<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Time for change</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/151454</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/151454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Time for change</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #6</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/151454/779105</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/151454/779105</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 15:39:27 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>CA LotteryGuy</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Todd...how much were sales affected in Missouri by going to a computerized draw?  Can you direct me to this information</p>]]></description>
			<category>CA LotteryGuy</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #5</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/151454/778982</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/151454/778982</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:39:06 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>That would be true if the sales were not affected, but they are.  While it may be a little bit cheaper to run the drawings on a computer, the drop in sales (as previously documented in states like Missouri) over-compensates for any savings, which results in a net loss vs. traditional ball drawings.  Thus, it is a myth that computerized drawings are  cheaper .</p>]]></description>
			<category>Todd</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/151454/778979</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/151454/778979</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:27:28 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Badger</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>No that won&#x27;t happen.  Using a computer and RNG program is much cheaper for them, plus they don&#x27;t have to pay to televise the drawings.  That gives them more profit, and making money is why the games exist. If anything, we will see more states go to RNG.  It would take a massive protest of the players, and hitting the lotteries in the pocketbook before they would even consider reverting back.</p>]]></description>
			<category>Badger</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/151454/778912</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/151454/778912</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 06:29:20 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I think that&#x27;s a great question.<br /><br />I have been saying for years now that some state is going to suddenly realize that turning back to real lottery drawings is going to be a major event that brings in a surge of new revenue.  You&#x27;d think with all the lotteries hurting right now -- and even thinking of doing the unthinkable and SELLING the lottery -- that they would kick this idea around.  Instead of selling the lottery, how about doing something for the players that will pay them back with extra... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/151454/778912">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Todd</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/151454/778896</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/151454/778896</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 06:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>guesser</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Nope, not unless it&#x27;s financially feasable, and that would take a few thousand people saying &#x27;switch back and we will start playing again&#x27;.</p>]]></description>
			<category>guesser</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/151454/778894</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/151454/778894</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 06:01:34 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Coin Toss</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Depends on the players....as long as people continue to play no matter what, no.</p>]]></description>
			<category>Coin Toss</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Time for change</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/151454</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/151454</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 05:27:22 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>numbergirly</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Do you think any of the states with electronic drawing will convert back to the old fashion way?<br /><br />numbergirly</p>]]></description>
			<category>numbergirly</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

