After months of pounding numbers calcu.....

Reply #35

hobber — Sun, 29 Apr 2007 03:52:57 GMT

Actually I sort of play the same way. After years of qp's and circling enough for a free play's though I didn't spend very much, I decided to look into it. I've read up, played the wheels and surprisingly did better than QP's. And it was exciting to see I could pick some numbers. The trouble with wheels is.. you have to get the numbers in the wheel to begin with. So I did this, put my data spread sheets to real work.

1. I use excel and VBA programming. Because I don't want to sit around for h... [ More ]

Reply #34

jarasan — Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:27:39 GMT

Here is the report for our outing last Sunday, 2 keepers, 33 and 35 stripers (rockfish), we trolled in the Chesapake Bay. In Md. we are very cognizant of the fish populations and follow the DNR rules to the letter. The striper populations seem to be a lot better. The problem is exactly what you say, out in deep water, and fishing regulations vary from state to state. There should be WorldWide moratorium on fishing for several years, because it is countries like Spain, Japan, Sweden, Tobago... [ More ]

Reply #33

cheesegrits — Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:55:04 GMT

Some of the inshore fish like sea trout, flounder are holding their own because the states and feds can control the harvest. It's the poor schooling fish in the deep water that have no protection that are being cleared for their protein. Even sharks are becoming scarce.

Reply #32

codmander — Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:15:07 GMT

elusive?? the fish are gone

1.codfish wiped out by huge trawlers

2.hardly a handful of giant tuna luckily plenty of 100 pounders around

3.pollack,haddock,monkfisk,wolfish,cusk all wiped out

4.and worse of all is all the spots((bumps wrecks rocks)) got ruined by big steel scollopers smashin the bottom

...................................... but I can still garetee you a tuna come june or striper homepage

Reply #31

jarasan — Sun, 22 Apr 2007 09:12:10 GMT

Codman another thing is you gotta go with your gut and not sweat the details too much. LOL jarasan

Gone fishin' today, wish us luck! Even the fish can be elusive

Reply #30

selfprodigy — Sun, 22 Apr 2007 04:21:56 GMT

Well I never used to win anything playing the lotto. I've read a few ebooks on lotto strategie and let me tell is you, most of it is total crap. However, I do believe since i've narrowed down the odds i have been almost winning my money back that i spent on the tickets. I've been hitting 3 of 6 numbers 4 draws in a row.

All i did balance my picks out between odds/even high/low hot/cold, and my own gut feeling. I've come incrediably close to the jackpot only 1 or 2 digits off on the 3 nu... [ More ]

Reply #29

Clipper — Sun, 22 Apr 2007 03:32:32 GMT

When the Lottery started in Texas we first had the 6 number game.....6 out of 50 digits. I tracked the numbers in that and soon saw some things that happened.

I divided the digits into Singles, Teens, Twenties, Thirties Forties...with 1 through 10-, 11-20, 21-30, 31-40 and 41-50. What I soon found out was that MOST of the time only 4 of the 5 denominations appeared in a game.

If you can eliminate 1 denomation you take out 10 digits. Another thing I found was that most of the time th... [ More ]

Reply #28

jarasan — Sun, 22 Apr 2007 01:33:01 GMT

How do you explain this? DC Daily6 computer drawn pick 6/39. See any patterns?

Sat, Apr 21, 200701-03-07-10-34-35, Bonus: 27

Fri, Apr 20, 200701-10-26-34-35-39, Bonus: 09

Thu, Apr 19, 200701-03-07-10-27-29, Bonus: 38

LOL jarasan

Reply #27

Clipper — Sun, 22 Apr 2007 00:14:00 GMT

The big question is.....Can the EXACT be predicted?

Actually there is a way to generate the EXACT combination. Of course, there might be as many as 10-20 other combinations before filters are used but there is a way.

I've got the software that can do it written for my system of tracking but for the life of me I havent been able to come up with a way to determine the right code to enter into the software to produce the combination :(

Hopefully one of these days I will have a... [ More ]

Reply #26

Amazing Grace — Sat, 21 Apr 2007 04:56:27 GMT

Perfect you have a system that bites!

Now reverse engineer it!

Never .

Reply #25

sook7b — Thu, 19 Apr 2007 23:31:54 GMT

well, try this for pick 3and 4, week1-----to---week---------------------4

most frequently drawn

9 ------8--- --0------6-------5--------3

0

Reply #24

pacattack05 — Thu, 19 Apr 2007 22:47:06 GMT

I forgot to mention one thing which is a little off base but incredible.

I forget the author of this quote, and can't remember it verbatim, but it goes something like this, I'm paraphrasing...

Humans are the eyes of the universe. It's like the universe had to create something animated and cognizant of it's surroundings in order to actually look back in on itself...

Funny....When I look into the mirror, I can almost grasp the statement above..

Reply #23

pacattack05 — Thu, 19 Apr 2007 22:38:16 GMT

Everything in life has a code to it. You can call it code, you can call it method, or anything that has a sequence of events which were dictated by their surroundings, whether it's the elements, or man made intervention.

When a scientist invents something, he or she has broken the code, that elusive code. When Thomas Edison invented the bulb, it took him about 10,000 experiments before he finally broke the code, which was a correct combination of materials, power, vacuum, etc....

I think... [ More ]

Reply #22

bobby623 — Thu, 19 Apr 2007 20:29:04 GMT

I think these posts underline two facts:

1. Number selection in any lottery is random. The machine doesn't know what the odds are or care that #1 has come up 150 times, compared to 45 times for #5. The little balls are agitated by a paddle in a drum. They all seek to escape, a condition that occurs a fixed number of times. The ball closest to the air shute or drop path wins.

There is no code. It's the way it works, and it has been working very well for many years. It might be different wi... [ More ]

Reply #21

Omniscient — Thu, 19 Apr 2007 18:56:33 GMT

When a system goes 'cold' like mine did a while back (mine plunged into the frigid depths of hell!) ..so what did I do ?? I tweaked and tweaked..then when that didnt work, I re-invented a new system... never giving up. I like to play the 3 and 4 games and play the lotto and Fantasy 5 once in a while or if the lotto jackpot climbs a bit. Never give up ... Dont play more ...play smarter!

Omniscient

Reply #20

RJOh — Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:16:13 GMT

New York's TAKE FIVE have similars odds as other states pick5 games.

Prize

LevelWinning Numbers

Matched Per GameChances of Winning

on $1 GameExpected Prize

Amount

1

2

5 of 5

4 of 5 + Extra

1:575,757

1:115,151

JACKPOT

$5,182.00

34 of 51:3,489$523.00

4

5

3 of 5 + Extra

3 of 5

1:1,745

1:109

$122.00

$27

6

7

8

2 of 5 + Extra

2 of 5

1 of 5 + Extra

1:109

1:11

1:21

$7

Quick Pick Free Play

Quick Pic... [ More ]

Reply #19

pacattack05 — Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:44:05 GMT

If I was in a boat with a friend and the boat was sinking, and I asked him if he knew how to swim, and he said.. I know I can , because he was too embarrased to say he couldn't, could cost him his life.

On the other hand, If he was honest and told me he couldn't, then I could maybe help him tread water long enough until help arrived.

Reply #18

Luminus — Thu, 19 Apr 2007 09:22:26 GMT

RJOh:

There are lots of lottery games with overall odds of winning a prize of 1:10, so if you're willing to buy 30 chances each time, you will probably win at least one prize($1 or a free ticket) every time. Ohio Rolling Cash5 and West Virgina Cash25 are just two of such games.

I don't live in Ohio or West Virginia. Here, in NY, playing 30 dollars on a QP will almost gaurantee a total loss. I know. I've tried.

Original Post by pacattack05 Also...Think you can and know yo... [ More ]

Reply #17

codmander — Thu, 19 Apr 2007 00:30:41 GMT

heck I'm just gonna try something else is all ok so I've been close and been far from winning ----------------------------------- never give up is my motto tryed somthing new last night and had 3 of 5 which was new so i'll stick with what im doin new

Reply #16

GASMETERGUY — Thu, 19 Apr 2007 00:26:52 GMT

OK, so your system bites. Now what? Are you willing to give up the ghost and remove yourself to the bland world of QP s? Are you willing to let the lotto world go on its merry way while you watch TV?

I don't think so.

Not knowing what kind of system you have been working on, I will be making several assumptions which, like my lotto numbers, will be totally wrong. So feel free to correct me.

I belive you have been seduced by the lotto math predator. Your system is one of +/- 2, th... [ More ]

Reply #15

pacattack05 — Wed, 18 Apr 2007 21:58:59 GMT

Also...Think you can and know you can is not semantics.

If you think you can swim in the ocean from a sinking boat, and if you know you can swim, may be the difference between life and death.

No semantics there....

Reply #14

RJOh — Wed, 18 Apr 2007 21:57:59 GMT

There are lots of lottery games with overall odds of winning a prize of 1:10, so if you're willing to buy 30 chances each time, you will probably win at least one prize($1 or a free ticket) every time. Ohio Rolling Cash5 and West Virgina Cash25 are just two of such games.

Reply #13

pacattack05 — Wed, 18 Apr 2007 21:55:44 GMT

Original Post by pacattack05

You can hit on a daily basis?

I highly doubt it.

Only if you play all 1000 possibilities

Oh, contraire. I think I can hit a prize every single day, playing less than $30. It just wouldn't be cost-effective.

My response was to the line above. You took my post and replied with.. Oh, contraire. I think I can hit a prize every single day..and so on....

In context to my quote which implies the p-3, considering I said play all 1000 possibilities,... [ More ]

Reply #12

Luminus — Wed, 18 Apr 2007 21:38:05 GMT

Saying I think I can is the same as saying I can. You're dealing in semantics. I put the word think there, because of the naysayers. And you haven't read what I said. I said hit a prize, not a jackpot. The lowest prize in the Take-5 is a Free Replay. You cannot parlay that into hundreds of thousands of dollars as you claim.

Reply #11

pacattack05 — Wed, 18 Apr 2007 21:33:26 GMT

Oh, contraire. I think I can hit a prize every single day, playing less than $30. It just wouldn't be cost-effective.

First you say you can, and now you say you think you can.

Secondly, if you can hit everyday costing only 30 bucks, assuming you're playing in a non-parimutuel state, you would net 50 bucks. So how is it not cost-effective?

I could parlay those monies won into hundreds of thousands within a few months.....LOL

Reply #10

Luminus — Wed, 18 Apr 2007 21:24:24 GMT

Original Post by pacattack05

Frequently and daily are two different things.

Also, I'm not talking boxed, which would be impressive nonetheless, but straight everyday.

True. Straight every day is improbable.

Original Post by pacattack05

You can hit on a daily basis?

I highly doubt it.

Only if you play all 1000 possibilities

Oh, contraire. I think I can hit a prize every single day, playing less than $30. It just wouldn't... [ More ]

Reply #9

cheesegrits — Wed, 18 Apr 2007 21:00:15 GMT

When you say frequently , exactly what interval are you talking about? I can hit several times a week on a cash 3, but unless I get straights or straight/boxes and offset my investment, I would end up losing in the long run. I've heard of folks hitting one number for a straight with $10-20, but it is never mentioned how long and how much they spent to hit that. And I never hear from them again.

And there are trends or groupings in statistics and probability, but I doubt there is a code th... [ More ]

Reply #8

pacattack05 — Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:55:44 GMT

You can hit on a daily basis?

I highly doubt it.

Only if you play all 1000 possibilities...

Reply #7

pacattack05 — Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:54:29 GMT

Frequently and daily are two different things.

Also, I'm not talking boxed, which would be impressive nonetheless, but straight everyday.

Reply #6

Luminus — Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:45:11 GMT

I know someone who hits the NUMBERS frequently, so I challenge that statement. I will crack this code and show you otherwise. I can win something on a daily basis, but I can't hit a jackpot on a daily basis. That is beyond our reach.

On another note, considering how many people believe in phsychics, how come none of them ever ask the most obvious of questions: What's tonights winnning lottery numbers

Reply #5

pacattack05 — Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:23:44 GMT

I believe that there is a code to be cracked, however, it will be out of reach to the mere mortal for a long time to come. I say this because the code is so complex and ever changing. I'm talking about hitting on a daily basis.

When someone finds the cure to the common cold, then maybe we'll have a fair shot, but until then, there are just way too many variables involved.

And I don't think we necessarily want a cure for the cold, because it actually helps to boost our immune system, but th... [ More ]

Reply #4

OldSchoolPa — Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:11:34 GMT

It's refreshing to find someone who has espoused number analysis finally admitting that such a pursuit is aimless and pointless (and perhaps moneyless as well). Come on over to the apparent dark side...QPs (or as one of my local IL store clerks says, You want a Quicker Picker?). I'll have the QP with all six winning numbers Alex for $36 million! Welcome to the wonderful world of buying QPs and saving your sanity.

Reply #3

pacattack05 — Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:32:18 GMT

Now jump ahead of yourself.

Did you try calculating standing on your head

Reply #2

RJOh — Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:28:28 GMT

Isn't closing your eyes and picking similar to QPs

Reply #1

Badger — Wed, 18 Apr 2007 01:41:31 GMT

Well okay then....but think how good you have become at working a calculator

After months of pounding numbers calcu.....

codmander — Tue, 17 Apr 2007 20:30:48 GMT

calculating, adding, subtracting , closing my eyes and picking, I have come to the conclusion my system totally --------------BITES