Random Numbers Predictable?

Reply #96

pumpi76 — Wed, 28 Mar 2007 22:08:01 GMT

When i say hot cold numbers i mean what numbers become hot and what numbers become cold from the inception of the game (you might take a 2year history for a pick5), perhaps longer for a pick6 (i don t know that is how i do it)....You may also start from when there change the machine since they change machines all the time...And you have to look at the 3 most predominat ratios for pick6, and perhaps the 3/4 most predominat ratios for pick6...

If you know the numbers are walking randomly, wh... [ More ]

Reply #95

RJOh — Wed, 28 Mar 2007 20:21:32 GMT

#DR DATE RC5 NUMBERS

6 03/21/07 04 08 13 21 22

8 03/19/07 13 14 24 29 37

26 02/24/07 05 10 13 14 24

50 01/27/07 03 11 13 30 39

56 01/20/07 02 13 17 24 39

65 01/10/07 02 05 13 20 31

88 12/13/06 05 13 21 24 28

93 12/07/06 13 18 24 26 38

109 11/18/06 08 13 14 18 23

110 11/17/06 13 14 31 33 35

124 11/01/06 13 14 22 23 39

130 10/25/06 12 13 18 29 30

131 10/24/06 01 07 10 13 24

137 10/17/06 11 13 28... [ More ]

Reply #94

Stack47 — Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:45:37 GMT

YOu are listing in which draws each number will appear and after taking note of each draw the numbers appear (or step), you will notice that each number sort of walks and if you can find the pattern in this number walks

If you know the numbers are walking randomly, why do you expect them to walk in a predictable pattern?

If let's say 3 plays in draw 3, draw 11, then draw 17, then draw 20, then draw 33, then the number 3 is making a random walk or footprint in the draws 3,11,17,20,33 e... [ More ]

Reply #93

pumpi76 — Wed, 28 Mar 2007 01:39:55 GMT

if someone cann't do the following Supercomputers will be able to do them...

Example of footprint or what i call a random walk...Imagine that you enumerated/list the draws from 1 to 100...And let's take some sample draws; sucessive sample draws...You would notice for example that 1 (or any numbers, we are just using 1 for the sake of it) first appear in the draw number 1, then in draw number 7, then in draw number 22 and so on..Is not only 1 but all the numbers (the total range)...YOu are li... [ More ]

Reply #92

pumpi76 — Tue, 27 Mar 2007 15:43:21 GMT

I disagree...I think you will need a software to go through all the combinations and calculate them, but when i mean all combinations i mean all...YOu might/may not need a software for pick3/4 but you will need a software for pick5/6...There are too many combinations...

Laura Simpson from Navy Federal Credit Union in Great Lakes, Illinois deserves to be rich... She is so rare...

Reply #91

RedToad — Tue, 27 Mar 2007 00:41:24 GMT

https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/153503.htm

Has a system, looking for a good programer.

Reply #90

Grumple Dumple — Tue, 27 Mar 2007 00:23:05 GMT

Hello there everyone.

I was only going to check in long enough to tell all of you that I had not skipped town and that I was still working on the thing and was not finished with it.

But having come back here I have an uncomfortable feeling that you might be thinking that I am just stringing you along by making all of you wait and extra day or two.

I was wanting to do this up right and reveal as much to you in the way of details as I can comfortably afford to do. I also don't want to mak... [ More ]

Reply #89

psykomo — Mon, 26 Mar 2007 22:00:48 GMT

What are his options??????????????????????????????????????????

What are your options????????????????????????????????????????

What are the OPTION$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Play'y the lottery is no different .................than goin to Atlantic City,

Vegas, your local indian gaming center or getting on a cruise ship

waiting til they get far enough offshore to open the CRAP TABLE$$$

?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

HOW MUCH MONEY $$$$$did... [ More ]

Reply #88

Stack47 — Mon, 26 Mar 2007 21:23:08 GMT

It's easy to assume that eventually any 3 digit number will come out and even after it fails 200 or 300 straight draws, it can still be profitable until the 500th draw. Most people don't want to wait that long and wouldn't give much credibility to a system that predicts that a number should come out within the next 300 draws. In Ohio, 023 hasn't been seen since January 7, 1984 (over 9500 draws) so the timing there would be when to begin playing it or when to stop.

The same can be said about... [ More ]

Reply #87

jarasan — Mon, 26 Mar 2007 21:22:57 GMT

Guru and myself thought this pages ago.

Reply #86

pumpi76 — Mon, 26 Mar 2007 20:26:25 GMT

And during this time, like my ear would get so jittery (sort of ed) and i would i heard stuff i shouldn't hear and saw things i shouldn't see (nothing bad, but detrimental to me)....And i would ask myself what are the odds .....A movie that resembles what i experience was the movie the Event Horizon , where people will experience things so detrimental that they will go crazy....And i did went crazy...And like 2 months later after i checked in into the psychiatric evaluation (i was evaluated b... [ More ]

Reply #85

pumpi76 — Mon, 26 Mar 2007 18:44:17 GMT

I once, like 6 years ago, i won twice the Virginia's Cash5, but on paper (meaning theoretically)...I didn't play the numbers because i didn't live in Va...Those days, I would say to myself this is what's going to play and i will wait the next day for the results (i was using Lottery Director back then, the free one)...And i matched it twice i think it was on the same week...I don't know how i did it, i didn't replicated it again but i think i could have if i wanted, for i created a very smart... [ More ]

Reply #84

KY Floyd — Mon, 26 Mar 2007 18:28:52 GMT

Judging from the number of responses in such a short period of time this thread certainly did get a lot of interest.

I agree. I think grumble may deserve some kind of award for the best troll I can remember ever seeing here.

Reply #83

RJOh — Mon, 26 Mar 2007 16:14:12 GMT

Once everything that makes sense has been posted, what is left to get people interest? Judging from the number of responses in such a short period of time this thread certainly did get a lot of interest.

I think there will always be someone starting a similar thread challenging anyone to come forward and prove they actually won a lottery jackpot or came close several times and explain their strategy thus saving them the time and work of developing one themselves.

Reply #82

guesser — Mon, 26 Mar 2007 08:17:17 GMT

Lantern, Lary, I agree with both of ya.

All we can do is make educated guesses based on past history and hope our guesses are extremely lucky.

That said, if the winning numbers are 3-4-25-40-50 PB 12, we can have 3-4-26-41-51 PB 10, and we are still losers, 'close' don't matter... all we can do is try to put ourselves in a better position to possibly win...

Reply #81

LANTERN — Mon, 26 Mar 2007 06:29:46 GMT

Sorry, but I have to make a very educated Prediction :

I predict that nobody will be able to prove that they themselves can predict lottery winning numbers down to 1 winning number, for a particular set draw and game all of the time, that is every single time without ever failing.

And I am of course not talking about all state predictions and or making a prediction that will be good for the next few days or week(s) and or months or even years.

------

But for one state, one particula... [ More ]

Reply #80

LANTERN — Mon, 26 Mar 2007 06:23:15 GMT

Yes, that has been a waste of money and time, that principle is more or less sound, but perhaps not in that particular way as is used by that program, but it is hard to tell, as it has been applied to jackpot kind of games and hardly anything can work right for them.

Something like that has a much better chance of working for pick 3 and 4 games.

But I guess that that person never thought about that.

Not that there is nothing at all that can be done for or about jackpot games prediction... [ More ]

Reply #79

LckyLary — Mon, 26 Mar 2007 04:42:45 GMT

My $0.02:

Genuinely Random is just what it sounds like. You can't predict that. There's no such thing in my opinion. Most our systems are based on that physical events on a naked-eye level are NOT totally random. RNGs that some drawings use are possibly based on White Noise as is the RNG in the Lottery Terminal used for QP. A sample of the volume (or whatever) of the noise is taken at the instant a button is pressed and a microscopic deviation in that timing will mean a very different numbe... [ More ]

Reply #78

guesser — Mon, 26 Mar 2007 04:36:28 GMT

RJ, we are wasting our time, we have clowns seemingly every 10 days or so posting claims they can't back up, just as we have clowns posting about every week stating 'the lottery is impossible to win', so I have NO idea how 'anyone' wins it if it is impossible to win..

However, I think it's entirely possible to keep some stats and point yourself in a direction to make some pretty decent choices, but still, you must have LUCK in picking those right combinations...

The kicker now is we have... [ More ]

Reply #77

RJOh — Mon, 26 Mar 2007 04:04:46 GMT

Maybe this is a prelude to the another introduction of some software that synchronizes with randomness to pick lottery numbers. I remember a similar discussion three years ago that a lot of members thought made sense.

Reply #76

emilyg — Mon, 26 Mar 2007 03:53:33 GMT

no will this do

Reply #75

Guru101 — Mon, 26 Mar 2007 03:40:42 GMT

I wish I knew why people start threads like this. It's ridiculous. First you got nay sayers that come onto a lottery forum saying The lottery is impossible to win!!! You're wasting your money!!! . Then you got guys like this that claim they discovered one of the biggest mysteries of the universe but provide no information that backs it up. This thread is 8 pages long and this guy still hasn't given us any info about how or what this thing is. I wish they would just stop.

Reply #74

JAP69 — Mon, 26 Mar 2007 03:32:55 GMT

This thread has been going on all day.

She/he specified what he/she was looking at. Got us guessing what the whole thing is about here with his/her last post. Going to come back later with more detail I reckon.

Could just as well posted a description of what he/she is talking about to begin with.

Reply #73

Guru101 — Mon, 26 Mar 2007 03:31:44 GMT

I got a system that will win the PowerBall every single drawing

Reply #72

Amazing Grace — Mon, 26 Mar 2007 03:27:41 GMT

Its a timing thing, My predictions are ahead of the draw, so if it comes out the day I predict it great.

But seldom, But they do come , its just when,

so my answer is

No.

But you can give it a good educated guess,

Reply #71

Stack47 — Mon, 26 Mar 2007 03:13:07 GMT

We have all taken those complete the series tests.

1 - 2 - 4 - 7 - 11 - 16 - 22 - 29 - ?

So I guess it's possible that somebody could look at series of 3 digit numbers and accurately predict the next 3 digit number. In the series I showed the 9th number in the series can be predicted, but so can the 10th and on into infinity. For your phenomenon to be versatile enough to predict the next 3 digit number every draw, tomorrow's numbers must be in the next series. If such a phenomenon exists... [ More ]

Reply #70

pacattack05 — Mon, 26 Mar 2007 03:08:27 GMT

I wish I knew what you're talking about....

Reply #69

JAP69 — Mon, 26 Mar 2007 03:05:27 GMT

All that is required are the eyes, a number (the more the better) of previously-drawn genuinely-random digits in three or more columns and a brain (I wish I had one of those. )

Well you specified what it was about.

Have a nice day.

It has been interesting.

Any one have an emoticon of someone wanking a chain

Reply #68

pacattack05 — Mon, 26 Mar 2007 02:56:20 GMT

Are you sure you're not Cashman

Reply #67

Grumple Dumple — Mon, 26 Mar 2007 02:51:12 GMT

Hello everyone.

I could not help but check back in.

It is getting very late here so I will post just this and leave again.

I see that some healthy skepticism has been introduced -- that's very natural and is as it should be where there's an absence proof.

Ever since the beginning post I have not felt that I have to prove the existence of the phenomenon (God knows I want to though!) -- I only felt the emotional need for a sense of relief by making the claim that it exists.

Here's... [ More ]

Reply #66

pacattack05 — Mon, 26 Mar 2007 02:28:15 GMT

I know exactly what you mean delores....

The universe is yet to be understood in it's fullest...I'm constantly finding different variations on beliefs of the origin of the human race.

I'm still amused of all the interpretations...LOL

Reply #65

delores247 — Mon, 26 Mar 2007 02:21:12 GMT

Hello everyone,This is what i think,i don't think it could be done each time but maybe many times ,you see the number Universe is made up of a certain order and Relativity, by this i mean there is a story behind every number,There is a reason for every number that hits the board from the various states that play,its like 1 big back yard,For instance when you see a 59pair the Clocks seen to follow ,Why is that? because our universe and world as we know it is made up of random numbers so fix that... [ More ]

Reply #64

Guru101 — Mon, 26 Mar 2007 01:29:40 GMT

LOL, I know what you're saying. It's kinda like how lurkers vote on polls on this website too. For example if I had this poll:

What is 2 + 2?

A. 4

B. 10000000000

There's always people that vote for the wrong or over-excessive answer. I'm not really sure why they can't just give a genuine answer. I guess throwing off polls is fun to lurkers of websites.

Reply #63

jarasan — Mon, 26 Mar 2007 01:16:57 GMT

Thank you, thank you, thank you pacattack05!

Yes that's right.

That's where all my pain is rooted -- in not being about to tie it together in my pitifully deficient brain

quoting the Grumple Dumple

Self deprecation, drama, angst, and the impossible dream of another Don Quixote seeking the truth of the lottery, I think we're being played here. Just a thought. I read the whole post all seven pages and see a rhetorical type circular argument here that reeks of another school project.... [ More ]

Reply #62

pacattack05 — Mon, 26 Mar 2007 01:11:03 GMT

It's Phenomenal

Reply #61

JAP69 — Mon, 26 Mar 2007 00:52:04 GMT

All that is required are the eyes, a number (the more the better) of previously-drawn genuinely-random digits in three or more columns and a brain (I wish I had one of those. )

I just got up from a nap and took a peek to see how this thread was going.

I take it you did not look at my blog. Been doing this method for years and years and years. There are other forum members who use it also.

I do not hit 100% accuracy but enough to keep me satisfied.

Read Thoth's post in lottery systems... [ More ]

Reply #60

fifilicia — Mon, 26 Mar 2007 00:13:58 GMT

Remember everything has it's own timing.

Reply #59

fifilicia — Mon, 26 Mar 2007 00:12:42 GMT

Hi GrumpleDumple, I definitely feel your pain. If i was in your shoes I would find some way (I know it's not easy) to set up a post one evening and try to get some answers from these intelligent folks here at LP. I firmly believe everthing happens for a reason and God knows when of if you will be able to divulge what 's burning you up inside.

Reply #58

budward — Mon, 26 Mar 2007 00:09:02 GMT

Thanks for stopping in grumple dumple.

Come back soon

Reply #57

Grumple Dumple — Mon, 26 Mar 2007 00:07:03 GMT

Boy, you've got that right! I'm tired.

I'm going to go and regenerate my brain (such as it is).

If I never get the opportunity to come back here I would just like to say this:

I appreciate very much having been given the opportunity to express my thoughts in this forum and I appreciate the respect shown to me when I could easily have been attacked or ignored -- but I can see that none of you are like that.

It is a very nice community here.

Even if I were to never persue this any... [ More ]

Reply #56

lotterybraker — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 23:52:11 GMT

well..good luck with that ok..but now its time to go eat and watch a movie..lol

Reply #55

Grumple Dumple — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 23:39:43 GMT

The thing is that the fact that it is random actually allows the numbers to be 100% correctly predictable.

The impossible is actually possible.

I wish to God it was one of you that came across this -- I can tell that there are some very intelligent and highly-intuitive individuals here who would know where to go with it.

Reply #54

Grumple Dumple — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 23:33:40 GMT

Hi pumpi76.

I don't use software or a computer.

This phenomenon can be perceived without software.

All that is required are the eyes, a number (the more the better) of previously-drawn genuinely-random digits in three or more columns and a brain (I wish I had one of those. )

That's not to say that the phenomenon could not be integrated into a software but I cannot even formulate ideas about that -- but software is not needed.

***

I'm going to go out on a limb and tell you th... [ More ]

Reply #53

lotterybraker — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 23:11:12 GMT

Well you can look until the cows come home..but you or noone will ever find it..Because..just in case you havent figured it out yet..you are trying to solve for R ..r meaning Random..now..look at it like this..How many Mathematicians are on this Planet..that think in their own wisdom that they can figure out Random...you know they have tried..AND FAILED I MIGHT ADD..

also..to keep you or anyone from getting close to finding anything that will allow you to be able to go from draw to draw to d... [ More ]

Reply #52

pacattack05 — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 23:04:36 GMT

I'm glad you agree...thanx

I think Yapple Dapple...I mean grumple dumple got me started on a thought of a LP system coordinator/coordinators involved in methodically melding the many different systems which have passed through, here at the LP.

I think he's on to something here. Everyone here has one, two, or three pieces of the puzzle if not more. Working not as one unit, but parts unassembled.

Let's unite and shake the lottery...P-3....off it's foundation...my brothers and sisters....L... [ More ]

Reply #51

pumpi76 — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 23:02:35 GMT

I do believe random numbers can be predictable, but depending which game you are playing...MegaMillions Powerball i believe are definately not predictable..Pick3/4 may be predictable but not profitable...like how i say before, you don t need to win the pick6 all the time, it only needs to be one time (if you are greedy is something else)...

Examples of Lottos that can be predicted and won are; Win for life, Hot lotto, MegaBucks, etc..For California superlotto you will need a supercomputer..... [ More ]

Reply #50

kayee — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 22:49:48 GMT

Reply #49

pacattack05 — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 22:24:14 GMT

I believe just about everyone here has that problem. I know I do. I have about 20 different methods, which if half of them came together I would probably win straight once a week.

There's nothing new about your enigma....LOL

Reply #48

JADELottery — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 22:20:14 GMT

It appears you are looking for a constant 100% precise prediction over a continuum of draw intervals. Unfortunately, the 'Uncertainty Principle' prevents that from happening to anyone existing in this Universe. Well, at least at this point in feeble Human understanding and knowledge or is there???

Actually, you just helped trigger another idea.... hmm.

Good luck, I'll keep monitoring.

Reply #47

Grumple Dumple — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 22:14:31 GMT

Ah, the pressure

Reply #46

Grumple Dumple — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 22:12:32 GMT

Thank you, thank you, thank you pacattack05!

Yes that's right.

That's where all my pain is rooted -- in not being about to tie it together in my pitifully deficient brain.

Reply #45

pacattack05 — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 22:10:01 GMT

I don't think he's claiming he knows the formula, but knows the formula is out there somewhere. Am I correct

Reply #44

kayee — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 22:10:00 GMT

Oh, okay. Hope you figure it out. Good luck

Reply #43

eddessaknight — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 22:09:33 GMT

@Grumple Dumple

I aggree, nothing is impossible. So post three straight numbers for all to see participate.

In all chaos there is a cosmos, in all disorder a secret order ~Carl Jung

eddessaknight

Reply #42

Grumple Dumple — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 22:07:36 GMT

Hi.

I have been saying from the outset that I recognize that it is there and even what it is doing but that I am having trouble understanding it.

Reply #41

kayee — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 22:05:41 GMT

You just said it was possible, so why can't you

Reply #40

Grumple Dumple — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 22:03:51 GMT

Wish I could

Reply #39

Grumple Dumple — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 22:03:13 GMT

Hi.

That's true that I don't have to buy any tickets to demonstrate it.

But then, as I've said, the problem is I just can't demonstrate it -- I can only claim it and that's an awful position to be in.

However, just making the claim has given me a measure of therapy that I was needing for a very long time.

You know how talking about something can make you feel better? It's like that.

Thanks for the good luck wish.

Reply #38

kayee — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 21:59:49 GMT

Sounds great! Post some predictions for specific states. Any state you choose.

Reply #37

RJOh — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 21:50:00 GMT

You don't have to buy any tickets to demonstrate that you really have encountered a phenomenon of being able to predict the winning lottery numbers with 100% accuracy, just post your pick for your state on the prediction board and we all will see this phenomenon at work, but be forewarned that someone may take advantage of your gift and play your picks. Good luck to you.

Reply #36

Grumple Dumple — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 21:41:22 GMT

Hey again.

I'm not sure how to address your point(s) except to say:

The odds of correctly predicting the Pick 3 straight (the correct digits in the correct order) is 1 in 1000 in a single attempt.

That is what I am claiming: that in a single attempt it can be predicted correctly straight and in every single attempt after that.

I am saying that the impossible is possible.

Reply #35

JADELottery — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 21:29:22 GMT

Yes it is real, when you talk about accuracy, yes it is. However, now that you stated the correct single 3 digit (or 4 digit) it now becomes a question of precision not accuracy. The word 'single' implies 'exact' and exactness is a level of precision.

Your original question should have been more to the tune of: Is it practical to be 100% accurate all the time? In that case, no it would not be practical, because you would have to cover all possible combinations.

Reply #34

Grumple Dumple — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 21:07:51 GMT

Thanks for that SirMetro.

I found a measure of comfort in your comments.

Reply #33

Grumple Dumple — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 20:54:02 GMT

Hello JADELottery.

This phenomenon (sick of the word yet?) has the potential to reveal the correct single 3 digit (or 4 digit) number(s) each and every time constantly.

It's an impossibility but it is real!

I just cannot prove it!

I know, it smacks of being just a little bit too convienent doesn't it? Even to me it does.

If you think that my one heart's desire isn't to prove the existence of this to all of you, you're wrong.

Reply #32

Grumple Dumple — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 20:40:50 GMT

I have not bought a single Pick 3 or 4 lottery ticket any time after encountering this thing that I cannot explain.

And I never will... not until I am able to predict with 100% accuracy what that evening's results will be.

Reply #31

JADELottery — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 20:40:10 GMT

We need to differentiate between accuracy and precision. Accuracy is the degree of a correct matching combination within a finite random selection. Precision is the degree of an exact combination prediction within a finite random selection.

To give an idea of what this is like, think about a person playing N number of combinations or lines for any given lottery. N can be 1 combination to All possible combinations. Keep in mind that no two combinations are alike and they are played on the same... [ More ]

Reply #30

Grumple Dumple — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 20:36:13 GMT

You know...

It has meant everything to me just to be able to talk about it some in this forum.

It also seems to mean a great deal to me to have been able to introduce at least the possibility of the existence of this phenomenon to the world at large even in the absence of any proof.

Everyone here shows class in not attacking someone who makes so outrageous (and seemingly impossible) a claim.

Thanks for that everyone.

Reply #29

SirMetro — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 20:35:48 GMT

The movie Rain Man comes to mind

Options:

a) Continue to muddle thru the madness one perceives within one's own mind

b) Close your eyes and take the perverbial leap of faith of bringing your thoughts into the real world.

c) Go see a Doctor for a pill to help you forget (as in the Matrix, shall it be the red pill or the blue pill?).

PS: As for level of intelligence, consider this, Albert Einstien, while walking a continous path around the University he taught at during an intervi... [ More ]

Reply #28

RJOh — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 20:26:50 GMT

Maybe you have the same problem some other lottery players have if you're buying lottery tickets expecting to win the jackpot every time and can't explain why it's not happening. You're just a gambler that's not very smart.

Reply #27

Grumple Dumple — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 20:19:29 GMT

Hello Four4me.

Since you mentioned intuition , I would very much like to make a comment on it.

I have always regarded the occasion (seems a very long time ago now) in which I saw the phenomenon as being a very highly-intuited moment (maybe that's not the best way of expressing it). It was as if I were peering into something that one is not supposed to be able to see.

I remember when I was younger a woman remarking to me that I was highly-intuitive . I can't remember under what ci... [ More ]

Reply #26

MADDOG10 — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 20:18:16 GMT

Well, then I suggest you get with someone who could help you put it together and be done with it....! There are a multitude of individuals here at LP that can do that for you..... Not so sure they would want to get involved, but what the hay, you never know.. Good luck.

Reply #25

LottoChica23 — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 20:17:27 GMT

I feel your pain... But remember it's how you look at it.

Accept it, don't try to explain it, and do as much good as you can with it.

Reply #24

Grumple Dumple — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 20:08:31 GMT

Hello MADDOG10.

That's the point: I can't put it all together -- even with my minimal intelligence.

I think that I mentioned earlier somewhere that I don't have a natural aptitude to tie it all together.

Therein lies the torment.

Reply #23

four4me — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 20:08:10 GMT

Yes i have i have seen with my own mind a new engine source using magnetics. but I'm not a physicist. it doesn't stop me from thinking about it and a few people i told said it was impossible.

Now back to the numbers if intuition is one of your key factors then that's a gift. My brother had the gift. he could walk into a lottery store minutes before the drawing and know which 3 numbers were going to be drawn. Now he wasn't able to do it every time but he had done it enough times to convince me... [ More ]

Reply #22

MADDOG10 — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 20:02:50 GMT

If that be the case, why the cat and mouse?

Why don't you put it all together yourself and be done with it. I'm quite sure anyone, even someone with minimal intelligence would be able to do just fine with what you've perceived.

Reply #21

Grumple Dumple — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 19:54:17 GMT

This is an objectively real phenomenon and it exists independent of my own obvious deficits to understand the thing.

Did you ever have only partial understanding of something's existence but you could see enough of it to know that indeed it does exist?

That's where I am.

Reply #20

LANTERN — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 19:54:13 GMT

Neither Jesus nor Nostradamus are here any-more, the Oracle at Delphi is also gone as far as I know.

There is no Secret way, statistics is the way, these posts are the result of not understanding what prediction is all about:

Very simple, it is about, past statistics, no secret there.

Reply #19

RJOh — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 19:44:45 GMT

If you know it's possible, why aren't you doing it? If you are doing it, you don't have to explain it just scam your winning tickets and post them and let them do the talking. As a matter of fact if you start winning often someone will notice and some reporter will probably find you and write the story for you.

You not the first person who have not won one jackpot that feel he has the potential to win them all. There may be a word to describe that feeling but I don't know it. Good luck... [ More ]

Reply #18

Grumple Dumple — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 19:43:41 GMT

Hi.

This does not depend on patterns.

Patterns are quite frankly undependable and therefore literally unpredictable.

This involves...

I am so very tempted to say it...

See, I am in a very uncomfortable and inconvienent position here: just how much do I reveal to any of you about it?

I can't have it both ways, but the fact is that I need help with it (from someone else) while at the same time not revealing any of it.

I have invested such a very long time on this that to reve... [ More ]

Reply #17

Grumple Dumple — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 19:31:12 GMT

Hi.

I know how vulnerable I have made myself by posting such a claim and then so very conviently not being able to prove it.

Like I said, it has been tearing me up on the inside that I can't understand it enough to make practical use of it.

I think that I am simply in need of being able to tell somebody that I know it exists.

It has already been therapeutic to me to be able to begin to talk about it.

Reply #16

LANTERN — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 19:21:50 GMT

You don't predict numbers, you forecast patterns of which numbers are a part of.

You don't predict, you Chart random.

It is all a matter of statistical probabilities.

By the way TRUE Random numbers are the very best kind of numbers to Forecast .

As to 100% ? Didn't I say that we are dealing with statistical PROBABILITIES , that is Possible future events, there is nothing for sure in this business.

Chances are, that chances are.

Reply #15

RJOh — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 19:19:03 GMT

I don't care what players believe, it's what they can actually do that counts. I'm sure most players believe they can win a jackpot when they buy a lottery ticket but guess what, they know better after the drawing.

If by asking that question, you're hoping someone will come forward who's winning often to explain how they're doing it, forget it, it's not going to happen. The only people who are claiming they can predict winning lottery numbers 100% of the time are those who are selling infor... [ More ]

Reply #14

JAP69 — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 19:14:49 GMT

I do not know what you are looking at so I do not know what to look at.

If I had seen it and If I put it in my blog you may find it there.

Reply #13

Grumple Dumple — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 19:11:11 GMT

Hi.

But the gift is the curse.

Reply #12

Grumple Dumple — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 19:08:26 GMT

You know... I'm the wrong kind of person to even be trying to solve this kind of thing.

I'm only marginally intelligent.

I mean, I have no mathematical skills at all -- but what I saw (and still continue to glimpse) does not involve the use of mathematics per se as far as I can tell.

I have no computer-related skills.

It should have been one of you to have encountered the thing. I'm sure if any of you had been the one to discover it, you would know how to fill in the gaps.... [ More ]

Reply #11

LottoChica23 — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 19:06:54 GMT

*Hypothetical*

His/Her options are to win the jackpot and share the numbers from time to time if s/he feels like it.

As far as having to or being able to prove it to someone, s/he should accept the fact that s/he has a gift. That's the hard part, knowing things and not understanding how you know it. It's not always easy under those circumstances...

Just tell this someone to enjoy his/her gift and spread the wealth.

Reply #10

JAP69 — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 18:57:53 GMT

What are his options?

I am not an excell programmer.

If you are an excell programmer work at the programming formula until you get it right.

Reply #9

Grumple Dumple — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 18:56:14 GMT

I don't know what to do about solving the thing.

It's been tearing me up on the inside for a long time now.

I think that the problem is that I don't have any natural aptitude for understanding the phenomenon even though I saw it.

Reply #8

pacattack05 — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 18:53:13 GMT

Alright now...let's have it...

It's nice to share. Don't be holdin' out now....LOL

Reply #7

Grumple Dumple — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 18:50:21 GMT

Meow

Reply #6

pacattack05 — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 18:46:52 GMT

The above statement sounds like that old phrase... My friend has this problem ...

When in actuality it's you that has figured something out but needs to get the knots untied, without revealing it's you.

I guess I just let the cat out of the bag...LOL

Reply #5

Grumple Dumple — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 18:41:34 GMT

I believe it is possible to do just that, but I would start with the Pick 3 and 4 type games first.

Reply #4

Guru101 — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 18:30:53 GMT

What would you think of someone who kept winning a jackpot over and over again? When I say over and over again, I don't necessarily mean every single draw, but perhaps once every several months or even once every several years

Reply #3

Grumple Dumple — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 18:27:20 GMT

*Hypothetical*

Let's say there was someone alive in the world today who serendipitously makes the discovery that there is an objectively-real phenomenon present within any (and every) given series of genuinely random consecutively-drawn numbers (digits) among two or more columns and that this phenomenon demonstrates that each and every drawing can be correctly anticipated (predicted) before it actually occurs -- and, as if that were not enough -- this phenomenon has an inherent versatility t... [ More ]

Reply #2

JAP69 — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 16:49:08 GMT

My idea of 100% accuracy for lottery numbers would be 1 number only for pick 3 or 4.

Pick 5 and jackpot games would be 1 line only.

This would need to happen each and every draw for 100% accuracy.

I really do not think so.

Reply #1

bomberos — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 16:41:27 GMT

Hi,

I'm no math whiz but I'd have to say no.

If it is even remotely possible it would have to be done by some kind of quantum computer far beyond our present technology.

Random Numbers Predictable?

Grumple Dumple — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 16:34:22 GMT

Hello.

Do any of you believe that genuinely random numbers can be predicted with a 100% accuracy all the time?

Thanks.