Anybody try this system?

Reply #23

Todd — Tue, 12 Feb 2008 04:35:31 GMT

Heck, the photo on his site is probably ripped off from somewhere too. I'll bet you could dig it up on some college site. Or maybe he stole someone's identity (a real college prof named Paul Connor).

Reply #22

BobP — Tue, 12 Feb 2008 04:17:15 GMT

Lotto Cheatah is a weighted random number generater that uses the draw history to weigh the numbers. Everyone gets a different answer so when they announce a win you can't duplicate it. BobP

Reply #21

RJOh — Mon, 11 Feb 2008 19:02:25 GMT

A while back, I bought a software called Lotto cheetah and as part of buying the system, you got a software called Lotto Egg which supposively uses algorythms to pick the numbers.

Lotto Cheatad is advertised as freeware, you pay for additional keys to update once the free ones are used up. The problem is you have little or no control, you're at the mercy of it so called algorithm to pick the combinations to play.

Reply #20

Omniscient — Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:04:09 GMT

Hi DownandDirty,

I wouldnt put too much confidence in algorythyms to pick lottery numbers. A while back, I bought a software called Lotto cheetah and as part of buying the system, you got a software called Lotto Egg which supposively uses algorythms to pick the numbers. Needless to say, it never produced one winning ticket. Just be cautious of strange systems out there.

I've had most of my hits using pencil and paper and picking the hot and cold numbers from a certain date range in the l... [ More ]

Reply #19

RJOh — Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:50:21 GMT

Google Algorithms=play the numbers that come up the most.

Actually playing the numbers that come up the most is not a bad idea. For example since the last matrix change of PowerBall, twenty-two numbers have come up 48% of the time even though they were only 40% of the numbers and have included 4 of the winning numbers 35 times and all 5 winning numbers 3 times.

If one had only played combinations from that group of numbers, their odd of having all 5 winning numbers would have increased b... [ More ]

Reply #18

DownandDirty — Mon, 11 Feb 2008 06:55:08 GMT

Just another internet huckster. I'm not a bit surprised. So.......you don't think Paul Connor is really a university math professor? Who spents years developing this method?

Algorithms are just an arbitrary method of narrowing things down; when you have many choices. As you know there are many methods/computer software out there to narrow down the given field to try to determine the winning lottery numbers. In relation to search engines algorithms, humans arbitrarily program the engines to gi... [ More ]

Reply #17

jigzy516 — Mon, 11 Feb 2008 03:50:23 GMT

man you guys are really awesome. i feel like jesus when he was young and listening to all the older wise men speaking about biblical truths. you people are truly intellectuals.....the smartest of the smart. all of you speak truthfully and express yourselfs so that others may not make the same mistakes. God bless you!!!

I totally agree about all these lottery systems books that keep coming out....many of them are just rubbish! i feel that what todd has going on here is the wisest investment a... [ More ]

Reply #16

Pogo — Sun, 10 Feb 2008 22:55:09 GMT

BobP nice to meet you - I have read several of your articles and would just like to thank you for the insight... I've added a few ideas of yours here and there to my spreadsheets. Just wanted to say thanks - and keep on writing... Pogo

Reply #15

BobP — Sun, 10 Feb 2008 21:42:23 GMT

You might want to consider many of the lottery tips you've already found and may be using are actually causing you to lose. All too many lottery players are playing hot and cold numbers on a split wheel (two independent wheels 3if3+3if4 side by side merged and sold as a 3if6 wheel) and filtering out all odd, all even, all low or all high combinations that could have given them a better shot at a 4# or 5# prize whose winning numbers are all odd or even or low or high. For example, four of the win... [ More ]

Reply #14

BobP — Sun, 10 Feb 2008 21:24:54 GMT

Thanks RJOh I've always appreciated your support. IMHO the more quality lottery information out there the better. The more it's out there the harder it is for these creeps to steal it and sell it because all the customers will realize it is republished from free sources and demand their money back. This is the beauty of LotteryPost, a true source for free lottery information. If we all start holding our cards close what's to talk about besides winners who waste their good fortune. Publish your g... [ More ]

Reply #13

RJOh — Sun, 10 Feb 2008 20:32:19 GMT

Looks like the only secret Paul Conner has is that his information is the work of someone else and is free on their websites and now that's not a secret any longer.

I've made some observations about most of the winning numbers in the PowerBall and MegaMillions drawings, but I'm afraid if I discuss them at LP, they too may become part of the secrets he's selling so I'm waiting until after I win a jackpot.

Note:if I don't win a jackpot before the end of this year, they won't be worth discuss... [ More ]

Reply #12

BobP — Sun, 10 Feb 2008 05:19:12 GMT

Sorry the robot won't let Paul Conner's site name appear even in my link to expose it. Just go to Lotto-Logix.com Information scroll down the right side menu till you see the w i n n i n g l o t t o s t r a t i g i e s ad box with the pretty girl, that's one of his ad banners heck if he can steal my work I can use his to expose it, click that it goes to my expos page not his scam site. There you can click on the link to get my free book Lottery Concepts. He's giving away Power Trails and other f... [ More ]

Reply #11

BobP — Sat, 09 Feb 2008 05:35:37 GMT

Paul Conner or whatever he is calling himself these days stole Lottery Concepts and is selling it as his own. He took customer comments from G.H. he has since stolen wheels and articles from other authors and added them as bonuses to the book. I gotta write a new book that stuff's over ten years old. Setup a page to warn people about this Paul Conner guy with a full copy of one of his ads, all the links on it now go to my free book. Not much more I can do without enriching lawyers and the book i... [ More ]

Reply #10

DownandDirty — Sat, 09 Feb 2008 01:23:38 GMT

I agree. 99.9% of the Lotto Tips I usually find, I'm already doing...for years now. Thank you for the link Libra Dave. A nice informative read. I guess I will google Algorithms to refresh myself. I did it once before but it was tough to follow. Another interesting concept this fellow mentions is something about vibration resonance or something. Wild. Sometimes, wild is good if it works.

Reply #9

RJOh — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 16:30:16 GMT

There are only so many common sense thoughts that can be written about playing lotteries and most have been written several times before, so much of this information is being rewritten, repackaged and resold as something new. With new people coming of legal age to play the lotteries everyday, there is always a new market for this old information.

Reply #8

libra — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 03:21:00 GMT

I have Paul Conner book Lotto Hidden Secrets. Is this the book you are refering to? If so save your money and go to www.lotto-logix.com click on articles and scroll down to Lottery Concepts Copyright 1994 by Robert Perkis. Because that's the entire book in one article, nothing was changed. I have the book because I collect lottery systems. When I got the e-book ,I knew I had seen it before somewhere. I don't know if Paul Conner bought the rights to the book or not, but if he did I don't think it... [ More ]

Reply #7

Todd — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 02:37:25 GMT

You may be surprised that you're not getting a bunch of excited reactions to the idea of using Google algorithms.

Most of the veterans here know that all of the lottery systems marketed like the one you're looking at are not created by someone who has truly found the answer .

Despite the fact that they come up with a variety of different things to base their numbers upon, all these systems share a common thread: they are all created by a person who has little interest in winning the lotter... [ More ]

Reply #6

DownandDirty — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 01:40:12 GMT

I don't know anything about the system being great or not. I just found the subject of his methodology interesting and was wondering if anybody out there in TV Land has tried it. I wouldnt pay $47 bucks for it.....or even consider it unless a number of know posters (of integrity) chimed in that they tried it and the informaton was of some value.

It's the thing about Algorithms that Google uses in search engines stuff that I found curious.

Reply #5

RJOh — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 01:25:44 GMT

If you think the system is so great, use it to pick some predictions for the prediction board and if you end up on the top ten predictors list then you'll have some creditability.

Reply #4

DownandDirty — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 00:35:37 GMT

Sorry Todd. I understand. I have zero affiliation with the system I posted about or any other system. I just assumed that this was the place to discuss (not sell) various lottey systems out there.

I just found the subject of algorithms (in the context this fellow represents it) interesting. I must say though, this fellow does have an extremely thorough internet marketing program in place to push his program. He has every base covered. All the tricks, buzzers and whistles.

Reply #3

Todd — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 00:07:02 GMT

You have a handful of posts to your name, so there is not a high trust factor. Many times a person who starts a web site goes around trying to create discussions about their web site, as if they are someone who stumbled across it.

Besides, 99% of the claims about lottery systems on the Internet are complete BS, no matter how great the web site looks.

Reply #2

pacattack05 — Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:19:14 GMT

Obviously, Todd is not allowing you to post the link here. I saw the link the other day, but I guess he deemed it inappropriate.

Reply #1

DownandDirty — Thu, 07 Feb 2008 20:49:03 GMT

very weird folks. Almost like the system is not allowing me to type ths mans website in. At the least, if you google Paul Connor you'll end up on one of his sites. Interesting reading at the least. One more time..... (winning

Anybody try this system?

DownandDirty — Thu, 07 Feb 2008 20:13:28 GMT

Anybody try this system from Paul Connor? Algorithims that Google uses for there search engines. Can anyone explain what this means? He says he wins 27K a month. I like the guys website. Too much money upfront. I would sell my system for much less. For some reason, I can't seem to even type the link on this post. Winning .