Stat Fever

Reply #8

sfilippo — Thu, 26 Jun 2008 22:35:18 GMT

Ball numbers to be wheeled...

10,11,12,15

21,25,28

49

50,54

Results for June 25, 2008 = 14-21-25-45-53

2 of 10

eh...

Reply #7

sfilippo — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 17:01:36 GMT

Here's a setup for Powerball using just a few data sets to determine some positions.

The data set has to lag the current draw in history by one drawing so you can see what position it was in just prior to the drawing. You will pick ball numbers based on the previous draw's positions.

Next drawing is based on 06/21/08 - 01/02/08 data set and those positions were based on the previous draw's data set, ect, ect...

06/25/08 - ??-??-??-??-??, Powerball: ??

Previous 50 draws 06/21/08 - 01... [ More ]

Reply #6

sfilippo — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 14:51:04 GMT

I started keeping Powerball stats and worked with it for about 6 months, but was mainly focused on Hi/Lo - Odd/Even guessing using vertical colomn skipping and front digit guessing. One or two white balls was as good as I could get. It seemed pointless, so I stopped. It was pretty much like flipping a coin 15 times and trying to guess the correct out come with 75% accuracy or better just to get a small prize. I bought quick picks as well, and the quick picks out performed all my efforts. Go figu... [ More ]

Reply #5

rcbbuckeye — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 14:32:50 GMT

Your response caught my eye, in that I track the jackpot games (Tx Lotto, MM, Tx 2 Step) like you described, but I have kept the stats for the last 3 1/2 years. I typically play the numbers by position and frequency. I also pay attention to which decades (1-9;10-19;etc) play in which position the most.

I have thought about just going back to a limited number of draws, say 30, or 50, or whatever. Have you kept stats longer than a year, and has it worked better, or do you do better with limited... [ More ]

Reply #4

Todd — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 13:56:00 GMT

I would like to cast a vote for this poll, but there is no poll response that fits Yes . For a Yes/No poll there should be at least a Yes and No , and then all the other in-betweens that make sense.

Reply #3

sfilippo — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 13:33:45 GMT

I'm a Statistics Player all the way!

The problem with Statistics is that they are updated after each drawing, so there is no historical data to work with.

It would probably take up a lot of memory to archive the stats here at LP, but it would become a gold mine, in my opinion.

Todd may have a way to isolate any given date parameters and bring them up through the stats layout dynamically, rather than saving each stat page daily.

The majority of players just want a quick fix from the l... [ More ]

Reply #2

JonnyBgood07 — Sat, 21 Jun 2008 20:11:09 GMT

I agree 100 percent! LOL

Reply #1

MmeFlorida — Sat, 21 Jun 2008 01:44:47 GMT

I think the stats as well as the top predictors info is a great bonus here at LP, at the very least , they can help you play smarter. Its fun too, now if I actually lived in the states I statistically do well in online , I probably wouldn't hit....

Stat Fever

JonnyBgood07 — Sat, 21 Jun 2008 01:00:48 GMT

Couldn't help but post this.The stat feature is cool as hell ya gotta admit.I understand the world is vast and so many3 or four digit good intentions get passed around.Was just curious how many of you take your stats seriously when placing bets on LP