https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/191481 Lottery Post Forum Topic: Why pools? en-us Lottery Post RSS Generator https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/191481/1273672 https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/191481/1273672 Wed, 08 Apr 2009 00:43:24 GMT time*treat Almost any pattern you look at will have a lot of junk in it, even when it also contains the winning combo.

Suppose your game is 5/39 and you decide Hey, it'd be neat to divide the numbers into five ranges and see how many of the winning numbers fall in each group.

Your five groups: A: 1-8, B: 9-16, C: 17-24, D: 25-32, E: 33-39

Now, pick a favorite 'pattern', say ABCCD. A casual backtest reveals how filthy, stinkin' rich you'd be if you'd played that set, over the years.

A detailed l... [ More ]

]]> time*treat https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/191481/1270065 https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/191481/1270065 Fri, 03 Apr 2009 14:43:15 GMT RJOh Using small pools of numbers is an advantage only if most or all the winning numbers are in it but that seldom happens. Having three of the winning numbers in a pool of 12 for MegaMillions or PowerBall is quite an accomplishment as attested to by the Maddog's challenges.

]]> RJOh https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/191481/1265888 https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/191481/1265888 Mon, 30 Mar 2009 08:50:38 GMT diamondpalace When the fishes are in a pond it is easier to catch than that in a lake, or an ocean.

]]> diamondpalace https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/191481 https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/191481 Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:53:32 GMT GASMETERGUY I have noticed that most if not everyone here attempts to reduce the numbers played into a pool of 10 to 20 numbers. From there they use wheels to determine which combinations to play. My question is why?

What is your reason for going in this direction rather than some other. And what might that some other be

]]> GASMETERGUY