How can we use "What we know for sure" to help us?

Reply #8

time*treat — Mon, 28 Dec 2009 18:09:12 GMT

A filter that works 50% of the time is no better than flipping a coin.

You would need to expand the lookback period to get some more useful information out of this one.

Reply #7

LottoVantage — Mon, 28 Dec 2009 02:33:51 GMT

The easiest and most predictable way to track mass numbers is with (total sums), and upper/lower tier number groups.

These number sets are adjusted for tonights draw, the target sum parameter is 55 to 78. The number strings cannot be mixed.

Wheel each string and reduce the sum parameter to 55 to 78 using a 4if5of18 wheel. The least expensive reduction would be to reduce the sum parameter from 66 to 67, (the center of the target sum parameter).

This approach will basically cover all numb... [ More ]

Reply #6

GASMETERGUY — Mon, 28 Dec 2009 01:52:16 GMT

What is the smallest unit of measurement we can know about any physical system? Surprisingly the smalllest unit of measurement is the bite, or bit: either zero (0) or one (1). Yes/no will work equally as well but relative to the computer, either zero or one would be best.

Now what can we do with this 0 or 1? That is the question. Any one care to hazard a guess

Reply #5

bomatt — Sun, 27 Dec 2009 22:56:32 GMT

Your numbers are not correct at least for Georgia.

Since 2008, 13% of the draws have been repeat numbers from the prior days,

closely followed by 2 days.

These are the breakdowns.

Dayssince CountOfDayssince

1 472

2 410

3 349

4 300

5 269

6 247

8 168

Another known is the difference between the numbers is mostly 1, then 2, then 3, then 4.

Expr7 CountOfExpr7

1 692

2 631

3 526

4 437

5 421

6 375

Reply #4

Liber8tor — Sun, 27 Dec 2009 17:18:52 GMT

Thanks Recovery.. I think you are correct. This was a rare occurance and can't be used other than a long shot.

I noticed, more often the case... that just one number will repeat from the previous drawing... but that is still hard to predict because you have to choose that one correct numbr out of 5.

Oh well.. back to the drawing board...

Reply #3

recoveryroad — Fri, 25 Dec 2009 19:17:59 GMT

I also noticed this draw where four of the numbers had hit very recently, and the one that didn't, 5, had hit about 5 or 6 days earlier. But the fact that the winning combination from that draw had that many recent hots was actually not that common from what I have been seeing lately over the past few months, especially since the triple 1-2-36 hit together again from two draws prior. The last time that happened so recently was between 11/30 and 12/2 where the triple 23-31-32 all hit together twi... [ More ]

Reply #2

Liber8tor — Thu, 24 Dec 2009 18:24:17 GMT

Thanks Skoaler.. good idea.

I have also ben experimenting with using 4 or less skips to create a field of numbers to choose from.

I'm not sure who posted it first, but the idea is basically:

1) 4 skips or less holds 50% of the winning numbers. 4 skips or less yields a pool of 18

numbers to choose from .

2) 6 skips or less holds 66% of the winning numbers. 6 skips or less yields a pool

of 23 numbers to choose from.

It would seem that if you choose fro... [ More ]

Reply #1

Skoaler — Thu, 24 Dec 2009 04:36:06 GMT

The best bet is to use somewhat you state above.. use one or 2 hots/1 potential hot and one cold and a random pick. The best bet is to have an even spread of something as you see it per draw.. never have too many of each and always play something near or off the perfect spread (1-9-18-27-36).. this is the perfect spread.. do not play this set of numbers but just edit it at random by 3 up/3 down each at random each number and you will start hitting stuff bigTiMe.. for instance I edit (1-9-18-27-3... [ More ]

How can we use "What we know for sure" to help us?

Liber8tor — Thu, 24 Dec 2009 02:23:26 GMT

I think in lotto, there are precious few things we know for sure There are some things that are almost for sure.... I'll take it.. close enough for horseshoes and hand grenades.

For instance: We all know.. that 50% of the time.. at least one winning number will repeat from the previous night's drawing.

And we also know.. that 50% of the time, another winning number will repeat from the drawing one night previous.

If we look at 12/22 we see that 4 of the 5 winning numbers... [ More ]