 08 Jan 2007 08:00:28 GMT

I don't doubt that the majority of my posts don't agree with some of the things that others have posted. I know that some people enjoy posting simply for the purpose of using the I agree sign icon, but I thought the purpose of a forum was the exchange of information and opinions. I don't see much point in posting unless I have something different to say. That's why I only post when I have a question or a different opinion, think that what's been said so far could be answered or expanded on,... [ More ]

Reply #48

budward — Mon, 08 Jan 2007 03:05:08 GMT

Thanks again -- rubi

Reply #47

Rubi 311 — Mon, 08 Jan 2007 02:49:20 GMT

Great job Budward

Reply #46

Rubi 311 — Mon, 08 Jan 2007 02:47:34 GMT

Great job Budward

Reply #45

budward — Mon, 08 Jan 2007 02:37:01 GMT

Yesterdays Results...01/06/08

String 1#'s Matched

The PickSat, Jan 6, 20071517243334403

Atlantic 6/49Sat, Jan 6, 200747182231343

Canada Lotto 6/49Sat, Jan 6, 20071920334345471

BC/49Sat, Jan 6, 20072628333640471

Canada Lotto 6/49Sat, Jan 6, 20071920334345471

LottoSat, Jan 6, 200728111519213

LottoSat, Jan 6, 20071219202936492

Win For LifeSat, Jan 6, 2007810111516183

LottoSat, Jan 6, 200715121421371

LottoSat, Jan 6, 200715202140422

LottoSat, Jan 6, 200731517... [ More ]

Reply #44

budward — Mon, 08 Jan 2007 02:30:34 GMT

Tonights Numbers...01/07/07

611151618192025333440434547

67101116181920253334404345

Reply #43

budward — Sun, 07 Jan 2007 22:03:05 GMT

Sorry, no numbers today.

I am typing from work right now. Won't be home til late. I will post todays numbers when i get home in case anyone wants to see what they would have been.

Reply #42

Rubi 311 — Sat, 06 Jan 2007 16:06:03 GMT

Nailed it MADDOG!!! When will people learn...they don't call you MADDOG for nothing...hehehe

Reply #41

MADDOG10 — Sat, 06 Jan 2007 15:46:37 GMT

Well KY Floyd,

I was hoping this would'nt come to this but since it has I see no reason to hold back.

As a matter of fact, I did go back over your posts and low and behold I found that you refuted the majority of post that were contrary to your beliefs. In mathmatical jargon, that would be 263 of 350 post for a total of 75.1 %. And no I won't say you're wrong..!

Out of the 350 or so posts, you've changed your thoughts in the middle of the thread as to make yourself look better or... [ More ]

Reply #40

KY Floyd — Sat, 06 Jan 2007 08:51:21 GMT

Busted. And I tried so hard not to let on that I believe that lottery results are random and governed by simple probability.

Actually, if you read my other posts in that thread (as well as many other threads) you'll see that I believe the results aren't perfectly random. Also, if you read the posts leading up to the one you quoted you might see that the quote is a specific response to the previous post, by Guesser, and is about the probability of numbers from the previous drawing repeating in... [ More ]

Reply #39

budward — Sat, 06 Jan 2007 06:06:53 GMT

Tonights Results...01/05/07

String 1#'s Matched

ConnecticutClassic LottoFri, Jan 5, 200726172833371

DelawareMulti-Win LottoFri, Jan 5, 2007912151823244

PennsylvaniaMatch 6Fri, Jan 5, 200716243236403

Puerto RicoLotoFri, Jan 5, 20071371523291

RevanchaFri, Jan 5, 20071317273536410

Washington, D.C.DC Daily 6Fri, Jan 5, 200767131618312

West VirginiaCash 25Fri, Jan 5, 2007211141720242

WisconsinSuper CashFri, Jan 5, 2007611172430342

String 2 #'s Matched... [ More ]

Reply #38

budward — Sat, 06 Jan 2007 05:11:04 GMT

thank-you Just6ntlc

check out my P-5 thread if you haven't already.

Reply #37

Just6ntlc — Sat, 06 Jan 2007 02:47:23 GMT

I support you budward. Good luck with your winning picks.

Reply #36

budward — Fri, 05 Jan 2007 21:34:45 GMT

thanks to MADDOG, rubi311, Todd, and pick3fan for your support.

Reply #35

pick3fan — Fri, 05 Jan 2007 21:03:54 GMT

hit it damn right (oops..sorry) WTG MADDOG and Todd....you guys tell him right....

Reply #34

Rubi 311 — Fri, 05 Jan 2007 20:26:41 GMT

Exactly! WTG Todd! You hit it right on the $$$! Great post

Reply #33

Todd — Fri, 05 Jan 2007 20:09:28 GMT

Yes, kudos Maddog! That was perfectly said. I get really sick of seeing someone have the courage to post their ideas, thoughts, and tests, only to be harpooned by a close-minded individual who thinks they have all the answers. I really like how you researched that past post to compare with the current one. It is always instructive and helpful to do a little digging before posting.

It is not necessarily a bad thing to disagree with someone. If you have an opposing view, then state what yo... [ More ]

Reply #32

Rubi 311 — Fri, 05 Jan 2007 19:35:43 GMT

Well said...kudos to you, Maddog! Makes you wonder if this kind of negative jargon prevents many members from posting their ideas.

Reply #31

MADDOG10 — Fri, 05 Jan 2007 19:06:54 GMT

KY Floyd,

What is your problem ? It seems as though every time someone else does something, or starts a thread such as this, you've got nothing but negative thoughts to say about it. Did someone pee in your cherrios today, yesterday, last week, last month or whenever.?

After reading some of your comments about this< I wonder if you would have said the same thing to say Bill Gates when he was testing his software. Or maybe Gen. Westmorland when he was in Vietnam .

Ma... [ More ]

Reply #30

KY Floyd — Fri, 05 Jan 2007 18:05:50 GMT

That the general purpose is to find winning numbers is obvious. I can't really think of anything else you might test for, at least with respect to picking numbers that you might play. What I haven't seen is any explanation of how or why the numbers were picked, or what combinations you're testing. Without knowing the parameters of a test the results aren't very meaningful and you can only make general conclusions. The general conclusion that seems obvious to me is that using combinations th... [ More ]

Reply #29

Rubi 311 — Fri, 05 Jan 2007 13:50:40 GMT

Thanks Budward

Reply #28

budward — Fri, 05 Jan 2007 12:46:52 GMT

Last nights Results...01/04/07

String 1#'s Matched

MassachusettsCash WinfallThu, Jan 4, 2007911181928310

New JerseyPick 6Thu, Jan 4, 20071230343844484

PennsylvaniaLucky for Life LottoThu, Jan 4, 20073581314354

Washington, D.C.DC Daily 6Thu, Jan 4, 2007616171820312

West VirginiaCash 25Thu, Jan 4, 2007236810202

WisconsinSuper CashThu, Jan 4, 200756122931382

String 2 #'s Matched

MassachusettsCash WinfallThu, Jan 4, 2007911181928311

New JerseyPic... [ More ]

Reply #27

budward — Fri, 05 Jan 2007 00:31:52 GMT

Here I my numbers for tonite 01/04/07

I almost forgot em.

145814162030353638414448

49141620242530353638394148

Reply #26

budward — Thu, 04 Jan 2007 23:58:12 GMT

Thanks Rubi.

It would be nice if the P-6 would all come together like the P-5 is doing.

Reply #25

Rubi 311 — Thu, 04 Jan 2007 15:23:23 GMT

Great job Budward! Colorado looking good! WTG

Reply #24

budward — Thu, 04 Jan 2007 14:57:42 GMT

Yesterdays Results 01/03

String 1#'s Matched

ArizonaThe PickWed, Jan 3, 2007713163639403

Atlantic CanadaAtlantic 6/49Wed, Jan 3, 2007715202141453

Canada Lotto 6/49Wed, Jan 3, 2007414172038481

British ColumbiaBC/49Wed, Jan 3, 20071926293134452

Canada Lotto 6/49Wed, Jan 3, 2007414172038481

ColoradoLottoWed, Jan 3, 2007158911413

DelawareMulti-Win LottoWed, Jan 3, 200789121625342

FloridaLottoWed, Jan 3, 2007824333650512

GeorgiaWin For LifeWed, Jan 3, 20078212430353... [ More ]

Reply #23

Rubi 311 — Wed, 03 Jan 2007 23:06:28 GMT

Budward, you've been hiding your other talent...a poet(lol). Keep on whittling and fiddling those numbers

Reply #22

budward — Wed, 03 Jan 2007 22:49:07 GMT

Thank you rubi and lottolaughs

How did you know I could fiddle around.

(with numbers, that is) LoL

There once was a man that could fiddle

but his numbers always stuck to the griddle

until that day

he bought some spray

now he has time to whittle

Now where did that come from?hehehe

Reply #21

lottolaughs — Wed, 03 Jan 2007 22:47:58 GMT

Darn tootin' right

Reply #20

Rubi 311 — Wed, 03 Jan 2007 22:23:57 GMT

As ONE of those couple of people , I understand exactly what Budward is testing...your ignorance! Budward's testing is a work in progress. He is gracious enough to share his work like many other LP members who are fine-tuning their work. Budward, you keep playing that fiddle

Reply #19

budward — Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:57:38 GMT

Yesterdays results

String 1...3 - 4# matches

ConnecticutClassic LottoTue, Jan 2, 200781521363941

PennsylvaniaMatch 6Tue, Jan 2, 200711113202940

Washington, D.C.DC Daily 6Tue, Jan 2, 2007258233238

West VirginiaCash 25Tue, Jan 2, 200771518192022

WisconsinSuper CashTue, Jan 2, 200791316303132

String 2... 1 - 4 # Match

ConnecticutClassic LottoTue, Jan 2, 200781521363941

PennsylvaniaMatch 6Tue, Jan 2, 200711113202940

Washington, D.C.DC Daily 6Tue, Jan... [ More ]

Reply #18

budward — Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:48:40 GMT

KY Floyd,

My strings are a test of my method of finding winning numbers for the Lotteries. How will I know if I am on the right track without testing. If I ever get a system that hits consistently, my next goal will be to start reducing numbers.

They are designed to be used with an abreviated wheel of which Todd has many good ones in the Wheels heading on the left of the page. I am testing against all states to see if any patterns will emerge in other states but my real goal is to find

Reply #17

KY Floyd — Wed, 03 Jan 2007 05:10:58 GMT

the procedure of submitting a statement to such conditions or operations as will lead to its proof or disproof or to its acceptance or rejection

So what exacty are you testing? All I see is numbers with no explanation, so the only realistic assumption is that you intend to apply all of the numbers to all of the games for which you've posted results. You've listed enough numbers to account for about 3000 combinations, and you posted results from about 3 dozen games offering less than $1000 in... [ More ]

Reply #16

budward — Tue, 02 Jan 2007 23:44:35 GMT

Here are my strings for tonite 01/02/07

12348111314151620233132

124811121415162123283237

Reply #15

budward — Tue, 02 Jan 2007 13:49:52 GMT

Yesterdays Results 01/01/07

String1...1 - 3 # match

Washington, D.C.DC Daily 6Sun, Dec 31, 200681416182128

WisconsinSuper CashSun, Dec 31, 200631113303137

DelawareMulti-Win LottoMon, Jan 1, 200751112162932

IllinoisLottoMon, Jan 1, 200741120243335

MassachusettsCash WinfallMon, Jan 1, 2007142326363745

New JerseyPick 6Mon, Jan 1, 20072811253446

OregonMegabucksMon, Jan 1, 200717893139

PennsylvaniaLucky for Life LottoMon, Jan 1, 20071812162128

WashingtonLottoMo... [ More ]

Reply #14

budward — Tue, 02 Jan 2007 13:24:36 GMT

KY Floyd

In case you didn't read the title of this thread

All Pick 6..All States Test

This is what test means

Main Entry: 1test

Pronunciation: 'test

Function: noun

Etymology: Middle English, vessel in which metals were assayed, potsherd, from Anglo-French test, tees pot, Latin testum earthen vessel; akin to Latin testa earthen pot, shell

1 a chiefly British : CUPEL b (1) : a critical examination, observation, or evaluation : TRIAL; specifically : the procedure of submitting a st... [ More ]

Reply #13

KY Floyd — Tue, 02 Jan 2007 05:55:07 GMT

The numbers come from the math. If you have 13 numbers and you're picking 6 number combinations there are 1716 possible combinations to choose from. Having two sets of 13 numbers gives you a total of 3432 combinations (there are some duplicates, but I'm not going to bother checking to see how many). Which of those 3000 +/- combinations would you play, and which states would you play them in? I agree that no one in their right mind would be playing every state and every combination, but I've not... [ More ]

Reply #12

budward — Tue, 02 Jan 2007 00:00:54 GMT

Thanks for your support lottolaughs

Reply #11

budward — Mon, 01 Jan 2007 23:59:59 GMT

Thank-you Just6ntlc

Reply #10

Just6ntlc — Mon, 01 Jan 2007 23:45:49 GMT

Good luck to you budward on your picks.

Reply #9

lottolaughs — Mon, 01 Jan 2007 22:23:50 GMT

Where do you get your numbers?! First off, no one in their right mind would be playing EVERY state,they would be playing their own using the strings.

I have a wheel book right here that plays 98 combos using 14 numbers. If I had played even BOTH strings at $98 dollars apiece it would have been less then $200 to win the Win For Life 5 numbers that budward predicted

Reply #8

KY Floyd — Mon, 01 Jan 2007 21:47:43 GMT

For each string of numbers there are 1716 possible combinations, so playing all combinations for both strings would cost over $3400 for each game (assuming $1 per play and that all of the games have matrixes with at least 41 numbers). Assuming multi-state tri-state megabucks is a redundant listing for ME, NH and VT, you've listed 9 games in the first post, so playing all the combinations for all of the games would cost almost $31,000. Ignoring the games that weren't listed in the first pos... [ More ]

Reply #7

budward — Mon, 01 Jan 2007 05:33:44 GMT

My number strings for Sunday and Monday 12/31 01/01

1591011141824252838404549

125810111416182425334049

Results for tonight as of 11:30pm

String 1... 1 - 3 number hit

Washington, D.C.DC Daily 6Sun, Dec 31, 2006 81416182128

WisconsinSuper CashSun, Dec 31, 2006 31113303137

String 2.... 1 - 4 number hit

Washington, D.C.DC Daily 6Sun, Dec 31, 200681416182128

WisconsinSuper CashSun, Dec 31, 200631113303137

(to

Reply #6

budward — Sun, 31 Dec 2006 22:22:00 GMT

Sorry, I forgot about that one. My numbers are geared for higher end numbers.

I might try working that one too if time permits. It sounds interesting.

Reply #5

RJOh — Sun, 31 Dec 2006 19:38:03 GMT

Are you including West Virgina Cash25 (6/25) in your test? I matched 5/6 on the prediction board Friday 12/29/06 for that game. It has the best odds of matching 6of6 of all the pick6 games.

Reply #4

Rubi 311 — Sun, 31 Dec 2006 19:28:23 GMT

WTG Budward! Great work

Reply #3

lottolaughs — Sun, 31 Dec 2006 19:23:45 GMT

Alright,budward! Great test results so far. I have no doubt we're going to be seeing some impressive things here on this thread.

Way to go

Reply #2

budward — Sun, 31 Dec 2006 13:07:30 GMT

My number strings for Sunday and Monday 12/31 01/01

1591011141824252838404549

125810111416182425334049

Reply #1

budward — Sun, 31 Dec 2006 12:53:16 GMT

Here are the results for my P-6 strings

String 1 Red numbers are matches Green highlighted were drawn before my numbers were posted. Several 4 of 6 hits in string 1

ArizonaThe PickSat, Dec 30, 200621216242536

Atlantic CanadaAtlantic 6/49Sat, Dec 30, 2006101628374748

Canada Lotto 6/49Sat, Dec 30, 2006101418404549

British ColumbiaBC/49Sat, Dec 30, 20065918283845

Canada Lotto 6/49Sat, Dec 30, 2006101418404549

ColoradoLottoSat, Dec 30, 2006129132430

FloridaLottoSat,

All Pick 6..All States Test

budward — Sun, 31 Dec 2006 01:32:48 GMT

I am testing 2 number strings for all Pick 6 games

145911121516222428313840

13459111215161824333841

Although some P-6 have already been drawn, I will not count their hits tonight.

They are

Ireland (Irish)LottoSat, Dec 30, 2006

Lotto Plus 1Sat, Dec 30, 2006

Lotto Plus 2Sat, Dec 30, 2006

MaineTri-State MegabucksSat, Dec 30, 2006

MichiganClassic Lotto 47Sat, Dec 30, 2006

MissouriLottoSat, Dec 30, 2006

Multi-StateTri-State MegabucksSat, Dec 30, 20... [ More ]