<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Roulette and the Law of the thirds.</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/202238</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/202238" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Roulette and the Law of the thirds.</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/202238/1432755</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/202238/1432755</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 21:06:48 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>WIN  D</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>LOL..... Those stats up there aren&#x27;t from the editorial section of the paper. Those are statistical results based on a very large data run. This isn&#x27;t something new it&#x27;s just a varification.<br /><br />(+ or -) big deal .....big variance demon. LOL<br /><br />What ?<br /><br />so what .....give me normal expectation plus or minus 10 or even 20%..... and I&#x27;ll beat their brains out. LOL<br /><br />NO LAWS ...?? How about the Law of Large Numbers ....... Law of Averages ... on and on etc.<br /><br />example<br /><br />According to the... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/202238/1432755">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>WIN  D</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/202238/1432555</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/202238/1432555</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 18:02:11 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>eddessaknight</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>First of all there is no &#x27;law&#x27; as in universal las like gravity that governs or compels outcomes besides there sheriff around to enforce your outcome when you need it most<br /><br />This is a mathematical attempt at achiveing equilibrium and expected balance-<br /><br />The big problem is that number outcomes often do not comply with statistical average expectaion.<br /><br />Check out the crtical factor called: VARIANCE demon.<br /><br />Appreciate this offering but it&#x27;s been tested to death and loses according to the neaga... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/202238/1432555">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>eddessaknight</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Roulette and the Law of the thirds.</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/202238</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/202238</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 20:52:53 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>WIN  D</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Law of the Third!!<br /><br />This is 999963 samples of 37 spins.<br /><br />1 PMZen pro Rotation: 0<br /><br />2 PMZen pro Rotation: 0<br /><br />3 PMZen pro Rotation: 0<br /><br />4 PMZen pro Rotation: 0<br /><br />5 PMZen pro Rotation: 0<br /><br />6 PMZen pro Rotation: 0<br /><br />7 PMZen pro Rotation: 0<br /><br />8 PMZen pro Rotation: 0<br /><br />9 PMZen pro Rotation: 0<br /><br />10 PMZen pro Rotation: 0<br /><br />11 PMZen pro Rotation: 0<br /><br />12 PMZen pro Rotation: 0<br /><br />13 PMZen pro Rotation: 0<br /><br />14 PMZen pro Rotation: 0<br /><br />15 PMZen pro Rotation: 3<br /><br />16 PMZen pro Rotation: 3... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/202238">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>WIN  D</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

