Has anyone here read Gail Howard's book-Lottery Master Guide?

Reply #61

Greg — Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:15:30 GMT

Gosh, if we required our cancer doctors to first have cancer before they removed ours, we'd be dead from cancer.

Then again, if we required our Presidents to show their balanced family budgets before so-called balancing our national budget, we wouldn't be trillions in debt!

In short, the best basketball/baseball/football/tennis coaches are many who never excelled or won a championship, let alone a gold medal.

But of all the Zillions of people who sell lottery articles, books, software,... [ More ]

Reply #60

grass34 — Mon, 16 Feb 2009 17:31:25 GMT

Your'e the MAn! just little patience and you will expect it!

Best wishes

Reply #59

Skoaler — Mon, 16 Feb 2009 01:10:37 GMT

I will wait until there is a person out there who has (Actually) won a lottery first--and (Then) made a program or wrote a book about how they done it before I buy another one..So far from every PC program to books I have seen none of these people admit that they themselves have ever won one..There ought to be a law that you must win one first before you can make a PC program or write a book about how others can win it..thats what I am going to do

Reply #58

rayal — Sun, 15 Feb 2009 14:56:17 GMT

This is for sure it helps. First it makes you to avoid elementary error when beginning a lottery player. It give a good acknowledge of what to do and what do not do. I did get my first acknowledgment from various books published by R. Serotic, than Dr Georges, etc.. and also Gail Howard. The most thing to remember it is have a good OBSERVATION of various patterns drawned in a particular lottery game. You come with enough acknowledgment to develop your own observations of various pattern and to a... [ More ]

Reply #57

Pogo — Thu, 05 Feb 2009 04:56:07 GMT

I'll give that a shot thanks for the info. Texas Joey - Much Appreciated, Pogo

Reply #56

Texas Joey — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:10:29 GMT

Try using 4 of the hot number and your 1 favorite and then a cold number and see how that works for you.

Its a good way to practice.

Reply #55

Texas Joey — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:08:08 GMT

There have been 59 Jackposts won $97 Million using Gail Howards systems. I think she is great and love her help!! Keep up the good work Gail

Reply #54

Pogo — Fri, 23 Jan 2009 04:25:07 GMT

While her books are a great stepping stone to get started... It will not produce a winner - I know from a couple years of experience from her products... You need something new and fresh that changes as frequently as the Lottery does - and LotteryPost is just what the Doctor ordered... Good Luck my friend and much success in the new year - Pogo

Reply #53

Texas Joey — Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:39:50 GMT

Well Pogo

We all have a dream of somekind. Hers was to write winning books. Mine is to win big!!

Joey

Reply #52

Pogo — Sat, 17 Jan 2009 02:58:37 GMT

Your book is an excellent read, but to be honest about the Gail Howard stuff it is old as dirt and doesn't help a bit... All her software still runs in MS-DOS - which is junk to begin with and then it doesn't include any new ideas as you update it... Go for Bob's Book - it's worth the money, Pogo

Reply #51

BobP — Fri, 16 Jan 2009 04:40:30 GMT

Reading this thread makes me wonder if anyone really knows how to do anything?

Think about it. Do you know how to catch a fish?

You might know how to go about catching fish, what tools to use, what bait to select, hook and line size, etc. Does this mean you will come back with a fish?

Lottery is fishing for a prize. No one can guarantee you will win unless you are willing to cover every possibility to buy the prize. For example it takes 163 combinations to buy the 3 number priz... [ More ]

Reply #50

jackpotismine — Fri, 16 Jan 2009 02:35:58 GMT

I think that wheels are great as others have said but remember that when GH first came out the matrix was a lot smaller. Most of the Big games matrix is so huge that wheeling just costs too much in this economy. And besides, now you can get free wheels and strategies.

Reply #49

grass34 — Fri, 16 Jan 2009 02:16:32 GMT

Reply #48

eddessaknight — Fri, 16 Jan 2009 01:29:44 GMT

RJOH, et al-

Realistically and non-sacrcastically:

WHO DO YOU HONESTLEY EXPECT IS GOING TO TEACH YOU HOW TO WIN ???

Think about it-

EddessaKnight

Reply #47

grass34 — Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:37:32 GMT

i agree

Reply #46

RJOh — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:11:14 GMT

If anyone had a system or some knowledge that gave them an an edge on winning the lottery they would no more share it with millions of other players than they would their winnings.

Reply #45

grass34 — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 03:19:57 GMT

yes i bought LMG..now study hard and educate my self.. woww.. fantastique!!

regards..

Reply #44

ThatScaryChick — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:37:14 GMT

I agree. If you happen to get the right numbers, wheels are a great system. But if you don't, the wheel is basically pointless. However, I still like to use wheels every now and then.

Reply #43

grass34 — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:44:59 GMT

btw how can we trap winning numbers in our wheels? is there a proven system, software or book or how can i educate me :)

thanks

Reply #42

Texas Joey — Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:06:21 GMT

Yes, I have read her books and have her dics on the lottery. Had them for about 12 years and won nothing. Spent a lot of money trying though!! Her odds are good only if you pick the wining numbers.

Joey

Reply #41

GamerMom — Sun, 04 Jan 2009 21:37:19 GMT

exactly. If a system really worked there would be millions of winners and they would certainly be dissapointed to have to split it amongst themselves

Reply #40

grass34 — Sun, 04 Jan 2009 21:24:26 GMT

thank you for advice mate.. im thinking.. .. ..

Reply #39

LotteryTechInc — Sun, 04 Jan 2009 15:37:47 GMT

Gail Howards software is one of the best out there as far as number analysis charts I don't like her wheels because they do not allow filtering you use them as is full,balanced or key numbers so I never use them but always use her charts.Robert Serotics book might be a little better because he uses a different approach I have Lottery Master Guide try amazon.com for Robert Serotics book it might be cheaper.Now as for all this talk about DUMB LUCK that only exists among Quick-Pick and Lucky number... [ More ]

Reply #38

PERDUE — Sat, 03 Jan 2009 22:36:03 GMT

I have all of Gail's products except the full wheel generator. I have had her products since Aug. 2005. I must admit I was a bit overwhelmed at first but, as I began to read the books and use the software I began to have fun. I've won a few times on 4 of 5 on TX cash 5 (5/37) but, most of the time I play on paper. I have to admit that using Gail's products make me think and use my mind outside the box when I begin my number selection. I read the Lottery Master Guide and the Advantage Plus Manual... [ More ]

Reply #37

grass34 — Sat, 03 Jan 2009 21:42:43 GMT

is this hard to reply? i need advice bcause i will buy one of Lottery master guide or robert serotic's the only way to win at lotto.. i will buy both books but cant afford yet. can anyone advice me which one should i buy first..

regards.

Reply #36

grass34 — Sat, 03 Jan 2009 03:01:43 GMT

what about Book by Robert Serotic: THE ONLY WAY TO WIN AT LOTTO ?

Gail Howard or Robert Serotic

Reply #35

pumpi76 — Fri, 31 Oct 2008 21:15:15 GMT

and i totally forgot about this one:

2 more evolutions that lottery softwares need: Pairs sequence/algorithm/mining for Pick3/Pick4 integrated with sum totals patterns (sum systems) along with delta lotto systems for Pick3 pick4...

Reply #34

Pick-5Player — Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:34:07 GMT

GREG I agree you're absolutely correct when I got my first program in 1996 Windows LottoPro I did not know anything about filters,wheels,number grouping or number analysis I thought the software would do all the work for me and win a jackpot BOY WAS I WRONG .I bought my second program in 1998 Gail Howards and spent 2 yrs learning from scratch the art of NUMBER SELECTION by studying,learning all I could and was able too hit 4 out of 5 in the pick several times then decided too play Cash 3 games u... [ More ]

Reply #33

Pick-5Player — Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:17:17 GMT

I have her software and book and personally I think there excellent at helping you analyse,track,determine how too select numbers.As for the comments about DUMB LUCK that too me is associated with QUICK-PICKS because it doesn't require you too use your brain but software does so when people win money using software I call it SMART LUCK and people have won using software including Gail Howards she has a section on her site of ACTUAL winners I think as recent as 2008.Another program that has had a... [ More ]

Reply #32

Greg — Tue, 28 Oct 2008 02:01:53 GMT

The best tennis player in the world can take a $20. racket and beat anyone here who has the latest, most expensive racket.

That should defeat the argument that DOS-based software is useless.

My point: it's not WHAT you got; it's how you USE what you got!

Number selections based on studying and intuiting patterns are where it's at. Any windows based lottery software I've seen merely repeats the original features in her software.

Do many people here understand how to use charts genera... [ More ]

Reply #31

pumpi76 — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 19:50:45 GMT

Forgot 7 more evolutions that lottery softwares need: Subsequent Sum Difference +/-, Subsequent Sum Difference accumulation on all Sums, Subsequent Sum Difference no more than 2 + or no more than 2 -, some system mentioned integration, Subsequent Sum Difference [sum total patterns] based on ending digits, 5's E/O, 4'S E/O, etc, etc, etc....

Reply #30

pumpi76 — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 18:21:25 GMT

I forgot 6 more evolutions that lottery softwares need: Ending digit position/location, high ending digit position/location with deducing, Subsequent sums difference averages, ending digit algorithms, ending digit sums (since they are only 10), all systems mentioned integrations, using 30 numbers in the sums of a Pick5/39 game and 25-27 numbers on a PIck5/35....

Reply #29

Stack47 — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:14:39 GMT

If I knew the sum was going to be 101 in any 5/39 game, I still have 9339 combinations. And ever if I also knew 2 of the numbers would be even and three of the numbers are low, I still have 2585 combos. But the drawings are random so it's guessing whether I'm doing the guessing or an artificial intelligence is.

We can still use past results for of a more educated guess, but by using these type of filters, we are guessing which group of combos will hit and lotteries don't offer group bets. Cau... [ More ]

Reply #28

pumpi76 — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 04:53:59 GMT

forgot 5 more evolutions that lottery softwares need: narrowing the field to 14-16 from lighter lotteries, Sum decades, 5's sums as well as 4's sums, ratios algorithms [any kind], delta lotto system sums, Vertical Lotto Digits Footprints averages, Horizontal Lotto Digital Footprints, PREDICTIONS, etc, etc, etc....

so what am i saying basically, i am saying that 100% of lottery softwares are VERY, VERY far behind they need to evolve a lot, they have much to evolve...They are all relying on old... [ More ]

Reply #27

pumpi76 — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 04:08:21 GMT

But even so it is a fact, 100% of lottery softwares need to evolve and tackle the lottery using other methods or systems, other methods like algorithms, or supercomputers or delta lotto systems, wheels with constraints, lotterywheelsdotcom with constraints, lotterywheelsdotcom with filters, 5's, 4's, custom made lotterywheelsdotcom wheels, Sums, ratio algorithms, ratio wheels, deducing, viewing pick5 as a pick3/0-9 + pick2/0-9, viewing pick6 as 2 pick3/0-9, other systems, etc, etc, etc...... [ More ]

Reply #26

pumpi76 — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 03:33:25 GMT

No i've never read any of her books, will like to though...But i still will like to know how players have won 87 million dollars worth using her system according to Gail Howard website...

Even though i've never read her book i got a hunch [and i think i could be correct about this], that her systems are far behind, just like 100% of lottery softwares on the market...Lottery softwares need to evolve they need to look at the lottery differently....

However i have to say, if her systems have... [ More ]

Reply #25

Pogo — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 02:29:42 GMT

Oops, sorry... Thought we were talking about her old software... Her books are pretty knowledgable and a great read for starting out with the lottery... I try to only use the information as a starting point though, and use the information to further other techniques and trial systems. Great Read - Enjoy... Pogo

Reply #24

Stack47 — Sun, 26 Oct 2008 19:48:51 GMT

Because we can't see the mechanism behind computer drawings, it makes some people wonder if there is a program that eliminates the highly wagered combinations from being drawn.

Just based on payoffs, state lotteries should expect to keep over 50% of all pick 3 sales. Even some of the smaller populated states are getting over $50 million in pick 3 sales each year. When they can make a minimum of $25 million a year by running an honest game, I can't see why they would risk that by cheating.... [ More ]

Reply #23

ThatScaryChick — Sun, 26 Oct 2008 18:11:30 GMT

Could be. I do think that computer drawings have made it so their are less winners compared to ball drawings. Especially with Pick 3.

Reply #22

L J1 — Sun, 26 Oct 2008 14:50:09 GMT

Very well said Greg. I totally agree.

Reply #21

L J1 — Sun, 26 Oct 2008 14:44:42 GMT

Could that be.... because many states now operate with computer machines vs mechanical ball machines

Reply #20

Pogo — Sun, 26 Oct 2008 13:52:51 GMT

In fact the software is a real piece of cr@p... Pardon my lil french, but it is all DOS based software, if you don't even have the time, skill, or willingness to port this over to a Windows GUI based format then she certainly doesn't deserve your money... I wasted my money - don't do the same... Apologies, for the negativity - I don't like it myself, Pogo

Reply #19

Rainmaker101 — Fri, 24 Oct 2008 19:47:56 GMT

Isn't that always the case? The people who couldn't succeed at a job write and sell books to others on how to do it! What a joke! I'm not necessarily picking on Gail's stuff, but it certainly would be alot more credible if there were one or two wins (or more) to back it up. But then again, if YOU won the Lottery Jackpot more than once, would you bother to write a how-to book

Reply #18

tiggs95 — Fri, 24 Oct 2008 14:34:38 GMT

Rather then spend 40.00..50.00 or 80.00 on a system book on how to hit the lottery I'd buy tickert's with the money..We are dealing with ping pong balls and dumb luck..If a system works once it should work ALL THE TIME..Good luck to everyone and trust in DUMB LUCK.............

Reply #17

Gailfan — Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:44:25 GMT

Thank you Greg! I agree completely. It is alot of fun just looking over and studying the charts. I play a 5/39 game (Paycheck) in Maine that costs $2.00 a play with a $2.00 cash prize with only 2#'s correct out of five. Now I know that doesn't sound like much, but it would be quite a thrill for me to win several of these and possibly a much bigger prize. Ray Lakin tells of his experience on Gail's website of winning more than $316,000. with this wheel. I don't play every time (it draws twice wee... [ More ]

Reply #16

Gailfan — Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:29:46 GMT

Hello tiggs95,

Please check out Smartluck.com. There are copies of Gail's winning tickets for wins on same day, though not the jackpot. Even though she has never won a jackpot, she gives alot of different ways of looking at and thinking about the numbers. She has helped alot of people and I hope we all will be among them soon. Good luck.

Gailfan

Reply #15

Greg — Fri, 29 Aug 2008 04:39:10 GMT

Of course every system works, guesser-- even a broken clock is right twice a day! Therefore, the issue is not that every system (eventually) works.

Rather, the issue is this: which systems, strategies, number selection processes are more LIKELY to work and thereby save the lotto player money wasted on selections that make no sense or have no reasoning behind them?

A baseball pitcher does not throw the same type of pitch over and over again. He mixes it up.

So too, a lottery player need... [ More ]

Reply #14

guesser — Fri, 29 Aug 2008 04:28:02 GMT

But Greg: EVERY 'system' works - it's all in the timing.

Now, this isn't to say that 'my 6 numbers I always play will hit', even though they may eventually, nobody knows.

The problem with any 'system' that relies on randomness is USUALLY relying on 'something to occur because it has not and is 'due'', *OR*, 'something is NOT due to occur because it just did, so go the opposite way and see if it works'.

The problem is, that confounds us because we still cannot narrow it down enough: how... [ More ]

Reply #13

Greg — Fri, 29 Aug 2008 04:11:06 GMT

By far, Howard's LM Guide is the best overall book on the lottery out there. If you read this one book, and truly understand it, all of it, you won't need to purchase any lottery software from anyone (Pick 3,4 games excepted).

Call me weird, but I enjoy rereading it from time to time because I get a kick out of how the book quantifies the kinds of characteristics some to most lotteries manifest that I then see occurring in the Cash 5 and Pick 6 games I play.

Howard's Chart #4, illustrated... [ More ]

Reply #12

guesser — Tue, 19 Aug 2008 07:10:26 GMT

Yep.

And if you glance thru her ads, you will see 'most' people that won with her 'systems' won mainly in the '80's and into the early 90's, not much in the last 15 years or so, not nearly as much as when the matrixes were a lot smaller.

Reply #11

guesser — Tue, 19 Aug 2008 07:08:03 GMT

You can do the same thing with a spreadsheet, but as you said, and as I have said for years, it still takes pure dumb luck.

Now, you can put yourself into a better position to compile distinct pools of numbers to draw from, that helps, but you still have to decide what to play, and guess right.

And as I have said a thousand times: when it's all said and done, after you narrow down numbers: to me, there is not much of a difference between 1 in 146 million and 1 in 10 million.

Think there... [ More ]

Reply #10

AlecWest — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 20:00:08 GMT

Exactly. She's just another dream merchant who's discovered the REAL secret to wealth - that more money can be made by teaching people how to become rich than by applying the techniques being taught.

I just visited her site. My God - $80 for her Advantage Plus CD. And it must be a very underutilized CD since she also offers the software on a 3.5 floppy disk.

Regards - J. Alec West

Reply #9

tiggs95 — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 19:19:41 GMT

I've never heard of Gail Howard hitting a big jackpot..I guess she's not LUCKY enough...........

Reply #8

psykomo — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 19:07:49 GMT

lol

psykomo

Reply #7

frapel — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 18:57:35 GMT

I have to disagree about some of the comments concerning software. If you use the software for analyzing the numbers you will see there are definite patterns that can be played. You can better your odds by knowing these patterns. If you use the software to just pick numbers, then I do not put much faith in that. I have read Gail Howard's book. She does provide alot of useful information, on the other hand, much of the book is a sell for her other products. I am an electrical engineer, with a min... [ More ]

Reply #6

AlecWest — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 16:09:41 GMT

If I won a lottery jackpot, and if the Lottery Commission asked me how I picked my numbers, I've considered replying, I used a computer program called LotSoLuck to pick the numbers. In my tests, if properly programmed, it hits the numbers every time. This is the first time I've used it on a ticket I actually bought ... but I will use it again.

Of course, there is no such software (grin). And while most people would know I was just having a little fun with the Lottery Commission, there'd alwa... [ More ]

Reply #5

tiggs95 — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 15:48:45 GMT

We are dealing with ping pong balls..Nothing will help you but dumb luck..If a system or book hits it is still dumb luck..Good LUCK.........

Reply #4

Coin Toss — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 13:50:36 GMT

If you read some of her strategies and then pick a game and track the drawings, you will see a lot of her Never plays be drawn.....i.e., never play all evens, all odds, never play an exact sequence, such as 7 14 21 28 35 42, etc..

Reply #3

jackpotismine — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:08:03 GMT

As they have told you on this post. A wheel is only as good as the numbers in them. Good Luck anyway

Reply #2

four4me — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 06:03:49 GMT

Any wheel is only good if you happen to put the right numbers into it. Nobody knows what those numbers are before the drawing. So it's a calculated guess if you guessed right and played the wheels combination you might win something.

You might be better off making your own wheel set and give it a whirl.

Reply #1

guesser — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 04:51:39 GMT

Do a 'search' and you will find tons of talk about her books.

A 'wheel' is a 'wheel', and software - hers or anyone else's - does not work, that we can tell you.

Has anyone here read Gail Howard's book-Lottery Master Guide?

valinter2004 — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 04:37:00 GMT

Hi I'm new here.I have read Gail Howard's books Lottery Master Guide also have her wheeling system books and software.I'm practicing just for now to trap 2 or 3 Power numbers since I plan to use her Wheel 5 Plus system with 2 power numbers and wheel 33 numbers.

So has anyone here first read her book Lottery Master Guide also used Wheeling systems to play your favorite lotto game?If so what kind wheeling system did you use?

I'm trying to start a thread for those who have used Gail Howa... [ More ]