show a system that 2 numbers that will not come in next draw

Reply #40

kellmellus55 — Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:54:34 GMT

(Here's your system posted) avidreamer

Hey everyone, kudos!

*I was reading a Post last week, and somebody (sorry forgot who), was asking for ideas on a system buit around 2 digits that WONT appear in the NEXT drawing!*

So with a little spark, I broke out the cavemans calculator;Heres what I Started to find:

*(Note: I was testing on Western Canada Drawing)

I found that by Excluding Triples and Doubles, 8 numbers can be wheeled into 56 boxed Combos. Well thats... [ More ]

Reply #39

LAVERNE MALONEY — Thu, 19 Apr 2007 07:40:02 GMT

You are welcome.

Yes avidreamer, your link is correct. It goes right to your new post: Playing a Pick-3 Missing Digits System.

Reply #38

avidreamer — Thu, 19 Apr 2007 07:21:49 GMT

HEY GUYS!!

(Thanks Malone for finding this post)

I'm a newbie to LotteryPost(An avid reader of the forums though LOL)

*I posted on a new thread a response to the first question, give me a sec to get the link

https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/154728.htm

Check it for me!!!

Goodtimes

Reply #37

avidreamer — Thu, 19 Apr 2007 07:21:36 GMT

Reply #36

LAVERNE MALONEY — Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:33:38 GMT

Quote from denniswaite,

what I would do if you could is too look up what came out on that date the prievious year or go back several years ;

use the results from all your resources to come up with a simple solution and play less numbers not more then you have a winning solution ............

HIGH 5 denniswaite HIGH 5 !!!!!, using the lottery tools here brings the hit(s) straight to your door.

Reply #35

denniswaite — Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:26:34 GMT

hey I looked up that other persons lottery predictions for michigan and 03 of them were right for box hit :

not a bad system but still your only guessing

what I would do if you could is too look up what came out on that date the prievious year or go back several years ;

use the results from all your resources to come up with a simple solution and play less numbers not more then you have a winning solution ......... [ More ]

Reply #34

LAVERNE MALONEY — Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:19:48 GMT

Hello there kellmellus55, when I look at the Michigan results I'm seeing so much of the 1 or 2 digit return. That's a state that you can count on that happening regularly. Take a look at Michigan's lineup.

Reply #33

kellmellus55 — Wed, 28 Mar 2007 18:53:46 GMT

855 Michigan midday came in so the so the system leaving out the last two won 96 wheel(02346789

Reply #32

kellmellus55 — Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:43:57 GMT

Here's a vtrac row for 551 last nites michigan draw

v551 440 445 490 495 940 945 990 995

Now what do i do with this?elimate 0-1-4-5-9?box(2-3-6-7-8) or do the opposite.

Reply #31

orangeman — Wed, 28 Mar 2007 13:49:56 GMT

Everyone is making things too complex. Just eliminate one Vtrac. Pretty simple. Why make things so complicated?

Orangeman

Reply #30

kellmellus55 — Wed, 28 Mar 2007 13:26:30 GMT

Last evening Michigan3-digit double number was 551 so leave out the 51 and wheel (02346789) for michigan midday

The other idea is take the last 10 drawings and leave out the last 2 number that came in midday

(example)

Numbers8245703196

Rank12333678810

Hit Times6544432110

leave out 96 and wheel(01234578) lets see which one will work better

Reply #29

kellmellus55 — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:15:35 GMT

Here's an idea you use the last 2 numbers in the last 50 draws results ( no doubles or triples)

This is Michigan Midday so leave out the 13 and wheel(72498056) midday total 56 numbers(56.00 to win 150.00)

Numbers7249805613

Rank1224566899

Hit Times20171716151414131212

024, 025, 026, 027, 028, 029, 045, 046, 047, 048, 049, 056, 057, 058, 059, 067, 068, 069, 078, 079, 089, 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 256, 257, 258, 259, 267, 268, 269, 278, 279, 289, 456, 457,... [ More ]

Reply #28

kellmellus55 — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 10:24:01 GMT

Thanks Laverne, it seems that this works better when you go from eve-mid-eve-mid not from mid to mid and eve to eve. Of coarse i eyeballed this too.

Maryland is 44-34 using this method for 6 months.(mid-mid)(eve-eve)

Kentucky is 35-33 using this method for 6 months(mid-mid)(eve-Eve)

I am still looking for a better system with a better percentage of winning, but this is a start for now.

I am sure there is someone else out there that has another idea that we can use taking out 2 number... [ More ]

Reply #27

LAVERNE MALONEY — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 04:25:39 GMT

kellmellus55

Clarkston,MI

United States

Member #35481

March 12, 2006

390 Posts

Offline

Posted: March 13, 2007, 12:56 pm - IP LoggedReply Favorites Member Top

Quote: Originally posted by LAVERNE MALONEY on March 13, 2007 Very, very easy. I'm not being funny.

Look at your last draw. There is a strong possibility that 2 #s from that draw may not repeat. (Although, it can happen but not everyday.) Take out the 2 digit combos of your choosing then do your wheelin... [ More ]

Reply #26

Rakster — Mon, 19 Mar 2007 04:06:44 GMT

143

Congrats man

Reply #25

kellmellus55 — Sun, 18 Mar 2007 05:46:30 GMT

Maryland is 899 so leave out the 89 and wheel (01234567)

no doubles or trips

012, 013, 014, 015, 016, 017, 023, 024, 025, 026, 027, 034, 035, 036, 037, 045, 046, 047, 056, 057, 067, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 134, 135, 136, 137, 145, 146, 147, 156, 157, 167, 234, 235, 236, 237, 245, 246, 247, 256, 257, 267, 345, 346, 347, 356, 357, 367, 456, 457, 467, 567

good luck 56.00 to win 150.00 boxed

Let's see what happens to this bet

Reply #24

CCHS13 — Sun, 18 Mar 2007 00:42:44 GMT

Im all ears, got to love the idea of making a consistent profit

Reply #23

WSN1 — Sun, 18 Mar 2007 00:33:25 GMT

Good catch CCHS, it would be great to identify what are the pattern indicators in IL that's makes it reverse filter for this method. This will help us set the limits of the system, like KY vs. IL

Reply #22

CCHS13 — Sun, 18 Mar 2007 00:21:26 GMT

Looks like this method may have potential in a few states but it works in reverse in Illinois

Reply #21

Rakster — Sat, 17 Mar 2007 23:55:44 GMT

Ya... back to the drawing board... 0-3 today.... Conneticutt is a Monday play...

There is no way to understand this game... no way. You have to be good to be lucky and lucky to be good... right now I am neither...lol

Reply #20

WSN1 — Sat, 17 Mar 2007 19:00:07 GMT

Well you've proven what I expected from your eyeball test, most states having a losing record. So, it's probably a good idea to identify what patterns made Kentucky and Maryland work and only play this strategy when a state's game is in those pattern cycles

Reply #19

Rakster — Sat, 17 Mar 2007 18:00:30 GMT

Well following this idea, wagering only .25 per set, you would have profited $614.00 in Kentucky and $628.50 in Maryland..

Thats over $1242 in profits in 6 months just playing these 2 states.

Looks pretty good to me

Reply #18

kellmellus55 — Sat, 17 Mar 2007 14:07:46 GMT

These 2 states have winning records over 6 months using an 8 wheel after a double.Most states have losing records for 6 months.I eyeballed these so i may have been off a little more or less.

W - L

Kentucky 44- 30

Maryland 47- 34

Good Luck

Reply #17

Rakster — Sat, 17 Mar 2007 13:17:01 GMT

Thanks WSN1...

I go randomly throughout all of the U.S.A.... whenever theres a double I look into it...lol...

Good Luck to you today and always

Reply #16

WSN1 — Sat, 17 Mar 2007 10:15:10 GMT

You're welcome, Rakster. You're correct applying the concept to multiple states is different in that each state's game has it's specific hit cycle for your method. In that case, to get a fair assessment of the probabilities for success you are definitely gonna need more that 4 states setup. I would suggest that you do a workout for 20-30 states for the next midday draw, then you can put your strategy to task against several different cycles of the game and see how it holds up. You can hit or mis... [ More ]

Reply #15

Rakster — Sat, 17 Mar 2007 06:47:43 GMT

I know I am grasping here and you may be right on the hit cycle... but I have rotated the 8 # selections the last couple days and have done well. Thing is, I am not playing them in one state... I am playing them with any state that had a double only last night. I know there will be days that a repeat digit will show up.... and days where there will be follow up doubles but seeing that its not focused on one state, it would be hard to say if its a hitting cycle or something that may just work f... [ More ]

Reply #14

WSN1 — Sat, 17 Mar 2007 05:52:18 GMT

Rakster, respectfully Im gonna have to go predict in my professional opinion that on the long haul this method is reasonable but on the surface it will not buy any added improvement to the 6# wheel's hit rate. Over the long haul the 2 digits from the double will miss regularly + the cold digits selected will miss also. It will probably become most apparent, if you future or backtest 100 draws. Your method could probably be in a hit cycle right now, after a cold spell. In my opinion, a 6# wheel o... [ More ]

Reply #13

Rakster — Sat, 17 Mar 2007 04:58:16 GMT

Sorry... my misunderstanding...lol

I seemed to have found a trick to even lower the 8 number plays to a 6 number rotation with some predictability.

Wait for a double like above, but elliminate those 2 numbers plus look back over the past 5 days... do a search as to what numbers haven't appeared in the past 5 days. You will find any where from zero to 4 different numbers haven't been called. I looked it up where taking the first couple of missing numbers and add them to the doubles from t... [ More ]

Reply #12

WSN1 — Sat, 17 Mar 2007 03:28:28 GMT

Huh?, maybe, I was not clear, the method of picking 2 of the last draws digits are reasonable. A 6# wheel is harder to do. I was simply saying if you eliminate 2 digits, you will statisically have a greater change of trapping the winning combo, but more # to play, 6#s are statiscally less lightly to have the winning combo, but less #s to play. So the key with either method you choice, is to find a way to improve either methods weak point, be it a 6# or 8# wheel. There is no magic bullet, but th... [ More ]

Reply #11

Rakster — Sat, 17 Mar 2007 02:29:39 GMT

So how hard would it be to lessen the 8 numbers from any doubles called from the night before. What strategies would you use to eliminate 2 numbers you think won't be called besides those that were eliminated from the day befores doubles

Reply #10

WSN1 — Sat, 17 Mar 2007 01:59:36 GMT

Omniscient, a 6# wheel sounds excellent, however it is no better than attempting than a 8# wheel if you do not have a demonstrated effective approach to trap the winning digits, at least 1/3 of the time. Personally, I havent seen the details of an effective approach.

In theory 6#s is more profit than 8#s, but 6# is statsically harder than 8#s, therefore, the profit factor becomes a insignificant, unless you have a solid factor of trapping the numbers equal to or greater than demonstrated by a... [ More ]

Reply #9

Rakster — Sat, 17 Mar 2007 01:05:36 GMT

Hit again in Michigan evening draw!!

4-7-4 last night... today 6-5-1 Winner!

Had it boxed but would have been a straight hit if I played it as a straight.

Reply #8

orangeman — Fri, 16 Mar 2007 22:08:33 GMT

Here's an idea . . . Determine which VTRAC will not come up in the next drawing. You will be dealing with 5 variables instead of the usual 10 since each VTRAC represents two numbers.

Orangeman

Reply #7

Rakster — Fri, 16 Mar 2007 22:03:31 GMT

Here is a way that does extremely well...

Look for a night that had a double in it...

example... California... last night 4-7-7

ELIMINATE the 4 and 7 the next draw... WINNER 531 today!

Doubles usually do not have repeats I find... if there is its usually another double which would kill you anyways.

KS the other night 9-9-6 next night 345 WINNER!

Ohio last night 6-7-6 today 829...WINNER!!

Try it out...

Reply #6

kellmellus55 — Fri, 16 Mar 2007 13:51:51 GMT

We hit once so let's try the system again for michigan midday today, But i added a twist.

*best to use only when a double number comes out last draw*

Here's how the system works, take yesterday michigan double number (or your state double) 474 and keep 2 numbers out (47) than wheel the remaining numbers(01235689)

Exclude doubles and triples leaves you with these 56 numbers boxed

(56.00 bet to win 150.00 betslips example)

012, 013, 015, 016, 018, 019, 023, 025, 026, 028, 029,... [ More ]

Reply #5

kellmellus55 — Tue, 13 Mar 2007 18:04:47 GMT

Thanks Lavenne Maloney for your help,and congrats on your winning pick

I use betslips online they pay out better than the states.

6 numbers are too hard to pick. i use 8 so i only have to find the 2 that is not coming in , in turn all you have to do in order to make more money is bet more.

Reply #4

OldTurkey — Tue, 13 Mar 2007 17:42:38 GMT

Michigan midday 280. 028BX.

Reply #3

Omniscient — Tue, 13 Mar 2007 17:33:41 GMT

8 number wheel ?!? ...that's alot of combos .. 6 number wheels only need 20 combos, more profit, just slightly more risk.

The nice thing is your 2 number payoff is 150 in Michigan , where as FL pick 3 is $80 boxed for a $1 play :( .... bummer ...

Omniscient

Reply #2

pacattack05 — Tue, 13 Mar 2007 17:02:43 GMT

Now you have to worry about doubles

Reply #1

kellmellus55 — Tue, 13 Mar 2007 16:56:58 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by LAVERNE MALONEY on March 13, 2007 Very, very easy. I'm not being funny.

Look at your last draw. There is a strong possibility that 2 #s from that draw may not repeat. (Although, it can happen but not everyday.) Take out the 2 digit combos of your choosing then do your wheeling.

Look at what sums are due in your state right now. Finding a winning # does not have to be a long drawn out procedure.

OK the last draw in michigan was 464 so i will wheel (0123578... [ More ]

show a system that 2 numbers that will not come in next draw

kellmellus55 — Tue, 13 Mar 2007 13:49:01 GMT

Instead of trying to find out what 3 numbers will come in the next draw it would seem easier to find what 2 numbers will not show in the next draw .then you can wheel the 8 remaining numbers.

Does anyone have a good system that will do this