lottery software

Reply #15

LANTERN — Mon, 22 Oct 2007 18:39:37 GMT

Again, it seems to me that the most inmportant part on winning on jackpot games is wheeling the right numbers, that is the group of numbers that will be used to make the combination lines with.

That is priority # 1 on predicting and playing jackpot kind of games.

For this the first thing that is needed is enough and also the right kind of stats, in at least 2 forms, numerical and graphical.

Both of those kinds of stats are very important and do complement each other, when one of them is... [ More ]

Reply #14

paurths — Mon, 22 Oct 2007 16:22:13 GMT

When?

Perhaps it is in the progress of being created...

Reply #13

RJOh — Sun, 21 Oct 2007 16:08:48 GMT

How much are you winning using these tools with LotSoft? I have had to result to designing my own software to incorporate my ideas into the way I pick my numbers. I'm not winning more than I'm spending yet but I feel I'm headed in the right direction.

Reply #12

sysp34 — Sun, 21 Oct 2007 14:37:13 GMT

lottofun

i think there isn't best software because each software have their own winning characteristic , i supposed you might purchase expert lotto because it's a filterout lottery program and if you able to create a good filters you might have a jackpot because using expert lotto you have a +/- 10 jackpot winning change using last 5 or 7 draws in a year so with deep workout you may win the jackpot.

also expert lotto can be combine with combos numbers for example from Lottery Post wheels.... [ More ]

Reply #11

computerhead723 — Sun, 21 Oct 2007 09:17:48 GMT

Can I Ask -How Many Numbers Do You End up Playing and How Many Times Hve You Won in the Last 2 Weeks with this Software

Reply #10

Fibonacci — Fri, 19 Oct 2007 11:50:47 GMT

The tools on Lottery post along with LotSoft by Paurths, a member of this forum are the only software I use and the only ones needed in my opinion.

Reply #9

Editgap — Fri, 19 Oct 2007 11:19:13 GMT

Welcome to LP.

Search LP for more discussion on Lottery software.

You might end up picking your own numbers like most people here.

I have Lottopro. I use it to study numbers and store data.

It is easy to see what the numbers simulate.

This was a tough decision for me 2 years ago. Like someone said, use the free trails then decide.

I end up with LS2004 with lottopro for all my statistical and filter needs.

Reply #8

LANTERN — Fri, 19 Oct 2007 08:36:08 GMT

True, it all depends in how the software is used, your software is very very good, even if it needs a few changes, already if used right people can win with it, it all depends on the interpretation of the stats and the right use of the filters.

-----------

By the way, When are you making software for jackpot game(s)?

You can do it!

The most important thing is uncovering the most likely numbers that will be wheeled, unlikley numbers can be filtered out, that is just one part, that i... [ More ]

Reply #7

paurths — Fri, 19 Oct 2007 07:54:19 GMT

IMHO, I believe firmly that all the software commercially available today are no better than Quick Picks. You would do better to study the lottory, read LP everyday, go back as far as you can and read the comments left by others, then write your own program.

This sounds like some weird advic...

Why would one then start to write their own program, since it will never be no better than Quick Picks ?

The question which has been asked here many, many times and to which there is yet to b... [ More ]

Reply #6

BobP — Fri, 19 Oct 2007 06:49:51 GMT

A hard look at Lottonet Integra tells me despite the hype there's nothing going on in there worth the purchase price. LottoPro 2007 is like smarter Quick Picks with wheeling. It has produced winners, but that winning is as much their luck as the software. Prof. Jones Platinum is thirty years old and it didn't product winners when it was new. If you want to fool around with one of the best without paying up front try http://www.ldir.com Lottery Director free demo you can always use the 900+ w... [ More ]

Reply #5

pumpi76 — Fri, 19 Oct 2007 05:16:08 GMT

leting you know from now that lottonet integra doesn't accept debit cards, only credit cards...like 2 years ago i tried buying it but i had a debit card and the lady told me that they don't accept debit cards...here name was monique...since i didn't have a credit card i could buy the software....

More important than winning the states' lotteries is the movie Red Planet ....

Reply #4

GASMETERGUY — Fri, 19 Oct 2007 00:47:37 GMT

IMHO, I believe firmly that all the software commercially available today are no better than Quick Picks. You would do better to study the lottory, read LP everyday, go back as far as you can and read the comments left by others, then write your own program.

The question which has been asked here many, many times and to which there is yet to be offered a satisfactory answer is: If your software is so good, why are you selling it?

The answers which have come forth are nothing l... [ More ]

Reply #3

psykomo — Wed, 17 Oct 2007 21:05:27 GMT

Hans>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

and this PSYKO hope's YOU will find a G@@D software S@@N!!!!!!!

Most all know on this site I only play in JACKPOT lotterie's $$$$$$$

NO<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< I have not won the BIG WON !!

BUTT there is alway's a BUT out THERE>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

ONE of the LP member's will B the..... ONE >>>>>>>>>>>>>$$$$$$$$$$$

LOL

PSYKOMO... [ More ]

Reply #2

Hans — Wed, 17 Oct 2007 19:51:50 GMT

The best software would be the one which can catch the jackpot in shortest time.

Hans

Reply #1

LANTERN — Wed, 17 Oct 2007 19:31:03 GMT

Download trials and see which you like best.

lottery software

lottofun — Wed, 17 Oct 2007 19:14:35 GMT

Hello everyone,

I am new to LP and I am starting to play the lottery seriously. I would like to purchase lottery software. I have heard of lottonet Integra xp01, lottopro 2007, Prof. Jones platinum lotto/lottery series. Can anyone help me in purchasing the best software.

thank you

Lottofun