The no name system

Reply #11

pacattack05 — Mon, 14 May 2007 11:34:10 GMT

Exactly correct. Maybe we need a type of seed to start with, rather than the night before's winning set. A qualifier of sorts.

Playing only on the days which seem more promising....LOL....Yeah right! If it were only that simple...LOL

Reply #10

pacattack05 — Mon, 14 May 2007 11:30:22 GMT

There really is no right or wrong way to do this system. I basically layed out a general format. You can tinker with this in any way you want.

Reply #9

hypersoniq — Mon, 14 May 2007 02:43:57 GMT

Long term backtesting tends to reveal a few truths, particularly in a single-line system. The most obvious is the gaps between straight hits... regardless of the system, they all tend to have a hit, then skip many months (even years) and then another hit...

I wonder about getting several variants together, playing one till it hits then skip that cold spell by jumping to the next...

Reply #8

zion1 — Mon, 14 May 2007 02:35:10 GMT

i swear to god i have been thinking the same thing but its not always coreect only sometimes its true

Reply #7

Ladee — Sun, 13 May 2007 04:20:08 GMT

Hi,

Trying to grasp your system and I see what you are doing but trying to figure out when/where to stop adding. ex. when you factored the 429 you had 4 lines but when you factored the 586 you had 6 lines am I just looking at this wrong...??? How would you factor 188? Thanks alot and I apologize for making something so simple seem complex...I'm new to the site and you are my first post...thanks again for any help at the possibility of winning!!!! Ladee (NC

Reply #6

pacattack05 — Sat, 05 May 2007 14:27:31 GMT

Tinkering with this system, I've found some interesting things.

With the rules above, the first vertical line going down counts up to the number at the top of the second line. For example:

106

217

328

439

540

651

762

873

984

095

06

7

See that in the first vertical line, I stopped with 0, which is the same number at the top of the second line in 106.

So what I did was to go up one more in the first line, so I would go to the number 1. would look lik... [ More ]

Reply #5

pacattack05 — Sat, 05 May 2007 04:03:25 GMT

Actually, don't get your hopes too high. I did a longer back test, and it had a long dry spell. I would probably keep playing until it looks like it's drying out, wait a bit until a hint of it comes along that it's coming back and start playing again.

Reply #4

Rakster — Sat, 05 May 2007 03:47:08 GMT

Thanks... it was close tonight... 676 was our number... had 2 of the numbers in there... you were right about that one

Reply #3

pacattack05 — Sat, 05 May 2007 03:18:41 GMT

I know...I was in a rush, before going to work....lol

471

582

693

704

15

6

You have 716.

Reply #2

Rakster — Sat, 05 May 2007 03:13:24 GMT

wow those directions are a little confusing...lol

Can you do 471 so I can see what you got and to see if I did it correctly? Thanks

Reply #1

pacattack05 — Sat, 05 May 2007 00:19:18 GMT

Winner in Florida was 491. 241 was the predicted number.

The no name system

pacattack05 — Fri, 04 May 2007 11:53:49 GMT

Sort of a twist from the old.

Three days ago in Florida: Winning number was 586

586

697

708

819

20

1

Two days later, which was last night, the winner was 128.

I notice that sometimes you will get 2 out of 3.

The first line, just count up to the next number in line 2. which was the number 8.

Second line, just count up to one more number, just past line 1.

Do the same with line 3 as you did with line 2, count up just one more than line 2.

Sometime you'll... [ More ]