Feb. 20: Washington, D.C. Needs Digit...

Reply #6

calabs — Sun, 21 Feb 2010 04:44:08 GMT

Thank you for checking Laverne....that's is good news...

Reply #5

LAVERNE MALONEY — Sun, 21 Feb 2010 04:23:41 GMT

Calabs I have been looking over my data from backtesting for the most part your findings as previously stated are holding true. It does not happen all of the time, but it does happen.

Reply #4

calabs — Sun, 21 Feb 2010 04:14:43 GMT

My pleasure padna'! It would be wonderful if there was some trigger, or something, that would reduce the number set. I guess one can always reduce by finding what due in the way of vtrac, rt sum, last digit sum, etc., but a unique trigger would be a great find!

Keep up the excellent work Laverne....

Reply #3

LAVERNE MALONEY — Sun, 21 Feb 2010 02:45:04 GMT

Thank you Calabs.

Calabs I tell you I have been in a spin with the simplicity of it all. You have made a great observation.

I have not looked at the states individually. However it seems that overall when one state has a hit with the missing digit another state(s) will have a hit(s), EDIT: the same day.

I will have to look over the backtests that I have done for any trends or patterns. If you have anymore observations Calabs I would welcome your posting.

Reply #2

calabs — Sun, 21 Feb 2010 02:22:54 GMT

Uncanny Laverne! Nice work! Have you been seeing any trends with these missing numbers? For example, say for this instance, 804, where that number that contains the 8, also contains another digit from the previous number? Reason I'm asking is I noticed the last number to contain an 8 was 800. The 0 was also in the next number (804). Just curious

Reply #1

LAVERNE MALONEY — Sun, 21 Feb 2010 00:51:31 GMT

$ame day $ervice!

Sat, Feb 20, 2010 Washington, D.C. DC Lucky Numbers Midday 8-0-4

Feb. 20: Washington, D.C. Needs Digit...

LAVERNE MALONEY — Sat, 20 Feb 2010 17:10:47 GMT

8...it has not shown since:

Sun, Feb 14, 2010 Washington, D.C. DC Lucky Numbers Evening 8-0-0