Constructing dynamic coverings

Reply #29

Todd — Sun, 23 Nov 2008 05:36:09 GMT

Er, ah, alrighty then. Good luck with that.

Reply #28

Amazing Grace — Sun, 23 Nov 2008 04:35:21 GMT

Excellent

Reply #27

LANTERN — Sun, 23 Nov 2008 04:09:21 GMT

Let us forget about my posts here on your thread.

Some or many people should have good use for your program.

My prediction techniques use other ways, to each, their own.

--------

You are probably one of the best lottery programmers or the best, we just don't see the lottery in the same way and that is OK with me, no big deal.

Reply #26

lottoarchitect — Sun, 23 Nov 2008 03:32:21 GMT

I'm not sure why you say this Lantern. I believe the example I display in this thread is very clear and informative of what we try to achieve here. The program simply makes this idea a reality. What confuses you so much

Reply #25

LANTERN — Sun, 23 Nov 2008 03:13:13 GMT

Well, I should had left this thread alone as I don't understand this program.

Reply #24

lottoarchitect — Sun, 23 Nov 2008 02:15:28 GMT

Lantern,

I got really confused with all these posts and I can't say I really understood what was the point of these. However I'll comment on some aspects you mention here.

First you say:

-----

In the Regular way, pick some numbers and just wheel them and put 6 numbers per line (For a pick 6 lotto), lowest numbers on the left side and higher numbers on the right.

-------

Wheel (Groups of) numbers by each Straight lotto positions for example:

1 Position: 03, 09, 17, 20, 25... [ More ]

Reply #23

lottoarchitect — Sun, 23 Nov 2008 01:53:56 GMT

Todd, I am not talking about filtering tickets from a full wheel. This is something very common and old fashioned with its good a bad parts. What is constructed by filtering a full wheel is indeed a custom wheel. However the term 'dynamic covering' has nothing to do with this approach. We do not filter out tickets here at all. In a dynamic covering we conform our tickets to pass our filters whilst maintaining the guarantee offered by the abbreviated covering. In fact, the dynamic covering has no... [ More ]

Reply #22

Todd — Sat, 22 Nov 2008 14:15:43 GMT

It is something available to every Gold and Platinum member at Lottery Post.

I call it what I believe may be a more common term, a filter, and I call the result a custom wheel (instead of a dynamic covering).

You can create a custom wheel (dynamic covering) by first choosing any Full Wheel from the Wheels page.

Then, the last option you see, just above the Create Wheel button, is a Filters button. Click that button to reveal the extensive filters available.

Anybody (not just premium

Reply #21

LANTERN — Sat, 22 Nov 2008 09:48:33 GMT

Another late addition:

Late addition:

(Is the only way for Stats and Include-Exclude filters to work right).

Of course, the final made and or BetSlip printed numbers would not have any 0 Primary numbers.

----------------------

Primary 0 Digits are also needed because of filtering that has to do with Primary and Secondary numbers.

As there are several filtration levels:

1 Position Primary numbers.

2 Positions Primary numbers.

3 Positions Primary numbers

Etc, depends

Reply #20

LANTERN — Sat, 22 Nov 2008 09:14:49 GMT

Late addition:

(Is the only way for Stats and Include-Exclude filters to work right).

Of course, the final made and or BetSlip printed numbers would not have any 0 Primary numbers.

Reply #19

LANTERN — Sat, 22 Nov 2008 08:47:04 GMT

Sorry! What I said before was wrong!

Instead the way to go is with Include (Allowed) filters by position:

Primary-Secondary Digits Filter by each position, for jackpot games.

Possible Primary #s would be 0 to 9.

Possible Secondary #s 0 to 9.

Of course, what you pick depends on a particular game.

For example, the 1 number is really 01 as there are no single digits per any positions, all numbers have a Primary (From 0 to 9) and a Secondary (From 0 to 9).

It would be more p... [ More ]

Reply #18

RJOh — Sat, 22 Nov 2008 07:19:16 GMT

Friday came and went.

Reply #17

LANTERN — Sat, 22 Nov 2008 03:46:53 GMT

Another thing:

A person at times or sometimes might want to filter lines in which the numbers are positioned like this:

Right, Natural Order

11/19/2008 52 15 48 37 40 47

11/15/2008 51 47 22 40 24 21

11/12/2008 47 53 01 50 40 20

11/08/2008 37 39 46 17 28 29

11/05/2008 51 45 20 50 01 26

11/01/2008 09 37 10 51 12 17

--------------

Instead of just like this or in addition to this:

Lowest to Highest Order

Wed, Nov 19, 2008... [ More ]

Reply #16

LANTERN — Sat, 22 Nov 2008 03:39:14 GMT

---------

Wheel (Groups of) numbers by each Straight lotto position for example:

1 Position: 03, 09, 17, 20, 25, 26, 34.

2 Position 05, 08, 11, 16, 23, 45.

3 position 12, 18, 29, 32, 43, 54.

Etc.

But the wheeled numbers (Lines) don't have to be wheeled from lowest numbers to highest numbers, so:

26 45 32 would be OK.

----------

I forgot to say, once that wheeling is done and a person checks the wheeled lines, sometimes a person might want to reformat those wheeled l... [ More ]

Reply #15

LANTERN — Sat, 22 Nov 2008 02:03:04 GMT

Some Lotto Texas past numbers.

Lowest to Highest Order

Wed, Nov 19, 2008 15-37-40-47-48-52

Sat, Nov 15, 2008 21-22-24-40-47-51

Wed, Nov 12, 2008 01-20-40-47-50-53

Sat, Nov 08, 2008 17-28-29-37-39-46

Wed, Nov 05, 2008 01-20-26-45-50-51

Sat, Nov 01, 2008 09-10-12-17-37-51

----------

Right, Natural Order

11/19/2008 52 15 48 37 40 47

11/15/2008 51 47 22 40 24 21

11/12/2008 47 53 01 50 40 20

11/08/2008 37 39 46 17 28 29

11/05/2008 5... [ More ]

Reply #14

lottoarchitect — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 23:06:53 GMT

AmazingGrace, you say the following:

Now some are 6-49 some others but notice first and last numbers.

so to be dynamic, would it not be better to have banker numbers and construct your ideas in the middle.

Would this work better?

Definitely! Something similar is to be added as well. Actually I have already a good list of additions to be made including bankers. However, the approach you demonstrate requires a lot of thinking so not to hinder drastically the coverage aspect of

Reply #13

lottoarchitect — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 22:40:38 GMT

A dynamic covering is the one that is being constructed on the fly to fulfill the constraints set. A fixed covering, such all all those found on the internet fail to this simply because they cannot be adjusted to accept additional constraints; the only constraint they hold by design is the coverage aspect (the primary reason they were build for). However, when you apply your own selection of numbers to a fixed covering, although you are guarenteed the coverage offered, you actually play a lot of... [ More ]

Reply #12

RJOh — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 22:04:38 GMT

What is dynamic covering? I think of a wheel as a fixed covering of the possible combinations of a set of numbers.

Reply #11

BobP — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 18:50:59 GMT

Cool !!! Can't wait to try it. BobP

Reply #10

lottoarchitect — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 18:27:28 GMT

I'd like to announce the availability of Wheel Generator on this Friday.

I have a good example analysed of what it aims to achieve as well.

cheers

lottoarchitect

Reply #9

Amazing Grace — Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:24:29 GMT

If doing so then we would apply your ideas or observations to the inside 4 number sets drawn.

Wed, Oct 15, 2008 07-09-15-21-38-40, Bonus: 13 inside sum 123, 3 odd 1 even

Sat, Oct 11, 2008 07-08-23-38-39-45, Bonus: 47 inside sum 153, 2 odd 2 even

Wed, Oct 8, 2008 04-13-19-32-40-45, Bonus: 28 inside sum 149,2 odd, 2 even

Sat, Oct 4, 2008 12-19-23-25-36-46, Bonus: 02 inside sum 149,3 odd 1 even

Wed, Oct 1, 2008 02-08-22-29-34-48, Bonus: 47 inside sum 141,1 odd 3 even

Reply #8

Amazing Grace — Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:12:12 GMT

maybe i am reading this wrong, But constructing dynamic coverings, in my mind would be the best possible way to build a combination set to ensure more low and high level wins,

So why not concentrate on the inside four numbers drawn.

and have your outside sent up as banker numbers,

so banker numbers 1 to 9 first postion, 40 to 49 in last , if playing a 6-49 lottery.

heres a simple search on my criteria.

Thu, Oct 16, 2008 New Jersey Pick 6 03-09-20-23-37-38

Thu, Oct 16, 2... [ More ]

Reply #7

lottoarchitect — Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:16:40 GMT

These are interesting ideas Amazing Grace, however I'm not talking about filtering down a set of tickets to reduce the cost, neither I understand why you compare the 2nd covering to what had been drawn in Canada. The selection of numbers was random.

I propose a totally different approach here. We have the total cost (tickets) to play predetermined e.g. I want to play 40 tickets with my own selection of numbers. I also want the tickets generated to conform to some constraints I want (filters... [ More ]

Reply #6

Amazing Grace — Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:59:36 GMT

To filter more i would go high low

2,4 low.6,8 high

40,42,44, low

46,48, high.

I choose high low

so

6xxxx40

6xxxx42

6xxxx44

8xxxx40

8xxxx42

8xxxx44

by doing this it allow me to play more of the inside combos.( xxxx

Reply #5

Amazing Grace — Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:55:24 GMT

Wed, Oct 15, 2008 07-09-15-21-38-40, Bonus: 13

Sat, Oct 11, 2008 07-08-23-38-39-45, Bonus: 47

Wed, Oct 8, 2008 04-13-19-32-40-45, Bonus: 28

Sat, Oct 4, 2008 12-19-23-25-36-46, Bonus: 02

Wed, Oct 1, 2008 02-08-22-29-34-48, Bonus: 47

Sat, Sep 27, 2008 11-19-29-33-44-46, Bonus: 34

Wed, Sep 24, 2008 10-27-36-40-42-43, Bonus: 37

Sat, Sep 20, 2008 02-10-24-31-33-49, Bonus: 03

Wed, Sep 17, 2008 07-09-17-23-27-32, Bonus: 22

Sat, Sep 13, 2008 05-18-20-26-37-39... [ More ]

Reply #4

Amazing Grace — Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:47:51 GMT

When playing the Canadian 6-49 lottery in my mind all combos should be construced as follows

1xxxx40 to 49

2xxxx40 to 49

3xxxx40 to 49

etc

9xxxx40 to 49.

from these you choose your start number to be even or odd when playing, that is to filter to play less combos.

Reply #3

Amazing Grace — Thu, 16 Oct 2008 15:30:31 GMT

03 06 07 35 39 46 * 136,4,2

03 06 08 15 24 34 * 90, 2,3

03 06 15 25 30 39 * 118,4,3

03 06 19 23 26 30 * 107,3,3

03 06 26 30 43 46 * 154,2,3

03 07 12 15 26 43 * 106,4,2

03 07 19 23 24 25 * 106,5,3

03 08 12 26 34 35 * 118,2,2

03 08 15 25 26 43 * 120,4,3

03 08 23 28 30 34 * 126,2,3

03 08 24 28 35 43 * 141,3,3

03 12 19 28 30 39 * 131,3,2

03 12 25 30 34 43 * 147,3,2

03 19 25 28 39 46 * 160,4,2

03 23 24 26 34 39 * 149,3,2

06 07 23 28 34 43 * 141,3,3

06 0... [ More ]

Reply #2

lottoarchitect — Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:39:20 GMT

Hi JKing,

the logic is universal and the system allows working with 2-12 ball lotteries. Up to 7 balls games, you can deal with a pool of 99 balls. Beyond 7 ball games, the total numbers you can deal with is reduced to a minimum 37 for a 12 ball lottery. I think this i more than enough for any sort of lottery game around the world. As for the release date, I expect it to be within next month, probably mid to end of November.

However, I'd like everybody's comments on the results presented a... [ More ]

Reply #1

JKING — Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:44:42 GMT

Hi,

It has been a long time. Welcome back. *S*

How long before you release your newest software?

What about 5 ball lotteries

Constructing dynamic coverings

lottoarchitect — Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:35:48 GMT

Well, greetings to everyone. It's been a while since my last post but I have some good news to announce. In the past I used to talk about a system (named Wheel Generator [WG]- search older posts here f you want more info) that can construct coverings on demand and also incorporating constraints (filters) to the final outcome. This is the first time I have actual testing data to present, as it currently forms, and I'd like to hear your comments.

I'll use an 18,6,4,6=42 covering to illustrate s... [ More ]