formula for predicting lottery numbers

Reply #22

RJOh — Sun, 25 Oct 2009 18:07:09 GMT

Game NameDraw Date Draw ResultLucky SumPayout

CASH 3 10/24/2009 Evening 106 7 $33,773.00

CASH 3 10/24/2009 Mid-Day 356 14 $30,193.00

CASH 3 10/23/2009 Evening 810 9 $59,370.00

CASH 3 10/23/2009 Mid-Day 568 19 $28,922.00

CASH 3 10/22/2009 Evening 818 17 $86,568.00

CASH 3 10/22/2009 Mid-Day 445 13 $20,115.00

CASH 3 10/21/2009 Evening 773 17 $64,952.00

Search For Past CASH T

Tennessee does show the pay... [ More ]

Reply #21

GASMETERGUY — Sun, 25 Oct 2009 16:33:30 GMT

In Tennessee ( and probably in all states that use RNG ), the player is not only fighting the odds, they are up against the whim of the lotto officials.

If any one player knew which combinations had the least amount of payout, he could be a winner every time.

Reply #20

Jordans121 — Thu, 22 Oct 2009 03:09:00 GMT

Why alot of people struggle with the lottery is b/c they dont put each number in its proper group. I did that about 3 wks ago and I can tell you that there are some amazing patterns that come out which if you have confidence in the next day (2 draws) that a particular category of numbers will show it will decrease the numbers you have to play, thus, allowing you to combo them for str8 hits

Reply #19

joker17 — Thu, 22 Oct 2009 03:03:11 GMT

What I am saying is that plugging a number into an EQUATION and getting a result that will be the next winning number is IMPOSSABLE.

Not if the equation that determined the final set to be played was an equation that adapted with every winning number. It morphed accordingly. Not stationary. That kind of program would be unbelievable. Possible, yet unattainable with the current technology.

The problem is replacing the important variables with the correct numbers.

Nothing is impossible. A... [ More ]

Reply #18

lasko222 — Thu, 22 Oct 2009 02:16:10 GMT

Formula is the key word here. Nothing you are saying has anything to do with a formula. Using possabilites, and probability is not what I am saying is impossable. I'm not talking about odds. What I am saying is that plugging a number into an EQUATION and getting a result that will be the next winning number is IMPOSSABLE. Don't try to prove me wrong but try rather to prove yourselves right.

Reply #17

joker17 — Thu, 22 Oct 2009 01:39:34 GMT

The other tool is called Pattern verification .

Once the pattern has been found, bets can be altered to fit accordingly.

There are folks who do nothing but look for pattern verifaction techniques in Slot machines all day long in Vegas for a living.

Recap:

1. You have chaos

2. You have pattern.

3 You have RND (in between chaos and pattern).

4.RND is an alarm clock ring to remind you that you have choas on the way or pattern headed your way. A mar... [ More ]

Reply #16

joker17 — Thu, 22 Oct 2009 01:31:24 GMT

Sorry to bust your bubble, but it's already been shown that randomness has patterns. Back in the late 70's early 80's, they had a computer randomly place a dot on a piece of paper at fast intervals. After a few hours, a snowflake looking picture had formed.

If black in roulette showed 20 times in a row, the contemporary wisdom taught in Universities is that the 21st time has an equal chance of showing black AGAIN....!

That may be true.....but what would you bet on.... for the 21st spi... [ More ]

Reply #15

diamondpalace — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:48:07 GMT

Random or not I'm going to win it. I have my own formula, I'm DiamondPalace

Reply #14

beaudad — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:39:42 GMT

It was said that you cannot put a man on the moon........yet we have the technology to do that now...(there are some that say that we didn't and Capricorn One was a great movie......that Hal Holbrook is quite an actor)(OJ Simpson was in that movie too).......Just because it's called random and someone says random is unpredictable.....However

Why would we listen to those that want to defeat us....... is an internal spirit and desire to defeat what they say ......I stand and say that you have a... [ More ]

Reply #13

LANTERN — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 03:46:31 GMT

You believe whatever you want to, of course.

I have proven it to myself that if the pick 3 is random being a lottery game, then random can be beat, that is that it very possible to do much better and often than what a person would expect from quick picks or any other random method, that is that there is some predicability to at least some form(s) of lottery games and that you could have some winning advantage that you can't get with quick picks and no I am not talking about winning the MM jac... [ More ]

Reply #12

JKING — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 03:21:05 GMT

Nice reply RJOh. Your much more diplomatic than I am. *L

Reply #11

RJOh — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 03:05:00 GMT

I think you're looking at predicting lotteries differently than those who are trying to do it. You're saying no one can pick the exact results of any lottery drawing using a formula and you're right but predictors on the prediction board aren't trying to do that. They are trying to pick a set of combinations(10-50) within parameters they think will include the next winning combination. If their parameters are right and they covered only a fraction of the possible combinations then they have impr... [ More ]

Reply #10

lasko222 — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 01:55:46 GMT

Flipping a coin is not a prediction. Telling me what the result of the next flip is a prediction. Which isn't very hard since its a 50/50 chance every time. Just like i know that the numbers 1,3,6 will be drawn in Virginia sometime, I just don't know when.

Reply #9

dr65 — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 15:52:57 GMT

Reply #8

JKING — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 15:31:16 GMT

Hi,

The problem is in predicting individual events in a random enviroment. One the other hand, randomness does have its own rules and is very predicatable over time. *S* I think people here sometime forget an example of flipping a coin. Over time heads will come up as many times as tails. Sounds predictable to me.*S* You can find many more rules if you have a math background, a computer, and really take the time to look. Or you could just dimiss the whole possibilty of predicting in a random... [ More ]

Reply #7

flat creek*kid — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 14:23:49 GMT

i agree on both sides. but in the state of tennessee there

is no random. they know (computer programmers) that people

are going to track numbers stats like longest pair out, most

double due. etc. so they repeat, backstep, it is hard to

predict tennessee, if you zig they zag. kid

Reply #6

JonnyBgood07 — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 14:07:08 GMT

Lottery as in High JP games?...or lotto p3/p4?

I can't stand this mentality.. .trying to PREDICT RANDOMNESS is non-sense .!!!!! Randomness can be very predictable in p3 and it is done here on a daily basis from a bevy of folks

Between your statement and this other person(can't recall the name) but he/she always says you can't predict pingpong balls ..and it's a flatout freaking lie.I'm not saying the games are biased for certain outcomes by organizations

do some reading around here... [ More ]

Reply #5

Newb — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 13:53:24 GMT

That's true, as the theory states every number has an equal chance of occuring as any other number, but reality gives us a different picture. Not all numbers have an equal chance...they cant have an equal chance otherwise we wouldn't see the lottery results we get week after week.

Reply #4

joker831 — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 13:22:53 GMT

No such thing as 'randomness' in lottery. If there were, then you would see stuff like : 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 come up like 4 or 5 times in a row. Trying to predict TRUE randomness is nonsense. Trying to predict lottery numbers is a LOT easier because it is not true randomness.

Reply #3

paurths — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 19:32:22 GMT

If the formula has only static elements, yes, then it is rediculous.

What a formula needs is dynamic elements, otherwise it can not anticipate on something that is dynamic on itself...

Reply #2

lasko222 — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 15:58:18 GMT

Yes I agree that past results, hot/cold and due numbers are a way to cut down on amount of numbers played. I'm saying that using a formula is just rediculous.

Reply #1

four4me — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 15:51:54 GMT

Yea but you could assume that might happen.

In horse racing people pick the jockey that has a good track record that's also riding a horse that has won many races not the jockey that has a poor track record and or a horse that has always came in last.

With numbers and history you can track things like sums hot cold numbers longest out due numbers and all sorts of things narrowing down what number might come out.... it's a predictable guess.

formula for predicting lottery numbers

lasko222 — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 15:42:22 GMT

Predicting the lottery would be the same as using a formula to predict plays in a football game. In other words, it is impossable for me to predict that Ray Lewis will sack Brett Favre tomorrow at 1:17pm causing a fumble that is recovered by the Ravens on the 37 yard line resulting in a loss of 4 yards. Random MEANS unpredictable... trying to PREDICT RANDOMNESS is non-sense.