Quick Picks Are NOT Random

Reply #18

MillionsWanted — Sun, 01 Jun 2008 21:40:55 GMT

Create your own real random quick pick numbers at RANDOM.ORG.

Reply #17

Clairvoyance — Sun, 01 Jun 2008 03:21:02 GMT

Think he said thermal pj's and a trophy or something like that LOL! Oh wait it was thermal noises while holding his HOF trophy! Yes I think that was it.

Wonder if quic pics make thermal noises? Will have to listen next time, maybe I can get the right quick pic and win.

Reply #16

pacattack05 — Sun, 01 Jun 2008 02:37:47 GMT

Mostly a lot of hot air.

Thermal and Lousie.

Reply #15

ThatScaryChick — Sun, 01 Jun 2008 01:49:38 GMT

I see what you did there.

Reply #14

Stack47 — Sun, 01 Jun 2008 01:36:16 GMT

Don't all lotteries give us the option to play our own numbers or let the terminal select them for us?

I've never seen a terminal print out a ticket with combinations like 6-6-6-36-39 so as long I get 5 different numbers, the terminal did its job. Maybe I should add Comedy section to where I might find his lottery book in local book store.

Reply #13

justxploring — Sun, 01 Jun 2008 01:04:06 GMT

If you believe quick picks are truely random then please stop reading here.

Gee I wonder what else he wrote

Reply #12

Guru101 — Sun, 01 Jun 2008 00:55:57 GMT

Really, it depends on what scale you look at the word random . On a low level, scientific scale, random really has no definition because everything works on a cause and effect basis. This is also why some people think there is no such thing as free will, but rather the illusion of free will. When using this logic, even something as random as ball drawings really isn't random at all. However, to us, it is random because of the way the human brain processes information and the limitations of the h... [ More ]

Reply #11

tntea — Sat, 31 May 2008 23:52:52 GMT

Don't prove anything. Just win the powerball tonight and have some fun.

What is the fuss about here

Reply #10

Stack47 — Sat, 31 May 2008 23:43:31 GMT

There is a 25 combination 39 number pick-5 wheel with a quick pick option on this site that is probably similar to how lottery terminals distributes its quick picks. Click on 1 to 39 numbers then Quick Picks and you see the 39 number in an unsorted order. Click on Create Wheel and those 39 numbers will be in 25 combinations. If you want 25 more combinations, click on Quick Picks again, the 39 numbers are now in a different order, and repeat the rest of the process.*

A lottery terminal could d... [ More ]

Reply #9

psykomo — Sat, 31 May 2008 22:10:29 GMT

EZ:

KAN U,........PLEASE (explain) ALL UR wonderful THOUGHT'sssssssssss

on the Lottery Post and to the BIG-WIDE WORDLAND ??

THANK'$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ GIVE us a CLUE ?????? !!!

LOL

PSYKOMO

Reply #8

Coin Toss — Sat, 31 May 2008 13:49:01 GMT

If everyone used my system, in the long run, the players would be +EV versus the house and the jackpots would never increase.

If there was such a system, and that was the case, the game the system was beating would no longer be available to play - no lottery would be booking the action.

Casinos long ago took the game of Faro out simply because it was an even money bet (for most of the game).

Every form of gambling is run so the losers pay the winners (a lot less than the house takes in... [ More ]

Reply #7

tiggs95 — Sat, 31 May 2008 12:21:56 GMT

I've hit a few QP's on cash 3..So maybe I'm in on the fix..They have people watching to make sure the drawings are fair..

Reply #6

sweetbitterkiss — Sat, 31 May 2008 12:06:35 GMT

just tell me your secret i need some money i know for sure i will try it

Reply #5

JWBlue — Sat, 31 May 2008 05:11:19 GMT

Isn't what the original poster says correct? Haven't there been many threads stating that creating numbers by a computer can not be random and that there is always some pattern to them

Reply #4

EZMoney — Sat, 31 May 2008 04:29:47 GMT

I didnt mean rigged like the lottery was behind it. I just meant predictable which it isnt supposed to be. The odds are SUPPOSED to be 1:180,000,000 or whatever it is to win Powerball. Not less than 1:50,000. The odds should be 1:36 to win a prize, not 1:3. If everyone used my system, in the long run, the players would be +EV versus the house and the jackpots would never increase.

Reply #3

four4me — Sat, 31 May 2008 04:09:08 GMT

While you were gone for all those years we've been there and done that with randomness.

The lotteries are not rigging the games. All the terminals function in the same manner producing Quick pick tickets.

By you own admission qpicks aren't random yet the word etymology suggests randomness in it's definition.

Thermal noise is a waste of hot air on your part. Thermal noise has nothing to do with the machine choosing specific differentiated lottery tickets in favor of the lottery... [ More ]

Reply #2

Guru101 — Sat, 31 May 2008 04:05:46 GMT

The only real way the lotteries could produce 100% unbiased randomnumbers via the quick pick is by using thermal noise as an entropysource

Not really.

Reply #1

pacattack05 — Sat, 31 May 2008 03:50:55 GMT

That's strange. All this time I thought they were using the ether manipulation process, which now I know, they don't.

Oh well. Life goes on.

Quick Picks Are NOT Random

EZMoney — Sat, 31 May 2008 03:34:39 GMT

If you believe quick picks are truely random then please stop reading here. I can prove quick picks are biased and rigged a certain way. The only real way the lotteries could produce 100% unbiased random numbers via the quick pick is by using thermal noise as an entropy source, which they dont.