proven lotto prediction!!

Reply #60

luckyhorse — Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:12:43 GMT

yes it can

Reply #59

redtag — Thu, 22 Feb 2007 21:15:43 GMT

can this be used wth pick 5

Reply #58

guesser — Thu, 22 Feb 2007 19:38:27 GMT

Yeah, people only want to play only one game, I can understand that.

I was hoping to have something with my earlier attempt at 'Post 6 numbers you will NOT play', but 95% of the folks totally missed the boat on that one, they ALL picked the 6 longest shots, and that's not what I intended, no matter how many times I tried to explain it.

Reply #57

RJOh — Thu, 22 Feb 2007 17:40:03 GMT

You may be right but you'll never really know until you've tried. There were other challenges before those of MADDOG but his were the only ones that survived.

Reply #56

luckyhorse — Thu, 22 Feb 2007 05:46:07 GMT

thanks vick as i jotted them down something didnt seem right thanks for proof reading foir me and once againthose 3 numbers i overlooked

Reply #55

luckyhorse — Thu, 22 Feb 2007 05:42:36 GMT

i played the full line 7,17,27,37,47 just in case more than one or two of them come

Reply #54

vick — Thu, 22 Feb 2007 05:30:47 GMT

for BC 49 Feb 24 2007 this is what i get:

1-5-7-11-14-15-16-17-18-19-23-25-37-45-47

BEST BET = 14

you have the 27 i don't, where did you get that from?

+

your seen to be missing :

11 - BRONZE RULE

19 - BRONZE RULE

45 - GOLDEN RULE 1 - period 2

Reply #53

luckyhorse — Thu, 22 Feb 2007 05:13:16 GMT

bc/49 prediction for feb 24/07 1,5,15,14,18,23,25,14,16,27,37,47,7,17, hey vick did i miss any numbers maybe if you could have a look would be appreciated this is for the british columbia 49

Reply #52

vick — Thu, 22 Feb 2007 04:44:30 GMT

Powerball picks for Feb 24 2007

using again all methods like before

10 picks :

1-3-4-6-12-15-32-37-42-52

BEST BETS:

3-4-12

good luck

Reply #51

vick — Thu, 22 Feb 2007 04:28:46 GMT

only 1 / 11 but hey it was a best bet the 2

i'll post another set for this Sat.

Reply #50

BobP — Wed, 21 Feb 2007 19:28:04 GMT

When back testing lottery prediction software begin with a large number field to see if the product has any prediction capability what-so-ever. Knowing the expected ratios provides the center chart line. If lottery software can't put all the winning numbers in a large field you don't need to waste time to prove it can't do it in smaller fields. Most wheels win one prize tier above their guarantee roughly half of the time so larger number field wheels for small prizes can be worth playing.... [ More ]

Reply #49

vick — Wed, 21 Feb 2007 10:06:50 GMT

So using all of the Methods unmodified as per the instructions except for Golden Rule 3 which i'm still figuring out i get these numbers for the Feb 21 Powerball:

11 numbers

2-5-15-25-31-33-34-35-36-39-55

Best bets :

2-33

GoodLuck

ps i don't play it cause we don't have that lotto up here in Canada

------------------

pss. i did a quick back test on the last draw Feb 17

13 numbers

1-4-5-10-14-25-35-36-42-45-50-52-53

Best Bets:

1

so hit for 3 including the best bet

and... [ More ]

Reply #48

vick — Wed, 21 Feb 2007 06:30:51 GMT

i modified it even further for keno to include only Silver rule 1, pair, triples etc, both today's and yesterday's picks that didn't hit yesterday and the sets are smaller and they hit very well when they do.

2 nights ago it would have hit for 7 / 11 numbers, which i would have wheeled for either 6, 7 or 8 numbers - potential $1000 to $5,000 win !!!!

feb 17 = 7 / 17 - not bad average is 5 [2/3 on the set's best bets though]

feb 18 = 7 / 11 - wow - average is 3

67-59-55-4... [ More ]

Reply #47

guesser — Wed, 21 Feb 2007 06:12:07 GMT

If I thought I would get a response to a Powerball challenge of picking 24 numbers, I'd try it, but I tried other challenges here with little success, so no.....

Reply #46

BobP — Tue, 20 Feb 2007 05:41:38 GMT

In a 6/49 game the odds of having all six winning numbers among any randomly selected 24 numbers is 1 time in 103 tries.

The odds of having all 6 winning numbers among any group of 18 is 1 in 753.

The odds of having all 6 winning numbers among any group of 12 is 1 in 15,134.

The odds of having all 6 winning numbers among any group of 36 is 1 in 7.

Not as easy as you might think.

BobP

Reply #45

guesser — Tue, 20 Feb 2007 05:30:32 GMT

But when it's all said and done, I'd say ANY of us that paid attention can list 18 numbers in a 49 game and have a pretty fair chance of hitting all 6 or 7, I'd say 1 out of every 4 times at worst. I'd try it, but I don't play any 49 games, and it would take me 3 months of data and database work before I'd even guess at what to list. I get all 5 WB's in Powerball every other game lately (obviously not in the same game), but I have a pool of 15, sometimes 16 numbers to work with, and that's too... [ More ]

Reply #44

BobP — Tue, 20 Feb 2007 05:16:27 GMT

I didn't just fall off turnip truck yesterday, it was last week.

I do understand what's going on here, how the boards and predictions work. I think in this case you missed the context of the thread. The man is being asked to make predictions and whether he cashed in any winning tickets, which implies actual play not just predictions for fun.

I would post Pick-3 and Pick-4 predictions I play because it doesn't matter to the prize pool. I would never post my Pick-5 and Pick-6 tickets... [ More ]

Reply #43

Todd — Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:40:26 GMT

I was going to say the same about you, but I wasn't sure about the fun part.

Reply #42

RJOh — Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:23:12 GMT

Many LP members post more combinations than they could ever play and some post for games they can't play but they put the same amount of effort in picking those combinations as the ones they do play because it's their hobby. Does that make them a fool?

Any combinations I post, I play if I can or would if I could. I post PB predictions, but it not played in Ohio and I only travel out of state to get tickets when its jackpot is over $200M and the weather is nice. I like to test my system b... [ More ]

Reply #41

vick — Mon, 19 Feb 2007 06:02:33 GMT

i'm working on some different modifications of his methods for keno and so far it seems very promising.

Basically i'm throwing out Golden 1

keeping only

Silver - sub3 4 - i also modified this to include any long sequence more than pairs

Silver 2 - but must have 4 numbers to qualify and decades in

+

then i see any numbers from this way for last draw that didn't hit and reuse them in this current draw

------------------------

I haven't played with Golden 3 yet but i t... [ More ]

Reply #40

luckyhorse — Mon, 19 Feb 2007 05:46:33 GMT

you guys are annoying but a'lot of fun this board is grrrrrrreat

Reply #39

Todd — Mon, 19 Feb 2007 05:32:50 GMT

Reply #38

luckyhorse — Mon, 19 Feb 2007 05:30:15 GMT

thanks bob i couldnt have said it better myself

Reply #37

Todd — Mon, 19 Feb 2007 05:30:07 GMT

I disagree, especially when the number set chosen by the system consists of almost half of the available numbers.

I also disagree that only a fool would post actual combinations. I don't consider myself a fool, and I have posted real combinations that I have played. I seriously doubt that people pick their lotto numbers for the jackpot games from the predictions board.

Reply #36

BobP — Mon, 19 Feb 2007 05:09:40 GMT

No offense, but only a fool would post actual combinations they intended to play. So many people might play them, just for the heck of it, the prizes would be diluted especially the jackpot.

Posting a reduced field is more then enough to proof a system. After that it's up to the quality of the wheel and the order the numbers are replaced on the wheel that determines what happens next.

BobP

Reply #35

guesser — Sun, 18 Feb 2007 20:35:25 GMT

I looked, I don't find anything but several laundry lists of numbers, but no actual games, I give up.

That should make you happy.

Reply #34

luckyhorse — Sun, 18 Feb 2007 07:22:49 GMT

check the threads and maybe lay off the pipe for awhile! the predictions are there !!!! not in the prediction tables listed but in these threads and come on give me a break because this is starting to resemble loser central

Reply #33

guesser — Sun, 18 Feb 2007 07:07:52 GMT

Just remember close doesn't count, it's all or nothing.

I missed it: Where do you post your actual pre-game GAME predictions ?

Not the laundry list of numbers, but the actual games

Reply #32

luckyhorse — Sun, 18 Feb 2007 06:17:29 GMT

well you guys i hit 3+bonus number with the selections i posted for the bc/49 and for the canada 6/49 i only hit 2 numbers i still think i'am onto something here as the prizes still keep coming next time the jacpot will be mine!!!!! todds probably laughing right now on my overblown enthusiasm lol

Reply #31

BobP — Sun, 18 Feb 2007 05:22:09 GMT

100% 4if6in18numbers42lines, replace my place holder pointer numbers with those from Luckyhorse. BobP

1 2 3 6 8 11

1 2 4 7 16 17

1 2 5 10 13 18

1 2 9 12 14 15

1 3 4 5 14 15

1 3 7 10 12 18

1 3 9 13 16 17

1 4 6 11 12 13

1 4 8 9 10 18

1 5 6 7 9 11

1 5 8 12 16 17

1 6 10 15 17 18

1 7 8 13 14 15

1 10 11 14 16 18

2 3 4 7 9 13

2 3 8 10 15 16

2 3 8 14 17 18

2 4 5 7 8 12

2 4 6 7 10 14

2 4 7 11 15 18

2 5 6 13 15... [ More ]

Reply #30

guesser — Sun, 18 Feb 2007 05:00:44 GMT

Great, what do you want to abbreviate ?

You still gotta make choices to narrow it down.

Reply #29

luckyhorse — Sat, 17 Feb 2007 07:45:11 GMT

guesser use an abbreviated wheel 18 4/6 in 42 games

Reply #28

guesser — Sat, 17 Feb 2007 05:55:24 GMT

Horse, you listed 18 numbers.

You have to list the GAMES, not 37% of the available numbers, that won't get you anywhere.

I feel safe in saying if most of us listed 18 numbers out of just 49, we would do better as well, but we are playing 12 out of 55 plus the PB, which is 4/42.

You have to get your list down to no more than 12 numbers or it is unaffordable to wheel, and even 12 is too much for us common folk.

Unless I read the chart wrong, to wheel 18 numbers in order to get just... [ More ]

Reply #27

luckyhorse — Sat, 17 Feb 2007 04:50:04 GMT

bc/49 prediction for feb 17/07 05,13,15,16,17,19,25,26,27,28,29,30,35,37,38,43,45,46 if i hit on this and the canada 6/49 i will start posting mm numbers and powerball and i will play them of course lol

Reply #26

luckyhorse — Sat, 17 Feb 2007 03:54:03 GMT

you must be bored how bout selecting some more losing numbers!!!! sorry buddy you lose this time its there and posted days before the draw maybe next week you will have the last laugh who knows

Reply #25

RJOh — Sat, 17 Feb 2007 03:37:59 GMT

I don't have to check any thread, there is a pull down menu associated with your name that can be used to check your prediction statistics, your posts, your predictions and profile.

Reply #24

vick — Sat, 17 Feb 2007 03:35:37 GMT

he posted them at the start of this thread

luckyhorse i also bought the method too - pretty cheap - and got a 3 / 7 on Super 7 tonight, i was using a modified version of his methods to trim the numbers down.

looks promising. I'll be trying it for keno - and the 649's too.

I've been talking with the Russian author on email and he seems genuine about his work and helpfull.

Reply #23

luckyhorse — Sat, 17 Feb 2007 03:33:04 GMT

you sir are an idiot jut check the latest threads there are 2

Reply #22

RJOh — Sat, 17 Feb 2007 03:31:02 GMT

I checked your prediction statistics and got the following message:

No report available: luckyhorse has not posted any predictions.

Reply #21

truecritic — Sat, 17 Feb 2007 03:28:07 GMT

Good job....any chance you actually won

Reply #20

vick — Sat, 17 Feb 2007 03:26:56 GMT

6 + B = 7 numbers out of 18 is outstanding - on average should only get 3.

Did you use some lottosynch + this other method or all this method?

What did you hit tonight

Reply #19

luckyhorse — Sat, 17 Feb 2007 03:13:03 GMT

well i hate to toot my own horn folks but if you look at my super 7 prediction and the winning number 1,5,7,25,29,31,35 b26 thats 6 plus the bonus number predicted !!!!!!! stick that in your ear lol

Reply #18

luckyhorse — Fri, 16 Feb 2007 22:45:36 GMT

how many timesdo i have to tell you this???? ITS NOT MY SYSTEM

Reply #17

RJOh — Fri, 16 Feb 2007 21:00:57 GMT

I doubt if luckyhorse is interested in helping anyone win a PB or MM jackpot. Participating in the MADDOG's challenges will expose his system as not being any better than those used by other LP members. Picking all 6 winning numbers in those challenges is hard.

Reply #16

psykomo — Fri, 16 Feb 2007 20:42:09 GMT

Mr. Horse........PSYKOMO was going to suggest you go to JACKPOT

forum post with MADDOG many others.................................!!!!

L@@Ks^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^guesser HAD the IDEA 1st..!!!!

If U-Can't get no.. RESPECT

on MADDOG's CHALLENGE U-may want to BUY another system or

PLAY QuickPicks

Reply #15

truecritic — Fri, 16 Feb 2007 20:16:20 GMT

You want an insult ? Get back to me when you folks win a Bowl game, or an NFL Playoff game.... (I'm KIDDING).

guesser, you are going to have to try a lot harder than that! I happen to agree with you

Reply #14

guesser — Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:25:19 GMT

I apologize, I didn't mean it the way it sounded.

What I meant was, most of the folks I see here deal with PB or MM, I don't see a lot of discussion on the Canadian Lottery. In fact, There is probably more discussion on State Lotteries, the Pick-3, 4 and 5's than there is PB or MM. I'd venture to say that more folks (on here) number-crunch MM or PB than most other lotteries, so if we could see predictions from one persons' system and compare them to each of our own, maybe together we can come... [ More ]

Reply #13

Todd — Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:32:17 GMT

Well, I'd have to agree, there are many Canadian members, so I don't mind seeing the Canada 7 stuff posted. Frankly, there are people from almost every country with a lottery who come here, so post whatever game you like.

However, the point is well taken that posting MM and PB predictions widens the appeal of the topic thread, because there are so many people interested in those two games. But if you just want to post S7, that's just fine with me.

Reply #12

truecritic — Fri, 16 Feb 2007 08:21:36 GMT

Gee, guesser, the guy is from Canada, what difference does it make what game he chooses????

so to be honest, it doesn't matter.

Really? Who says Canadian games don't matter? What an insult.

Reply #11

guesser — Fri, 16 Feb 2007 07:41:44 GMT

Fine by us, Mr. Horse.

But let me say: run your system with MegaMillions numbers, and Powerball numbers, because that's what most of us can relate to. You can obviously still run your Canada 7 numbers, but I don't think many of us follow that one at all, so to be honest, it doesn't matter.

Reply #10

luckyhorse — Fri, 16 Feb 2007 06:00:11 GMT

sorry let me correct the date saturday feb 17/07 and i agree with you there are a'lot of scams on ebay probably 99% of them is usually oold recycled garbage from some other author but my enthusiasm on this sytem comes from the fact i have never seen this before which makes it original when i saw it i went wow! i have to take a closer look at this and that in itself was worth the $5 i paid here i will pu this in bold ok? DO NOT BUY THIS SYSTEM TILL I HAVE POSTED ENOUGH PREDIUCTIONS TO MAKE IT... [ More ]

Reply #9

Todd — Fri, 16 Feb 2007 05:49:47 GMT

I moved your post into the existing thread. Please keep the posts under one thread. I am not comfortable having multiple threads floating around, when it's basically an advertisement for something resembling an eBay scam.

Reply #8

luckyhorse — Fri, 16 Feb 2007 04:55:13 GMT

this is for the saturday feb 10/07 canada lotto 6/49 draw 41-37-40-25-42-08-39-38-15-05-35-45 good luck! ps: i'am not out to prove anything to anybody here is a guy who likes investigating different and using different strategies every draw maybe this sounds like you? for this draws numbers i have stuck with the newest strategy

Reply #7

Raziel — Mon, 12 Feb 2007 23:32:13 GMT

I hear you on that one RJOH...I to am surprised he is still using the same name.

Raziel

Reply #6

RJOh — Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:58:27 GMT

Hey Clint,

You're new here so I suspect these are the first posts of luckyhorse you've read but I have been reading his scams since he started posting on the old Maybelle website. I'm just surprised that he's still using the same name since many of the older LP members were Maybelle members too until it went out of business.

Reply #5

guesser — Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:38:29 GMT

Clint, he's going to have to do a LOT better than listing 38% of the available numbers for Canada Super 7.

*IF* he can get it down to 10, MAYBE 11 numbers, then, and only then, will he have something worth being excited about.

Reply #4

Todd — Mon, 12 Feb 2007 18:17:38 GMT

Hey Clint,

Maybe you should ask me why I'm posting that, rather than assuming a guy named luckyhorse with 109 posts to his name is on the up up.

Maybe you should try to understand the nature and flow of the forums before using your first post to criticize the forum administrator, eh?

If you cared to ask, I would have been happy to tell you about the dozen other scams that luckyhorse has boasted about here.

Reply #3

Bull Dog — Mon, 12 Feb 2007 18:09:13 GMT

Hey Todd, how about cutting the guy a little slack? He is excited!!!!! He says in previous posts that back testing of this system looks very promising. Why not let him try out the system and post the results as he has offered? We are all grown people and we can decide whether we are interested or not. If it turns out to be something worthwhile, I sure sure would be interested and so would a lot of other folks. I thought exchanging ideas was what this site was all about anyway.

Clint

Reply #2

Todd — Mon, 12 Feb 2007 05:40:39 GMT

Please keep the breathless exciting subject lines to a reasonable level. First of all the subject proven lotto prediction is a contradiction in terms. A prediction is not proven, it is something that remains to be proven.

Unless, of course, the system has proved that it has won a jackpot in the past, which of course it has not. If it had, then the person hawking that scam on eBay would have no reason to do so.

Reply #1

Pilot — Mon, 12 Feb 2007 05:35:05 GMT

Dear Luckyhorse,

Dude, make a prediction for NY daily KENO for tomorrow 2/12.

Thanks

Pilot

proven lotto prediction!!

luckyhorse — Mon, 12 Feb 2007 03:32:09 GMT

this is for the feb 16/07 canada lotto super 7 draw 4-5-7-15-17-19-23-25-26-27-28-29-31-35-41-44-45-47 eventually when i learn more i will be able to cut the amount of numbers down good luck