The Vertical Method :Position Isolation Snippets

Reply #18

JonnyBgood07 — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:31:47 GMT

I agree with you surge...funny you should bring this angle of things up.because I've been studying the hell out of that way of things.I call em anomeles even though the numbers give themselves up from time to time within vertical sequencing.A person has to be quick to find these things because they will fade fast if they happen to be in the same area more than two or 3 times

That's definitely an excellent alternate way to do things though

I have also been trying a way to beat allstates p4... [ More ]

Reply #17

JonnyBgood07 — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:22:23 GMT

In that example,micro assumed that was where the digit run/string was that would clue us onto last nights first digit only(what you have in yellow)

None of the 3 positions clues will come from the same string/digit run..

Reply #16

CARBOB — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:12:48 GMT

What confuses me about this system is this, what position do you use this for? Which play 4 draw is this related too?

06/14/09 4 6 6 4 2 9 3 0 6 8 1 9 3 0

06/13/09 4 9 6 1 3 5 6 7 5 6 5 9 7 4

06/12/09 1 2 5 0 8 5 1 8 2 2 8 2 9 9

06/11/09 6 0 6 4 5 5 7 3 9 1 4 0 3 4

06/10/09 5 9 2 1 5 1 5 6 6 4 1 2 7 6

06/09/09 6 9 2 3 1 6 2 5 7 3 4 7 6 2

06/08/09 6 3 0 5 1 3 5 7 0 9 9 0 9 9

06/07/09 1 5 4 6 2 1 0 1 6 9 2 1 2 7

06/06/09 4 0 5 7 4 3 9 1 8 5 4 3 5 6

Reply #15

Surge — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:36:16 GMT

Interesting post JohnnyB

I was checking it out for Ohio, and it's certainly accurate

Mon, Jun 15, 2009 2-9-0 2-3-6-5

Sun, Jun 14, 2009 4-2-7 2-2-3 7-6-6-5 7-1-0-6

Sat, Jun 13, 2009 1-2-4 7-7-9 8-2-9-9 4-0-7-2

Fri, Jun 12, 2009 9-6-2 5-6-0 3-7-8-0 7-3-5-2

Thu, Jun 11, 2009 6-8-2 2-6-6 2-9-9-2 7-9-0-3

Wed, Jun 10, 2009 3-1-2 3-0-3 0-8-4-6 5-6-8-8

Tue, Jun 9, 2009 8-3-0 6-0-0 0-9-9-1 2-3-0-5

Mon, Jun 8, 2009 2-2-0 9-7-0 1-6-4-4 4-9-7-4

Sun, Jun 7, 2009... [ More ]

Reply #14

microspot80 — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:29:55 GMT

Well Jonny look like this string was right because P1 was actualy 4, (5-1

Reply #13

Kaptainess — Mon, 15 Jun 2009 04:58:53 GMT

Okay, I'm going to try your system JonnyBGood, and if I deep fry my brain I won't be able to post anymore! :-). That could be a good thing

Reply #12

MmeFlorida — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 23:22:25 GMT

Thank You Jonny and Micro for explaining this further, I have to print this out and get a couple of pencils ready...LOL!!!!

I'll try some new plays this weekonce again- Thank You

Reply #11

JonnyBgood07 — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 23:17:32 GMT

MICRO you got it!!!!!!!!!

THANK YOU SWEET JESUS!!!!!!!!!...I've been dying for someone to get where I'm coming from!...you are right on point,but always scour around as there may be more references with similar parallel strings/digit runs

What I use all the time is out of the three positions,2 you will have to find the vertical parallel and 1 is always part of a recent play4..end of story..that's all there is to it

Reply #10

JonnyBgood07 — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 23:09:08 GMT

the strings just give away 1 position Mme..here's an excerpt from GA mid which is 1 less and is a perfect example of a recent play 4 affecting vertical activity..and this is about as easy as it will get to understand 1less * equal to * or 1 more than..The second position in the midday totally played off the evening play 4 on june 11th...can you see how it ended up being a 7 in the middle position?

the middle position formed a scenario that makes 1 less than the play 4

play 4 was 7 0 2 4... [ More ]

Reply #9

microspot80 — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 22:19:35 GMT

So using this information Jonny, the isolation string for the evening draw tonight would be 1,0,4,1 (135, 085, 455, 151) and the comparison string that I found to use was in the mid-day from dates range of 6/6/09 to 6/10/09 5,4,0,2,2 (405, 154, 630, 692, 592) which was closest to this string. Looking for 104, 103, or 105, but using this since its 4,0,2....am I still right at this point, or do I need another comparison string.

? 4 0 1 1

5 4 0 2 2

So is the digit 6 (+1) or is 5 (5), or is... [ More ]

Reply #8

microspot80 — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 22:04:01 GMT

No I think that the 4 was referring to yesterday's mid-day draw 496, the two 6's that were mentioned is referring to the two 6's in the string of numbers for position 1. I could be wrong but this is my assumption. :-) Trying to figure it out also.

Reply #7

MmeFlorida — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 19:49:40 GMT

I am no numbers person by any means.. but could you consider what fell this mid-day as CLOSE

664 there is the 4 ( not in the first pos I know, but it is there) and you mentioned double 6's

...am I getting this

Reply #6

MmeFlorida — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 13:43:55 GMT

Thank You so much JonnyB for this thread

Reply #5

CARBOB — Sat, 13 Jun 2009 23:34:18 GMT

Thanks for explanation, very creative thinking.

Reply #4

JonnyBgood07 — Sat, 13 Jun 2009 23:05:46 GMT

no prob carbob....

I generally will use the last 3 digits for any given position what's highlighted in yellow in the above example and weigh them against other nearby vertical activity/strings..so for example I was looking around for anything vertically with a 1-6-5 1-6-4 or 1-6-6.I noticed in the eve there is a digit run that consists of a 3-1-6-5-5 ...so at a minimum we know the 3 could be a contender for the first posistion..but relooking at the midday string it's really 6-5-6-1 which is w... [ More ]

Reply #3

CARBOB — Sat, 13 Jun 2009 22:12:18 GMT

I just reread your post. How many draws of the Play 4 ,are you using? Also, are you using both of the Play 4 draws, Mid Eve

Reply #2

CARBOB — Sat, 13 Jun 2009 22:09:27 GMT

Can you see how the 4 digit evolved today? Ifso I will use other examples

I don't, but I appreciate you starting this thread. Will you give some more detail about how the digit 4 evolved

Reply #1

CarliG — Sat, 13 Jun 2009 21:45:17 GMT

Thanks Jonny,

Im with you so far. Will be keeping an eye on this.

CarliG

The Vertical Method :Position Isolation Snippets

JonnyBgood07 — Sat, 13 Jun 2009 21:13:27 GMT

I will make this brief and as easy to understand as possible so not to confuse anyone like before.Alot has changed since the last time I posted my method and it seems to be terminally consistent with the exception of when a triple falling or duplicate digits falling in the same position

Facts:You will hit str8 more than box with the assumption you are correctly reading things.(landing a box is still an enigma to me with this method but they do happen)

You need to use the last 3 or more di... [ More ]