<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Lookit this (Wisconsin )</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/155924</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/155924" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Lookit this (Wisconsin )</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/155924/832819</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/155924/832819</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 17:10:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>lottolaughs</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I read somewhere that on any given lottery day in New York at least 10,000 tickets are sold playing the numbers 1-2-3-4-5-6. (for P6,of course. Wonder how many play 1-2-3-4-5 for P5?)  This is the closest I&#x27;ve ever seen it come in any game. Has it ever come up in any other lottery?? Anyone know</p>]]></description>
			<category>lottolaughs</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/155924/832504</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/155924/832504</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 23:23:41 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>we;reallwinners</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Draw Date  State  Game  Results<br /><br />Sun, Jul 9, 2006MichiganFantasy 501-05-08-17-24<br /><br />Tue, May 30, 2006MichiganFantasy 501-05-08-17-24<br /><br />Pretty amazing.........</p>]]></description>
			<category>we;reallwinners</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/155924/828758</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/155924/828758</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 12:45:32 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Badger</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Of course the advocates for RNG would say this just proves randomness.  But I&#x27;m thinking the odds of this combination being drawn must be about as high as the odds of winning the jackpot.<br /><br />It&#x27;s not just that they&#x27;re all low. That I can live with...It&#x27;&#x27;s that it was so close to being 1-2-3-4-5<br /><br />I can&#x27;t help but go Hmmmmmmm....</p>]]></description>
			<category>Badger</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/155924/828720</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/155924/828720</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 09:00:06 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>LOTTOMIKE</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>thanks badger for pointing this out.<br /><br />1-2-3-5-6<br /><br />this right here is the sole reason computer draws need to be banned.i don&#x27;t think those numbers would&#x27;ve come up like that in a ball draw with all low numbers....</p>]]></description>
			<category>LOTTOMIKE</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Lookit this (Wisconsin )</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/155924</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/155924</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2007 02:26:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Badger</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Tonights Badger 5 (5/31 game, RNG) drawing was<br /><br />1-2-3-5-6<br /><br />Sheesh</p>]]></description>
			<category>Badger</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

