<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Number of winners in Mega Millions last night</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/193903</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/193903" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Number of winners in Mega Millions last night</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/193903/1305101</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/193903/1305101</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 14:42:44 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>bobby623</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In Texas, 6 of the 7 5/5 winners picked their own numbers. The &#x27;48&#x27; suggests birthdays were a factor.</p>]]></description>
			<category>bobby623</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/193903/1304613</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/193903/1304613</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 21:27:59 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>SpanaUnlimited</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Actually it was multiples of 12. 12-24-36-48 The numbers 0 and 60 were not chosen because they are not in available numbers to choose.<br /><br />If it was multiples of 6. Then selecting 06 and 54 could have been possible. Since both of those numbers are available in the game.<br /><br />The only exceptions to the mulitple of 12 rule was WB 07 and MB 27. The WB 07 is a typical number chosen since it is the pop culture&#x27;s most luckiest number. So it isn&#x27;t such a shock to see 07 in a drawing.<br /><br />As far as the MB 2... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/193903/1304613">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>SpanaUnlimited</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/193903/1304575</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/193903/1304575</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 20:41:01 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>RJOh</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>All but the WB 07 and MB 27 were multiples of six so maybe it was a case of a bunch of players playing some kind of number distribution pattern with gaps of 5-6 between each numbers. I couldn&#x27;t find a recent event in the news with those numbers.</p>]]></description>
			<category>RJOh</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Number of winners in Mega Millions last night</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/193903</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/193903</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 13:04:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Bradly_60</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Wow! 2 jackpot winners and 33 match 5 winners. That is crazy, especially since the jackpot wasn&#x27;t really that high. Is this a case of the fortune cookie scenario we had with Powerball a couple years back...haha. I mean it could be birthday&#x27;s but usually not that many people hit it right on.<br /><br />Brad</p>]]></description>
			<category>Bradly_60</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

