22 Hits Saturday using OLD Tibetan Hor System

Reply #63

Timmer692002 — Sun, 04 Feb 2007 00:53:33 GMT

WinD

I'm looking at those numbers, impressive!

The question I have is which states did you get 50 hits in? Obviously in that short of time, you used multiple states.

In my brief look at history ( only going back to 1/1/07) and in only 3 states (MI, GA and CA) using both mid and evening draws, CA evening hit the most.

Which state did you find to hit most, using those numbers?

Tim

Reply #62

Raven62 — Sat, 03 Feb 2007 15:38:53 GMT

02 February 2007 - Midday

California 5-5-9

Tennessee 5-4-5

20x56x$.25(straight bet)=$280

1(straight win)x$225=$225

(Loss=$55)

20x56x$.25(boxed bet)=$280

2(boxed wins)x$75=$150

(Loss $130)

Connecticut 7-9-5

Kentucky 6-2-7

Michigan 8-3-5

Missouri 7-5-3

New York 3-4-8

Ohio 5-8-3

Texas 7-5-8

Virginia 8-3-4

Washi, D.C. 6-5-8

20x56x$.25(straight bet)=$280

1(straight win)x$225=$225

(Loss=$55)

20x56x$.25(boxed b... [ More ]

Reply #61

Raven62 — Fri, 02 Feb 2007 23:38:16 GMT

01 February 2007 - Midday

Illinois 8-8-2

Kentucky 9-9-7

Maryland 9-4-4

Virginia 2-2-5

Washi, D.C. 7-8-7

20x56x$.25(straight bet)=$280

1(straight win)x$225=$225

(Loss=$55)

20x56x$.25(boxed bet)=$280

5(boxed wins)x$75=$375

Kool $95 Profit!

California 8-6-3

Connecticut 8-5-2

Delaware 7-8-5

Idaho 8-9-7

Indiana 8-5-2

Michigan 6-9-7

Missouri 2-8-9

Ohio 5-8-6

South Carol 7-3-8

Tri-State 5-7-4

20x56x$.2... [ More ]

Reply #60

cps10 — Fri, 02 Feb 2007 20:00:07 GMT

Thanks for continuing to track this Raven...it's very interesting

Reply #59

Raven62 — Thu, 01 Feb 2007 14:46:44 GMT

31 January 2007 - Midday

New York 5-5-4

20x56x$.25(straight bet)=$280

0(straight win)x$225=$225

(Loss=$280)

20x56x$.25(boxed bet)=$280

1(boxed win)x$75=$75

(Loss=$55)

Connecticut 6-3-9

Pennsylvania 4-7-3

Tennessee 3-7-9

Tri-State 2-8-3

20x56x$.25(straight bet)=$280

1(straight win)x$225=$225

(Loss=$55)

20x56x$.25(boxed bet)=$280

4(boxed wins)x$37.50=$150.00

(Loss $130.00)

31 January 2007 - Evening

Arizona 7-2-2

California

Reply #58

Raven62 — Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:44:47 GMT

30 January 2007 - Evening

Indiana 2-5-5

Louisiana 2-5-5

Nebraska 3-9-9

Tri-State 4-8-8

W. Virginia 5-3-3

33x56x$.25(straight bet)=$462

4(straight win)x$225=$900

Kool $438 Profit!

33x56x$.25(boxed bet)=$462

5(boxed wins)x$75=$375

(Loss=$87)

Arizona 9-6-2

California 8-3-6

Connecticut 4-6-8

Kansas 7-2-5

Maryland 7-8-4

Minnesota 5-6-4

New Jersey 8-7-4

New Mexico 7-5-9

Oklahoma

Reply #57

Amazing Grace — Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:57:18 GMT

Not necessarily in the wallet, but with the skills that I have acquired. It's just a matter of time before this pays off big time for me.

Reply #56

cps10 — Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:53:03 GMT

WSN1

You can get it to work...you are wanting knowledge, and you are going to find here no doubt about it. It took me a while, but once I got it, man do I feel rich. Not necessarily in the wallet, but with the skills that I have acquired. It's just a matter of time before this pays off big time for me.

Reply #55

WSN1 — Wed, 31 Jan 2007 09:31:06 GMT

Very good point. I got to find enough of thos nuggets, so I can play regularly again.

Reply #54

WSN1 — Wed, 31 Jan 2007 09:28:18 GMT

Ok cps10, I get it. Thanks

Reply #53

Raven62 — Wed, 31 Jan 2007 03:20:04 GMT

30 January 2007 - Midday

Connecticut 3-3-6

Indiana 5-4-4

Tennessee 6-2-2

20x56x$.25(straight bet)=$280

1(straight win)x$225=$225

(Loss=$55)

20x56x$.25(boxed bet)=$280

3(boxed wins)x$75=$225

(Loss=$55)

California 5-6-8

Delaware 8-6-5

Maryland 5-2-8

Ohio 3-6-5

District of Columba 9-7-8

20x56x$.25(straight bet)=$280

1(straight win)x$225=$225

(Loss=$55)

20x56x$.25(boxed bet)=$280

5(boxed wins)x$37.50=$187.50

(Loss $92.50

Reply #52

takeitez — Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:17:14 GMT

33x56x$.25(boxed bet)=$462

7(boxed wins)x$75=$525

Kool $63 Profit

??????

ez

Reply #51

cps10 — Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:05:58 GMT

Nice work Raven

Reply #50

Raven62 — Tue, 30 Jan 2007 14:38:17 GMT

Evening 01/29/2007

Louisiana 6-3-6

New York 3-3-5

Ohio 6-3-6

Texas 8-8-1

Virginia 0-6-0

West Virginia 7-7-1

Wisconsin 6-0-6

33x56x$.25(straight bet)=$462

1(straight win)x$225=$225

(Loss=$237)

33x56x$.25(boxed bet)=$462

7(boxed wins)x$75=$525

Kool $63 Profit

Reply #49

WIN D — Tue, 30 Jan 2007 01:20:25 GMT

Thank you MSgirlinga.... Hit as 763

That was a good 50/50 shot we had. That number was an early come back Box... the straight version of that number had not hit since Jan 2006.

If you can play it... LA tonight is another good 50/50 shot. Maybe even better.

Reply #48

cps10 — Tue, 30 Jan 2007 00:56:15 GMT

The If Loss column represents your cumulative loss if you lose on that step of the progression, plus it is quarter bets.

Reply #47

msgirlinga — Tue, 30 Jan 2007 00:41:56 GMT

WTG WIN D 1/29 GA Eve 763 bx hit

This is hit # 19 from your list this month, this is a repeat of

GA Eve 1/16 367 str hit

Reply #46

WSN1 — Tue, 30 Jan 2007 00:38:40 GMT

cps10, this is where I maybe missing something with understanding your progression, in the first example is this not a profit of $236.50, but a loss, because you would have spent $56 x 86 = $4816, you a bank of 1,200 and you only get a return of $236.50, then your return and bank get's depleted by the -$4816 progressive expense. If I played the 8 game stretch.

Reply #45

cps10 — Tue, 30 Jan 2007 00:22:16 GMT

Overall losses: $992

I think we could easily tweak this to our advantage.

Reply #44

cps10 — Tue, 30 Jan 2007 00:20:47 GMT

Last backtest: Monday 12/4/06 - Sunday 12/10/06:

Hits: 15 x $900 = $13,500

Cost: $20,832

Profit = ($7,332

Reply #43

cps10 — Tue, 30 Jan 2007 00:16:14 GMT

Another backtest: Monday 12/11/06 - Sunday 12/17/06:

Hits: 22 x $900 = $19,800

Cost: $20,832

Profit = ($1,032)

3rd loss...still up overall

Reply #42

cps10 — Tue, 30 Jan 2007 00:11:29 GMT

Another backtest: Monday 12/18/06 - Sunday 12/24/06:

Hits: 27 x $900 = $24,300

Cost: $20,832

Profit = $3,468

Reply #41

cps10 — Mon, 29 Jan 2007 23:59:02 GMT

Another backtest: Monday 12/25/06 - Sunday 12/31/06:

Hits: 20 x $900 = $18,000

Cost: $20,832

Profit = ($2,832)

2nd loss - still up overall.

Reply #40

cps10 — Mon, 29 Jan 2007 23:57:58 GMT

That I'm not sure about stavros...

Reply #39

stavros — Mon, 29 Jan 2007 23:53:18 GMT

Ok! What we have to do is get this system to work with Lucky's

Reply #38

cps10 — Mon, 29 Jan 2007 23:52:50 GMT

Another backtest: Monday 1/1 - Sunday 1/7:

Hits: 24 x $900 = $21,600

Cost: $20,832

Profit = $832

Reply #37

cps10 — Mon, 29 Jan 2007 23:47:17 GMT

Another backtest: Monday 1/8 - Sunday 1/14:

Hits: 22 x $900 = $19,800

Cost: $20,832

Profit = ($1,032)

First loss...

Reply #36

cps10 — Mon, 29 Jan 2007 23:33:30 GMT

Another backtest: Monday 1/15 - Sunday 1/21:

Hits: 27 x $900 = $24,300

Cost: $20,832

Profit = $3,468

Reply #35

cps10 — Mon, 29 Jan 2007 23:28:38 GMT

Okay, I backtested last week (Monday 1/22 - Sunday 1/28):

Cost to play all states all draws all 56 numbers from Raven:

$20,832

Hits: 27 x $900 = $24,300

Profit for one week: $3,468

Pretty nice

Reply #34

cps10 — Mon, 29 Jan 2007 23:22:32 GMT

I made a mistake with my calculations...I am going to take a stab at this again

Reply #33

cps10 — Mon, 29 Jan 2007 22:51:32 GMT

Nevernind...I have backtested it...$13820 in profits playing $1 all straight doubles (20 of them) in all states for the past week (Mon-Sun).

Reply #32

cps10 — Mon, 29 Jan 2007 22:43:16 GMT

Raven

This is really cool...have you been looking just at straights? And for how long have you been doing that? I wonder if WIN D did that with the original box list? I am think straights are the answer for sure.

Reply #31

Raven62 — Mon, 29 Jan 2007 22:17:00 GMT

Midday 01/29/2007

Georgia 3-3-9

New Jersey 7-5-7

New York 2-2-4

20x56x$.25(straight bet)=$280

2(straight wins)x$225=$450

Kool $170 Profit

Reply #30

cps10 — Mon, 29 Jan 2007 20:09:18 GMT

Let me also emphasize what WIN D has brought forth...he and I play different systems at different times, depending on what opportunities arise. Granted, this opportunity with 6 skips on the numbers happened in TX once that month. Okay, well, you look for other opportunities to play when those aren't hitting. The way we approach things (mathematically and statistically), we can always find a winning proposition in any state with any draw, at any time. That is how you have to play the lottery. Not... [ More ]

Reply #29

cps10 — Mon, 29 Jan 2007 20:03:35 GMT

Now, another way to do this, WSN, is to go for the straight. Lately, that is what I have been doing. Straights have provided me with better opportunities and higher payoffs. If you were to do this online, here is what your progression would look like:

Draw#sBet/UnitUnitsBetIf LossIf Win

156$14.00 1$14.00 ($14.00)$211.00

256$14.00 1$14.00 ($28.00)$197.00

356$14.00 1$14.00 ($42.00)$183.00

456$14.00 1$14.00 ($56.00)$169.00

556$14.00 1$14.00 ($70.00)$155.00

656$14.00 1... [ More ]

Reply #28

cps10 — Mon, 29 Jan 2007 19:56:06 GMT

WSN, again - like most people say, I would play these when there was a substantial skip between these numbers. Meaning, if you get past 5 or 6 draws without one drawn, then play them. Especially if you are playing offline.

If you play online, you would be looking at quite a gap there between 7/29 and /9 between hits, but it could be done using the following progression ($0.25 bets online):

DrawSGL #sBet/UnitUnitsSGL BetIf LossSGL Win

156$14.00 1$14.00 ($14.00)$23.50

256$14... [ More ]

Reply #27

msgirlinga — Mon, 29 Jan 2007 19:10:46 GMT

WTG Raven 1/29 GA Midday 339

Reply #26

WSN1 — Mon, 29 Jan 2007 19:02:38 GMT

cps10, will you use this example to display how you would play the 56#s st and bx using progressive wagering. This is over a 30 day period in TX. It has 2 st hits and 13 bx hits, however there are long periods without hits. How would you do this offline or online and still make a profit?

18/31/2006389389y

28/30/2006576576y

38/29/2006956956y

48/28/2006399399n

58/26/2006848848n

68/25/2006547547y

78/24/2006423423y

88/23/2006761761n

98/22/2006369369y

108/21/2006036... [ More ]

Reply #25

msgirlinga — Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:32:47 GMT

WIN D, and thanks for posting the list,

As a numbers player I owe it to myself to give this list a chance just like any other system and make it effective for me, instead of trying to eat the whole pie at one time I am taking it a slice at a time because the old saying practice makes perfect comes to my mind, therfore as one who wants to make money I will try to perfect list and see if it makes $money$.

After researching my regular numbers that I play, quite a few of them are on this lis... [ More ]

Reply #24

Raven62 — Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:07:09 GMT

You're Welcome!

Last night would have been a good time to play them Allstates:

29x56x$.25(Straight)=$406

5 Straight Hitsx$225=$1125

A Kool $719 Profit

Reply #23

Amazing Grace — Mon, 29 Jan 2007 06:39:17 GMT

Knowing the 3 was missing again and reailizeing that sum 17 was due another hit helped,

No one said it would hit tomorrow,

But my prediction was based on some of that data, it may come from that line , that list hit average every 4 days in Wc, surely you will be able to peg some of them based on Highs and lows, evens and odd, LDrs and mirror combos, combos missing etc, Then it comes down to the laws of probability.

This gabe is so radically you need to be thinking about so mant things

Reply #22

Rakster — Mon, 29 Jan 2007 05:38:46 GMT

I am not sure how you got I was negitively thinking in that last post...lol

What I would like to know is how you got this... or where you got this...

Your target line as of yesterday was this line

289,345,346,348,349,356,357,358,359

How do you know this is the target line... it could be any of the lines on page 1... just b/c its the longest doesn't really mean its the next to hit... or does it work in conjunction with other data

Reply #21

Amazing Grace — Mon, 29 Jan 2007 05:24:30 GMT

I just realized that i was a day earlt on this one, i had bigger money on it the other day only$2.00 on it tonight.

Quote: Originally posted by WIN D on January 26, 2007 Just forget all the silly stuff and focus on the real Math. Thats the important part.

234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 245, 246 ,247, 248,

249 ,256, 257, 258, 259 ,267, 268, 269, 278, 279,

289, 345 ,346, 347, 348, 349, 356, 357, 358, 359,

367, 368, 369, 378, 379, 389, 456, 457, 458 ,459,

467, 468, 469, 478 ,... [ More ]

Reply #20

Amazing Grace — Mon, 29 Jan 2007 04:59:39 GMT

Thanks Raven Always like a doubles list

Reply #19

Raven62 — Mon, 29 Jan 2007 04:56:24 GMT

For the folks that like Double the Payout:

223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 233, 244, 255, 266, 277, 288, 299,

334, 335, 336, 337, 338, 339, 344, 355, 366, 377, 388, 399, 445, 446,

447, 448, 449, 455, 466, 477, 488, 499, 556, 557, 558, 559, 566, 577,

588, 599, 667, 668, 669, 677, 688, 699, 778, 779, 788, 799, 889, 899

Reply #18

Amazing Grace — Mon, 29 Jan 2007 04:52:37 GMT

Rackster you have to get rid of your negative thoughts.

Look simple home work.

Your target line as of yester day was this line

289,345,346,348,349,356,357,358,359

Why was that the target line?

because if you run a year of data on Western Canada, you see that

that line has the following left that has not hit,346,347,348,357,359

The largest line with the most missing, go figure

you see that line had 5 of the total 9 missing.

Hmm only eight left.

How do you know which... [ More ]

Reply #17

Rakster — Mon, 29 Jan 2007 02:53:17 GMT

Well their number came up today on W Canada's p3... 395 -- 359

Box winner... I also had 359 as a box play from another system I used... well I guess its time to run the numbers...lol

Reply #16

cps10 — Mon, 29 Jan 2007 02:35:23 GMT

Mathematically, these gems are to hit every 3 draws. So, the key is to play when they are overdue or when they are at their maximum drought.

But even using a progression will allow you to play for an extended drought. For instance, in Arizona, the longest amount of draws where this didn't hit was 8 draws. So, with a progression, and $625, you could ride it out at all times...

Reply #15

Amazing Grace — Mon, 29 Jan 2007 02:31:33 GMT

Great to see this post back Win D

Email rcvd.

Reply #14

WIN D — Mon, 29 Jan 2007 02:26:27 GMT

Here ya go. This is my state....Georgia. I use several different methods at different times. Everything cycles yes.... Right now I am into using this group of numbers.

Just as one example of using this group ..... Selectively. Wait...then when the opportunity comes around consider this method.

Wait for situation like this one and focus on just these numbers...

Notice Ga. Midday just had 2 doubles followed by..... a single number. We had about a 50/50 chance that the Single was... [ More ]

Reply #13

Rakster — Mon, 29 Jan 2007 02:20:19 GMT

Now thats logical thinking...lol.. .and it makes a lot of sense too!

I was checking out what it would cost us to play these games for all states... take a look at that 50 wins the past 3 days and see for yourself what it would cost us...lol.... 1 or 2 states would be the idea I am sure as all, well take a look...

I loaded up my offshore site and wagered .25 on each number for every state. It would cost me $826.00 a day. Today we had 22 hits... thats 22 x $37.50 = $825.00... we lost $1.00... [ More ]

Reply #12

WIN D — Mon, 29 Jan 2007 02:09:21 GMT

If I can be a little serious for just a sec...

No one is at that level. Well... maybe a Rich guy in Hong Kong or something can play that way but not most people. Most understand that they will have to make this Math work for them in ..... imaginative ways.

There is the rub. Imagination and Pocket Book are way different for different people.

The idea here isn't really about ONE way of using this stuff. It's throwing it out there for the whole tribe to look at .....and think abou... [ More ]

Reply #11

Rakster — Mon, 29 Jan 2007 01:50:27 GMT

lol... I would like to think its about me winning too... but that many numbers to cover all the states.. .that quite the investment.

I was checking just our WC lotto and there were a few hits too but with no 0,1 and no doubles, playing 50+ tickets a draw would not be profitable here.

Don't get me wrong.. if you can do it all the best to you bud... I just can't see how it would be just concentrating on those amount of numbers here.... All the best all good luck the rest of the way... [ More ]

Reply #10

Blackie — Mon, 29 Jan 2007 01:49:29 GMT

I'm looking to be put of of my misery NBEY.

Just joking but feel bad enough.

Reply #9

WIN D — Mon, 29 Jan 2007 01:46:42 GMT

Hey..... its not about you winning. It's about Predictions Man.

I post the numbers and then ..... Y'all post WTG's .... and Wow!

Then.... I am like cool and stuff.

P.S. Well ...I actually can't take the credit cause the Secret numbers were orginally discovered by Bruce Kilimanjaro of upper east side Tibet.

Reply #8

Rakster — Mon, 29 Jan 2007 01:39:27 GMT

No kidding.. thats an aweful lot of numbers to be playing in that many different states...

Reply #7

viperfour — Mon, 29 Jan 2007 01:37:21 GMT

Yeah, but how much would you have to spend to play and would you come out ahead or in the red

Reply #6

tntea — Mon, 29 Jan 2007 01:08:18 GMT

Reply #5

lottery101 — Mon, 29 Jan 2007 01:07:34 GMT

NBey6,

I'm watching your post and predictions.

Reply #4

cps10 — Mon, 29 Jan 2007 01:02:17 GMT

LOL...well, I am willing to take that risk, NBey

Reply #3

NBey6 — Mon, 29 Jan 2007 00:57:02 GMT

We can and I know how, but if I tell you, I'll have to kill you

Reply #2

Blackie — Mon, 29 Jan 2007 00:41:31 GMT

Wouldn't it be nice if we could figure out which State will have those numbers

Reply #1

emilyg — Mon, 29 Jan 2007 00:36:32 GMT

22 Hits Saturday using OLD Tibetan Hor System

WIN D — Mon, 29 Jan 2007 00:34:56 GMT

50 Hits in 3 days using the OLD TIBETAN HOR SYSTEM !

234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 245, 246 ,247, 248,

249 ,256, 257, 258, 259 ,267, 268, 269, 278, 279,

289, 345 ,346, 347, 348, 349, 356, 357, 358, 359,

367, 368, 369, 378, 379, 389, 456, 457, 458 ,459,

467, 468, 469, 478 ,479, 489, 567, 568, 569, 578,

579, 589, 678, 679, 689, 789,