Ten Number Challenge

Reply #32

budward — Sat, 20 Jan 2007 00:30:48 GMT

CAEve-245246247257265267457465467657

ILEve-246324326346392394396924926946

OKEve-251261265269291295651691695951

Reply #31

tntea — Fri, 19 Jan 2007 21:45:26 GMT

OH 304

TS 311

GA 104

Reply #30

wingnut71 — Fri, 19 Jan 2007 13:53:22 GMT

hello everyone can someone tell me what would work for michigan? THX

Reply #29

tntea — Fri, 19 Jan 2007 13:14:15 GMT

011,012,103,104,105,106,131,132,133,134,135,136,031,032,033,034,035,036

Reply #28

Shawn67 — Fri, 19 Jan 2007 07:36:02 GMT

My picks for 01/19/07:

332 - 481 - 560 - 345 - 386 - 210 - 285 - 380

Let's see how these do......Anybody else want to join in

Reply #27

budward — Fri, 19 Jan 2007 00:43:20 GMT

Let's get this thing fired up again!

CAEve-154214215254291294295914915954

ILEve-230520523530620623630650652653

OKEve-152612615652912915952961962965

Reply #26

Shawn67 — Tue, 16 Jan 2007 04:07:10 GMT

Congratulations..great job tntea

Reply #25

tntea — Tue, 16 Jan 2007 04:02:11 GMT

020 021 023 024 025 290 291 293 294 295 091 090 092 093 094 095

Oklahoma

Reply #24

budward — Mon, 15 Jan 2007 16:27:30 GMT

thank you, tntea

Reply #23

tntea — Mon, 15 Jan 2007 16:12:00 GMT

Great Job...

Reply #22

budward — Mon, 15 Jan 2007 15:59:56 GMT

GA Sun, Jan 14, 20070-3-2

Reply #21

tntea — Mon, 15 Jan 2007 00:17:18 GMT

Yes.. good luck

Reply #20

budward — Sun, 14 Jan 2007 22:06:48 GMT

Tonights Numbers...

CAEve-215231235315915921923925931935

GAEve-201301320321390391392901920921

ILEve-173179193213217219273279293793

OKEve-215615621625915921925961962965

Reply #19

Shawn67 — Sun, 14 Jan 2007 18:15:12 GMT

tntea, are you calling these numbers for Oklahoma again tonight?? (note to self....must learn v-tracs better)...

Reply #18

tntea — Sun, 14 Jan 2007 12:42:43 GMT

OLD: 020 021 023 024 025 290 291 293 294 295 091 090 092 093 094 095

OK ... $$$Win

Reply #17

mysticwomyn — Sun, 14 Jan 2007 05:13:27 GMT

CA mid today

412-153-117-653-158-060-435-115-165-106

Reply #16

Shawn67 — Sun, 14 Jan 2007 04:30:18 GMT

Awesome job TnTea, didn't notice that the first time around. Good job, I wish I understood v-tracs better. I've taken your tutorials, but I just don't think I get it.......

Reply #15

Amber88 — Sun, 14 Jan 2007 04:20:19 GMT

tntea had it...669 straight! WTG tntea

Reply #14

Shawn67 — Sun, 14 Jan 2007 03:49:18 GMT

669 in OK tonight...No Hit. Oh well, better luck next time.

Reply #13

lottolaughs — Sun, 14 Jan 2007 03:47:02 GMT

Looks like the old -10 system came through tonight--draw tonight 406 box hit!

Can't wait to see how OK does tonight

Reply #12

tntea — Sun, 14 Jan 2007 01:46:59 GMT

Ok

Double vtrac return:699 199 149 644 144 649 664 669 169

OLD: 020 021 023 024 025 290 291 293 294 295 091 090 092 093 094 095

Reply #11

Amber88 — Sun, 14 Jan 2007 00:51:27 GMT

Here's what I get for OK. Watch these for a few days:

025 246 248 266 488

Reply #10

Shawn67 — Sun, 14 Jan 2007 00:30:27 GMT

Hey.....Thanks LL, you're the bomb. Let's see how they do.

Reply #9

lottolaughs — Sun, 14 Jan 2007 00:22:02 GMT

How rude of me! Let's do Oklahoma for you too,Shawn.......

The +13 System---026 036 046 192 102 112

The +222 System---351 352 353 261 262 263 252 253 254

The New # System---967 077 990

The -10 System---038 039 040 041 030 031

Best of luck

Reply #8

budward — Sat, 13 Jan 2007 23:31:40 GMT

I am getting my numbers from........ the dreaded Lotto Buster. I am letting it pick

Hot,Cold,Pattern,Super Picks, Random picks. 1 pick from each category and then wheeling the 5 most picked individual numbers into my picks. I tried this once last week and got a box hit in GA.

Reply #7

Shawn67 — Sat, 13 Jan 2007 23:21:51 GMT

Good to hear from you Budward!!! Anything you want to share with us? How are you getting your numbers? Come on everyone. This is what it's all about.

Reply #6

budward — Sat, 13 Jan 2007 23:14:07 GMT

Something new I am trying. Count me in!!

CAEve-127128129178179198278279298798

ILEve-213271273513521523527571573713

GAEve-327527532537592593597927932937

OKEve-145214215245914915921924925945

Reply #5

Shawn67 — Sat, 13 Jan 2007 22:32:18 GMT

That's what I'm talkin about LL!!! Come on everyone else, don't be shy, let's get this party rollin......

Reply #4

lottolaughs — Sat, 13 Jan 2007 22:09:51 GMT

Thanks Shawn! Good to see you posting too!

Will try out a few of those here. Let's see which cakes still rise or which goes flat! I use these occasionally but it will be nice to test them all together.

For newbies these can be found on these threads:

www.lotterypost.com/thread/142297.htm

www.lotterypost.com/thread/142698.htm

Testing for CALIF evening only--

The -10 System--638 639 630 631 640 641

The +13 System--358 359 350 136 137 138

The +222 System--676 677 678... [ More ]

Reply #3

Shawn67 — Sat, 13 Jan 2007 21:25:55 GMT

Good to hear from you LL, let's get the recipe book out....

Reply #2

lottolaughs — Sat, 13 Jan 2007 21:20:01 GMT

Love this,Shawn! And you are right about more and more numbers being used in systems to win.

Old lottolaughs has had a lot of systems with 10 numbers or less. Just recently was thinking about going back and retesting some of my old dinosaurs . Will post some predictions in a little bit after I blow the dust off and put some gas in! Great idea

Reply #1

Amber88 — Sat, 13 Jan 2007 20:26:47 GMT

I use a couple of different systems, along with the tools here at Lottery Post. Being a platinum member has great advantages...the use of the tools and systems. One of my favorite tools (outside of LP) is the program Lotto Pro. I don't usually play all of the picks it generates, but it has a great feature...the due number. When it says it's due, it's going to hit. I compare that number with the stats here at LP and it's pretty much a sure thing. So if you already have a hot pair in mind and you... [ More ]

Ten Number Challenge

Shawn67 — Sat, 13 Jan 2007 20:15:08 GMT

I have noticed an ever-increasing tendency for new systems requiring more and more picks be made in order to generate a hit. Not necessarily a bad thing if it is a guaranteed hit, but as we all know, there are no guarantees in this business. I have one simple challenge......Lets use this thread to post any new (or old) systems that anyone uses (or has used) with good results, that involve no more than say ten (give or take) numbers to choose from. One of my new personal favorites that I am using... [ More ]