<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>MORE Stench in PA</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/169906</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/169906" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: MORE Stench in PA</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #10</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/169906/975248</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/169906/975248</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 02:23:29 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>You know what, Benmas, or is your real name Jimmy Sands?<br /><br />Ever since I posted on the STENCH here in PA, Jimmy has been silent, GONE! POOF-- just like that!<br /><br />He did his damage and now he&#x27;s gone. I called him out in another post but funny thing was he never responded or showed up at the LP Corral. I guess he couldn&#x27;t stand the heat. The heat of the TRUTH!<br /><br />Benmas, or Jimmy, or whatEVER your name is, you are just trying to get us to accept INJUSTICE. No different than the people in the &#x27;60&#x27;s... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/169906/975248">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Greg</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #9</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/169906/974448</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/169906/974448</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 16:29:39 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>ThatScaryChick</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Sad isn&#x27;t it</p>]]></description>
			<category>ThatScaryChick</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #8</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/169906/974326</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/169906/974326</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 11:57:24 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>LOTTOMIKE</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>we better hold our noses because that stench is never ever going away my friend.we can sit here and reminence about the days when the lottery was fun and you could actually win before all the exexcutives and the suits jumped in and ruined everything by tweaking the games and messing with matrixes.</p>]]></description>
			<category>LOTTOMIKE</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #7</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/169906/974323</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/169906/974323</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 11:54:15 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>LOTTOMIKE</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>as soon as one state executes one of its brilliant new sucker games that players fall for then other states take notice and copy the formula to its own benefit.such as the trend of computerized draws which the wicked witch here in tennessee decided to implement since here employees were &#x27;tired&#x27; of fooling around with the ball machines for hours every day.i could not believe that when i read it.that and it costs less money were the directors excuse here in tennessee to change to RNG.</p>]]></description>
			<category>LOTTOMIKE</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #6</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/169906/974301</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/169906/974301</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 11:25:54 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>benmas</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>you are wrong to a certain extent....play less $ or less frequently is better...Even with the game nearly doubling the previous odds..it is still the best jackpot game in PA...it has 5 times better odds than match 6, it is better than PB match 5...and the jackpots will roll more often than in the past...pick 3 and 4 are not jackpot games so i will dismiss them as alternatives (they are not greener pastures)...the majority of people play it to hit it big...(by the way ever since the new format th... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/169906/974301">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>benmas</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #5</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/169906/974049</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/169906/974049</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 19:53:17 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Omniscient</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Dont play the Cash5 anymore and work on the pick 3 and 4&#x27;s. No big jackpots, but much better odds. Just make the decision to stop playing that pick5 once and for all and move on to greener pastures. Best of Luck !<br /><br />Omniscient</p>]]></description>
			<category>Omniscient</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/169906/974042</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/169906/974042</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 19:44:39 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>ThatScaryChick</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>That&#x27;s horrible.</p>]]></description>
			<category>ThatScaryChick</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/169906/973998</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/169906/973998</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 18:27:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>LOTTOMIKE</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>crap like this is why i don&#x27;t even play anymore.the consumer is being cheated left and right and every couple years they raise the matrix more and more and most lottery players keep on playing anyway.powerball will end up having 65 or 70 balls in the next five years....</p>]]></description>
			<category>LOTTOMIKE</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/169906/973964</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/169906/973964</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 17:18:52 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>sarfi33</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>FEB&#x3e; 2, 2008 result 4 of 5 $82.00. What a joke.</p>]]></description>
			<category>sarfi33</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/169906/973903</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/169906/973903</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 14:29:40 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>jackpotismine</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I feel your pain! Keep hope alive</p>]]></description>
			<category>jackpotismine</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>MORE Stench in PA</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/169906</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/169906</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 02:48:19 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Whoopeedo! The new starting Jackpot for Cash 5, NOW a 5/43 game, is $125,000.<br /><br />25,000 more for adding FOUR more numbers to the number field?<br /><br />What a disgrace.</p>]]></description>
			<category>Greg</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

