I Always thought an 85% or 90% number reduction would be enough.

Reply #8

WIN D — Thu, 03 Sep 2009 14:06:43 GMT

Thanks for the replies everyone ..... and John..... thanks for the printout.

Noticed that CA had a Straight hit off the list ....a little early.

I really wish I could take advantage of some of the more obvious filters at the right times ...... after the fact they always seem so completely obvious .....of course. Perhaps.....if I were smarter it would be obvious before hand.

I always think to myself...... If a smart person had the same information I had worked on at the time ..... [ More ]

Reply #7

JAP69 — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 15:09:29 GMT

Get your 100 or so exact order str8s and look into your sytems tracking for exact order prs filter.

Current S.C. selection for 9/2 mid.

ABC 123 LMH

012, 013, 014, 015, 016, 017, 018, 019, 023, 024,

025, 026, 027, 028, 029, 034, 035, 036, 037, 038,

039, 045, 046, 047, 048, 049, 056, 057, 058, 059,

067, 068, 069, 078, 079, 089, 123, 124, 125, 126,

127, 128, 129, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 145,

146, 147, 148, 149, 156, 157, 158, 159, 167, 168,

169, 178, 179, 189, 234,

Reply #6

Broulir32 — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 01:16:56 GMT

haha not only CA FL is very similar, I guess its the hot weather good job do

Reply #5

WIN D — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 00:06:01 GMT

*** In an attempt to answer the new member's question above regarding the filters etc. .... here are some ruff examples.

Here are some CAStraight doubles ...... 99 OLD ones . At least 3 years old.

On average.... one of these doubles should hit STRAIGHT on the Ca Eve Game.....about every 3rd. double that hits...... we're talkin' straights here.

Just for general informational purposes..... the 115 -288- 889 -336 have not hit in any form during that time.

005, 006, 010,... [ More ]

Reply #4

JKING — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:11:46 GMT

Hi,

Even though you may have a high reduction method, the thing to look at is .....what is your percentage of error in using that reduction technique. If you have a 99.99% reduction method with 100% error.....well I think you know what I mean. This is the pitfall of alot of systems being posted at the LP.

Just one persons opinion. *S

Reply #3

TURBOvq35 — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 18:15:13 GMT

Sorry to bother yall, but I was curious on how this 1000 draw time filter and positional digits filter works. You can pm me if needed.

thanks very much.

Reply #2

johnph77 — Sun, 30 Aug 2009 22:33:11 GMT

The deduction has sound reasoning in the math.

If the previous day's drawing contained three different numbers there are 343 combinations that do not contain any of the three numbers and 657 combinationss that do.

If the previous day's drawing contained a double there are 512 conbinations that do not contain any of the two numbers and 488 combinations that do.

If the previous day's drawing was a triple there are 729 combinations that do not contain that number and 271 combinations that... [ More ]

Reply #1

WIN D — Sun, 30 Aug 2009 22:05:52 GMT

.....Here is an observation that deserves attention. It's along the same lines as the positional filters .

Normally there are 263 Single number hits per year .....and around 98 or 99 double hits....plus 3 trips. (average)

Using just the Single numbers during the year ...... going form just single to single numbers we can say the following:

Tracking Single to Single numbers only.... you would be hard pressed to find 3 draws in a row of ZERO digit returns.

Again...this do... [ More ]

I Always thought an 85% or 90% number reduction would be enough.

WIN D — Sun, 30 Aug 2009 17:40:13 GMT

I always thought that an 85 or 90 % reduction in the 1000 numbers chart would be enough ........but NO !

I still just can't bring myself to play more than 100 straight numbers per game.....and thats a problem.

After applying a 1000 draw time filter ..... and a positional digits filter the reduction is dramatic....but still just too many numbers to play on a regular basis.

The 145 Straights left standing after an 85.3 % reduction of the 1000 potential straights.