LottoSync v1.8 download

Reply #63

BobP — Sat, 17 Jan 2009 07:14:31 GMT

Lotto-Cheatah will give you something different every time. It's what you would call a smart random number generator. The output will fall within certain perameters instead of being all over the place, but still random. If they tell you it predicted a win, you can't duplicate the result with the same settings.

BobP

Reply #62

MillionsWanted — Sat, 17 Jan 2009 01:14:53 GMT

Will lottery software ever be able to predict lottery draws with high precision? Probably not. Not even when using worlds most powerful computer.

Even worlds most powerful computer is dependent on the quality of the software running on it which also is made by humans.

If a lottery is not totally random, prediction software will perhaps be able to make high precision predictions once in a while.

Even though lottery prediction might be far-fetched, it is fascinating to use and experiment

Reply #61

LotteryTechInc — Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:43:48 GMT

No Lottery Software can predict the exact 5 or 6 numbers for a jackpot but what they can do if it's a very good program is suggest,predict,forecast a group of numbers say 12-24 and trap the winning 5/6 numbers in a particular lottery game.I have several programs that I'm TRAINING to do just that by tweaking and experimenting with the settings this is how it's done find a really good program that has the ability too analyse,forecast numbers and experiment with the settings you'll be surprised by... [ More ]

Reply #60

paurths — Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:10:45 GMT

Last night results: 6 - 17 - 22 - 24 - 38 - 39 / 6

1) lottosync 1.8 = 40 - 19 - 22 - 35 - 17 - 25 - 31 - 37 - 32 - 30

2) number23 = 36 - 35 - 20 - 23 - 31 - 27 - 21 - 2 - 38 - 3

Reply #59

Pogo — Sun, 11 Jan 2009 03:41:05 GMT

So far - I would have hit 2 numbers for $1 win in last night's drawing of NC Pick5... So far so good... Pogo

Reply #58

number23 — Sat, 10 Jan 2009 13:34:44 GMT

Hi

why not but i don t knox i can here so here is mu results...

1) lottosync 1.8 = 40 - 19 - 22 - 35 - 17 - 25 - 31 - 37 - 32 - 30

2) number23 = 36 - 35 - 20 - 23 - 31 - 27 - 21 - 2 - 38 - 3

tonight 6/42 result

Reply #57

paurths — Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12:11:21 GMT

Hi, perhaps it would be interesting to actually show your numbers in advance?

So everyone can see the result when the drawing is done

Reply #56

number23 — Sat, 10 Jan 2009 11:46:29 GMT

hello guys

belgian lotto 6/42 fall tonight...

i made a mix between lottosync 1.8 and my method ...

1) Pool x100 - 10 numbers

2) my method - 10 numbers

let s the game begin now

Reply #55

Blackie — Sat, 10 Jan 2009 06:20:30 GMT

Thanks LottoChica

Reply #54

LottoChica23 — Sat, 10 Jan 2009 05:15:34 GMT

More or less...

I see that people are very being wary here I do not understand why just giving my results that's all

Reply #53

Blackie — Sat, 10 Jan 2009 04:06:27 GMT

Looks like this person thinks there are alot of suspicious people hereand doesn't know why.

Not sure but thats what the translation says.

Reply #52

psykomo — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 23:52:00 GMT

thank's Guru:

For U help in this matter........................................................!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

FIRST of all may psykomo say ALL PEOPLE!!!!!!!!!

in Belgium....RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGREAT PEOPLE!

BUT when U from Belgium visit the DUMB American's in D USA

we R LUCKY 2 find someone who speak's french ?

WE have HAD many Belgium's visit our family in USA and give THANK'SSS!!

TRANSLATION:

NO translation needed !!

The people of Belgium R GREA... [ More ]

Reply #51

number23 — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:29:18 GMT

je vois que les gens sont tr s m fiants ici je ne comprend pas pourquoi ...

j ai juste donner mes r sultats c est tout

Reply #50

Scott311 — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:17:03 GMT

Mystery Solved! Now we can all play nice

P.S. I wanna win the lottery

Reply #49

Guru — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:49:49 GMT

I see that number 23 lives in Liege... that's the French speaking part of Belgium... I'm from Flanders and speak Dutch.

Really... I don't know this person...

Reply #48

Todd — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:29:08 GMT

I can never be 100%, but I do not believe they are the same person. Perhaps they know each other; only they could attest to that either way.

Reply #47

pick4hawk — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:16:11 GMT

I believe todd: will resolve who you are.

thank you

Reply #46

number23 — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 11:16:31 GMT

of course i m from belgium and i m not guru

you should just play and that is not so bad

Reply #45

Guru — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 08:21:28 GMT

Xavier...

The only thing I can say is that the methods behind LottoSync are far removed from what you assume they are.

Problem is I can't repeat this forever and ever because it's eating away valuable time.

If your personal results are temporarily less than stellar... simple streakyness is the cause... stick with LS and It will turn in your favor...

I know from running many forecast tests (talking about thousands ran on a renderfarm) that missing out 4 times is absolutely normal... [ More ]

Reply #44

xavier102772 — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 06:16:21 GMT

What I love about Lottosync is how much time it takes to do it's predictions . 50 samples takes about an hour. 100 samples takes about 2 hours and 200 samples takes about 3 hours. Not only that, I'm enjoying how it hangs my computer because it's using so much of my computers' resources.

Anyway, I'm not sure who's actually testing Guru's software but I've run 4 tests so far and have less than stellar results. Meaning I'm not seeing any 3 out of 6 number prediction results. I've gotten 2 out o... [ More ]

Reply #43

vick — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 04:10:02 GMT

i also found good results when i used only the 1st number of each keno draw as history and using 50 samples

so looks like the history makes some big difference.

still testing .....

Reply #42

Tenaj — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 03:37:11 GMT

Ricky'ssoftware ..... statistics wise .........is the best in the world . Onebig reason is that you can actually modify it ...and change the batsize ,,weight ...length etc. to fit your particlar needs.

TRUE

Reply #41

Badger — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 03:35:43 GMT

I'm having to send you a PM. All explanations ain the PM

Reply #40

WIN D — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 03:33:33 GMT

Ricky brings up good points and Lantern does too.

Bad Baseball players shouldn't fault the bat ...... Not when there are soooooo many other things to blame.

Good players shouldn't credit just the bat either ....... but it would be really hard to get hits without one. That's true. LOL

Statistics is an exact science ......that actually deals with inexact information.

it can't always lead to numerically exact conclusions ....... but rather gives us probabilities abo... [ More ]

Reply #39

LANTERN — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 02:55:35 GMT

Vick, Hi!

Thanks!

It used X 100, the default, it is the only sample rate that I have tried so far.

I had the software predict or give out 6 numbers.

The 3 winning numbers that it gave out of the 6 that it predicted were the first 3 numbers on the left, the 1st, the 2nd and the 3rd numbers, the 4th, 5th and the 6th were not good numbers.

----------

LottoSync is able to Predict which numbers might have the best chance of coming out together soon, not always exactly for

Reply #38

paurths — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 01:09:19 GMT

Sorry, don't agree.

I will not mention any productname , because not done, but my software spits out the same numbers for you, for George, for Jennifer, for anyone.

Exactly the same!

Why?

Because it does not predict anything!

The algorithme i implemented worked for a while, but then, for no reason whatsoever it when freezing cold. Sometimes it revives, butseldom. Not enough to use it every single day and make a profit withoutany further thinking.

I always make very clear to eve... [ More ]

Reply #37

Todd — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 00:32:40 GMT

Thanks Scott, I appreciate your support (and nice compliment!)

I hope when people test a lottery system that they test it alongside some quick picks to see if it does better. Always track both for the duration, and if you generate different numbers in the lottery system, you also generate new QPs.

I have found that with any system you really have to go for a month to find out. That weeds out the random ups and downs, and gives a better balanced picture.

Reply #36

Scott311 — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 00:29:30 GMT

I'm still testing Lottosync for 26 more days. So far it has not disappointed me, I am just hoping for more. Playing Carolina Cash 5 these past few days lottosync has hit on 2 numbers every night, and I am only forcasting 9 numbers, 200x . There have been many times in the past where I would wheel 15-20 numbers and buy up to 60 tickets and not even get 1 number right. If this system stays consistent for the remainder of my trial, I will buy it. I guess the trick is that you has to tweak the setti... [ More ]

Reply #35

Todd — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 00:09:14 GMT

I've never tried sending him a PM, so I don't know.

Reply #34

Todd — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 00:06:56 GMT

No, I treat everyone the same. I don't have enemies and favorites. Lottery Post is not a place to be used to support commercial products and services for free. If anything, I have been very flexible in this case.

Reply #33

BobP — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:55:42 GMT

I can't speak for guru.

Speaking for myself. Over the years, I've learned not every customer is worth having, not every sale worth making (something the bozos I worked for never understood and partly why they are bankrupt today).

You are better off some customers never walked through the front door. The trouble they cause, the demands they make, the information they never have enough of, the refunds they demand after using up the products, all steal time from the legitimate customers... [ More ]

Reply #32

Scott311 — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:51:05 GMT

Listen to me now but hear me later,Guru = Marco, .........just call me Holmes,.....Sherlock that is

Reply #31

pick4hawk — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:50:23 GMT

number23 :

very interesting, guru is from Belgium as well.

I wonder if they are one and the same person. (number23 = guru ?)

garbage is garbage

todd: guru does not respond to pm's that is probably why he answered someone question in open forum.

Reply #30

number23 — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:18:49 GMT

thanks

both of them ...

2 numbers in first part and 2 in the second

Reply #29

vick — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:19:45 GMT

very good, Congrats

In what order did the 4 numbers hit, ie 1st or 2nd of predicted set ?

Thanks and good luck

Reply #28

pick4hawk — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 16:40:19 GMT

todd:

marco never responds to pm --or is it just me

Reply #27

Scott311 — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 16:24:32 GMT

I take it Todd and Marco go wayyyyyy back

Reply #26

Guru — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 14:11:36 GMT

You are so right about this Todd...

We do have a support forum on our website and indeed people should go overthere or send me a mail if they have a problem.

Regards,

Marco

Reply #25

Todd — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 14:05:15 GMT

Please don't post support requests for a product on Lottery Post. Guru, please respond to such things through private messaging. I believe you have a support forum on your site.

Reply #24

Guru — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:37:41 GMT

Badger,

send me your activation code to our support mail and I'll check if there is something wrong with it.

Regards,

Marco

Reply #23

Guru — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:24:25 GMT

No, Server is up and running...

Reply #22

Badger — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:52:55 GMT

I am trying out yhe trial version. Worked okay at first, but yesterday and today it keeps telling me that the connection with the server failed and it won't allow me to use the program.

Is there a problem with the server

Reply #21

Guru — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 11:06:51 GMT

- The PRNG drives the individual experiments performed... the PRNG is not the output of the numbers.

Reply #20

MillionsWanted — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 10:28:22 GMT

Was the system you used large enough to give you a 4 number prize

Reply #19

number23 — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 10:19:23 GMT

hello guys

i just hit 4/6 @ belgian lotto...

Pool X100 - 10 numbers

Thanks Marco

Reply #18

paurths — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 09:44:27 GMT

Out of all possible futures, pick 1...

Reply #17

xavier102772 — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 08:19:44 GMT

Hmmm, are you sure it doesn't have a little RNG in it? You do say it is on your website after all. Also, I have no doubt that the results aren't purely random. I've said so in my posts on what I think. I may be way off or I may not in my estimation of your software. I'm certain you are doing some good things behind the scenes in Lottosync, I just think the things you're doing behind the scenes aren't any better than what I could easily come up with right now and give away for free. Not only that... [ More ]

Reply #16

vick — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 08:14:00 GMT

here's one of Marco's links, try wraping your head around this -)

The eminent Swiss psychiatrist, Carl Jung, who studied with Sigmund Freud and is best known for his introvert/extrovert personality classifications, devoted many writings to numerology. He stated that numbers existed before the consciousness of man existed, meaning that man discovered numbers and did not invent them. He believed that numbers play a large part in everyone's life. Instead of joining the multitudes trying to... [ More ]

Reply #15

Pogo — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 07:02:02 GMT

Just finished my first forecast and went to wheel them and print them out when I noticed... hmmm... One lil hitch for the Pick 5 users... Only Pick 6 wheels come standard, so you'll have to load your own wheels by hand - like entering your pick data... Anyways, I continue on my lil quest and I'll report back tomorrow evening if I can get my wheels punched in by then... Good Morning All, Pogo

Reply #14

Guru — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 06:58:27 GMT

Xavier... don't jump to conclusions too fast... it is not an rng... by no means...

Try it for a month regularly and you will see that an RNG simply cannot perform that good. That does not mean you can't have several forecasts in a row missing... streakyness will always be present...

At first, the results of Lottosync may look random to someone who doesn't know what is behind the scenes though...

I would also suggest not to speculate too much on how the numbers are selected... so far I h... [ More ]

Reply #13

vick — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 06:33:47 GMT

Thta's pretty good lantern

How many samples did use? 50, 100 150 or 200?

You predicted 6 or 10 numbers?

In what order did the 3 numbers hit, ie 1st or 2nd of predicted set ?

Thanks and good luck

Reply #12

Pogo — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 06:13:59 GMT

My point is - He's giving u a free month to figure this thing out... If it doesn't work for you or think it is a scam in some fashion walk away as usual, but to be honest, this gentleman is giving me a free month - I'm taking it and running... If I come up with some winnings - he's definitely getting some of my money... If not I'll take my 2 bucks somewhere else... For now I say use the free month Good Luck to all! Happy New Year - Pogo

Reply #11

LANTERN — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 05:59:47 GMT

A few hours ago I made my first back test for a Tx jackpot lottery game (I won't say for which one of them) and out of 6 predicted numbers it matched 3 right.

That was not the work of any regular RNG.

I have never before seen any program that can do that and it was on the very first test.

Out of 5 possible stars I am giving it SIX

Reply #10

Todd — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 04:27:45 GMT

I would like to say here that your statement is true for all of those software packages out there that chew on numbers for a while, and do some kind of intelligent RNG (whatever that means).

But the Lottery Post Lucky's systems are what I would consider commercial lottery programs because they are available only to Platinum members, yet they always produce the same set of numbers for every user.

I suppose one functional distinction between the Lucky's systems and Lotto packages is that peo... [ More ]

Reply #9

RJOh — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 04:08:36 GMT

Fibonacci's comments about LottoSync could be said about any commercial lottery program, all of them give different results every time they're run and probably don't preform any better than an RNG. If anyone is interested in testing that theory, LP has a good Quick Pick RNG.

The problem with any lottery forecasting program that most players don't seem to grasp is that even when they work as designed, they seldom pick winning combinations more often the the odds would suggest.... [ More ]

Reply #8

xavier102772 — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 02:36:45 GMT

I'd agree with Fibonacci, it is really not much different than a random nmber generator. It looks like it chooses number predominantly from the last 6-11 draws depending on how many numbers in the draw. It definately picks one or two from the previous draw as far as I surmised when I ran through my tests. But yes, for the most part it is randomly going about choosing numbers. Albeit from a limitted number of past drawing where the degree of certainty for the winning numbers to appear is high. In... [ More ]

Reply #7

predictorpick33 — Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:45:29 GMT

I wish we can import past draws to lottosync using .txt file and if there is a way for online update too,is it possible to include these 2 features ? Thanks.

Reply #6

Guru — Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:23:55 GMT

1 for pick 6 lotteries you can only match 6 numbers... if a forecast is made with 10 numbers... 4 numbers will always be redundant.

So chances are 100% that 4 redundant numbers are always going to come up in a random way...

But if you take a close look at a large number of forecasts for the same draw... you would find a lot of similarities between the forecasts.

meaning that the amount of times 1 or more from the 6 matching numbers are present in a series of forecasts is far higher t... [ More ]

Reply #5

Fibonacci — Tue, 06 Jan 2009 21:05:28 GMT

Guru, thanks for taking it in the spirit it was meant. Since we are all trying to learn to beat the system and hopefully make some money (one way or another) I have some questions:

Here's what I gather from the website

1. Everytime a user gets a prediction set the numbers are different only a .

2. No two users will get the same sets of numbers.

Only a system that uses all possible combinations (ie random) could produce those kinds of results.

Still it can be useful I guess...... [ More ]

Reply #4

Guru — Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:57:46 GMT

Hi Fibonacci,

I understand your concern... but it's not an RNG.

Regards,

Marco

Reply #3

Fibonacci — Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:51:46 GMT

Might as well be a RNG.

Unlimited prediction sets ie a diferent set of numbers every iteration is tantamount to a random set of numbers. Behind the gobbledygook it's a RNG.

Reply #2

xavier102772 — Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:58:19 GMT

I'm not sure I'd be thanking Guru too much just yet. I'll try out his software as well, although just checking out the site and the pricing doesn't give me a warm fuzzy feeling with it's recurrent billing and license model. Oh well, I'll let everyone know what I think after I've downloaded it and tested it.

Reply #1

Pogo — Mon, 05 Jan 2009 21:47:14 GMT

Thank You, Thank You, Thank You... Loading up my data now - I'll let you know how it goes in VA NC... Thanks, Pogo

LottoSync v1.8 download

Guru — Fri, 02 Jan 2009 18:20:41 GMT

Just in case someone missed it... it's ready for download

Can't post any links here... but you can find my webpage in my profile.

Regards,

Marco