Lump Sum V.S 26 Year https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/199495 Lottery Post Forum Topic: Lump Sum V.S 26 Year en-us Lottery Post RSS Generator Reply #3 https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/199495/1392802 https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/199495/1392802 Tue, 01 Sep 2009 17:18:14 GMT rburton Somethings badly wrong when the Government takes 60% of a persons money.

]]> rburton Reply #2 https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/199495/1390395 https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/199495/1390395 Sat, 29 Aug 2009 22:12:34 GMT allmost well if your not good with money take the 26, if you are then the cash option would be best if, you know how to invest it ...... and it would depend on your age..

]]> allmost Reply #1 https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/199495/1388735 https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/199495/1388735 Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:48:22 GMT Piaceri Why would you do that?

Why borrow when you can Bank on yourself ? Borrow from yourself for 6% interest, then you earn 6% interest on your money instead of the bank earning 6% on your money.

Besides, when you look at the current administration, your future annutity payments might be taxed at 60% or more.

Annuity is lose lose right now.

]]> Piaceri Lump Sum V.S 26 Year https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/199495 https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/199495 Thu, 27 Aug 2009 23:28:01 GMT kdmccaskill What is better

with 26 year couldn't you use your mega million contract to take out loans

]]> kdmccaskill