For the sake of being blunt...

Reply #60

pacattack05 — Thu, 03 Jan 2008 04:30:35 GMT

I take the fifth....lol

Well, if I was there in 1965, it had to be when I was about a year old....lol

My grandmother, (bless her soul) is about 102 years old. WOW!...I remember at an early age, at 4 pm everyday, the tea would come out and she would put a sugar cube in her mouth and take a sip of tea. Sip some more, some more, some more, and put another cube in her mouth, and so on.....

I love my grandma,,,,she's a trip....

Reply #59

jarasan — Thu, 03 Jan 2008 03:57:04 GMT

Ride the wave

Reply #58

user044 — Thu, 03 Jan 2008 03:48:44 GMT

The thrill of the chase

Thats what makes the game fun - for me anyway.

Humility is a very hard lesson to learn and once learned has to be practiced daily.

Surfs up Greg.

Reply #57

Greg — Thu, 03 Jan 2008 03:20:48 GMT

I want to say a few things.

One, of all the LP names people use here at LP, I have to say that the name, Numba Tuff is a darn good and inventive one. When I read it, I think of somebody determined to battle the numbers the way Beowulf battled monsters in the original Beowulf story I read in school (many years before the movie came out, btw). So congrats on having a darn good name; my name is SO boring, hehe.

Second, if you research my posts, you will see that I am a big fan of learni... [ More ]

Reply #56

CARBOB — Thu, 03 Jan 2008 00:13:24 GMT

Pac, I had a friend who lived not far, from the Berkeley campus. He took me to a pizza parlor, on campus, in 1965. You would have had to be there to believe. I can truthfully say, those were not sugar pills

Reply #55

bashley572 — Wed, 02 Jan 2008 23:30:19 GMT

NumberTuff-

question - Have'ya won anything lately??? Cuz that is why most people are on this site - to win

Reply #54

pacattack05 — Tue, 01 Jan 2008 01:20:39 GMT

Now I know how Rjoh got his insight. Todd is the man....! He teacheth, the masses....An they say how high do you want me to be?

How high? As high as a berkley student on sugar pills...lol

Reply #53

LckyLary — Tue, 01 Jan 2008 01:17:29 GMT

Wheeling systems - they ring of Gail Howard. I have one of those pamphlets from the Stop Shop called How To Win The Lottery but I think a lot of the advice GH presents doesn't improve your odds other than if you wheel numbers you're now playing 10 tickets and your chances went up 10-fold. If I play 10 a drawing vs. 1 I will win 10x as often unless I am using a great system to get the numbers to wheel in the first place. I think there is a calculator on here (is there?) that would tell you what... [ More ]

Reply #52

Todd — Tue, 01 Jan 2008 00:57:51 GMT

If you are a moderator on another board, I'm shocked at your complete lack of understanding of netiquette on forums. I actually took it easy on you and got a bunch of questions why I did so. You don't sound like a moderator at the ESPN site, so I'll just pretend you didn't say that.

Have a wonderful 2008, Mr. Moderator.

Reply #51

pacattack05 — Tue, 01 Jan 2008 00:32:54 GMT

I can't speak for the community Numba tuff.

All I want to say tonight, over, an over, and over, is Have a Happy New Year!!! Everyone...that includes lazy lottery nerds that have no life, and no clue as to what city they're even in.....Much less figuring out the odds...lol Them even

Reply #50

RJOh — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 19:47:11 GMT

Love, Peace, and Happiness to all.

Ditto to you Dude. When you decide to buy that winning ticket, take a picture of it and send in a copy after you cash it in.

Reply #49

NumbaTuff — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 19:08:57 GMT

This is unbelievable ! And Todd, I didn't know you was the Owner. Look dude, I think you have a wonderful site. After reading through alot of features, indeed, you have some very helpful tools to assist lottery players.

I'm just getting back after getting comments from posters, through private message, on things I was looking for and they were very good tip/advices. Today, I decided to go ahead and reveal some parts of my method/patterns - just wanted to show some love to all for helping me w... [ More ]

Reply #48

Todd — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 13:42:06 GMT

Nice one Pac! The pimple stuff was kind of gross tho...

Reply #47

pacattack05 — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 07:21:56 GMT

Pac: Hi folks! I have this idea that I want to share concerning the p-3. Let's toss it around like a salad in mid december. I ran a short test and it looks promising. Here's the cost: xxxx Here's the profit: xxxx Let's test this and see if it is just a short streak, or something viable. Here's how it works........etc....

Joe Shmo: I got a jewel that'll blow your socks off, but yous guys, I have this strange feeling I'm with a bunch wanna be lottery punks who think just because they've s... [ More ]

Reply #46

GASMETERGUY — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 04:25:46 GMT

Am I the only one to think of Alonzo Wright when I read these posts?

Inquiring minds want to know but I don't have an inquiring mind.

Reply #45

BobP — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 04:16:34 GMT

The same wheel concept only with a 5if5 guarantee would take 1024 combinations. That's 5 groups of 4 numbers each. First group contributes one of its four numbers to the 1st combination position. The second group one number to the second position. The third group one number to the third position and so on. Every number in every group is played against every other number in the other groups. If as you say, you can make up (I assume 5) groups of 2 to 4 numbers each and capture all 5 winning numb... [ More ]

Reply #44

pacattack05 — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 03:28:16 GMT

Thanx, but those hair-brained ideas of mine were just thrown out there for people to see if they can tweak it somehow and make a steady profit.

Just for the record, I don't have any pimples on my ass, but if I did.........lol. It was the first thing that came to mind.

Reply #43

rcbbuckeye — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 03:24:04 GMT

I'm rather new here, and I don't post much. I mostly duck in and out. I like to look around and see if there are any new things that I might want to test. I always play my own numbers, because I trust my own way of doing things rather than taking someone elses numbers. Having said that, there are some really deep thinkers, and talented people here that make reading the posts fun. BobP posted a 4if5 guarantee the other day that I thought was pretty neat, so I'm going to play around with it and te... [ More ]

Reply #42

jarasan — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 03:05:58 GMT

Money talks, toro kaka walks.

Reply #41

time*treat — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 02:57:42 GMT

While I have no knowledge of how sensible or wreckless Pac's butt pimple may be, I can say he has generously shared plenty of his ideas, and some of them have shown a profit potential.

Reply #40

RJOh — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 02:43:42 GMT

There are plenty of real lottery players (people who has money to spend) at LP who just like discussing lottery strategies and systems and they don't need to pool their resources (their money) with someone on the Internet that they've never met who claims to have a flawless winning lottery system. That claim sounds like one used by scammers to sell worthless lottery software and books. There are hundreds of similar claims all over the Internet by scammers (money chasers), just google winnin... [ More ]

Reply #39

jarasan — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 02:42:25 GMT

This thread applies:

https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/167924

Coin Toss's observations and those which follow is one of these, right from the Ponderable Ponderosa.

History repeats itself.

Reply #38

reddog — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 02:41:49 GMT

I just ran my method for the last Mega Million draw and it was flawless ( 2-4 different numbers for each set and having all the winning numbers except the Bonus Ball). It's amazing and when you invest more of your time searching methods and studying/understanding patterns, the better you're off as a serious Pro of the game - trust me

I'm not wanting to steal any of your ideas, but just curious as to how many sets of numbers do you work out on pencil and paper

Reply #37

LckyLary — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 02:03:40 GMT

I do programming if you're looking for such. Most of my algorithms are secret so I would only share them in exchange for something that I'd need to strengthen my own. Pick 5 is just Mega without the Bonus Ball, but my algos cover all games.

One thing you're not saying is if you match x numbers, how many sets are generated per drawing? There's a program one person had on here that everyone was raving about, because it seems to win often. All it does is wheel a string of numbers in a particul... [ More ]

Reply #36

lottolaughs — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 01:52:07 GMT

He can't prove anything to us because it's all a bunch of crap. If he really wants to prove he's so good, he should have predicted and showed his hit percentages first.

If I had a method that was flawless, I wouldn't waste my time going on a lottery forum preaching, and dangling carrots in front of people. I'd either share it, or just keep it to myself.

Amen! Thanks Pac. I thought he was supposed to do Maddog's challenge. Didn't see any predictions on the thread. Now's the time to either... [ More ]

Reply #35

pacattack05 — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 01:48:01 GMT

Don't bother, he's confused. He first comes here asking everyone if they're really happy with their system or method. Then he says that he has a method that is flawless. Then he insults the community's intelligence by saying that we probably won't be able to grasp his wisdom. Then he says he dosen't want to share any info with lazy slobs who just sit here all day waiting for their ship to come in.

This type of person likes to go on boards and flaunt something and then insult anyone who repli... [ More ]

Reply #34

pacattack05 — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 01:24:32 GMT

And Just what I thought too. You represent a few who come on here acting like they're all that. I was actually trying to be nice, but after reading this, you are just an A-hole in my book. Mr. holier than thou crap.

Just because I sit here and read the prediction board hoping for someone to show a profit doesen't mean I don't do any work myself. You don't know me from a hole in the wall and act as if what I write at the end of a reply like hee haw is just too childish for your maginficent br... [ More ]

Reply #33

time*treat — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 01:02:38 GMT

JAP69 was kind enough to point out that a generic 1-to-x wheel could be created, printed out, and the real numbers could be mapped onto it, if privacy was an actual concern.... which it isn't. Now, some new-and-improved obstacle will be introduced.

And, I'd like a side of mirror, to go with my smoke.

Reply #32

Todd — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 00:46:13 GMT

I used to answer those questions, until I realized that the people who ask them can never be satisfied, because there is always another conspiracy hiding behind the one I answer.

Can you imagine? With hundreds -- maybe thousands -- of wheels generated at Lottery Post every day, that I would give a hoot what one person did? That I would actually sit there and pour over all the hundreds of thousands of numbers pushed around this site every day in order to figure out the secret number sequenc... [ More ]

Reply #31

JAP69 — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 23:50:00 GMT

Cashiers check will do.

Reply #30

justxploring — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 23:23:19 GMT

Since you so knowlegeable and a Moderator ( if I'm not mistaken), why don't you show me how to do it myself without going through the system ? I offered you a cool deal in the past ( don't if you read it, though ). So, what do you say ?

I didn't think there were moderators on Lottery Post. Todd is the owner of this site, and I was under the assumption that he controls everything (except our minds! but there could be subliminal images. lol)

Maybe you got confused with g... [ More ]

Reply #29

NumbaTuff — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 23:01:21 GMT

Reply #28

MADDOG10 — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 22:39:43 GMT

You said:

As far as my method being flawless - it's the truth. I've said it before, my method produces 2-4 numbers for each set ( the 5 separate white balls). It's the Bonus ball numbers I have to work on. When I say it's flawless - it is in the fact that the winning number was among the 4 numbers. So, with my method, I'm dealing with 4 such numbers for each set and as I've explained and plead on some of my posts, I need someone to show me how to play all those numbers where each of those nu... [ More ]

Reply #27

NumbaTuff — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 22:33:30 GMT

Sounds more like a hunch - a good tool in figuring out numbers from time to time. Even still, a theory is no harm in sharing since it's based on your instinct and not anything practical.

Reply #26

NumbaTuff — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 22:26:25 GMT

Thanks for the tip. I'ma just stick to doing it with my own hands, paper, and a pen. Just testing you out though -- if I would send you a check, what type of check

Reply #25

guesser — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 21:48:40 GMT

shushhhh !!

Don't tell anyone !!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ya think the day will come where ANYBODY shares 100% of what they 'know' ?

I won't, but it's not because it's a 'secret' - it's because I don't have the time to explain EVERYTHING I track, theories I have developed. And the one thing anyone knows is this: you can have all the theories you want, but not all of them work all of the time. Some do a little better than others a higher percentage of the time, you have to go with gut i... [ More ]

Reply #24

JAP69 — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:10:25 GMT

Now if that works for you and you hit big money just pm me for my mailing address.

A check in my mail for 100 thou will do.

Reply #23

JAP69 — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:04:34 GMT

Yeah, I checked out the Wheel Forum. Question - does the Moderators see the numbers you input ? Does any LP associate sees what you input ? Plus, I don't quite understand it. I know the system suppose to play every combination based on the number you give it. Does it ? And how confidential is it ?

If you are worried about someone seeing the numbers you input just number your pick 1 thru whatever and when you get the output of the lines and combinations generated convert the input numbers b... [ More ]

Reply #22

JAP69 — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 19:52:48 GMT

Now, if there someone that can show me how to do it, bless it that person for I have something to give back in valuable insight to picking numbers.

There are no doubt a great many indivduals here at lottery post who could do that.

They just have not stepped forward to offer their assistance up to this point.

Reply #21

JAP69 — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 19:42:00 GMT

Yeah, I checked out the Wheel Forum. Question - does the Moderators see the numbers you input ? Does any LP associate sees what you input ? Plus, I don't quite understand it. I know the system suppose to play every combination based on the number you give it. Does it ? And how confidential is it ?

There is only one person who can answer that question.

That is Todd.

Reply #20

NumbaTuff — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 19:19:05 GMT

Yeah, I checked out the Wheel Forum. Question - does the Moderators see the numbers you input ? Does any LP associate sees what you input ? Plus, I don't quite understand it. I know the system suppose to play every combination based on the number you give it. Does it ? And how confidential is it ?

Now, if there someone that can show me how to do it, bless it that person for I have something to give back in valuable insight to picking numbers.

Reply #19

JAP69 — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 19:09:49 GMT

I need to know how to work combinations To me, a combination is matching up all the number you pick to be played with all the other numbers you picked.

Seems like a simple task to figure out if anyone knows how you want to combine the numbers you pick.

Just simple wheeling procedure to me.

There are a lot of lottery wheels here at lottery post in systems. If what you want is not in the wheels I am sure a program could be created to get all the combinations you want. By someone.

Reply #18

NumbaTuff — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 19:02:24 GMT

Just what I thought - you represent like maybe, 85 to 90 percent of the memebrs at LP. Of course that's a wild guess on my part but it's what I feel most of the posters on here do: sit, read, and expect somebody to show them how to win. Now, let's say real players actually did that. What good is that gonna do for him? You'll simply take their method, patterns and win big and gone on about your business. And the real players that gave you your winning luck would either have share in the jackpot... [ More ]

Reply #17

NumbaTuff — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 18:49:01 GMT

Of course from your perspective, you may see it that way, I don't. I can see if the fella is criticizing my method or how I look at patterns but it's neither. He insulted me personally. I can disagree with your system, method, or pattern but for me to call you, for ex., a b1tch for not agreeing with your insights would be unwarranted and your motives will come to surface. It's called, a Hater.

As far as my method being flawless - it's the truth. I've said it before, my method produces 2-4 nu... [ More ]

Reply #16

jarasan — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 15:38:45 GMT

Winner, winner chicken dinner

When everybody now gets an A or the same grade for whatever the performance or task be, (outcome based), challeging or questioning something turns into criticism.

In the real world, statements need to be backed up with facts, scores count, and on this LP site there are people such as RJ, Stack, myself and many others that deal in facts and truth.

On the other hand there are people that make unfounded statements and purport them to be factual all the time... [ More ]

Reply #15

Stack47 — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 14:39:14 GMT

I never understand the personal insults by posters like RJOH and Stack47.

It's a message board so people respond to other messages. You said that you hardly ever play and I responded with: if you don't buy a ticket, you have no chance of winning. How can a simple fact be called a 'personal insult'?

As far as I know, there are no established rules requiring all 50,000 plus Lottery Post members to give a post or every poster any credibility for unproven claims. Since this is about the lot... [ More ]

Reply #14

pacattack05 — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 05:57:48 GMT

Forgot to mention....I would really love a program for template conversion from roulette to a fantasy five game with 1-36. Very very interesting.

I like your ideas Numbatuff....

I guess people on this board like to see more show than hype. And the veterans here, have seen them all claiming something. Hence the feeling of being attacked. RJOH tells it as he sees it. I don't blame him because I'm guilty for doing it too. It's not always politically correct, but factual nonetheless. My interp... [ More ]

Reply #13

justxploring — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 05:45:42 GMT

Numba - I don't think you are being insulted. I just don't understand why someone would write

I just ran my method for the last Mega Million draw and it was flawless

(a) without posting the numbers before each draw to prove it share

(b) without betting REAL money if he's so sure he's going to get 5 numbers.

Someone can say that the lottery is fun and a challenge, but the whole point is to win money. You can design a house, a car, or anything else that your mind can conceive, b... [ More ]

Reply #12

pacattack05 — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 05:22:02 GMT

Systems are fixed and the house eventually wins. The system will do the same thing over and over without modifying it as the numbers change. For the most part.....

This is why I like this roulette method, not system, which morphs after each spin or drawing. I'm currently working on how to implement the success of the method with the p-3. Ran some tests but I would need a program to keep track of the extra applications needed to make it fit for the p-3. Anyhoo......

Reply #11

NumbaTuff — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 05:03:59 GMT

I never understand the personal insults by posters like RJOH and Stack47. What's funny, I don't even remember doing anything bad to those guys other than stating my knowledge about the Lottery.

By the way, Kola seems to have a bright mind about the lottery. After reading her comments, I thought, This is ONE serious Pro.

I'm sure she (?) knows more than she shown here - like that Sun Moon thing post. I think her understanding on the lottery is much deeper than that and I'm a deep thin... [ More ]

Reply #10

tntea — Sun, 30 Dec 2007 01:37:52 GMT

Yeah... to answer your first question..

Kola is one to admire... Keep reading you will find others... Read everything you can find on WinD..

Reply #9

bashley572 — Sat, 29 Dec 2007 22:57:31 GMT

Kola-

That was a work of art the way you put that - well done!!

And Numbertuff the information and help here is invaluable. I have spent years playing the lottery and every day I am humbled by things I learn and read on this site.

Bash

Reply #8

RJOh — Sat, 29 Dec 2007 21:42:09 GMT

It's seems you want to get one person to join you, but I really doubt you will find anyone of your caliber here.

The problem is Numba Tuff hasn't proved he's the caliber of the player that he's looking for. The caliber of players he's looking for aren't interested in the BS he's posting (to be blunt).

Reply #7

GASMETERGUY — Fri, 28 Dec 2007 22:30:43 GMT

I don't believe in a Lottery System, I believe in methods and patterns - it's the only approach that derives its' practical results purely from the Lottery Matrix

If you believe in methods and patterns, then you have a system.

Reply #6

JAP69 — Fri, 28 Dec 2007 18:06:18 GMT

Thanks BobP.

I like it.

Reply #5

BobP — Fri, 28 Dec 2007 05:06:56 GMT

Five groups of four numbers each. If one and only one number is correct in each group 4if5 is guaranteed. Replace my place holder pointer numbers with your best picks.

| 1-2-3-4 | 5-6-7-8 | 9-10-11-12 | 13-14-15-16 | 17-18-19-20 |

01 05 09 13 17

01 05 10 14 18

01 05 11 15 19

01 05 12 16 20

01 06 09 14 20

01 06 10 13 19

01 06 11 16 18

01 06 12 15 17

01 07 09 15 18

01 07 10 16 17

01 07 11 13 20

01 07 12 14 19

01 08 09 16 19

01 08 10 15 20

01 08 11 14 17

01 08 12 13 18

02 0... [ More ]

Reply #4

Kola — Fri, 28 Dec 2007 04:07:42 GMT

HAHAHA...You reckon' ?

Hmm...Quite perceptive...

All the Best...

Reply #3

jarasan — Fri, 28 Dec 2007 03:38:32 GMT

Yes. A lot.

Reply #2

Kola — Fri, 28 Dec 2007 00:34:35 GMT

Hello NumbaTuff.

Thanks for the generous nod you gave me in your post. I started playing the lottery around the November of 2005. I joined the LP a month later. In my short time of valuable LP learning from all the great posters and my own pencil and paper monkey-wrench lottery patch-up work, I have observed and agree with much of what you said about patterns. Don't be too sure though that some of my approaches are very different than yours. I have a number of different approaches that I have... [ More ]

Reply #1

sfilippo — Fri, 28 Dec 2007 00:11:11 GMT

I started a thread called Powerball Strategies and didn't get much response.

I could only assume that the Big Jackpot Game strategies were kept private by most players.

It's seems you want to get one person to join you, but I really doubt you will find anyone of your caliber here.

For the sake of being blunt...

NumbaTuff — Thu, 27 Dec 2007 18:53:31 GMT

Ladies and Gentlmen, can you honestly say that any system you've used thus far has improve your chances at winning the lottery, consistently ? I don't believe in a Lottery System, I believe in methods and patterns - it's the only approach that derives its' practical results purely from the Lottery Matrix.

A system is self-invented. It doesn't derive purely from the behavior of the Lottery Matrix (numbers). I like to see more of you people get involved creating methods, studying patterns and... [ More ]