Instead of 1/1000

Reply #24

bashley572 — Mon, 24 Mar 2008 09:06:22 GMT

Thanks Maddog10 -369 came out last night, I had 2 of 3 on EACH pick but that doesn't help. Did a little back checking lastnight for that last 10 months or so and noticed that in NY this system works for picking the first digit about the following-

Every 4.68 plays with the longest couple of plays not hitting 28, 20, 16 then then a bunch of 11's 9's.

There were ALOT of times that it would REPEAT the next play. Not sure yet how that helps. I think for me its not going to be a 'system' on it... [ More ]

Reply #23

MADDOG10 — Sun, 23 Mar 2008 20:01:47 GMT

Try these also:

116

126

156

161

162

165

166

168

186

216

261

516

561

611

612

615

616

618

621

651

661

681

816

861

Reply #22

bashley572 — Sun, 23 Mar 2008 18:44:03 GMT

Well didn't matter as 776 hit last night (7 again in first digit!!) and then 678 midday today - SO the 6 did hit first digit from the 776 last night..... gonna try something strange, playing the 6 to hit first digit again tonight - 632 695 ..see if what the 7's where doing (with hitting multiple times in first digit) will travel over to the 6's .....

Reply #21

Rakster — Sat, 22 Mar 2008 12:12:08 GMT

You better play 312 and 342 as well.

Reply #20

bashley572 — Sat, 22 Mar 2008 11:59:34 GMT

Ok, 173 came out last night in NY EVE.

So with the idea of picking one of the digits from that number and using it in the first position - I am going to pick '3' as the first digit which works good for me as I was going to play 234 123 anyway I will now play them 324 321 thus putting the 3 in the first digit and see how that works.

Reply #19

Stack47 — Sat, 22 Mar 2008 00:33:09 GMT

February had 11 which the first digit was a repeat from the previous play.

You can probably play the front pair for 50 cents so it would cost you $5 to play all the front pairs with that digit or $145 for the entire month. Those 11 hits would get you $275 or a nice profit of $130. There are other betting strategies like playing a $1 or more on some of the second position digits to increase the profits.

Reply #18

bashley572 — Fri, 21 Mar 2008 16:45:52 GMT

And of course NY Lottery CONTINUES to mess with us players with a box repeat of yesterdays midday

746!!!!

which makes 7 a 4 out of 5 plays for the first digit....

Reply #17

bashley572 — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:31:14 GMT

And of course NY Lottery does somthing totally unexpected!

Midday # 764

So that makes the first digit of 7 a three-peat, in the SAME position

Reply #16

bashley572 — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:05:11 GMT

Ok, this sounds like a real interesting topic. I follow NY #'s and applied the idea to this month March then February. If I am counting right, using the 'pick a # from the previous play' for the first digit idea, here is what it looks like.

February had 11 which the first digit was a repeat from the previous play. And had 3 repeat first digits.

March has had 7 which the first digit was a repeat from the previous play. And has ALREADY HAD 3 repeat first digits!!

Ok, and last nights # was... [ More ]

Reply #15

Shawn67 — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:04:37 GMT

It has been my experience so far that most systems that play for boxes play at a loss over time. The key is finding a good system for straights.

Reply #14

pacattack05 — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 08:31:08 GMT

Straights is the desire here. I've seen that system for boxed a long time ago. After many trials it deemed unprofitable.

Reply #13

BobP — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 06:26:19 GMT

The, If You Can Pick One Digit You Can Win Pick-3 System has been free on Lotto-Logix for years.

http://www.lotto-logix.com/txthouse/lottodojo2.html

BobP

Reply #12

gsc5 — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:53:55 GMT

Thanks, maybe that will help. By the way, I did meet a man that said he made on a average of $60k a year, but wouldn't say how, except he played alot of numbers. Today I was talking to a store manager, I said something about p/3. She said there was a guy that comes in everyweek and cashes in $800. or more. She said he's been doing that for months.

I'll tell what I really think. I think its the fear of losing that dominates our plays. And why most never win. We attract what we fear. Our desir... [ More ]

Reply #11

Stack47 — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:37:26 GMT

Say the first is 4, then you play the entire set of 100 numbers giving you a profit of $500.

It would cost you $100 to buy the tickets so the profit is $400. I'd probably get a ten 4X front pairs at $10 a piece, but I understand where you're going.

Here in Mo. if you were to predict the first number 12 times in a month straight, playing each day. You would profit $4200. a mo.

That would be more like 12 X $500 = $6000 minus the cost $100 X 31 = $3100 or around $3000 a month and gettin... [ More ]

Reply #10

pacattack05 — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 02:01:30 GMT

There is about a 70 percent chance that a previous number from the last drawing will show. Maybe less than 70, I'm not sure, but even then, I'd have to play all three from the night before, unless it was a double then I'd only have to play 2, but playing all 3 would cost 300 bucks.

I have a better solution. First do a 50/50 filter. The first 500 and the second 500. 000-499....500-999. See which one is over due in each position, and then you only have 125 combos to deal with.

5X5X5=125

T... [ More ]

Reply #9

pacattack05 — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:46:07 GMT

But you only have 4 chances to make a hundred bucks profit before you even out on the fifth, and that's if you get it right on the fifth.

It's not that easy to get the first number right. If it was, I'd be rich by now...lol

Reply #8

gsc5 — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:11:00 GMT

If you could pick the first digit, then the next two are easy. Say the first is 4, then you play the entire set of 100 numbers giving you a profit of $500. Here in Mo. if you were to predict the first number 12 times in a month straight, playing each day. You would profit $4200. a mo. That would be a living to me. Why should that be so hard.

With all the high math, and complex systems trying to find 1/1000, you would think, if that effort was directed to coming up with just the first digit,

Reply #7

pacattack05 — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 00:14:03 GMT

It's not hard to pick the first digit correctly, it's the last two that are tricky.

038

138

238

438

538

638

738

838

938

Reply #6

gsc5 — Wed, 19 Mar 2008 23:16:27 GMT

I would like to be consistent picking the first digit, that would give me a profit of $500. That could be a living.

Reply #5

Stack47 — Wed, 19 Mar 2008 20:46:19 GMT

If you're just picking one digit in any position, play that one digit with all 55 two digit combinations. The win potential is 36 ways to win $25, 18 ways to win $105, and 1 way to win $445 betting $55. If you're trying to pick one digit in one position, play front pair or back pair. The win potential is $40 betting $10.

If you have a consistent method for picking the one digit, it could show a small profit, but I believe gsc5 mentioned making a living .

Reply #4

pacattack05 — Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:49:16 GMT

I'm sure there is a way to figure out how to incorporate that one digit with the 174 combos without buying his system. I did just that with one of steve player's systems that he charged 30 bucks for. I figured it out just by the description of the system and a few key hints he gave...lol

Reply #3

libra — Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:12:49 GMT

There is a one digit system out there. It's by Lottery systems International. It's called 174 One Step Pick One Number Three Digit Lottery system.You pick one digit and play the 174 combos that it shows for that digit. You Play it .50 - .50 If that digit shows you will hit it ,7 ways 6 boxes and 1 straight. Now how good are you at picking one digit consistantly at $174. a pop? This system is copyrighted 1999. So I don't know if it still exsists. The address in the book is, Lottery system Interna... [ More ]

Reply #2

gsc5 — Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:07:29 GMT

pacattack05, I'm all ears!! I don't have the answer, thats what I am looking for, someone that could make some sense of it to me. Just one digit and its position and you can win if you cover all the numbers with that digit. Why should that be harder than 1/1000 or 1/100

Reply #1

pacattack05 — Wed, 19 Mar 2008 13:05:40 GMT

I'm all ears.

Instead of 1/1000

gsc5 — Wed, 19 Mar 2008 11:30:20 GMT

You might just make a living playing p/3, if instead of trying to predict 1/000 or 1/100. You predict 1 digit only.