<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>the next computerized state</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/155798</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/155798" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: the next computerized state</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/155798/827247</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/155798/827247</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 12:36:23 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>spy153</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>who was the last one?  I haven&#x27;t seen any difference in the way the numbers are coming out myself.  Going RNG didn&#x27;t change anything as far as I can see.  And yes, I feel there are more to come. As you know, it is just easier for them to keep up with rather than fight with the whole ball thing, no matter how much we dislike it.</p>]]></description>
			<category>spy153</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>the next computerized state</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/155798</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/155798</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 11:29:45 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>LOTTOMIKE</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>do you think states are done switching from balls to computer draws for now?   its been awhile since we&#x27;ve been hoodwinked.the last i remember was hot lotto going RNG which was a veey sneaky move.i think states should at least prepare players for the change......</p>]]></description>
			<category>LOTTOMIKE</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

